Advection-condensation of water vapor with coherent stirring: a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

advection condensation of water vapor with coherent
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Advection-condensation of water vapor with coherent stirring: a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Advection-condensation of water vapor with coherent stirring: a stochastic approach Yue-Kin Tsang Centre for Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics University of Exeter Jacques Vanneste School of Mathematics, University of Edinburgh


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Advection-condensation of water vapor with coherent stirring: a stochastic approach Yue-Kin Tsang Centre for Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics University of Exeter Jacques Vanneste School of Mathematics, University of Edinburgh

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Condensation of water vapour

specific humidity of an air parcel: q = mass of water vapor total air mass saturation specific humidity, qs(T) when q > qs, condensation occurs excessive moisture precipitates out, q → qs qs(T) decreases with temperature T T decreases with latitude ⇒ qs position dependent qs(T1) qs(T2) T2 < T1

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Atmospheric moisture and climate

Earth’s radiation budget: absorption of incoming shortwave radiation generates heat heat carried away by outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) water vapor is a greenhouse gas that traps OLR OLR ∼ − log q OLR ∼ − log[q + q′] ≈ − log q +

1 2 q

2 q′2

how fluctuation q′ is generated? what is the probability distribution of water vapor in the atmosphere?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Advection-condensation paradigm

Large-scale advection + condensation → reproduce (leading-order) observed humidity distribution

Observation Simulation – velocity and qs field from observation – trace parcel trajectories backward to the lower boundary layer (source) – track condensation along the way ignore: cloud-scale microphysics, molecular diffusion, . . .

(Pierrehumbert & Roca, GRL, 1998)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Advection-condensation model

PDE formualtion: ∂q ∂t + u · ∇q = S − C q is treated as a passive scalar advected by a prescribed u Particle formulation: d X(t) = u dt , dQ(t) = (S − C)dt air parcel at location X carrying specific humidity Q S = moisture source (evaporation) C = condensation sink, in the rapid condensation limit C : q( x, t) → min [ q( x, t) , qs( x) ] saturation profile: qs(y) = q0 exp(−αy) y = latitude (advection on a midlatitude isentropic surface) or altitude (vertical convection in troposphere)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Previous analytical results

1D stochastic models: u ∼ spatially uncorrelated random process

Pierrehumbert, Brogniez & Roca 2007: white noise, S = 0 O’Gorman & Schneider 2006: Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, S = 0

0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 q 0.2 0.1 1 2 Dt Random Walk with Barrier Diffusion Condensation Fit, q = Aexp(–B (Dt)1/2) 3 4 5

FIGURE 6.8. Decay of ensemble mean specific humidity at y = 0.5 for the bounded random walk with a barrier at y = 0. The thin

  • FIG. 2. Mean specific humidity vs meridional distance for initial

value problem. Moisture distributions are shown after the evolu- tion times T at which L(T) 4Ls in each case. Solid lines are

Sukhatme & Young 2011: white noise with a boundary source

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 500 1000 1500 2000 r h(r) 5 10 20 40 60 80 100 0.5 1 1.5 2 x 104 RH months PDF from ERA

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Coherent circulation in the atmosphere

moist, warm air rises near the equator poleward transport in the upper troposphere subsidence in the subtropics (∼ 30◦N and 30◦S) transport towards the equator in the lower troposphere Q: response of rainfall patterns to changes in the Hadley cells?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Steady-state problem

bounded domain: [0, π] × [0, π], reflective B.C.

qs(y) = qmax exp(−αy): qs(0) = qmax and qs(π) = qmin

resetting source: Q = qmax if particle hits y = 0

π π x y

cellular flow: ψ = −U sin(x) sin(y);

(u, v) = (−ψy, ψx)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Stochastic system with source dX(t) = u(X, Y ) dt + √ 2κ dW1(t) dY (t) = v(X, Y ) dt + √ 2κ dW2(t) dQ(t) = [S(Y ) − C(Q, Y )]dt

ψ = −U sin x sin y u = −ψy v = ψx

U = 1 κ = 10−2

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

x y

log10 q at time = 0.0 −2 −1.5 −1 −0.5

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Source boundary layer

x y

−2 −1.5 −1 −0.5

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

q

10 20 30

P(q) x = π/2

✛ ✚ ✘ ✙ Bimodal distribution: layer consists mainly of either:

Q = qmin from upstream of the flow and diffuse in from the domain interior Q ≈ qmax from the resetting source particles with Q ≈ qmax spreading into the domain as x increases

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Condensation boundary layer

x y

−2 −1.5 −1 −0.5

y = 3π/4 P(q) y = π/2

0.1 0.2 0.3

q y = π/4

✛ ✚ ✘ ✙

moist particles move up into region of low qs(y) at some fixed height y1: mainly consists of Q = qmin (diffuse in from the interior) and Q = qs(y1) — Bimodal distribution condensation ⇒ localized rainfall over a narrow O(ǫ1/2) region

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Interior region

x y

−2 −1.5 −1 −0.5

50 100

time

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04

mean q U = 1 U = 5 U = 20

qmin

✬ ✫ ✩ ✪

a homogeneous region of very dry air Q ≈ qmin is created in the domain interior the vortex "shields" the source from the interior interior effectively undergoing stochastic drying

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Steady-state problem

Steady-state Fokker-Planck equation for P(x, y, q): ǫ−1 u · ∇P − ∂q[(S − C)P] = ∇2P , ǫ = κ/(UL) ≪ 1

Rapid condensation limit:

P(x, y, q) = 0 C = 0

  • for x, y ∈ [0, π] and q ∈ [qmin, qs(y)]

Resetting source at bottom boundary:

P(x, y = 0, q) = π−1δ(q − qmax)

At the top boundary: P(x, y = π, q) = π−1δ(q − qmin)

Hence, ǫ−1 u · ∇P = ∇2P which predicts a boundary layer of thickness O(ǫ1/2)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Matched asymptotics

  • 1. domain interior, to leading-order:

P0 = π−2δ(q − qmin)

  • 2. source boundary layer:

P0 = G(x, y) δ(q − qmin) + H(q, x, y)

  • 3. condensation boundary layer:

P0 = G(x, y) δ(q − qmin) + [π−2 − G(x, y)] δ(q − qs(y)) In the O(ǫ1/2) boundary layers, introducing coordinates (Childress 1979): ζ = ǫ−1/2ψ and σ =

  • |∇ψ| dl ,

l = arclength Equation for G(σ, ζ) reduces to: ∂σG = ∂ζζG

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Mean moisture input rate Φ

Φ = ǫ−1/2

π (qmax − qmin) , ǫ = κ/(UL)

10

  • 4

10

  • 3

10

  • 2

10

  • 1

ε

10

  • 1

10 10

1

10

2

mean moisture input rate, Φ Monte Carlo asymptotics ~ε−1/2

Other diagnostics: horizontal rainfall profile, vertical moisture flux, . . . etc