coherent beam beam effects
play

Coherent beam-beam effects X. Buffat Content Coherent vs. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Intensity limitations in Particle Beams Coherent beam-beam effects X. Buffat Content Coherent vs. incoherent Self-consistent solutions Coherent modes of oscillation Decoherence Impedance driven instabilities Summary


  1. Coherent modes of oscillation Vlasov perturbation theory (5) Rigid bunch model : Each beam centroid position and momentum x 1 ,x' 1 and x 2 ,x' 2 Equation of motion :  ( x i ' ) t + 1 = M lattice ⋅ M BB ( x i ' ) t x i x i Non Linear beam-beam map :  2 −Δ x Δ x' coh =− 2 r 0 N 2 ) 1 4 σ Δ x ( 1 − e γ r Linearized kick :  Δ x ' coh = 4 πξ Δ x 2 Write one turn matrix and find  eigenvalues / eigenvectors

  2. Coherent modes of oscillation Vlasov perturbation theory (5) Rigid bunch model : Vlasov perturbation theory : Each beam phase space distribution Each beam centroid position and momentum x 1 ,x' 1 and x 2 ,x' 2 ( 1 ) , F ( 2 ) F Liouville's thorem : Equation of motion :   { ( 1 ) ∂ F ( 1 ) , H ( F ( 2 ) )]= 0 ( x i ' ) t + 1 = M lattice ⋅ M BB ( x i ' ) t ∂ t +[ F x i x i ( 2 ) ∂ F ( 2 ) , H ( F ( 1 ) )]= 0 ∂ t +[ F Non Linear beam-beam map : Hamiltonian   (lattice + beam-beam) 2 −Δ x Δ x' coh =− 2 r 0 N 2 ) 1 4 σ Δ x ( 1 − e ( 1 ) , Ψ ( 1 ) , F ( 2 ) ,t ) H ( J γ r First order perturbation Linearized kick :   ( i ) = F 0 + F 1 ( i ) Δ x ' coh = 4 πξ F Δ x 2 Formulate the linearized system  Write one turn matrix and find  as a linear operator → find eigenvalues / eigenvectors eigenvalues / eigenfunctions

  3. Coherent mode spectrum Q σ = Q Q π = Q - ξ Rigid bunch :

  4. Coherent mode spectrum Self-consistent Q σ = Q Q π = Q - Y ξ Model :

  5. Coherent mode spectrum Self-consistent Q σ = Q Q π = Q - Y ξ Model :  The Yokoya factor Y is usually between 1.0 and 1.3 depending on the type of interaction (Flat, round, asymmetric, long-range, …) (5)

  6. Incoherent spectrum  The non-linearity of beam-beam interactions result in a strong amplitude detuning  The single particles generate a continuum of modes, the incoherent spectrum

  7. Incoherent spectrum  The non-linearity of beam-beam interactions result in a strong amplitude detuning  The single particles generate a continuum of modes, the incoherent spectrum

  8. Incoherent spectrum  The non-linearity of beam-beam interactions result in a strong amplitude detuning  The single particles generate a continuum of modes, the incoherent spectrum  Both the σ and π mode are outside the incoherent spectrum

  9. Incoherent spectrum  The non-linearity of beam-beam interactions result in a strong amplitude detuning  The single particles generate a continuum of modes, the incoherent spectrum  Both the σ and π mode are outside the incoherent spectrum → Absence of Landau damping !

  10. Observations (6) LEP TRISTAN PETRA

  11. Observations (6) LEP TRISTAN PETRA LHC RHIC

  12. Observations (6) LEP TRISTAN PETRA LHC Perfect agreement RHIC  with fully self- consistent models

  13. Observations (6) LEP TRISTAN PETRA LHC Perfect agreement RHIC  with fully self- consistent models  SPPS ?  Tevatron ?

  14. Multiparticle tracking (see K. Li's lectures)  Model the beam distribution with a discrete set of macro- particles  Track the particles, solving for each beam's fields at each interaction  Non-linear beam-beam map  Gaussian fit : soft-Gaussian approximation 2 − x i ( x i ' ) t + 1 = M lattice ⋅ M BB ( x i ' ) t Δ x' i =− 2 r 0 N 1 x i x i 2 ) 2 σ ( 1 − e γ r x i Numerical Poisson solver 

  15. Beam-beam coherent mode spectrum Soft-Gaussian approximation  The soft-Gaussian approximation underestimate the Yokoya factor

  16. Beam-beam coherent mode spectrum Soft-Gaussian approximation  The soft-Gaussian approximation underestimate the Yokoya factor → Need to fully resolve the particles distribution

  17. Beam-beam coherent mode spectrum Self-consistent field solver Soft-Gaussian approximation  The soft-Gaussian approximation underestimate the Yokoya factor → Need to fully resolve the particles distribution

  18. Decoherence : weak-strong  Multiparticle tracking simulation, with a single beam and a fixed beam-beam interaction → weak-strong regime :  Start the simulation with a beam offset with respect to the closed orbit and let it decohere

  19. Decoherence : weak-strong

  20. Decoherence : weak-strong

  21. Decoherence : weak-strong

  22. Decoherence : weak-strong

  23. Decoherence : weak-strong

  24. Decoherence : weak-strong

  25. Decoherence : weak-strong

  26. Decoherence : weak-strong

  27. Decoherence : weak-strong

  28. Decoherence : weak-strong

  29. Decoherence : weak-strong The amplitude detuning due to beam-beam interaction leads to  decoherence identically to other lattice non-linearities d ϵ 1 2 dt = Δ → ϵ 0 2 Decoherence time ~1/ξ 

  30. Decoherence : strong-strong  Similar setup but :  Two independent beams  Non-linear beam-beam map based on the charge distribution  Start the simulation with both beams offset in the same direction with respect to the closed orbit  Let the mode decohere ?

  31. Decoherence : σ-mode

  32. Decoherence : σ-mode

  33. Decoherence : σ-mode

  34. Decoherence : σ-mode

  35. Decoherence : σ-mode

  36. Decoherence : σ-mode

  37. Decoherence : σ-mode

  38. Decoherence : σ-mode

  39. Decoherence : σ-mode

  40. Decoherence of the σ mode

  41. Decoherence of the σ mode

  42. Decoherence of the σ mode

  43. Decoherence of the σ mode

  44. Decoherence of the σ mode  The single particle motion is the linear composition of the centroid position and the position with respect to the centroid position → The single particle motion does not change the coherent force

  45. Decoherence of the σ mode  The single particle motion is the linear composition of the centroid position and the position with respect to the centroid position → The single particle motion does not change the coherent force  The incoherent and coherent motion are decoupled → Absence of decoherence

  46. Decoherence : strong-strong  Identical setup :  Two independent beams  Non-linear beam-beam map based on the charge distribution  Start the simulation with both beams offset in opposite directions with respect to the closed orbit  Let the mode decohere ?

  47. Decoherence of the π mode

  48. Decoherence of the π mode

  49. Decoherence of the π mode

  50. Decoherence of the π mode

  51. Decoherence of the π mode

  52. Decoherence of the π mode

  53. Decoherence of the π mode

  54. Decoherence of the π mode

  55. Decoherence of the π mode

  56. Decoherence of the π mode

  57. Decoherence of the π mode

  58. Decoherence of the π mode  Due to the particles frequency spread, the beam distribution is distorted (i.e. non-Gaussian)  The bunch centroids remain out of phase → The coherent force is (almost) unaffected  This is a consequence of the decoupling of the incoherent and coherent motion, as they have different frequencies

  59. Decoherence of the π mode

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend