Joint beam study coherent tune shift Aine Kobayashi KEK / J-PARC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

joint beam study coherent tune shift
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Joint beam study coherent tune shift Aine Kobayashi KEK / J-PARC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Joint beam study coherent tune shift Aine Kobayashi KEK / J-PARC US-Japan meeting on Accelerators and Beam Equipment for High-Intensity Neutrino Beams Accelerator Session 21 Mar 2019 1 Motivation : y beam poser 490 kW 2 4


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Joint beam study coherent tune shift

Aine Kobayashi KEK / J-PARC US-Japan meeting on Accelerators and Beam Equipment for High-Intensity Neutrino Beams Accelerator Session 21 Mar 2019

  • 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Motivation : tune shift correction at J-PARC MR for higher beam intensity

bunch train tune shift correction is

  • ne of necessary element for higher

beam power.

2

MR BLM

before

Power 450 kW Loss 850 W Power 451 kW Loss 590 W

injection acceleration injection acceleration

correction

reduced beam loss by 30 % ↓ beam poser 490 kW

2 4 6 8 bunches after 2 4 6 8 bunches

νy νx

3νx=64 ν

x

  • ν

y

= νx + 2 νy = 6 4 2017 Dec.

collaborated with MR monitor, beam comm. and magnet groups

RCS MR

2 bunches × 4 times injections

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Motivation : current status

3

vertical horizontal

dots : measured, dashed lines : fitted

Estimations on the effects from beam impedance for tune shift are necessary.

  • intensity, number of bunches and bunching factor dependences
  • difference of single bunch and multi bunches of tune shifts
  • Simplified models based on main

transverse-impedance sources : space charge and resistive wall

  • It explains qualitatively the origin
  • f bunch-train tune shift.

Lastlett (B.Ng)

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Motivation : current status

4

  • There are some discrepancies

between models and measurements.

  • assumption (e.g. bunch spacing)
  • other impedance sources (kicker)
  • For quantity explanation, additional

measurements and considerations for estimate wake field are tried (ongoing).

cross-section of bending magnet

RCS MR

bunch spacing is not equidistance when injection

  • ccupy 37 % for whole accelerator

circumference

  • ther parts : assumed circle cross-section

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Joint beam study at FNAL RR

  • 19 March 2019
  • Rob Ainsworth, Aine Kobayashi and Kenichirou Satou
  • Recycler Ring

(Thank you very much for arranging this opportunity, zKiyomi, Bob, FNAL peoples and US-Japan collaboration.) [Studied menu]

  • intensity, number of bunches and bunch length dependences : done last year for

horizontal direction

  • intensity dependences
  • number of batches dependences
  • batch spacing dependences

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Intensity dependence

x [mm] y [mm] amplitude amplitude turn turn tune tune

6

horizontal vertical

BPM:HP306 BPM:VP227

horizontal horizontal vertical vertical

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Number of batches dependence at constant intensity

consistent within the error (need to normalise intensity)

7

intensity time time time time

horizontal vertical

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Batch space dependence

Consistent with two filling patterns.

81 bunches/1 batch

horizontal vertical

2 batches ̶ next to each other ̶ opposite sides

slide-9
SLIDE 9

ξ→ 0

x [mm] y [mm] turn turn x [mm] y [mm] turn turn 2 batches ̶ next to each other ̶ opposite sides

ξx = -5.8, ξy = -7.8 8.2×1012 ppp 8.1×1012 ppp

2 batches ̶ next to each other ̶ opposite sides

Consistent with two filling patterns for both achromaticity settings.

Imaginary part of the tune shift growth rate measurement

9

horizontal vertical horizontal vertical

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Summary

  • For higher beam intensity, understanding of tune shift mechanism is

necessary.

  • For make a comparison between data and models, we had joint beam

study at FNAL RR.

  • Intensity dependences and number of batches dependences of tune

shifts were observed for both horizontal and vertical directions.

  • No apparent difference was observed in tune slope with different batch

distances. To do

  • Precise analysis of data and compare models.
  • Investigate on the impact of the wake length for other batches.

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

backups

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Tune shift study in J-PARC MR [Collaborators] Aine Kobayashi, Takeshi Toyama, Yoichi Sato, Susumu Igarashi, Testushi Shimogawa, Fumihiko Tamura, Yasuyuki Sugiyama and Masahito Yoshii [Acknowledgements] Yong Ho Chin, Kazuhito Ohmi, Yasuhiro Shobuda, Kenichirou Satou, Hironori Kuboki, Jumpei Takano and all MR members JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Specially promoted Research, JP16H06288 Tune shift study in FNAL RR [Collaborators] Aine Kobayashi, Robert Ainsworth [Acknowledgements] Kiyomi Seiya, Kenichirou Satou and US-Japan collaboration US-Japan budget

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Last year

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Single bunch event measurements (2015/12/24) Multi bunch event measurements (2017/11/30)

by A. Kobayashi et al.

horizontal vertical