2 5 2017
play

2/5/2017 Hancock County Flood Risk Reduction Project Update: Maumee - PDF document

2/5/2017 Hancock County Flood Risk Reduction Project Update: Maumee Watershed Conservancy District Draft Draft January 17, 2017 Project Overview Agenda Stantec Scope Ga p Ana lysis Da ta Co lle c tio n De sig n Re fine me


  1. 2/5/2017 Hancock County Flood Risk Reduction Project Update: Maumee Watershed Conservancy District Draft Draft January 17, 2017 Project Overview Agenda Stantec Scope • Ga p Ana lysis Da ta Co lle c tio n • • De sig n Re fine me nt Why Alternatives? Alternatives • Hydra ulic • Cha nne l Wide ning , Da m Re mo va l, a nd Bridg e Mo dific a tio ns • Hydro lo g ic Dive rsio n E xpa nsio n / E xte nsio n a nd Sto ra g e Draft Draft • Our Cha lle ng e L a rg e r flo o ds ha ve o c c urre d mo re fre q ue ntly Draft Draft 1

  2. 2/5/2017 Draft Draft We ste rn Cha nne l Size Co sts E stima te Dive rsio n o f E a g le Cre e k 25-Year Channel Sizing Estimates 01 Lands & Damages $ 6,580,000 25-ye a r 3,000 c fs 02 Relocations $ 14,590,000 06 Fish & Wildlife $ 1,758,000 08 Roads, Railroads Bridges $ 2,657,000 50-ye a r 3,500 c fs 09 Channels and Canals $ 34,587,000 15 Floodway Control & Diversion Structure $ 8,708,000 18 Cultural Resource Preservation $ 692,000 30 Planning, Engineering & Design $ 8,182,000 100-ye a r 4,050 c fs 31 Construction Management $ 3,149,000 First Costs $ 80,903,000 Interest during construction $ 5,671,000 500-ye a r 5,400 c fs Total Cost $ 86,574,000 Draft Draft **Ab o ut $15 millio n a llo c a te d fo r b ridg e s a nd ro a ds Stantec Scope E nte r Sta nte c • Ana lyze the USACE F e a sib ility Re po rt to unde rsta nd the ir finding s a nd re c o mme nd a ny c ha ng e s to the Co rps c o nc lusio ns • Pe rfo rm fie ld surve ys a nd g e o te c hnic a l inve stig a tio ns • De te rmine pre fe rre d c ha nne l a lig nme nt • Prepare property acquisition plan and legal descriptions • Prepare final design and construction plans • Prepare necessary documents to secure Draft Draft regulatory permits 2

  3. 2/5/2017 Pha se 1 – Ga p Ana lysis Sta nte c Sc o pe Pha se 2 – Wo rk Pla n & Pro o f o f Co nc e pt Co nc e ptua l De sig n Adva nc e me nt • Pa rt A – Additio na l Da ta Co lle c tio n And Ana lysis • Pa rt B – Re fine me nt o f Co nc e ptua l De sig n • Pa rt C – 30% De sig n Pla ns Draft Draft 4 Key Gaps De sig n a nd E ng ine e ring Missing 1. Unc le a r pro je c t o bje c tive Da ta / Ana lysis Co st/ E c o no mic s 2. BCR le ss tha n 1.0 Hydro lo g y & Hydra ulic s (H&H) 3. Risk ba se d e va lua tio n ne e de d 4. Co nflic ting re sults be twe e n USACE mo de l a nd re po rt Draft Draft Pa rt B Pa th F o rwa rd • Asse ss wa ys to impro ve the initia l de sig n c o nc e pt (Alte rna tive 13) Re fine me nt o f Co nc e ptua l De sig n • Be ne fit/ Co st Ana lysis – E va lua te a dditio na l be ne fits to a c hie ve a BCR g re a te r tha n 1 • H&H – Asse ss va ria tio ns to the re c o mme nde d pla n via c ha nne l a lig nme nt, da m a lig nme nt, c ha nne l sizing Draft Draft 3

  4. 2/5/2017 Co nc e pt Diversion Channel Refinement De sig n Ana lysis Draft Draft Co nc e pt De sig n Ana lysis Dive rsio n Cha nne l Alig nme nt Draft Draft Co nc e pt De sig n Ana lysis E a g le Cre e k Dive rsio n Cha nne l Pro file Draft Draft 4

  5. 2/5/2017 Co nc e pt Preliminary Recommendations De sig n Re fine me nt • Re lo c a te e ntra nc e • Re duc e dive rsio n c ha nne l le ng th • At-g ra de inte rse c tio n with Aura nd Run E a g le Cre e k Dive rsio n • Re fine pro file Cha nne l – Re duc e o ve ra ll e xc a va tio n & wa ste Re duc e ro c k e xc a va tio n – • Upda te width fo r de sig n disc ha rg e 25yr -vs- 100yr c a pa c ity – • Cro ssing g e o me trie s • Gra ding Re vie w Draft Draft Why Problems to Solve Alternatives? • Co nflic ting Mo de l/ Re po rting Re sults Re sidua l Risk o f Pro je c t • • Do ub le -Pe a ke d Hydro g ra ph Draft Draft April 2015 August 2015 Draft Draft 5

  6. 2/5/2017 Draft Draft Upda te d Achieve approximately 4.5’ level of reduction in Pro je c t Findlay to reduce flooding Ob je c tive at Main Street and other key points Be tte r c ha nc e a t “flo o d fig hting ” “The 4.6’ drop in WSE in downtown Findlay is based on a model run Spe c ific & me asurable where the flow pro je c t g o al optimization feature did not properly converge on an internally consistent result.” Draft Draft T he Bla nc ha rd Rive r Wa te rshe d Draft Draft 6

  7. 2/5/2017 Hydro g ra ph 15,560 cfs 14,370 cfs Co mpa riso ns E xisting Co nditio ns 11,120 cfs 10,470 cfs Bla nc ha rd Rive r in F indla y 7,880 cfs 4,600 cfs 1,890 cfs Draft Draft Hr 43 Part A Hydro lo g y a nd Hydra ulic s (H&H) “There would be a minimal performance of Alternative 13 when storm Additio na l events are primarily over either the Blanchard River or Lye Creek watersheds upstream of Findlay, with minimal storm events over the Da ta Eagle Creek watershed.” Co lle c tio n USACE F e a sibility Study And Ana lysis Will E a g le Cre e k dive rsio n wo rk? • Pro b a b ility o f a disc ha rg e o f X o n E a g le Cre e k whe n the Bla nc ha rd Rive r in F indla y e xpe rie nc e s a disc ha rg e o f Y • Appro pria te ly size E a g le Cre e k dive rsio n fo r de sire d flo o d risk re duc tio n Draft Draft Pe rc e nt o f Wa te rshe d Influe nc e d Re sidua l Risk Draft Draft 7

  8. 2/5/2017 Hydro g ra ph Co mpa riso ns 11,120 cfs 10,890 cfs E a g le Cre e k 10,680 cfs Dive rsio n Bla nc ha rd Rive r in F indla y Draft Draft Hr 65 Bla nc ha rd Rive r Ra ting Curve a t Ma in Stre e t Draft Draft Alternative 13 (Recommended Plan) Why 25-year event diversion channel with Eagle Creek at 100 cfs • Alternatives? Curre nt pro je c t do e s no t fully a c hie ve de sire d re duc tio n (2’ dro p in WSE @ Ma in St.) • • Re c o mme nde d Pla n re c e ive s flo w fro m o nly 15% o f the dra ina g e a re a • BCE < 1.0 Pro je c t a dditio ns a nd/ o r e nha nc e me nts ne e de d to ma na g e “do ub le pe a k” • Draft Draft 8

  9. 2/5/2017 Alte rna tive s Draft Draft Hydraulic Improvements Co nc e pt De sig ns “Clean out the Blanchard!” Re vie we d Re mo ve Inline Riffle s/ Da ms Cha nne l Wide ning Bridg e Mo dific a tio ns Draft Draft F lo o dpla in Be nc h Wide ning Hydra ulic Impro ve me nts Draft Draft 9

  10. 2/5/2017 L o w He a d Da ms & Riffle Struc ture s Hydra ulic Impro ve me nts Draft Draft RR Bridg e F a c ing upstre a m Draft Draft Opportunities • Re duc e WSE o n the Bla nc ha rd Rive r Co nc e pt • Po te ntia l c o st sha ring with RR fo r re pla c e me nt De sig n Ana lysis Challenges • Minima l rise a va ila b le - tie in to side stre e ts Bla nc ha rd Rive r Mo dific a tio ns Costs RR Bridge Modification Costs Scenario RR Rise Track & Roadway Total 1' Rise $125,000 $130,000 $255,000 RR Bridg e 2' Rise $300,000 $500,000 $800,000 3' Rise $900,000 $2,000,000 $2,900,000 Mo dific a tio n 50' Span Addition $1,000,000 Reduction in WSE? • ~0.05’ fo r 1’ rise • ~0.10’ fo r 2’ rise Draft Draft • ~0.20’ fo r 3’ rise 10

  11. 2/5/2017 Bla nc ha rd Rive r Ra ting Curve a t Ma in Stre e t Draft Draft Pe rc e nt o f Wa te rshe d Influe nc e d Draft Draft Dive rsio n E xte nsio n Draft Draft 11

  12. 2/5/2017 Dive rsio n Eagle to Lye to Blanchard E xte nsio n Draft Draft Pe rc e nt o f Wa te rshe d Influe nc e d Draft Draft Pe rc e nt o f Wa te rshe d Influe nc e d Draft Draft 12

  13. 2/5/2017 Sto ra g e Draft Draft E a g le Cre e k Dry Sto ra g e Draft Draft Hydro g ra ph Co mpa riso ns 11,120 cfs E a g le Cre e k 10,890 cfs 10,680 cfs Sto ra g e Bla nc ha rd Rive r in F indla y Draft Draft Hr 65 13

  14. 2/5/2017 Sto ra g e Draft Draft Bla nc ha rd Rive r & Po ta to Run Sto ra g e a t Mt. Bla nc ha rd Draft Draft Hydro g ra ph Co mpa riso ns Mt. Bla nc ha rd Sto ra g e + E a g le Cre e k Sto ra g e Bla nc ha rd Rive r in F indla y Draft Draft 14

  15. 2/5/2017 Pe rc e nt o f Wa te rshe d Influe nc e d Draft Draft Draft Co nc e pt De sig ns Re vie we d Bla nc ha rd/ L ye Cuto ff L e ve e E xisting Co nd. 500-Ye a r Ma ximum De pth Draft Draft Co nc e pt De sig ns Re vie we d Bla nc ha rd/ L ye Cuto ff L e ve e With L e ve e 500-Ye a r Ma ximum De pth Draft Draft 15

  16. 2/5/2017 Opportunities • Re duc e flo o ding a lo ng L ye Cre e k Co nc e pt Challenges De sig n Ana lysis • I nduc e d flo o ding a lo ng Bla nc ha rd Rive r • Pro pe rty b uyo uts? Cut-o ff L e ve e Costs • ~$8,000,000 fo r c uto ff le ve e (fro m USACE / URS a na lysis) Increase in WSE • 0-2’ Draft Draft 2007 F lo o d Hydro g ra ph Co mpa riso ns Mt. Bla nc ha rd Sto ra g e + E a g le Cre e k Sto ra g e Bla nc ha rd Rive r in F indla y Draft Draft 2007 F lo o d Hydro g ra ph Co mpa riso ns E a g le Cre e k Dive rsio n Bla nc ha rd Rive r in F indla y Draft Draft 16

  17. 2/5/2017 • Pa th F o rwa rd Clo sing • Sc he dule • Que stio ns Draft Draft Draft 17

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend