Who Ar ho Are Not ot Ac Achi hieving Del Siegle National Center - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

who ar ho are not ot ac achi hieving
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Who Ar ho Are Not ot Ac Achi hieving Del Siegle National Center - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Who Ar ho Are Not ot Ac Achi hieving Del Siegle National Center for Research on Gifted Education del@uconn.edu A C Career eer Guidanc ance e Test Test PROBLEM: A cat is in the tree and it wont come down. Explain briefly how


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Del Siegle

National Center for Research
  • n Gifted Education

del@uconn.edu

Who Ar ho Are Not

  • t Ac

Achi hieving

slide-2
SLIDE 2

A C Career eer Guidanc ance e Test Test

PROBLEM: A cat is in the tree and it won’t come down. Explain briefly how you would get the cat out of the tree.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

If you answered…

Climb the tree.

It means that…

You are of average intelligence, you could be a good sales clerk. Climb the tree with a ladder. You are of above average intelligence. You could be a sales clerk supervisor.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

If you answered…

Get a sexy cat to entice the other cat out of the tree.

It means that…

You have a future in advertising or show business. Call, “Here, Kitty, Kitty.” You are a foolish

  • ptimist. Do not try to

start your own business. Chop down the tree. You are an active doer, rather than a passive thinker. Join the military.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

If you answered…

Call the fire department.

It means that…

You know how to delegate responsibility. Become an administrator. Set the tree

  • n fire.

You have imagination, creativity, and a warped sense of humor. You’d make a great teacher of the gifted.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Think of an underachiever

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

POTENTIAL PERFORMANCE

slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Endepohls-Ulpe and Ruf (2006) found gifted underachievers, children with low achievement motivation, and gifted girls were at higher risk to be overlooked as gifted. Therefore, they were less likely to develop fully their talents…

slide-11
SLIDE 11 The National Center for Research on Gifted Education (NCRGE – http://ncrge.uconn.edu) is funded by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education PR/Award # R305C140018

Predicted probability of being identified as gifted in grade 4 for students from different demographic groups

Referencc 13.23 Non-Under/FRL 4.18 Non-Under/EL 7.06 Non-Under/FRL/EL 2.13 Under 5.05 Under/FRL 1.63 Under/EL 2.58 Under/FRL/EL 0.82

slide-12
SLIDE 12 The National Center for Research on Gifted Education (NCRGE – http://ncrge.uconn.edu) is funded by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education PR/Award # R305C140018

Probability of identification as gifted in grade 4 for reference students and students who are EL, FRL, and UNDER after controlling for Reading and Math scores and school SES and school percentage of gifted students

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Points above the Mean in both reading and mathematics; SD is approximately 9.5 points Probability of Identification
slide-13
SLIDE 13 The National Center for Research on Gifted Education (NCRGE – http://ncrge.uconn.edu) is funded by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education PR/Award # R305C140018

What is the relationship betw een the %

  • f free and

reduced lunch students in a school and the % of students identified as gifted?

  • .61

.61

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Perspective

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Reasons

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Sample

  • 212 primarily middle school students identified

as gifted underachievers (9- to 17-years-old).

  • 94% of sample between 10- to 15-years old, M

= 12-years-old.

  • Approximately ¾ of sample were male; ¼ were

female.

  • 74% Caucasian, 13% Latino, 4% African-

American, and 2.5% Native American.

  • IQ scores (n = 121); M = 131.8, SD = 9.2.
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Instrumentation

  • ADHD-IV Rating Scale (Home Version)
  • Two 9-item subscales:

– Inattention

  • e.g. “Has difficulty sustaining attention in tasks or play

activities.”

– Hyperactivity/Impulsivity

  • e.g. “Interrupts or intrudes on others.”
  • Reliability estimates:

– Inattention alpha = .93 – Hyperactivity/Impulsivity alpha = .89

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Instrumentation

  • ADHD-IV Rating Scale (School Version)
  • Two 9-item subscales:

– Inattention

  • e.g. “Does not seem to listen when spoken to directly.”

– Hyperactivity/Impulsivity

  • e.g. “Blurts out answers before questions have been

completed.”

  • Reliability Estimates:

– Inattention alpha = .88 – Hyperactivity/Impulsivity alpha = .91

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Type % in GUA Sample % in Norm Group Inattentive 23.13 3.2 Hyperactive 2.1 Combined 6.72 2.2 Overall prevalence 29.85 7.5 ADHD IV School Rating Scales- Teacher Type % in GUA Sample % in Norm Group Inattentive 39.62 10 Hyperactive 1.89 3.2 Combined 9.43 8.4 Overall prevalence 50.94 21.6 ADHD IV Home Rating Scales- Parent

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Discussion

  • Many underachievers are inattentive.
  • This inattentiveness crosses over home and

school environments.

  • Are these students who actually

suffer from ADHD inattentive type

  • r is inattention a

characteristic of underachievers.

  • Should we treat the ADHD or the

underachievement?

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Grades Matter

slide-22
SLIDE 22

In the largest longitudinal study of underachievers conducted to date, McCall, Evahn, and Kratzer (1992) found that 13 years after high school, the educational and

  • ccupational status of high school

underachievers paralleled their grades in high school, rather than their abilities.

What happens to underachievers?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

?

? ? ?

?

How do instill a value for learning

slide-24
SLIDE 24 Possesses Adequate Skills to Perform the Task Sets Realistic Expectations and Implements Appropriate Strategies to Successfully Complete Goals (Self-Regulation) Task Engagement and Achievement

Achievement Orientation Model

Del Siegle and D. Betsy McCoach Neag School of Education University of Connecticut Values the Task
  • r Outcome
(Goal Valuation) Motivation

+ + =

CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE CULTURE Teachers Peers Family Confident in One’s Ability to Perform the Task (Self- Efficacy) Expects to Succeed (Environmental Perceptions)
slide-25
SLIDE 25

C

auses of Underachievement

POSSIBLE

Initiating Situation Power Struggles Inconsistency and Opposition

Inappropriate Education Environment

Competition Issue Value Conflict Limited Opportunities

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Maladaptive Competence Beliefs Pathway 1) identity tied to their gifted label and 2) identity tied to easy early achievement …so self-handicap to protect their gifted identity.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Maladaptive Competence Beliefs Pathway 1) identity tied to their gifted label and 2) identity tied to easy early achievement …so self-handicap to protect their gifted identity. Declining Value Beliefs Pathway 1) insufficient challenge in school work and 2) fail to see value in academic work …so don’t connect effort and positive

  • utcomes (Snyder & Linnenbrink-Garcia, 2013)
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29

st

Recognize st stude dents’ s’ giftedn dness ss and t their contribution to i its growth

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Francoys Gagné Joseph Renzulli

slide-31
SLIDE 31

performance

goals

learning/mastery

goals

Carol Dweck

Entity (Fixed Mindset) Incremental (Growth Mindset)

slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Use Specific, Developmental Compliments TIP “Nice work.” “You’ve learned to write supporting sentences in a paragraph that elaborate

  • n the topic sentence.”
slide-35
SLIDE 35

In gifted education, we have a difficulty balancing act recognizing…

effort ability

slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37

by JACK HANDEY

Children need encouragement. So if a kid gets an answer right, tell him it was a lucky guess. That way, he develops a good, lucky feeling.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Unfortunately…many young people believe making mistakes means they are not smart and that having to work hard also means they are not smart.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Mistakes are the portals

  • f

discovery

  • James Joyce
slide-40
SLIDE 40

TIP

Share stories of setbacks and accomplishments

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Discuss How the Brain Works

TIP

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Document Grow th

TIP

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Create time capsules w ith short and long term aspirations. TIP

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Share Your Objectives

TIP

  • Begin lessons by listing and discussing the

skills that students have mastered from previous lessons.

  • Post the goals (skills) students will learn

during a new lesson.

  • Check off goals as the lesson progresses.
  • At the end of a lesson, review the goals (skills)

which were achieved. Provide students time to reflect on what they learned.

slide-45
SLIDE 45
slide-46
SLIDE 46

TIP Avoid Unnecessary Assistance

slide-47
SLIDE 47

est

slide-48
SLIDE 48

nd

Learn rn what i is s meaningful t to st stude dents

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Personally M eaningful

Tied to Student’s I dentity Personally I nteresting to the Student I ntegral to Student’s Vision of the Future Viewed as Useful

Eccles and Wigfield

Connected to Prior Knowledge and Present Experiences

slide-50
SLIDE 50 Directions: Please complete all of the following sentences regarding the class that you are focusing on for this program. There are no right
  • r wrong answers. Put down the first idea that comes into your head. When you are done, give this form back to your
teacher/counselor.
  • 1. When I try hard in this class, it's because _________________________.
  • 2. I would spend more time on my schoolwork if _________________________.
  • 3. If I do poorly in this class, then ___________________________________.
  • 4. When I don't try hard in this class, it's because ____________________.
  • 5. I would rather do ___________________ than do my work for this class.
  • 6. Doing well in this class will help me to ________________________.
  • 7. Doing poorly in this class will keep me from ________________________.
  • 8. This class is important because ________________________________.
  • 9. The most interesting thing that I learned this year is _______________________.
10.The thing that I am most interested in learning more about is ________________. 11.The most interesting thing that I learned in _______ class is _________________. 12.I feel best about myself when _______________________________________. 13.I feel worst about myself when _____________________________________. 14.I am most proud of _____________________________________________. 15.I wish that I could ______________________________________________. 16.When I grow up, I want to ________________________________________. 17.I really value ___________________________________________________. Note: The goal valuations interventions are based on the work of D. Betsy McCoach.
slide-51
SLIDE 51

Never underestimate the pow er of student interest in making learning meaningful

slide-52
SLIDE 52

The future influences the present as much as the past.

Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche

slide-53
SLIDE 53

“I don’t want to be

  • challenged. I want to be

intellectually stimulated.”

Challenge

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Quest for Mastery Search for Meaning

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Passion Urgency

Optimal Arousal Leads to Optimal Human Performance

Adrenalin

slide-56
SLIDE 56
  • Too little academic challenge, too little intellectual

stimulation produces bored students.

  • Too much academic challenge, too little intellectual

stimulation produces “turned off” students.

  • Too much academic challenge with adequate intellectual

stimulation produces frustrated students.

  • Optimal challenge combined with intellectual stimulation

produces students in a state of “flow”.

ecause content is academically challenging does not guarantee that students will find it intellectually stimulating.

Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi coined the term “flow”

B

slide-57
SLIDE 57

1. Teach them to love the field 2. Develop their skills and discipline 3. Help them to make a unique contribution

Meaningfulness and the Roles

  • f Teachers Change as Talent

Develops

Benjamin Bloom
slide-58
SLIDE 58
slide-59
SLIDE 59

The Enrichment Triad Model

Type I General Exploratory Activities Type III Individual & Small Group Investigations of Real Problems Type II Group Training Activities

slide-60
SLIDE 60

rd

Help students set realistic expectations

slide-61
SLIDE 61

1: Self-Oriented (Originate from within the individual – Personality, Parents, and School Curriculum) 2: Socially Prescribed (Others place high standards – Love and Acceptance Contingent upon Achievement & Inappropriately Easy Curriculum) 3: Other Oriented (Perfection expectations of others)

Types of Perfectionists

Kristie Speirs Neumeister

Ball State University
slide-62
SLIDE 62

ERFECTIONISTS LAY

GAMES

P

  • Numbers Game
  • Focusing on the Future
  • Telescopic Thinking
  • Pining Over the Past
  • Getting it Right
  • All or Nothing
  • Mood Sw inging

UNHEALTHY

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Why People Sometimes Become Perfectionists

  • Birth Order
  • Messages of the Media
  • Generational Inheritance
  • Pressure from School

and Peers

  • Superkid Syndrome
  • MA > CA
  • Dysfunctional Family
slide-64
SLIDE 64

TIPS

To Reduce

Unhealthy Perfectionism

Creative Outlets

Miriam Adderholdt-Elliott and Jan Goldberg
slide-65
SLIDE 65

“Use what talents you possess; the woods would be very silent if no birds sang there except those that sang best.”

  • Henry Van Dyke
slide-66
SLIDE 66

th

Create a reward system when necessary

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Underachieving gifted students are more externally oriented than achieving gifted students. Underachieving gifted males are more externally oriented than underachieving gifted females. Nongifted students are more externally

  • riented than achieving gifted students.
Moore, 2006
slide-68
SLIDE 68
slide-69
SLIDE 69

th

Int Introduce appr ppropr priate rol

  • le m

mod

  • dels
slide-70
SLIDE 70

Children's identification with a positive adult role model in their environment is based on three variables…

…similarities that children see between themselves and the adult …the power of the adult as perceived by the child

  • - Silvia Rimm

…nurturance, or the warmth of the relationship between the child and a particular adult

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Support

Don’t Give Up… All of Us Are Works in Progress ACHIEVEMENT

Chad
slide-72
SLIDE 72

How ’s life?

slide-73
SLIDE 73

.

“We can do no great things; only small things with great love.”

  • Mother Teresa

“I am only one, But still I am one. I cannot do everything, but still I can do something; And because I cannot do everything I will not refuse to do the something that I can do.”

  • - Edward E. Hale
slide-74
SLIDE 74

Prufrock Press