Where do topological Tutte polynomial come from?
Iain Moffatt
Carolyn Chun, Jo Ellis-Monaghan, Thomas Krajewski, Steve Noble, Ralf Rueckriemen, Ben Smith, Adrian Tanasa
Royal Holloway, University of London
Where do topological Tutte polynomial come from? Iain Moffatt - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Where do topological Tutte polynomial come from? Iain Moffatt Carolyn Chun, Jo Ellis-Monaghan, Thomas Krajewski, Steve Noble, Ralf Rueckriemen, Ben Smith, Adrian Tanasa Royal Holloway, University of London Dagstuhl, 13 th June 2016 A review of
Royal Holloway, University of London
16 1
Background Minors Constructing the polynomials Matroids Remarks
◮ T(G) is well-defined. ◮ T(G) = A⊆E
◮ r(A) = #verts. − #cpts. of (V, A) . ◮ Defined for matroids - take r to to be rank function. ◮ T(C(G)) = T(G), where C(G) is cycle matroid
16 2
Background Minors Constructing the polynomials Matroids Remarks
◮ Plane graph - drawn on a sphere, edges don’t
◮ embedded graph = graph in surface - drawn on
◮ cellularly embedded graph - drawn on surface,
16 3
Background Minors Constructing the polynomials Matroids Remarks
◮ M. Las Vergnas’ 1978 polynomial, L(G; x, y, z)
◮ B. Bollobás and O. Riordan’s 2002 polynomial
◮ V. Kruskal’s 2011 polynomial
1 2 s(A)b 1 2 s⊥(A)
16 4
Background Minors Constructing the polynomials Matroids Remarks
◮ Explain how all three polynomials arise as the
◮ unified / canonical approach ◮ Want:
◮ deletion-contraction relation ◮ terminates in edgeless graph
◮ Problems:
◮ The definition of deletion and contraction ◮ Cases for the relation (analogues of loop, bridge,
16
Background
5
Minors Constructing the polynomials Matroids Remarks
16
Background
6
Minors Constructing the polynomials Matroids Remarks
16
Background
7
Minors Constructing the polynomials Matroids Remarks
◮ 2 deletion and 2 contractions 4 domains
◮ four “T
◮ Need to recognise these four polynomials.
16
Background
8
Minors Constructing the polynomials Matroids Remarks
◮ discs for vertices, ◮ ribbons for edges.
◮ Ribbon graphs describe exactly cellularly
◮ Ribbon graph deletion / contraction
16
Background
9
Minors Constructing the polynomials Matroids Remarks
◮ ribbon graph ←
◮ boundary coloured r.g. ←
◮ vertex coloured r.g. ←
◮ vertex and boundary coloured r.g. ←
16
Background Minors
10 Constructing the
polynomials Matroids Remarks
◮ We have
◮ deletion and contraction ◮ objects closed under the operations ◮ reduce to edgeless ribbon graph
◮ We need
◮ to identify the cases for the recursive definition ◮ i.e., find analogues of loops and bridges
16
Background Minors
11 Constructing the
polynomials Matroids Remarks
◮ 2 graphs on 1 edge:
◮ For ec = E\e, look at pair
◮
◮ Define
◮ Then U(G) is T
l
b
bb + 1, bl al + 1)
16
Background Minors
12 Constructing the
polynomials Matroids Remarks
◮ Apply canonical construction to topological graphs. ◮ 5 vertex and boundary coloured ribbon graphs: ◮ Define a T
◮ 4 variables (for well-definedness) ◮ 6 term deletion-contraction definition ◮ Krushkal’s polynomial K(G; x, y, a, b).
16
Background Minors
13 Constructing the
polynomials Matroids Remarks
◮ The deletion-contraction invariants for the other
c.f., Krajewski, Moffatt, & T anasa, arXiv:1508.00814.
16
Background Minors Constructing the polynomials
14 Matroids
Remarks
Moffatt & Smith, ask; Chun, Moffatt, Noble & Rueckriemen, arXiv:1403.0920, arXiv:1602.01306; Ellis-Monaghan & Moffatt, arXiv:1311.3762; Krajewski, Moffatt, & T anasa, arXiv:1508.00814.
16
Background Minors Constructing the polynomials
15 Matroids
Remarks
◮ Canonical approach to the T
◮ 4 types of deletion and contraction for embedded
◮ 4 (or 5 or 3) topological T
◮ “full” recursive definition ◮ recovers Bollobás-Riordan, Las Vergnas, and
◮ All polys recovered from Krushkal by forgetting
◮ matroid framework.
16
Background Minors Constructing the polynomials
15 Matroids
Remarks
16
Background Minors Constructing the polynomials
15 Matroids
Remarks