why algorithmic and rigorous polynomial approximations
play

Why Algorithmic and Rigorous Polynomial Approximations? Rigorous - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Why Algorithmic and Rigorous Polynomial Approximations? Rigorous Polynomial Approximation = Polynomial + error bound Rigorous methods Algorithmic methods Efficient and accurate 1/16 Multinormval Why Algorithmic and Rigorous Polynomial


  1. Why Algorithmic and Rigorous Polynomial Approximations? ▸ Rigorous Polynomial Approximation = Polynomial + error bound Rigorous methods Algorithmic methods Efficient and accurate 1/16 Multinormval

  2. Why Algorithmic and Rigorous Polynomial Approximations? ▸ Rigorous Polynomial Approximation = ▸ Solutions of coupled systems of linear Polynomial + error bound ordinary differential equations. ▸ with componentwise error bounds. Rigorous methods Algorithmic methods Efficient and accurate 1/16 Multinormval

  3. Why Algorithmic and Rigorous Polynomial Approximations? ▸ Rigorous Polynomial Approximation = ▸ Solutions of coupled systems of linear Polynomial + error bound ordinary differential equations. ▸ with componentwise error bounds. ▸ Various fields of applications: 1 . 2 1 . 1 d ( h ) y P ( h ) h 1 Rigorous methods 0 . 9 0 . 9 1 1 . 1 1 . 2 1 . 3 x Algorithmic methods Safety-critical Computer-aided engineering mathematics Efficient and accurate 1/16 Multinormval

  4. Outline 1 Introduction 2 A New Framework for Componentwise Validation 3 Componentwise Validation of Coupled Systems of Linear ODEs in Cheby- shev Basis A Sparse Linear Algebra Problem A Newton-like A Posteriori Fixed-Point Operator for Validation 4 Conclusion and Future Work Multinormval

  5. Outline 1 Introduction 2 A New Framework for Componentwise Validation 3 Componentwise Validation of Coupled Systems of Linear ODEs in Cheby- shev Basis A Sparse Linear Algebra Problem A Newton-like A Posteriori Fixed-Point Operator for Validation 4 Conclusion and Future Work Multinormval

  6. Banach Fixed-Point Theorem for A Posteriori Validation ▸ Fixed-point equation T ⋅ x = x with T contracting, ▸ Approximation x ○ to exact solution x ⋆ , General scheme ▸ Compute a posteriori error bounds with Banach theorem. 2/16 Multinormval

  7. Banach Fixed-Point Theorem for A Posteriori Validation ▸ Fixed-point equation T ⋅ x = x with T contracting, ▸ Approximation x ○ to exact solution x ⋆ , General scheme ▸ Compute a posteriori error bounds with Banach theorem. Banach Fixed-Point Theorem If ( X , d ) is complete and T contracting of ratio µ < 1, ▸ T admits a unique fixed-point x ⋆ , and ▸ For all x ○ ∈ X , d ( x ○ , T ⋅ x ○ ) ⩽ d ( x ○ , x ⋆ ) ⩽ d ( x ○ , T ⋅ x ○ ) . 1 + µ 1 − µ 2/16 Multinormval

  8. Banach Fixed-Point Theorem for A Posteriori Validation ▸ Fixed-point equation T ⋅ x = x with T contracting, ▸ Approximation x ○ to exact solution x ⋆ , General scheme ▸ Compute a posteriori error bounds with Banach theorem. Quasi-Newton Method for F ⋅ x = 0 Banach Fixed-Point Theorem Compute A ≈ ( D F ) − 1 x ○ in order to define: If ( X , d ) is complete and T contracting of ratio µ < 1, T ⋅ x = x − A ⋅ F ⋅ x . ▸ T admits a unique fixed-point x ⋆ , and ▸ For all x ○ ∈ X , Banach fixed-point theorem applies if for some r > 0: d ( x ○ , T ⋅ x ○ ) ⩽ d ( x ○ , x ⋆ ) ⩽ d ( x ○ , T ⋅ x ○ ) . µ = sup x ∈ B ( x ○ , r ) ∥ 1 − A ⋅ D F x ∥ < 1, 1 + µ 1 − µ ∥ x ○ − T ⋅ x ○ ∥ + µ r < r . 2/16 Multinormval

  9. Banach Fixed-Point Theorem for A Posteriori Validation ▸ Fixed-point equation T ⋅ x = x with T contracting, ▸ Approximation x ○ to exact solution x ⋆ , General scheme ▸ Compute a posteriori error bounds with Banach theorem. Quasi-Newton Method for F ⋅ x = 0 Banach Fixed-Point Theorem Compute A ≈ ( D F ) − 1 x ○ in order to define: If ( X , d ) is complete and T contracting of ratio µ < 1, T ⋅ x = x − A ⋅ F ⋅ x . ▸ T admits a unique fixed-point x ⋆ , and ▸ For all x ○ ∈ X , Banach fixed-point theorem applies if for some r > 0: d ( x ○ , T ⋅ x ○ ) ⩽ d ( x ○ , x ⋆ ) ⩽ d ( x ○ , T ⋅ x ○ ) . µ = sup x ∈ B ( x ○ , r ) ∥ 1 − A ⋅ D F x ∥ < 1, 1 + µ 1 − µ ∥ x ○ − T ⋅ x ○ ∥ + µ r < r . Applications to function space problems: Early works by Kaucher, Miranker, Yamamoto et al ( ∼ 80’s, ∼ 90’s). Lessard et al (2007 - today). Benoit, Joldes, Mezzarobba (2011); Bréhard, Brisebarre, Joldes (2017). 2/16 Multinormval

  10. Example: Polynomial Equation in the Plane 1 sin 3 x + cos 3 x = 0 ⇔ s 0 � s 3 + 4 c 3 − 3 c = 0 c 2 + s 2 − 1 = 0 − 1 c − 1 0 1 3/16 Multinormval

  11. Example: Polynomial Equation in the Plane 1 x ◦ x ⋆ s 0 � s 3 + 4 c 3 − 3 c = 0 c 2 + s 2 − 1 = 0 − 1 c − 1 0 1 3/16 Multinormval

  12. Example: Polynomial Equation in the Plane 0 . 56 x ◦ 0 . 55 s x ⋆ c 0 . 54 0 . 83 0 . 84 0 . 85 3/16 Multinormval

  13. Example: Polynomial Equation in the Plane 0 . 56 x ◦ 0 . 55 s T · x ◦ x ⋆ � � 0 . 25 − 0 . 20 A = − 0 . 37 1 . 2 c 0 . 54 0 . 83 0 . 84 0 . 85 3/16 Multinormval

  14. Example: Polynomial Equation in the Plane 0 . 56 r ( · 10 − 3 ) µ = � 1 − A · D F � 2 Stability 3 5.98e-2 No 4.5 7.55e-2 No 5 8.09e-2 Yes 100 1.21e+0 Yes x ◦ 0 . 55 s T · x ◦ x ⋆ � � 0 . 25 − 0 . 20 A = − 0 . 37 1 . 2 c 0 . 54 0 . 83 0 . 84 0 . 85 3/16 Multinormval

  15. Example: Polynomial Equation in the Plane 0 . 56 ≤ � x ◦ − x ⋆ � 2 ≤ � x ◦ − T · x ◦ � 2 � x ◦ − T · x ◦ � 2 1+ µ 1 − µ x ◦ 0 . 55 s T · x ◦ x ⋆ c 0 . 54 0 . 83 0 . 84 0 . 85 3/16 Multinormval

  16. Example: Polynomial Equation in the Plane 0 . 56 3 . 97 · 10 − 3 ≤ � x ◦ − x ⋆ � 2 ≤ 4 . 68 · 10 − 3 x ◦ 0 . 55 s T · x ◦ x ⋆ c 0 . 54 0 . 83 0 . 84 0 . 85 3/16 Multinormval

  17. Vector-valued Metric and Perov Theorem Vector-Valued Metric ( X i , d i ) 1 ⩽ i ⩽ p complete metric spaces. d ( x , y ) = ( d 1 ( x 1 , y 1 ) , . . . , d p ( x p , y p )) ∈ R p + vector-valued metric. F ∶ X → X is Λ -Lipschitz for Λ ∈ R p × p : + d ( F ⋅ x , F ⋅ y ) ⩽ Λ ⋅ d ( x , y ) ∀ x , y ∈ X 4/16 Multinormval

  18. Vector-valued Metric and Perov Theorem Vector-Valued Metric ( X i , d i ) 1 ⩽ i ⩽ p complete metric spaces. d ( x , y ) = ( d 1 ( x 1 , y 1 ) , . . . , d p ( x p , y p )) ∈ R p + vector-valued metric. F ∶ X → X is Λ -Lipschitz for Λ ∈ R p × p : + d ( F ⋅ x , F ⋅ y ) ⩽ Λ ⋅ d ( x , y ) ∀ x , y ∈ X Convergent to Zero Matrices Λ ∈ R p × p is convergent to zero if: Λ k → 0 as k → ∞ , ⇔ ρ ( Λ ) < 1. Generalized Contractions F ∶ X → X is a generalized contraction if it is Λ -Lipschitz for Λ convergent to zero. 4/16 Multinormval

  19. Vector-valued Metric and Perov Theorem Vector-Valued Metric d ( x ○ , x ⋆ ) ⩽ d ( x ○ , T ⋅ x ○ ) + d ( T ⋅ x ○ , x ⋆ ) ( X i , d i ) 1 ⩽ i ⩽ p complete metric spaces. d ( x , y ) = ( d 1 ( x 1 , y 1 ) , . . . , d p ( x p , y p )) ∈ R p + vector-valued metric. F ∶ X → X is Λ -Lipschitz for Λ ∈ R p × p : + d ( F ⋅ x , F ⋅ y ) ⩽ Λ ⋅ d ( x , y ) ∀ x , y ∈ X Convergent to Zero Matrices Λ ∈ R p × p is convergent to zero if: Λ k → 0 as k → ∞ , ⇔ ρ ( Λ ) < 1. Generalized Contractions F ∶ X → X is a generalized contraction if it is Λ -Lipschitz for Λ convergent to zero. 4/16 Multinormval

  20. Vector-valued Metric and Perov Theorem Vector-Valued Metric d ( x ○ , x ⋆ ) ⩽ d ( x ○ , T ⋅ x ○ ) + Λ ⋅ d ( x ○ , x ⋆ ) ( X i , d i ) 1 ⩽ i ⩽ p complete metric spaces. d ( x , y ) = ( d 1 ( x 1 , y 1 ) , . . . , d p ( x p , y p )) ∈ R p + vector-valued metric. F ∶ X → X is Λ -Lipschitz for Λ ∈ R p × p : + d ( F ⋅ x , F ⋅ y ) ⩽ Λ ⋅ d ( x , y ) ∀ x , y ∈ X Convergent to Zero Matrices Λ ∈ R p × p is convergent to zero if: Λ k → 0 as k → ∞ , ⇔ ρ ( Λ ) < 1. Generalized Contractions F ∶ X → X is a generalized contraction if it is Λ -Lipschitz for Λ convergent to zero. 4/16 Multinormval

  21. Vector-valued Metric and Perov Theorem Vector-Valued Metric ( 1 − Λ ) ⋅ d ( x ○ , x ⋆ ) ⩽ d ( x ○ , T ⋅ x ○ ) ( X i , d i ) 1 ⩽ i ⩽ p complete metric spaces. d ( x , y ) = ( d 1 ( x 1 , y 1 ) , . . . , d p ( x p , y p )) ∈ R p + vector-valued metric. F ∶ X → X is Λ -Lipschitz for Λ ∈ R p × p : + d ( F ⋅ x , F ⋅ y ) ⩽ Λ ⋅ d ( x , y ) ∀ x , y ∈ X Convergent to Zero Matrices Λ ∈ R p × p is convergent to zero if: Λ k → 0 as k → ∞ , ⇔ ρ ( Λ ) < 1. Generalized Contractions F ∶ X → X is a generalized contraction if it is Λ -Lipschitz for Λ convergent to zero. 4/16 Multinormval

  22. Vector-valued Metric and Perov Theorem Vector-Valued Metric ( 1 − Λ ) ⋅ d ( x ○ , x ⋆ ) ⩽ d ( x ○ , T ⋅ x ○ ) ( X i , d i ) 1 ⩽ i ⩽ p complete metric spaces. ( 1 − Λ ) − 1 = 1 + Λ + Λ 2 +⋅ ⋅ ⋅+ Λ k + . . . ⩾ 0 . d ( x , y ) = ( d 1 ( x 1 , y 1 ) , . . . , d p ( x p , y p )) ∈ R p ⇒ d ( x ○ , x ⋆ ) ⩽ ( 1 − Λ ) − 1 ⋅ d ( x ○ , T ⋅ x ○ ) . + vector-valued metric. F ∶ X → X is Λ -Lipschitz for Λ ∈ R p × p : + d ( F ⋅ x , F ⋅ y ) ⩽ Λ ⋅ d ( x , y ) ∀ x , y ∈ X Convergent to Zero Matrices Λ ∈ R p × p is convergent to zero if: Λ k → 0 as k → ∞ , ⇔ ρ ( Λ ) < 1. Generalized Contractions F ∶ X → X is a generalized contraction if it is Λ -Lipschitz for Λ convergent to zero. 4/16 Multinormval

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend