Valuing Natures Benefits within the Columbia River Basin An economic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

valuing nature s benefits within the columbia river basin
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Valuing Natures Benefits within the Columbia River Basin An economic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Valuing Natures Benefits within the Columbia River Basin An economic analysis to assist with the moderniza@on of the Columbia River Treaty Gregory Haller, Conserva@on Director 1948 Flood in Vanport, Oregon Flooding at Vanport 1948


slide-1
SLIDE 1

“Valuing Nature’s Benefits within the Columbia River Basin” An economic analysis to assist with the moderniza@on of the Columbia River Treaty Gregory Haller, Conserva@on Director

slide-2
SLIDE 2

1948 Flood in Vanport, Oregon

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Flooding at Vanport

slide-4
SLIDE 4

1948 Bonners Ferry Flooding

slide-5
SLIDE 5

1964 U.S.-Canada Columbia River Treaty

  • Flooding in the U.S spurred Treaty

nego@a@ons

  • Signed in 1961, implemented in 1964
  • Resulted in three new dams in Canada and
  • ne in the United States
  • Two purposes: coordinated flood risk

management and hydropower genera@on

  • Power sharing commitment (“Canadian

En@tlement”)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

1964 U.S.-Canada Columbia River Treaty

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Hydrograph at The Dalles

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Columbia River Treaty

  • No end date, but the Treaty can be terminated with ten

years no@ce by either side.

  • 2024 – Coordinated flood control ends, requiring the U.S.

to use all effec@ve storage space in U.S. reservoirs before it can call upon Canada to store water in the event of a flood.

– Poten@al to disrupt ecosystem and other opera@ons that benefit other water users/uses

  • 2013 Regional Recommenda@on includes adding

“ecosystem-based func@on” as a 3rd purpose of the Treaty

  • U.S., Canada, Tribes and stakeholders gearing up for

nego@a@ons

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Context and Need For Environmental Economic Analysis

  • Support the inclusion of “ecosystem-based

func@on” as a third purpose of the Treaty

  • Counter the arguments made by u@li@es and
  • thers that say:

– “The region can’t afford to do more for salmon”

  • We’ve spent $12 billion salmon recovery since 1992

– “Salmon runs are doing just fine” – “Primary Objec@ve of Treaty nego@a@ons should be to rebalance the Canadian En@tlement”

  • $250 million power to the Canada every year
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Study Purpose

Define the economic, ecological, cultural and social benefits that the ecosystems of the Columbia River Basin provide, and the impact of investments in the conserva@on of these natural assets, including fisheries, water quality, flood risk reduc@on and electrical power, will have on the region’s economic and social well-being.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Study Sponsors

  • Upper Columbia United Tribes
  • Columbia River Intertribal Fish Commission
  • Pacific Rivers
  • WaterWatch of Oregon
  • Save Our Wild Salmon
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Scope of Study

  • Columbia River Basin (U.S. and Canadian

por@ons)

  • Will compare con@nued development trends
  • vs. a natural resource alterna@ve scenario,

that will consider investments and changes to hydropower opera@ons, the restora@on of floodplains and other habitats that generate ecological and economic dividends.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

What will the Study assess?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Recrea@onal Fishing

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Resident fisheries

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Tribal & Non-Indian Commercial Fisheries

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Lamprey

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Irriga@on

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Naviga@on

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Renewable Energy Development

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Thank you!