tisbury elementary school
play

Tisbury Elementary School JUNE 7, 2017 AGENDA| 1. Latest Community - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SLIDE TITLE| Slide SubTitle Building Committee Presentation for: Tisbury Elementary School JUNE 7, 2017 AGENDA| 1. Latest Community Survey 2. Public Forum & Evaluation Criteria 3. Traffic Study Update 4. General Permitting Update 5.


  1. SLIDE TITLE| Slide Sub‐Title Building Committee Presentation for: Tisbury Elementary School JUNE 7, 2017

  2. AGENDA| 1. Latest Community Survey 2. Public Forum & Evaluation Criteria 3. Traffic Study Update 4. General Permitting Update 5. Discussion of Options 1. New 2‐Story School on the Manter Well Site (Site & Cost, Plans, Massing & Views) 2. New 3‐Story School on the Tisbury School Site (Site& Cost, Plans, Massing & Views) 3. New 2‐Story School on the Tisbury School Site (Site& Cost, Plans, Massing & Views) 4. Addition / Renovation (Site& Cost, Plans, Massing & Views) 5. Base Repair 6. Upcoming Events

  3. COMMUNITY SURVEY| GENERAL INFORMATION • Dates survey was available: May 17 th – May 26 th • Locations survey was available: ‐ online through Survey Monkey ‐ in print at select locations around town • Total number of responses: 138 • Responses to Question 8 have not been included ‐ Q8 (optional): name, email address, phone number • 162 “false” submissions were removed from data set ‐ 162 responses came from the same IP address and submitted in quick batches and some over the span of hours and at unusal times

  4. COMMUNITY SURVEY| Q1: PLEASE TELL US ABOUT YOURSELF? (STREET NAME OR ZIP CODE) Answer Response Response Options Percent Count 1.3% 1 02535 6.49% 5 02539 28.57% 22 02557 18.18% 14 02568 20.78% 16 02575 No Zip Code 24.68% 19 Answered Skipped Question Question 138 0

  5. COMMUNITY SURVEY| Q2: WHAT IS YOUR AGE? Answer Response Response Options Percent Count Under 25 1 1.4% 26‐35 5 8.0% 36‐45 22 27.5% 46‐55 14 19.6% 56‐65 16 18.8% 66+ 19 24.6% Answered Skipped Question Question 138 0

  6. COMMUNITY SURVEY| Q3: WHAT IS YOUR PREFERENCE BETWEEN RENOVATION/EXPANSION OR NEW CONSTUCTION? Answer Options Response Response Answered Skipped Percent Count Question Question 138 0 Renovation/Expansion of existing Tisbury School 50.00% 69 New construction (current site or Manter site) 50.00% 69

  7. COMMUNITY SURVEY| Q4: WHAT IS YOUR PREFERENCE OF THE TWO (2) SITE OPTIONS FOR THE TISBURY SCHOOL? Answer Options Response Response Answered Skipped Percent Count Question Question 138 0 Current location (40 W. William Street) 59.4% 82 40.6% 56 Manter site

  8. COMMUNITY SURVEY| Q5: IF NEW CONSTRUCTION IS SELECTED BY THE SBC, WHAT IS YOUR PREFERENCE FOR SITE LOCATION? Answer Options Response Response Answered Skipped Percent Count Question Question 138 0 Current location at 40 W. William Street (new) 55.8% 77 44.2% 61 Manter site (new)

  9. COMMUNITY SURVEY| Q6: CHOOSE UP TO THREE (3) FACTORS THAT ARE MOST IMPORTANT TO YOU?

  10. COMMUNITY SURVEY| Q6: CHOOSE UP TO THREE (3) FACTORS THAT ARE MOST IMPORTANT TO YOU? Answer Options Response Response Percent Count Total cost of project 26.8% 37 Maintenance and/or Operation costs of building 13.8% 19 Environmental impact 35.5% 49 Location of students during construction (existing or temporary space) 35.5% 49 Reuse/renovation of existing Tisbury School building 38.4% 53 Flexibility/adaptability of school building 27.5% 38 Future expansion potential for school building 14.5% 20 Outdoor educational or recreational space 21.0% 29 Proximity to Town Center 39.1% 54 Student safety/security 38.4% 53 Answered Question Skipped Question 138 0

  11. COMMUNITY SURVEY| Q7: HOW DO YOU USE THE SCHOOL FACILITIES? (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)

  12. COMMUNITY SURVEY| Q7: HOW DO YOU USE THE SCHOOL FACILITIES? (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) Answer Options Response Response Percent Count 31.2% 43 My child is a student at the Tisbury School 68.8% 95 Town Meeting 43.5% 60 Community Use 44.2% 61 Playground 13.0% 18 Gymnasium 26.8% 37 Other / None of the Above Answered Question Skipped Question 138 0

  13. PUBLIC FORUM & EVALUATION CRITERIA | CRITERIA WEIGHTING SITE/OPTION SELECTION TOP 1O CRITERIA VOTES TOTALS TOTALS STEP 1 (EXISTING VS MANTER) IMPACT ON TOWN – LONG TERM 40 EXISTING SITE 35 PLANNING MANTER SITE 29 IMPACT ON TOWN – LOCATION 37 BUILDING EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM FIT 37 TOTALS STEP 2 (ADD/RENO VS NEW) IMPACT TO EDUCATION – SHORT TERM 29 ADDITION/ RENOVATION 22 DESIGN FLEXIBILITY 26 NEW CONSTRUCTION 15 PERMITTING/ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 20 TOTALS STEP 3 (TWO VS THREE STORY) COMMUNITY USAGE/ ACCESS 19 TWO STORY EXISTING SITE 0 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS 15 THREE STORY EXISTING SITE 22 POTENTIAL FOR EXPANSION 14 CONSTRUCTABILITY/PHASING 9

  14. TRAFFIC SURVEY| LOCUS MAP

  15. TRAFFIC SURVEY| TRAFFIC COUNT LOCATIONS

  16. TRAFFIC SURVEY| EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS (ATR) – STATE ROAD

  17. TRAFFIC SURVEY| SCHOOL TRIP ORIGIN/DESTINATION

  18. TRAFFIC SURVEY| TRAFFIC LEVEL OF SERVICE

  19. TRAFFIC SURVEY| EXISTING VOLUMES & LOS – EXISTING SCHOOL

  20. TRAFFIC SURVEY| EXISTING VOLUMES & LOS – MANTER SITE

  21. TRAFFIC SURVEY| FUTURE NO‐BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES & LOS – EXISTING SITE

  22. TRAFFIC SURVEY| FUTURE NO‐BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES & LOS – MANTER SITE

  23. TRAFFIC SURVEY| FUTURE BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES & LOS – EXISTING SITE

  24. TRAFFIC SURVEY| FUTURE BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES & LOS – MANTER SITE

  25. TRAFFIC SURVEY| RECOMMENDATIONS EXISTING SITE • Improvements to crosswalks and sidewalks; • Review of traffic signage and regulations and improve signage, markings, etc. to meet current standards for schools; and • Reach out to parents via social media. MANTER SITE • Install school zone and signs; • Review of traffic signage and regulations and improve signage, markings, etc. to meet current standards for schools; and • Reach out to parents via social media.

  26. GENERAL PERMITTING UPDATE| TISBURY SCHOOL MANTER SITE SITE MVC X * MHC x NHESP ** X ** SPR x x SP x x CC * MVC – Development of Regional Impact (DRI) ** NHESP Tisbury Site Bushy Rockrose No Longer Listed as of 2012 Manter Site Gerhard’s Underwing Moth Special Concern Faded Gray Geometer Threatened Note: NHESP Mapping is being updated and being reviewed under public comment. Presently neither sites show protection status. Subject to change.

  27. NEW 2‐STORY OPTION, MANTER SITE| SITE PLAN NEW 2 STORY ON MANTER Turf Play Area (SF) 111,000 SF Hard Surface Play 4,200 SF Area (SF) Structured Play 8,720 SF Area (SF) TOTAL 123,920 SF * Parking Spaces 70 Parent Drop off 295 (LF) PROJECTED COST CONSTRUCTION COST: $37,999,000 – $40,659,485 PDP CONSTRUCTION COST: $40,899,064

  28. NEW 2‐STORY OPTION, MANTER SITE| FLOOR PLANS FIRST FLOOR PLAN

  29. NEW 2‐STORY OPTION, MANTER SITE| FLOOR PLANS SECOND FLOOR PLAN

  30. NEW 2‐STORY OPTION, MANTER SITE| VIEWS EAST VIEW EAST ELEVATION

  31. NEW 2‐STORY OPTION, MANTER SITE| MASSING

  32. NEW 3‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| SITE PLAN NEW 3 STORY ON TISBURY Turf Play Area (SF) 73,205 SF Hard Surface Play 4,200 SF Area (SF) Structured Play 16,113 SF Area (SF) TOTAL 93,518 SF * Parking Spaces 70 Parent Drop off 297 (LF) PROJECTED COST CONSTRUCTION COST: $35,379,000 ‐ $38,379,903 PDP CONSTRUCTION COST: $ N/A

  33. NEW 3‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| FLOOR PLANS FIRST FLOOR PLAN

  34. NEW 3‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| FLOOR PLANS SECOND FLOOR PLAN

  35. NEW 3‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| FLOOR PLANS THIRD FLOOR PLAN

  36. NEW 3‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| VIEWS SOUTH WEST VIEW WEST ELEVATION

  37. NEW 3‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| MASSING

  38. NEW 2‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| SITE PLAN NEW 2 STORY ON TISBURY Turf Play Area (SF) 63,499 SF Hard Surface Play 4,200 SF Area (SF) Structured Play 12,613 SF Area (SF) TOTAL 80,312 SF * Parking Spaces 58 Parent Drop off 325 (LF) PROJECTED COST CONSTRUCTION COST: $35,554,000 ‐ $38,653,069 PDP CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 40,677,692

  39. NEW 2‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| FLOOR PLANS FIRST FLOOR PLAN

  40. NEW 2‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| FLOOR PLANS SECOND FLOOR PLAN

  41. NEW 2‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| VIEWS SOUTH WEST VIEW WEST ELEVATION

  42. NEW 2‐STORY OPTION, TISBURY SITE| MASSING

  43. ADDITION‐RENOVATION| SITE PLAN ADD/RENO ON TISBURY Turf Play Area (SF) 65,037 SF Hard Surface Play 3,522 SF Area (SF) Structured Play Area 11,793 SF (SF) TOTALS: 80,352 SF * Parking Spaces 80 Parent Drop off (LF) 358 PROJECTED COST CONSTRUCTION COST: $35,634,000 ‐ $39,420,168 PDP CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 39,771,397

  44. ADDITION‐RENOVATION| FLOOR PLANS FIRST FLOOR PLAN

  45. ADDITION‐RENOVATION| FLOOR PLANS SECOND FLOOR PLAN

  46. ADDITION‐RENOVATION| FLOOR PLANS THIRD FLOOR PLAN

  47. ADDITION‐RENOVATION| VIEWS SOUTH VIEW SOUTH ELEVATION

  48. ADDITION‐RENOVATION| MASSING

  49. BASE REPAIR| EXISTING ON TISBURY Turf Play Area (SF) 93,224 SF Hard Surface Play 3,366 SF Area (SF) Structured Play Area 6,075 SF (SF) TOTALS: 102,665 SF * Parking Spaces 71 Parent Drop off (LF) 165 PROJECTED COST CONSTRUCTION COST: $17,111,554 ‐ $23,248,000 PDP CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 17,119,724

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend