time of flight detectors at rhic
play

Time of Flight Detectors at RHIC Time of Flight Measurements at - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Time of Flight Detectors at RHIC Time of Flight Measurements at RHIC ! TOF detector as a PID devices ! PHENIX-TOF and BRAHMS-TOF PHENIX Time-of-Flight Detector ! Mechanical design and PID capability ! Detector performance in


  1. Time of Flight Detectors at RHIC • Time of Flight Measurements at RHIC ! TOF detector as a PID devices ! PHENIX-TOF and BRAHMS-TOF • PHENIX Time-of-Flight Detector ! Mechanical design and PID capability ! Detector performance in year-1 operation • Hadron PID by PHENIX-TOF • Summary Tatsuya Chujo for the PHENIX Collaboration BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO @ CAARI 2000 Univ. of North Texas, TX 11/1/2000

  2. Time of Flight Measurements at RHIC • Hadronic observables for QGP search 1. Identified single particle spectra and yields 2. Special and temporal evolution of the source, extrapolated by Hanbury-Brown Twiss effect (HBT) 3. Strangeness abundance In-medium modification of φ meson’s property 4. ………… Precise measurement of identified hadrons in wide p T range is required to understand the collision dynamics at RHIC Needed high timing resolution TOF detector at RHIC experiments BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO @ CAARI 2000 Univ. of North Texas, TX 11/1/2000

  3. Why PID by TOF Is Important ? PID by dE/dx in TPC (STAR) PID by TOF (WA98) from T. Ullrich talk at DNP2000 TOF – TOF expected [ns] 1.0 GeV/c • Limitation of PID capability by dE/dx : p < 1 GeV/ c π π π π /K separation • PID by TOF : Clear π π π π /K/p separation at higher momentum. BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO @ CAARI 2000 Univ. of North Texas, TX 11/1/2000

  4. TOF Detectors in HI Experiments SPS-WA98 ARM II (1995-1996) AGS-E866 (1993-1996) AGS-E802 (1987-1996) • TOF is considered as the most reliable and stable devices for PHENIX charged particle identification. (2000-) BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO @ CAARI 2000 Univ. of North Texas, TX 11/1/2000

  5. Performance @ CERN WA98 Experiment TOF resolution PID performance σ TOF = 85 ps σ σ σ Selected high momentum pions TOF – TOF expected [ns] • Achieved timing resolution : σ σ σ TOF = 85 ps σ • Demonstrated clear π π /K/p separation. π π • Installed tested WA98-TOF counter in PHENIX. BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO @ CAARI 2000 Univ. of North Texas, TX 11/1/2000

  6. TOF Detectors at RHIC H2 H1 BBC (start timing) TOF PHENIX Central Arm Detectors TOFW BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO @ CAARI 2000 Univ. of North Texas, TX 11/1/2000

  7. PHENIX-TOF vs. BRAHMS-TOF PHENIX BRAHMS H1 H2 TOFW forward rap. forward rap. mid rap. Acceptance mid-rapidity 1.2 < η η < 3.5 η η 2.0 < η η η η < 3.5 0 < η η η η < 1.2 –0.35 < η η η η < 0.35 Distance from vertex 5m 9 m 20m 4m 4 σ π /K separation < 3.3 GeV/ c < 5.0 GeV/ c < 2.2 GeV/ c < 2.4 GeV/ c 4 σ K/p separation < 5.7 GeV/ c < 8.5 GeV/ c < 3.7 GeV/ c < 4.0 GeV/ c • BRAHMS : Cherenkov counters are also used for hadron PID at high momentum PHENIX : Finely segmented high resolution TOF at mid-rapidty. BRAHMS: Wide kinetic coverage, PID @ high momentum with Cherenkov counter. * In this talk, only PHENIX-TOF detector are reviewed. BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO @ CAARI 2000 Univ. of North Texas, TX 11/1/2000

  8. PHENIX-TOF Basic Design Acceptance : driven by HBT and φ meson ∆θ = 40 deg. ( ∆η = 0.7) , ∆φ = 45 deg. Timing Resolution : p T distribution more than 2 GeV/ c and φ meson measurement Required σ σ TOF < 80 ~ 100 ps for σ σ 4 σ π σ π σ π σ π /K separation at p = 2.4 GeV/ c 4 σ σ K/p separation at p = 4.0 GeV/ c σ σ (@ flight path = 5m) Segmentation : Keep the occupancy level < 10 % dN ch ≅ ≅ 1500 1000 segments dy ∆φ ∆φ = 45 deg. , ∆η ∆φ ∆φ ∆η = 0.7 ∆η ∆η TOF ~ 100 cm 2 /segment at 5 m from vertex BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO @ CAARI 2000 Univ. of North Texas, TX 11/1/2000

  9. PHENIX-TOF Components 96 slats/panel 385cm 10 panels 200cm • Scintillator : Bicron BC404 • decay constant : 1.8 ns • attenuation length : 160cm PMT 200cm • PMT : Hamamatsu R3478S • Rise time : 1.3 ns • Transit time : 14 + - 0.36 ns • Consists of 960 plastic scintillators • PMT readout at both ends of scint. (1920 ch.) BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO @ CAARI 2000 Univ. of North Texas, TX 11/1/2000

  10. Features of TOF Mechanical Design 1. Used Honeycomb Board for scint. stacking • Rigid structure with mass-less in 2m x 0.5 m • Carbon fiber sheet + “honeycomb” structure • Uniform structure 2. Used prism light guide to reduce dead space Prism light guide PMT Scintillator slat BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO @ CAARI 2000 Univ. of North Texas, TX 11/1/2000

  11. Front End Electronics (FEE) PMT input lemo FEE board (16 ch/board) Block Diagram of FEE QVC/AMU 12 bit ADC PMT Format Buffer Discr. TVC/AMU 12 bit ADC • Custom-made chips of TVC+AMU and QVC+AMU Overall timing resolution of < 25 ps • Use of Analogue Memory Unit (AMU) Programmable up to 4 µ µ µ sec delay w/o coaxial µ delay cables. Discriminator TVC+AMU chip (4ch /chip) Sub-board • 16 inputs for PMT signals per board, which are split for timing and charge measurements BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO @ CAARI 2000 Univ. of North Texas, TX 11/1/2000

  12. Front End Electronics (cont.) Elimination of Cross Talk between adjacent channels Each channel consists of two independent ch. 1. Signal : connected to PMT 2. Reference: antenna for cross talk elimination Channel 2 ADC counts 1: Signal No cross talk in differential output 2: Reference 1-2: Difference Channel 1 discriminator time BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO @ CAARI 2000 Univ. of North Texas, TX 11/1/2000

  13. TEC/TOF Matching TEC: Time Expansion Chamber σ σ σ TOF-TEC ~ 2 cm σ TOF • σ σ TOF-TEC = 2cm Corresponding to the TOF resolution of 120 ps σ σ • Consistent with TOF intrinsic timing resolution without slewing correction. Timing resolution will be improved by fine tuning of calibration parameters. σ σ σ σ TOF ~ 80 ps BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO @ CAARI 2000 Univ. of North Texas, TX 11/1/2000

  14. Global Track/TOF Association ∆ y [cm] Select in 2 σ σ radius σ σ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ z [cm] ∆ ∆ ∆ z [cm] ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ y [cm] Association window size : dr = 5 cm (~ 2 σ σ σ σ of in y-z projection plane) *Clear correlation between global tracks and TOF hit positions are seen BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO @ CAARI 2000 Univ. of North Texas, TX 11/1/2000

  15. Hadron PID by PHENIX-TOF Note: e + π π + PHENIX Preliminary π π * No slewing correction * Applied track association cut K + Proton : dr = 5 cm * No acceptance/efficiency/decay corrections PHENIX Preliminary p (a.u.) π + π π π PID cut K + K - Proton w/o PID cut π π π π - e - m 2 [GeV/c 2 ]   2     TOF = − Clear hadron PID achieved   2 2   m p 1     L   BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO @ CAARI 2000 Univ. of North Texas, TX 11/1/2000

  16. Summary Reviewed PHENIX-TOF detector functionality and performance from the • first RHIC run. • Tracking detectors (DC/PC/TEC) and TOF detector had been operated successfully during the run. • TOF intrinsic timing resolution ~120 ps have been achieved by TEC/TOF hit position matching without slewing correction. • Fine tuning of TOF timing calibration parameters will be done. Clear hadron PID have been achieved. • • Lots of interesting physics will come next. 1) Single particle spectra for π + , π − , K + , K - , p and  p(<p T >, centrality dependence) 2) Particle ratio K/ π ,  p/p etc. and their centrality/p T dependence 3) HBT analysis 4) φ K + K - physics BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO @ CAARI 2000 Univ. of North Texas, TX 11/1/2000

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend