Observation of Mechanical Triplet Vibrations in RHIC C. Montag, BNL - - PDF document

observation of mechanical triplet vibrations in rhic
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Observation of Mechanical Triplet Vibrations in RHIC C. Montag, BNL - - PDF document

Observation of Mechanical Triplet Vibrations in RHIC C. Montag, BNL Nanobeam 2002 Overview of RHIC: 12 oclock Polarimeters 2 oclock 10 oclock BRAHMS PHOBOS 8 oclock 4 oclock STAR N RF 6 oclock W E PHENIX


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Observation of Mechanical Triplet Vibrations in RHIC

  • C. Montag, BNL

Nanobeam 2002

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview of RHIC:

10 o’clock PHOBOS 12 o’clock Polarimeters 2 o’clock BRAHMS 4 o’clock RF 6 o’clock PHENIX Injection 8 o’clock STAR BLUE YELLOW N E S W

Superconducting two-ring heavy ion collider, 3.8 km circumference, γAu ≈ 100.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Spectra of horizontal BPM signals in both rings: Total amplitude corresponds to ≈ 5 . . . 10% of the rms beam size. Similar spectra → common source.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Schematic overview of a RHIC interaction region:

−100.0 −50.0 0.0 50.0 100.0 s/m −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 x/m DX DX IP D0 D0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q3 Q2 Q1 6 o’clock triplet 5 o’clock triplet

Triplet quadrupoles share a common cold mass for both beams.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Spectra of horizontal beam and triplet motion (IP 4 triplet):

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Dominant frequency lines in the horizontal BPM spectrum, and corresponding triplet locations: Frequency Triplet 7.75 12 8.825 8 10.14 4, 11, 12 10.625 9 10.825 2 11.00 11 11.325 6 12.700 (10) 13.000 1 13.275 unknown 13.55 9, (2) 14.325 2 15.950 2 16.133 4 16.500 8

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Mechanical resonance frequencies of the cold masses in the cryostat. Mechanical model: Quadrupole fd/Hz fq/Hz Q1 21.2 15.8 Q2 14.0 14.3 Q3 15.0 14.1

  • Resonance frequencies of this simple model

are very close to observed ones.

  • Vibrations disappeared when machine was

warmed up.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

RMS closed orbit distortion: σco(s) =

  • β(s)
  • β

2 sin πν σq |f| √ N Observed rms beam jitter corresponds to rms quadrupole jitter amplitudes of σq ≈ 0.5 µm. For the triplets as a whole, σtriplet ≈ 10 µm. Measured rms amplitudes on triplet cryostats are 200 nm at most. → Beam jitter is caused by vibration of the cold masses within the cryostat, rather than by motion of the entire triplet.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Anti-symmetric IR optics results in relative beam offset at IPs:

IP F D F F D F D F D D F D D0 D0 DX DX D0 D0

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Modulated beam-beam interaction may be the source of emittance growth at the begin of each luminosity run: Simulation studies are in progress to investigate this effect.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Conclusion

  • IR triplet vibrations have been identified

as source of horizontal beam jitter around 10 Hz.

  • Driving force seems to be related to cryo

system.

  • Measurements inside one triplet beam pipe

in progress.

  • Plan to permanently attach accelerometers

to cold masses in one triplet.

  • Modulated beam-beam offset probably

causes emittance dilution at the beginning

  • f each luminosity run (needs to be

investigated).