Thomas Sullivan President, Rockpointe March 2015 Thomas Sullivan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

thomas sullivan
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Thomas Sullivan President, Rockpointe March 2015 Thomas Sullivan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Thomas Sullivan President, Rockpointe March 2015 Thomas Sullivan Former political consultant who founded Rockpointe, Inc., an accredited bio- medical education company in 1995 Authority in changing medical education environment and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Thomas Sullivan

President, Rockpointe March 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Thomas Sullivan

  • Former political consultant who founded

Rockpointe, Inc., an accredited bio- medical education company in 1995

  • Authority in changing medical education

environment and economy

  • Author of Policy and Medicine, the

leading online coverage of the Sunshine Act, a resource informing the medical community on trends, threats and changing processes

  • Disclaimers: Information provided is for

educational purposes and should not be construed as legal advice

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Agenda

  • Overview of Sunshine Act
  • Review 2013 Data
  • A Look at Three Years of

Massachusetts Data

  • Discuss Reaction
  • Recommendations
  • Resources
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Overview of Sunshine Act

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Background on the Sunshine Act, Section 6002 of the Affordable Care Act

  • Senator Grassley of Iowa and former Senator

Kohl of Wisconsin introduced unsuccessful versions of a Sunshine bill in 2007 and again in 2009, focused on public disclosure of the financial relationships between physicians and the pharmaceutical, device, and biologics industries.

  • The Sunshine Act was finally enacted as a small provision in the much

larger Affordable Care Act in 2010 (Section 6002).

  • The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) was delegated

the task of creating the necessary regulations to implement it.

  • Following numerous delays, CMS released the final regulations on

February 8, 2013.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

In General

  • The Sunshine Act requires applicable manufacturers (AM) of

“covered” drugs, devices, biologics, or medical supplies to report annually to the Secretary of HHS certain payments or other transfers

  • f value to covered recipients (CR)--physicians and teaching hospitals.
  • The Sunshine Act does not “ban” any payments but simply requires

reporting of payments and transfers of value.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Who Reports?

  • (1) Applicable manufacturers of covered drugs,

devices, biologicals, and medical supplies covered by Medicare, Medicaid, or CHIP are required to report on their transfers of value

  • (2) Applicable Group Purchasing Organizations (GPOs)

– Report only physician ownership, investment interests – Definition includes physician owned distributors (PODs) that purchase products for resale

  • Excludes OTC-only makers

Covered recipients, including colon and rectal surgeons, have no reporting obligations. Only manufacturers are subject to Civil Monetary Penalties for noncompliance.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Who Is Reported On?

  • Physician/and or group practice

– MD’s, DO’s, Dentists, Dental Surgeons, Podiatrists, Optometrists,

  • r Chiropractors

– All physicians that have a current license regardless of whether enrolled with CMS, or whether treating patients

  • Ownership interests of employees of manufacturers and

immediate family members

  • Payments to non-CRs meant to pass through to physicians

must be reported as indirect payments

  • Sunshine Act excludes: payments to bona fide employee of

applicable manufacturer (except ownership interest), residents, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, physicians in their capacity as payments

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Who Is Reported On?

Teaching hospital

– Any Institution receiving payments under:

  • Indirect medical education (IME)
  • Direct Graduate Medical Education
  • Psychiatric hospital IME

CMS publishes an annual list identifying the teaching hospitals that are affected (over 1200)

Does not include payments to non- healthcare departments at universities affiliated with hospital

Must report indirect payments as required

slide-10
SLIDE 10

What is Reported? Three Open Payments Databases

  • General
  • Ownership
  • Research
slide-11
SLIDE 11

General Database

What information is reported?

  • Covered recipient name and business address
  • NPI Number and Specialty
  • State professional license #(s), at least one State
  • The amount and date of payment
  • Form of Payment

–Cash or cash equivalent –In-kind items or services –Stock, stock option, ownership interest –Dividend, profit or other return on investment

  • Nature of such payment (16 categories)

–If payment or transfer relates to marketing, education, or research of a drug, device, biological, or medical supply, the related product must also be identified

  • Product Market Name and NDC Code
  • Context: 200 characters
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Travel Lodging Consulting Research Ownership Interests., Royalties and Licenses Gifts Entertainment Food and Beverage Speaking Education

General Database Nature of Payment

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Ownership

  • Employees of manufacturers, as well as their

immediate family members, with ownership interests in privately held companies with marketed products must be reported:

– Spouse – Natural or adoptive parent, child or sibling – Father, mother, daughter, son, brother or sister- in-law – Stepparent, stepchild, stepbrother, or stepsister – Grandparent or grandchild – Spouse of grandparent or grandchild

  • CMS gives an exemption on this requirement if the manufacturer or GPO

does not know of the relationship

  • Only 224 of the reported entries in 2013 were owned by immediate

relatives, worth $51,675,944

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Research

  • All payments made in connection

with an activity that meets the definition of research, and that are subject to a written agreement, contract, or research protocol, or both, are reported under “special rules.”

  • List Principle Investigators under

total amount of the study

  • Certain research payments made

to a CR by an AM under a product research or development agreement may be delayed from publication on the Web site.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Must also report indirect payments

  • Direct Payment

– Manufacturer pays physician or hospital directly

  • Indirect Payment

– Manufacturer pays a 3rd party directly, the 3rd party then pays a physician or Hospital

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Payment Exclusion Categories

  • 1. Indirect payments where AM is

unaware of identity of CR

  • 2. Payments <$10 unless annual

>$100

  • 3. Product samples, vouchers,

coupons

  • 4. Educational materials/items that

directly benefit patients or intended for patient use, value of services to educate patients

  • 5. 90 day equipment loans
  • 6. Items/services under contract

warranty

  • 7. Physician as patient
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Continuing Medical Education

  • The Sunshine Act first included a specific exemption for accredited

CME speaker fees if the program was accredited by one of five specific bodies. CMS deleted this original language, but effectively incorporated the CME exemption for speakers and attendees at accredited CME events.

  • Where sponsors do not “require, instruct, direct, or otherwise cause

the [CME] event provider to provide the payment…to a covered recipient,” such payments are not reportable. CMS indicates manufacturers meet this threshold when they do not (1) select or pay the speaker directly, or (2) provide the CME provider with a distinct list of speakers to consider.

  • CMS notes they “will provide sub-regulatory guidance specifying

tuition fees provided to physician attendees that have been generally subsidized at continuing education events by manufacturers are not expected to be reported.”

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Review & Dispute

  • Prior to data publication in June 2015,

register with the Open Payments system at cms.gov/openpayments in

  • rder to review data that will be made

public, resolve data disputes, and request data corrections during the 45-day review and dispute period.

  • The Open Payments system will alert the reporting applicable

manufacturer or GPO of the dispute. After being alerted, the AM

  • r GPO will work with you directly to resolve the dispute. Any data

that needs to be changed will be re-reported. AMs and GPOs then have 15 days to resolve and submit corrections. Disputed data that is not resolved by the end of the 15-day period will be published on the public website, but will be marked as disputed.

  • In 2014 only 4.8 percent of physicians and 29.8 percent of

hospitals registered to review their data

slide-19
SLIDE 19

2013 Data

slide-20
SLIDE 20

What Can We Glean From Year 1? A lot of missing payments

Entity Total Identified Yet to Be Reported Percent Missing

Physicians 546,000 360,000 186,000 34.1% Teaching Hospitals 1,360 873 487 35.8% AM’s and GPO’s 1,419 1379 40 02.8% Records 4,400,000, 2,700,000 1,700,000 38.7% Amounts $3.5 Billion $1.3 Billion $2.2 Billion 62.8%

Does not include $1.1 billion of disputes and delayed research (full total = $4.6 billion)

Source: Compiled from U.S. Department of Health & Human Services data

  • penpaymentsdata.cms.gov
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Many Payments Lack Names

Citing data inconsistencies and uncertainty, the federal government withheld the names

  • f doctors and

hospitals for 40% of

  • payments. This

chart shows the percent of money that was withheld.

– ProPublica 10/1/14

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Most Payments Were Very Small

Less than $10, 366,113, 14% Between $10-$15, 875,887, 33% Between $15-$20, 465,816, 18% Between $20- $100, 562,241, 21% Greater than $100, 356,617, 14%

Payments Number <$1.00 24,897 <$.50 9,437 <$.01 646

Source: Compiled from U.S. Department of Health & Human Services data openpaymentsdata.cms.gov

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Estimate to Collect Information

  • Centers for Medicare and

Medicaid Services estimated that the program would cost physicians and industry

$629,479,56 1 over 3 years

Source: Open Payments Final Rule, Federal Register February 2013

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Payments by Recipient Type

[VALUE], [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE], [PERCENTAGE]

Physicians Teaching Hospitals

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Payments by Physician Type Identified 2013 Data

Chiropractor 0% Doctor of Dentistry 8% Doctor of Optometry 0% Doctor of Osteopathy 2% Doctor of Podiatric Medicine 3% [CATEGORY NAME] [PERCENTAGE]

Source: Compiled from U.S. Department of Health & Human Services data openpaymentsdata.cms.gov

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Payments by Company

Courtesy Huron Consulting

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Nature of Payments Detail

Nature of Payments Total Percent of Total Research $1,486,242,674 60.34% Royalty or License $302,474,187 12.28% Services Other than Consulting $202,557,342 8.22% Consulting Fee $158,200,318 6.42% Food and Beverage $92,816,309 3.77% Travel and Lodging $74,075,322 3.01% Grant $38,126,886 1.55% Education $26,667,323 1.08% Honoraria $25,544,566 1.04% Gift $19,213,865 0.78% Faculty at Non Accredited Event $14,844,660 0.60% Current or prospective ownership or investment interest $10,567,522 0.43% Facility Fees (TH Only) $4,744,889 0.19% Speaking at Accredited Event $4,221,536 0.17% Charitable Contribution $2,531,755 0.10% Entertainment $157,333 0.01% Total $2,462,986,488

Source: Compiled from U.S. Department of Health & Human Services data openpaymentsdata.cms.gov

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Hospital Payments/Category

Category Nationwide % Total New Jersey % Total Research $175,614,096 42.18% $1,519,736 68.92% Royalty or License $147,707,114 35.48% $100,000 4.54% Grant $32,960,055 7.92% $72,040 3.27% Speaking/Faculty/NonCME $16,776,971 4.03% $134,872 6.12% Consulting Fee $14,402,011 3.46% $44,266 2.01% Gift $13,871,646 3.33% $77,678 3.52% Education $7,143,789 1.72% $44,097 2.00% Facility Fees (TH Only) $4,744,889 1.14% $79,155 3.59% Charitable Contribution $2,356,541 0.57% $111,650 5.06% Honoraria $174,567 0.04% $14,720 0.67% Food and Beverage $112,622 0.03% $6,453 0.29% Speaker/Faculty, Non Accred $13,002 0.00% $250 0.01%

Total $416,332,265 $2,204,917 0.53%

Raw Data: Courtesy of Huron Consulting

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Payments by Physician Specialty

Rank Physician Specialty # Payments Total Average 1 Orthopedic Surgery 52,962 $73,165,243 $1,381 2 Internal Medicine 379,165 $24,562,672 $65 3 Cardiology 149,271 $21,797,429 $146 4 Neurology 82,503 $15,825,438 $192 5 Neurological Surgery 21,837 $13,507,585 $619 6 Gastroenterology 88,981 $13,468,983 $151 7 Psychiatry 84,901 $13,465,762 $159 8 Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 54,811 $12,195,751 $223 9 Family Medicine 387,290 $10,905,193 $28 10 General Surgery 37,268 $9,934,689 $267

Open Payments General Payment Database (Identified Records) 2013

slide-30
SLIDE 30

General Payments to Hospitals in NJ

Teaching Hospital Name

Total Payment % of Total

Masked by CMS $ 336,351.06 49.09% Ahs Hospital Corp. $ 54,126.67 7.90% Princeton Healthcare System $ 50,249.54 7.33% Deborah Heart And Lung Center $ 31,763.00 4.64% Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, Inc $ 28,101.93 4.10% Meridian Hospitals Corporation $ 21,035.48 3.07% The Cooper Health System $ 20,255.26 2.96% Englewood Hospital And Medical Center $ 18,207.22 2.66% Hudson Hospital Opco Llc $ 14,387.72 2.10% St Josephs Hospital And Medical Center $ 13,364.00 1.95% Saint Barnabas Medical Center $ 13,266.58 1.94% ATLANTICARE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER $ 13,112.06 1.91% SOMERSET MEDICAL CENTER $ 10,517.04 1.54% Trinitas Regional Medical Center $ 7,253.56 1.06% South Jersey Hospital Inc $ 6,934.34 1.01%

Raw Data: Courtesy of Huron Consulting

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Ownership Interests by Specialty

Rank Specialty Invested Current Interest % Return

1 Orthopedic Surgery $51,458,363 $73,839,114 43.5% 2 Obstetrics & Gynecology $44,833,476 $42,701,714

  • 4.8%

3 Gastroenterology $44,407,718 $41,910,224

  • 5.6%

4 Cardiovascular Disease $36,413,038 $35,744,398

  • 1.8%

5 Ophthalmology $8,408,034 $31,160,069 270.6% 6 Surgery/Hospice and Palliative Medicine* $0 $21,733,719 Infinity 7 Neurological Surgery $13,353,588 $20,818,359 55.9% 8 Anesthesiology $4,057,986 $13,718,687 238.1% 9 Radiology/Diagnostic Radiology $2,068,745 $10,794,529 421.8% 10 Urology $6,196,856 $10,783,906 74.0% 11 Internal Medicine $4,490,437 $8,959,934 99.5%

* Represents 1 investor and one company

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Ownership Interest NJ Docs

Last Name Initial Investment Current Value

Piskun $0 $21,733,719 Hensle $1,150,224 $4,208,291 Reiley $1,150,224 $4,098,921 Dello Russo $1,334,150 $1,332,500 Kindermann $144,000 $790,800 Parekh $450,000 $581,250 Lanteri $37,700 $576,179 PETROSINI $286,244 $367,906 HOLLAWELL $203,002 $289,815 GORMLEY $200,000 $200,000 DWYER $114,400 $114,400 Husserl $104,418 $104,418 ZANGER $103,392 $103,392 Piccoli $199,996 $102,562

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Research

Policy and Medicine 10/1/14

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Research by Specialty

Rank Specialty Total Research Payments 1 Medical Oncology $5,121,943 2 Internal Medicine $3,389,810 3 Ophthalmology $3,247,256 4 Hematology & Oncology $3,180,196 5 Pediatric Hematology-Oncology $3,017,692 6 Pulmonary Disease $2,793,114 7 Other Service Providers/ Specialist $2,491,590 8 Radiation Oncology $2,391,436 9 Family Medicine $2,249,035 10 Rheumatology $1,362,191 11 Surgery $1,250,718

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Research Payments to NJ Teaching Hospitals

Teaching Hospital Payment Percent

  • f Total

Masked by CMS $698,014 45.9% Ahs Hospital Corp. $233,317 15.4% University of Medicine and Dentistry of NJ $171,322 11.3% The Cooper Health System $103,762 6.8% Saint Barnabas Medical Center $76,763 5.1% Meridian Hospitals Corporation $60,343 4.0% Deborah Heart And Lung Center $43,786 2.9% Saint Michael'S Medical Center $33,300 2.2% Centrastate Medical Center Inc. $23,412 1.5% Winthrop University Hospital Association $16,250 1.1% Englewood Hospital And Medical Center $13,900 0.9%

Open Payments 2013 Data – Policy and Medicine

Research Payments to NJ Teaching Hospitals

slide-36
SLIDE 36

A Look at Massachusetts

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Total Companies Reporting in Massachusetts

2010 2011 2012 Difference 2011-2012 Difference 2010-2012 Total $64,572,273 $62,451,397 $55,615,073

  • 12%
  • 13.9%

Payments 17,162.00 16,443.00 19,549.00 16% 13.9% Average Payment $3,763 $4,265 $2,845

  • 50%
  • 24.4%

Median Payment $124 $147 $124

  • 18%

0.0%

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Massachusetts Top 20 Companies

2010 2011 2012 % Change 2011-2012 % Change 2010-2012 Total Payments $38,038,051 $35,106,567 $27,162,992

  • 23%
  • 29%

# of Payments 18,715 15,956 18,213 14%

  • 3%

Payment Size $2,032 $2,200 $1,491

  • 32%
  • 27%

Recipients 5,836 4,824 6,706 39% 15% Payment/Recipient $6,518 $7,277 $4,051

  • 44%
  • 38%
slide-39
SLIDE 39

Breakdown of Payments 2012 – Massachusetts

Compensation 58% Grants/Education 17% CME Conferences 9% Education/Training 4% Other 4% Food 3% Marketing Studies 3% Charatable Donantions 2%

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Mass Education 2010-2012

2010 2011 2012 3 Years % Charitable Donation Total $2,949,818 $1,109,588 $1,447,269 ($1,502,549)

  • 51%

CMEs, third-party Conferences,

  • r Meetings Total

$7,647,238 $8,908,006 $5,085,729 ($2,561,509)

  • 33%

Compensation for Bona Fide Services Total $35,070,883 $32,627,559 $32,097,007 ($2,973,876)

  • 8%

Education/Training Total $2,516,437 $2,509,912 $2,170,666 ($345,771)

  • 14%

Food Total $1,181,526 $1,114,095 $1,556,465 $374,939 32% Grants/Educational Gifts Total $11,491,092 $11,717,624 $9,642,140 ($1,848,952)

  • 16%

Marketing Studies Total $1,222,770 $704,989 $1,507,442 $284,672 23% Other Total $2,345,808 $3,759,625 $2,059,638 ($286,170)

  • 12%

Grand Total $64,425,572 $62,451,397 $55,566,356 ($8,859,216)

  • 14%
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Breakdown of Recipients 2012 Massachusetts

Physicians 56% Accute Hospital 19% Clinical Labs 13% Clinic 5% Nurses 3% Pharmacists 2% Dentist 1% NP's 1% PA's 0% Podiatrists 0% Chiropractor 0% Optomitrists 0%

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Massachusetts Top 50 Physicians

2010 2011 2012 Total $8,874,882 $8,692,011 $8,878,302 Average $177,497 $181,510 $177,566 Median $164,893 $152,926 $140,354 Change

  • 2.06%

2.10%

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Massachusetts Data Top 50 Doctors: 2009-2012

Of those listed four times in the top 50 – only 10 for all four years

1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years Physicians 59 25 17 10 Average/Year $135,746 $155,017 $154,346 $187,811

Massachusetts Top 50 Physicians

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Massachusetts Hospital Data Top 50 Hospitals

2010 2011 2010-2011 Difference 2012 2011-2012 Difference 2010-2012 Difference Total $16,715,739 $12,744,273

  • 24%

$5,218,848

  • 59%
  • 69%

Average $303,922 $245,082

  • 19%

$89,980

  • 63%
  • 70%

Median $14,290 $5,419

  • 62%

$5,729 6%

  • 60%
slide-45
SLIDE 45

Reaction

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Reaction Thus Far

The Open Payments or “Sunshine Act” is designed to prey on the ancient physician prejudice that earning money is somehow beneath the profession, much like physician advertising was once taboo and frowned upon by the old guard. –Physicians Practice Magazine

Augusta Examiner

So Much For Transparency, Open Payments Database Toggles the Mind – The Wall Street Journal Another Government Website Rollout That Is Found Wanting – The New York Times Doctor Payments Show Little Value at Launch Time – US News Open Payments Site Launches to User Complaints – Health Leaders

As the inventor of a solution that preserves eye tissue for surgery, Bloomington’s Dr. Richard Lindstrom has given sight to legions of people worldwide and become highly sought after for speeches and consulting deals. He has been handsomely rewarded for his work. Lindstrom received $330,452 in payments just during the last five months of 2013 from companies whose ophthalmology products he prescribes for patients, according to a newly published federal database. (Minneapolis Star Tribune)

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Innuendos

“…doctors reaping over half a million dollars each…” “…murky financial ties between physicians and the health care industry…” “…lucrative arrangements are just some of the findings…” “For some doctors, treating patients isn’t the only way to make money.” “A Michigan plastic surgeon was paid more than $300,000 to travel the world teaching doctors about new cosmetic products like a breast implant.” “The retired chief executive of the Mayo Clinic, who once helped write its conflict of interest policy, received more than $237,000 in compensation for serving on multiple corporate boards.”

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Going Forward: Who Will Use The Data?

  • Prosecutors

– Anti kickback – False claims – Stark II – Consumer protection

  • Plaintiff Attorneys

– Malpractice and product liability suits – Qui Tam – Divorce and business – Consumer protection suits

  • Media
  • IRS
  • Employers
  • Journal Editors
  • FDA/PHS/CDC/NIH
  • Academic Medical

Centers

  • Medical Societies
  • Students
slide-49
SLIDE 49

Recommendations

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Physician Recommendations

  • Be sure to utilize the review period.

This past year, physicians saw that improper payments were paired next to their names.

  • Payments were also mixed between

doctors with similar first and last names.

  • CMS took Open Payments offline to work out these problems.

They de-identified at least one-third of the system’s data because of potential accuracy issues.

  • Begin the Open Payments registration process early;

physicians this past year indicated the process was very time consuming and had some technical glitches.

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Faculty Considerations

  • Updated Disclosure Forms that are accurate
  • Is the NPPES Data Correct
  • Register for Open Payments
  • Do I know all the interactions that I have had
  • Do I know the “value” of travel, lodging and meals for

non CME activities (Consulting, IRB, Non Accredited)

  • Am I compliant with Intuitional Requirements
  • Omission is a future problem
slide-52
SLIDE 52

Prepare Your Faculty

For Speakers, Consultants and Researchers

  • Have signed copies of all agreements for services

– Make sure agreements comply with applicable anti- kickback statues – Compensation needs to reflect fair market value for services delivered

  • Keep a running file of your events, honorarium payments
  • Request a cost statement for each event from the

company hiring you – including, meals, all forms of transportation, and lodging

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Teaching Hospital Considerations

  • Know which departments and offices are interacting with

industry

  • Manage all research and consulting contracts through a

central office to ensure accuracy

  • Conduct internal FMV tests to ensure that you are now
  • ver billing (Kickback)
  • Secure access to key faculty accounts on open payments

– do the hard work for faculty

  • Review the data when it comes out – There may be some

surprises

  • Know your disclosure policies may not match Sunshine

Database (Cleveland Clinic)

  • Review your Contracts for Clauses Around Sunshine
slide-54
SLIDE 54

Further Recommendations

  • While the Open Payments database was missing a lot of

data, CMS has reportedly improved its technical

  • processes. In June of next year, many more payments will

likely be posted.

  • If patients ask about these relationships, help your faculty

to understand to be honest. Focus on why working with industry is important:

– Practicing surgeons are a vital source of information for companies and are also essential for training other surgeons going forward – Innovative devices and therapies stem from collaboration

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Remember Other Disclosures

  • Physicians and Institutions financial relationships with medical

products industry is required to be reported by numerous

  • rganizations:

– National Institutes of Health (NIH) – Food and Drug Administration (FDA) – Universities – Hospitals – Accredited Education – Medical Journals – Institutional Review Boards – Associations

  • States with Disclosure Laws: Massachusetts, Vermont, Minnesota,

West Virginia, Connecticut, D.C.

  • International Disclosure: Several countries have adopted similar

Sunshine language; dozens of European member companies have adopted disclosure provisions

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Remember Other Laws

  • Anti Kickback
  • False Claims Act
  • IRS Reporting
  • Stark
  • State Regulations
slide-57
SLIDE 57

Open Payments Resources

  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

– http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/National-Physician-Payment- Transparency-Program/index.html

  • Policy and Medicine

– http://www.policymed.com/physician-payment-sunshine-act/

  • American Medical Association

– www.ama-assn.org/go/sunshine

  • Partners for Healthy Dialogs

– http://www.healthydialogues.org/health-care-professionals

  • Advamed

– http://advamed.org/issues/16/physician-payments-sunshine-law

  • CME Coalition (Including Guide and Q&A)

– http://cmecoalition.org/resources

  • Medscape (CME Accredited Web courses)

– http://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/780900 – http://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/807771

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Life Science Compliance Update

  • False Claims Act and Qui

TamDevelopments

  • Health Care Fraud Alerts and

Enforcement Trends

  • Corporate Integrity

Agreements

  • Physician Payments Sunshine

Act

  • FDA Guidance and Warning

Letters

  • International Regulations

and Enforcement

  • Best Practices For

Compliance

www.Lifescicompliance.com

slide-59
SLIDE 59

For More Information

Thomas Sullivan

tsullivan@rockpointe.com 202-309-3507 www.policymed.com www.rockpointe.com