thermodynamics of ads 3 gravity
play

Thermodynamics of AdS 3 gravity: extremal CFTs vs. semi-classical - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Strings and Fields 2019 @ YITP, Kyoto 20 Aug 2019 Thermodynamics of AdS 3 gravity: extremal CFTs vs. semi-classical gravity Yasunari Kurita Kanagawa Inst. Tech. 1 AdS 3 pure gravity Asymptotic symmetry is Virasoro sym. with central charge


  1. Strings and Fields 2019 @ YITP, Kyoto 20 Aug 2019 Thermodynamics of AdS 3 gravity: extremal CFTs vs. semi-classical gravity Yasunari Kurita Kanagawa Inst. Tech. 1

  2. AdS 3 pure gravity Asymptotic symmetry is Virasoro sym. with central charge (Brown-Henneaux 1986) In terms of AdS/CFT, quantum gravity is boundary CFT. ⇒ Find the CFT! At T =0, the boundary is cylinder. For T > 0, it is 2-dim. Torus. Author: Polytope24 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdS/CFT_correspondence From now on, we consider CFT on torus 2

  3. Witten(2007) • Assumption : holomorphic factorization • Witten’s conjecture (2007) : quantum theory of AdS 3 pure gravity is extremal CFTs with c = 24𝑙 (𝑙 = 1,2,3, … ) and it’s anti -holomorphic pair ℓ 𝐻 = 16𝑙 is quantized. For each k, one CFT possibly exists. Note 1 : Note 2 : 「 large k 」~「 small G 」 ( semi-classical ) 「 large k 」~「 large c 」 ( thermodynamic limit ) This has nice microscopic description for BTZ entropy! 3

  4. BTZ entropy Witten 2007 • In extremal CFTs, for large k correction ? Bekenstein-Hawking # of primaries which create BTZ 4

  5. Appendix: Extremal CFT For c =24 k, extremal CFT is a CFT whose lowest dimension of nontrivial primary is k + 1 (its maximum). For c =24 k, it is known that the lowest dimension of nontrivial primary is equal to or less than k +1. Note 1 : large mass gap Extremal CFT spectrum AdS 3 classical gravity 𝑀 0 M Primary and its decendants massive BTZ 1 Nontrivial first primary 0 massless BTZ ( not black hole ) massgap massgap (conical singularity) (Virasoro decendants − 1 of the ground state) Global AdS 3 −𝑙 Ground state 8𝐻 Interpretation: nontrivial primary fields make BTZ black hole 5

  6. Appendix2: Extremal CFT Note 2 : the partition function is uniquely determined! 𝜐 is moduli of the boundary torus Contributions from Ground state and its Virasoro descendants primaries ( 𝑀 0 ≥ 1 ) (these determine the pole structure at q= 0.) Mathematical fact : holomorphic & modular inv. ⇒ “ 𝑎(𝜐) is a polynomial of J - function” Determine the polynomial of J to have the same pole Klein ’s structure with Z , then the partition function is uniquely j-invariant determined . 6

  7. This work • investigates thermodynamic quantities obtained from extremal CFT partition functions Z k for several k . → We find usual Hawking-Page transition (AdS 3 ↔ BTZ) • For rapidly rotating spacetime, we also find several new phases which do not appear in the usual Hawking-Page transition. This is consistent with the phase diagram obtained by Maloney-Witten 2007. • compare these (quantum) results with those of semi-classical gravity. 7

  8. 3-dim. Hawking-Page Semi-classical Free energy entropy S AdS 3 phase BTZ phase BTZ AdS 3 T T c AdS 3 BTZ HP critical temperature Non-rotating Im 𝜐 𝜐 -plane Limit of Ω E Limit of Ω E AdS 3 BTZ conical? Moduli parameter complex ? 8 Re 𝜐

  9. Partition functions of extremal CFTs • For first several k, obtained by FLM(‘84) having Monster symmetry Indices are k Given k, the partition function is computable! For example : k = 10 9

  10. Extremal CFT Non-rotating case • k =20 case • k =1 case S S BTZ BTZ T T AdS 3 AdS 3 For large k, the transition (at T HP ) becomes sharp! The sharp transition appears in the semi-classical limit. One can see that quantum theory for AdS 3 gravity might be a sequence of extremal CFTs. 10

  11. Rotating case For small k, one finds smooth transition between AdS 3 and BTZ in many parameter region, as non-rotating case. However, a t some points, singular behavior appears. For example : k =1 , Ω 𝐹 ℓ = 0.2375 27 ・・・ entropy Free energy Angular momentum This singular transition appears at T HP The transition appears even for small k, Zeroes of Z k that is, not in the thermodynamic limit. 11

  12. Ω 𝐹 = 0.2375 ・・ 𝐾 → −∞ Zeroes of Z 1 𝐾 → ∞ Ω 𝐹 = −0.2375 ・・ 𝜐 -plane At the zeroes of the partition function, the free energy diverges. 𝑎 1 =0 𝑎 1 =0 The zeroes (shown as in the right figure) are on the unit circle | 𝜐| = 1 , which corresponds to the Hawking-Page critical temperature. ー 1 ー 1/2 1/2 0 1 Along the pink line, J function takes real value. 12

  13. Spin up • At Ω 𝐹 ℓ ≃ 0.790295 ( for the case of k =1 ) J entropy Free energy AdS 3 phase BTZ New phase These two critical temperatures are different from T HP 13

  14. Zeroes of Z 1 again ( k =1 case ) 𝜐 平面 S and T transformations 𝜐 → − 1 𝜐 → 𝜐 + 1, Ω 𝐹 ℓ = −0. 79 𝜐 Ω 𝐹 ℓ = 0. 79 and their combinations move zeroes Z 1 = 0 to other points which are not on the circle | 𝜐 |=1. ⇒ The transition occurs at 𝑈 ≠ 𝑈 𝐼𝑄 ー 1 ー 1/2 0 1/2 1 The appearance of new phase might be a prediction from 3-dim. Quantum gravity (extremal CFT). 14

  15. Semi-classical limit ( 𝑙 → ∞ ) • For large k, the # of zeroes of 𝑎 𝑙 increases and the zeroes 𝑎 1 =0 condense into the red line. ⇒ phase boundary The condensation of zeroes has been proved by Maloney and Witten (2007). ー 1 ー 1/2 1/2 0 1 Inconsistent with the semi-classical result! 15

  16. Phase diagram Inverse temp. 𝛾 = 𝑈 −1 𝛾Ω 𝐹 extremal CFT Semi-classical T = T HP AdS 3 AdS 3 Ω 𝐹 ℓ = −1 Ω 𝐹 ℓ = 1 BTZ BTZ Unknown? Conical? Complex? Maloney- Witten(‘07) Phase diagrams are different ! 16

  17. Discussion (summary) • There is an inconsistency in the semi-classical limt ( 𝑙 → ∞ ). Possibility 1 : unknown classical solution that corresponds to the new phase? Possibility 2 : Witten conjecture might get some correction at least for large k : t he quantum theory for pure AdS 3 gravity might not be the sequence of extremal CFTs. • conformal bootstrap : for 𝑙 ≥ 20 , non exisistence of extremal CFTs! Bae, Lee, Lee 2016 • The new phase at k =1 (the FLM model does exist) might be a new prediction from quantum gravity. In order to obtain semi-classical phase diagram, it seems that modular invariance has to be broken in large k limit. Is it correct? How? ( It also seems to be consistent with Honda-Iizuka-Tanaka-Terashima 2015 ) 17

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend