The Jet Kinematics of FSRQ 1928+738 Kunwoo Lee, Jongho Park, Sascha - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The Jet Kinematics of FSRQ 1928+738 Kunwoo Lee, Jongho Park, Sascha - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The Jet Kinematics of FSRQ 1928+738 Kunwoo Lee, Jongho Park, Sascha Trippe Seoul National University Basic Info of FSRQ 1928+738 MOJAVE 15 GHz Common Name : 4C +73.18 z ~ 0.302 Flat Spectrum Radio Quasar S 43 > 3 Jy
- Common Name : 4C +73.18
- z ~ 0.302
- Flat Spectrum Radio Quasar
- Known to have large viewing angle
~13 deg (e.g. Hovatta 2009)
Basic Info of FSRQ 1928+738
S43>3Jy M BH∼10
8.57 M sol
http://www.physics.purdue.edu/astro/MOJAVE /sourcepages/1928+738.shtml
MOJAVE 15 GHz
Jet Bending
Lister & Homan (2005) Roland et al (2015) One of the major bending sources ! One of the binary SMBH candidates!
KaVA Monitoring
(2017.02 ~ )
- KaVA 43GHz Intensity Map
- KaVA 43GHz UV plane
- KaVA 43GHz Intensity Map
- Core a : innermost region
- Core b : recollimation shock
(& Knot A)
- Knot B : downstream jet component
- Knot C : downstream jet component
- Knot D : downstream jet component
1mas = 4.4pc
τ∼1
KaVA Monitoring
5 Jet regions
(2017.02 ~ )
stationary surface →jet ejection region → new ejection soon? τ∼1
KaVA Result – Core a
The brightest region →knot, passing through a recollimation shock
KaVA Result – Core b & Knot A
The brightest region →knot, passing through a recollimation shock
KaVA Result – Core b & Knot A
The brightest region →knot, passing through a recollimation shock
KaVA Result – Core b & Knot A
2nd brightest component →recently passed the recollimation shock
KaVA Result – Knot B
The weakest region →knot lost most of its energy → seems natural
KaVA Result – Knot C
2nd weakest region → Doppler boosted !! → bending towards LOS SD=δD
3 Sintr D≿SC=δC 3 Sintr C
KaVA Result – Knot D
δ= 1 γ(1−βcosθ) γvar=βapp
2 +δ 2+1
2δ θvar=arctan 2βapp βapp
2 +δ 2−1
Main Results – (1) Apparent Velocity
Separation from core [mas]
βapp= βsinθ (1−βcosθ)
βapp= βsinθ (1−βcosθ) δ= 1 γ(1−βcosθ) γvar=βapp
2 +δ 2+1
2δ θvar=arctan 2βapp βapp
2 +δ 2−1
Main Results – (1) Apparent Velocity
βappincreasesasa functionof distance!! why ? decreasingθ? ? →Deriveδ!!
c x (flux decay time in obs frame) = c x (shrank light travel time)
- = (physical size of knot)
δvar= sDL c Δtdecay(1+z)
Jorstad et al. (05, 17)
Main Results – (2) Doppler factor
Ex) Knot B
c Δtobs=c(1+z)Δtintr δ sD L (1+z)
2=c Δ tintr
Main Results – (2) Doppler factor
δ= 1 γ(1−βcosθ) γvar=βapp
2 +δ 2+1
2δ θvar=arctan 2βapp βapp
2 +δ 2−1
τdecay=1.3×τrising
Valtaoja et al (1999)
Separation from core [mas] Separation from core [mas]
δvar= sDL c Δtvar(1+z)
βapp= βsinθ (1−βcosθ)
Main Results – (2) Doppler factor
δ= 1 γ(1−βcosθ) γvar=βapp
2 +δ 2+1
2δ θvar=arctan 2βapp βapp
2 +δ 2−1
Separation from core [mas] Separation from core [mas]
βapp,δvarincreasesasa functionof distance!!
βapp= βsinθ (1−βcosθ)
Main Results – (3) Viewing angle
δ= 1 γ(1−βcosθ) γvar=βapp
2 +δ 2+1
2δ
θvar=arctan 2βapp βapp
2 +δ 2−1
Separation from core [mas]
βapp,δvarincreases asa functionof distance!!
~13deg (H09)
θo decreases as a functionof distance !! βapp= βsinθ (1−βcosθ)
Main Results – (3) Viewing angle
δ= 1 γ(1−βcosθ) γvar=βapp
2 +δ 2+1
2δ
θvar=arctan 2βapp βapp
2 +δ 2−1
LOS
Separation from core [mas]
βapp= βsinθ (1−βcosθ)
Main Results – (4) Lorentz factor
δ= 1 γ(1−βcosθ) γvar=βapp
2 +δ 2+1
2δ
θvar=arctan 2βapp βapp
2 +δ 2−1
βapp= βsinθ (1−βcosθ)
Main Results – (4) Lorentz factor
βapp= βsinθ (1−βcosθ)
Bending towards LOS Accelerating
Not only bending, but also accelerating !!
Under collimation !! θ∝ 1 Γ
sl=R(separation) st=R×sin(|PA−PA|)+r θproj=arctan( st sl )
Main Results – (5) Half Opening angle
θopdecreases as afunction of distance !!
tanθop=tanθprojsin θo
Discussion – Acceleration & Collimation
- Jet structure transits, Parabolic jet (being collimated) → Conical jet (ballistic)
Asada & Nakamura (2012), Nakamura & Asada (2013), Algaba+ (2017), Hada+ (2018)
Accelerating & Collimating at (0~5 mas)! KaVA 43GHz Magnetically dominated parabolic jet with bulk acceleration → conical jet with slow deceleration Potter & Cotter (2013) Decelerating at (~10 mas)?? KaVA 22GHz
Observation (M87+) Theory
z∼10
6 Rs(HST−1,M 87)
z∼10
6∼8 Rs(S ,1 H 0323+342)
Summary of the Jet Kinematics
The jet of 1928+738 is bending, moreover, bending towards our line of sight !!
- The jet of 1928+738 is accelerating & being collimated !!
(at 0 ~ 5 mas region)
- → Excellent laboratory for studying ‘Acceleration’ & ‘Collimation’ & ‘Bending’
- How about outer regions?
(at ~ 10 mas region) → further study with KaVA 22GHz
Thank you
βapp= βcosθ (1−βcosθ) δ= 1 γ(1−βcosθ) γvar=βapp
2 +δ 2+1
2δ
LOS
Separation from core [mas]
Discussion – Acceleration & Collimation
Discussion – Acceleration & Collimation
Accelerating & Collimating at (0~5 mas)! KaVA 43GHz Magnetically dominated parabolic jet with bulk acceleration → conical jet with slow deceleration Potter & Cotter (2013) Decelerating at (~10 mas)?? KaVA 22GHz
Observation (M87+) Theory
z∼10
6 Rs(HST−1,M 87)
z∼10
6∼8 Rs(S ,1 H 0323+342)
- Jet structure transits, Parabolic jet (being collimated) → Conical jet (ballistic)
Asada & Nakamura (2012), Nakamura & Asada (2013), Algaba+ (2017), Hada+ (2018)
Discussion – Acceleration & Collimation
Accelerating & Collimating at (0~5 mas)! KaVA 43GHz Magnetically dominated parabolic jet with bulk acceleration → conical jet with slow deceleration Potter & Cotter (2013) Decelerating at (~10 mas)?? KaVA 22GHz
Observation (M87+) Theory
z∼10
6 Rs(HST−1,M 87)
z∼10
6∼8 Rs(S ,1 H 0323+342)
- Jet structure transits, Parabolic jet (being collimated) → Conical jet (ballistic)
Asada & Nakamura (2012), Nakamura & Asada (2013), Algaba+ (2017), Hada+ (2018)
Summary of the Jet Kinematics
1928+738 is bending, moreover, towards our line of sight !!
- 1928+738 is accelerating & being collimated !!
(at 0 ~ 5 mas region)
- How about outer regions?
(at ~ 10 mas region) → further study with KaVA 22GHz
- How about inner regions?
(at
δ= 1 γ(1−βcosθ) γvar=βapp
2 +δ 2+1
2δ θvar=arctan 2βapp βapp
2 +δ 2−1
Discussion – Position Angle
Discussion – Outlier?
Accretion rate – Variability timescale
log(tintr)=1.88→3.15
- Not a true outlier ?
- It seems to be
a fundamental relation
Park & Trippe (2017)
Summary
- 1928+738 is not a true outlier of
‘accretion rate – variability timescale’ relation
- 1928+738 is bending,
moreover, towards our line of sight !!
- 1928+738 is accelerating & collimating !!
(at 0 ~ 5 mas region)
- How about outer regions?
(at ~ 10 mas region) → further study
δ= 1 γ(1−βcosθ) γvar=βapp
2 +δ 2+1
2δ θvar=arctan 2βapp βapp
2 +δ 2−1