The Green Cruise Port Project HELCOM Cooperation Platform Results of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶

Jan 05, 2024 6 likes •260 views

The Green Cruise Port Project HELCOM Cooperation Platform Results of Interreg Project Green Cruise Port Ingo Fehrs, Hamburg Port Authority Helsinki, March 27th, 2019 Green Cruise Port (GCP) Overview Basic Information EU Interreg Programme

SLIDE 1

The Green Cruise Port Project

HELCOM Cooperation Platform “Results of Interreg Project Green Cruise Port” Ingo Fehrs, Hamburg Port Authority Helsinki, March 27th, 2019

SLIDE 2

2

Basic Information

EU Interreg Programme

GCP is a project in the EU Interreg Baltic Sea Region Programme 2014‐2020

(www.interregbaltic.eu)

GCP elaborates a multidimensional strategic approach for a sustainable and qualitative

future development for cruise shipping in port areas.

GCP encourages investments and procedures in environmentally friendly cruise port

infra and superstructure in the Baltic Sea Region

GCP was implemented from March 2016 to February 2019.
GREEN CRUISE PORT embraces 20 partners, covering geographically all BSR countries

and The Netherlands.

Budget: 2.8 Mio € (ERDF/NO budget 2.1 Mio € plus 0.7 Mio € own contribution).

Green Cruise Port (GCP) Overview

SLIDE 3

3

GCP Overview

Basic Information

Map

SLIDE 4

4

Development of Sustainability in Cruise Port Locations Full Partner

1. Hamburg Port Authority
2. Hamburg Cruise Net e.V.
3. Rostock Port
4. Freeport of Riga Authority
5. Port of Tallinn
6. Klaipeda State Seaport Authority
7. Maritime Institute Gdansk
8. Port of Helsinki
9. Port of Bergen
10. Port of Esbjerg

SLIDE 5

5

11. Port of Oslo,
12. Port of Stockholm,
13. Port of Copenhagen
14. Rosmorport Kaliningrad Branch
15. Port of Amsterdam
16. Port of Gothenburg
17. Rosmorport Northwest Basin

Branch St. Petersburg

18. AIDA Cruises
19. TUI Cruises
20. Senate Chancellery of City of Hamburg

Development of Sustainability in Cruise Port Locations Associated Partner

SLIDE 6

6

Project Structure

WP2: Sustainable energy supply & solutions for emission reduction WP3: Smart cruise terminal buildings & reception facilities WP4: Smart cruise port traffic solutions & economic effects

Improvement

port infrastructure in order to reduce cruise vessel emissions in harbours by adaption of latest technical sustainabilty developments establish cruise port superstructure e.g. modern terminal buildings, barrier‐free access and suitable reception facilities Environment‐ friendly traffic inte‐ gration

cruise ports into local transport systems and economic impact on port cities and regions

WP1: Project Management, Administration, Communication

SLIDE 7

7

Project Structure

10 Workshops and 2 Conferences for Partners and Stakeholders
2 Best Practice Tours for Partners
7 Steering Committee Meetings (internal)
12 Conceptual‐, Analytical‐, Technical‐Studies and Business Plans (ST)
Green Cruise Port Action Plan 2030

SLIDE 8

8

Cruise industry in the Baltic Sea Region faces two main challenges

PROJECTIONS FOR SHIPPING’S CO2 EMISSIONS TO 2035 cruise industry has to respond to environmental challenges and try to minimize negative externalities

Source: ITF (2018): Decarbonising Maritime Transport

DEVELOPMENT OF CRUISE PASSENGER VISITS IN THE BSR cruise industry has to create the structural conditions to accommodate the expected industry growth

Main Goals of Action Plan

Merge the knowledge generated within the GCP project and in other related projects worldwide to provide information on how to  meet growing sustainability requirements  accommodate the projected industry growth  strengthen economic effects

SLIDE 9

9

Relevant Environmental Rules For Ships And Ports

Emission type Regulations considered Air Emission Rules and Requirements

For ships: MARPOL Annex VI, Directive 2012/33/EU of the European Parliament
For road and non-road vehicles: EURO standards

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Rules and Regulations

For ships: MARPOL  Energy Efficiency Design Index and Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan /

EU MRV

For road and non‐road vehicles: EURO standards, EG Nr. 443/2009 and EG Nr. 510/2011

Noise Rules and Requirements

For ports: Directive 2002/49/EC (Environmental Noise Directive END)
For ships: SOLAS regulations of the IMO

Wastewater Discharge Rules and Requirements

MARPOL Annex IV (special area for sewage from passenger ships in Baltic Sea), CLIA policies
PRF Directive: indirect fee (30% ) also for sewage, and mandatory delivery also covers sewage from

ships (in accordance with the MARPOL discharge norms and with the exception based on sufficient storage capacity) Waste Management Rules and Regulations

For ports: MARPOL 73/78, EU Port Reception Facility Directive which requires MS to provide for

adequate PRF, and provides for No‐Special‐Fee for garbage, New Directive will be adopted in April 2019.

For ships: MARPOL Annex V (Pollution by Garbage, PRF Directive: article 7: mandatory delivery
bligation, as well as dedicated inspection regime (article 11)
MARPOL Annex I: oily waste (including oily slops): PRF Directive
MARPOL Annex II: tank washing containing NLS: PRF Directive
MARPOL Annex VI: scrubber residues: PRF Dirctive Green Ship concept: PRF Directive (article 8)

SLIDE 10

10

Proposal of measures on how to improve level of sustainability

Measures suggested are designed to reduce emissions and waste in cruise ports that arise from

Cruise ships at berth
Pier & cargo handling

equipment

Terminal buildings
Road (external) traffic

EMISSION SOURCES OF A TYPICAL CRUISE TERMINAL Land-side emissions & waste Water-side emissions & waste

SLIDE 11

11

two main criteria for assessment

1. Impact on sustainability

Quality of a measure with regard to their potential on reducing local air pollutants, greenhouse gas and noise emissions

more than 100 measures have been compiled and prioritised

2. Efforts for implementation

Capital and operational expenditure as well as operational efforts to implement a certain measure

SLIDE 12

12

Evaluation of measures for WP 2 ‐ Sustainable Energy Supply & Innovative Solutions for Emission Reduction

Objective 1: Avoid or reduce ship GHG and air emissions in ports Ship-port interface

1. On-shore power supply (OPS)
2. LNG PowerPac
3. LNG bunkering facilities: truck-to-ship (TTS)
4. LNG bunkering facilities: shore to ship
5. LNG bunkering facilities: ship- to-ship (STS)
6. LNG bunkering facilities: local liquefaction plant
7. Mobile LNG barge
8. Automated mooring Systems

Exhaust gas treatment systems

9. Diesel particle filer (DPF)

10. Selective catalytic reduction system (SCR) 11. Scrubber systems Alternative fuels 12. LNG 13. Advanced biofuels 14. Ammonia (NH3) 15. Electric / hybrid propulsion 16. Hydrogen (H2) 17. Methanol Energy efficiency measures 18. Energy efficiency measures Objective 2: Avoid or reduce ship noise emissions in ports 19. Exhaust silencers 20. Noise reduction of ventilation systems Further measures: 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 18

SLIDE 13

13

Evaluation of measures for WP 3 – Smart Cruise Terminal Buildings & Innovative Reception Facilities

SLIDE 14

14

Evaluation of measures for WP 3 – Smart Cruise Terminal Buildings & Innovative Reception Facilities

SLIDE 15

15

Evaluation of measures for WP 4 – Smart Cruise Port Traffic Solutions & Economic Effects

SLIDE 16

16

Evaluation of measures for WP 4 – Smart Cruise Port Traffic Solutions & Economic Effects

SLIDE 17

17

Summary: Top 5 measures to reduce ship and port emissions and waste in port areas (WP 2+3)

Measure Area

Emission focus Evaluation

GHG Air Noise

Waste

Impact Efforts Vessel‐related emissions On‐shore power supply Ship‐port interface X X X LNG bunkering facilities: truck‐to‐ ship Ship‐port interface X X Liquefied natural gas Vessel fuels X X Energy efficiency measures Vessel X X Exhaust silencers Vessel X Port‐related emissions Emission reduction target Whole port area X X X X Obtain “green” energy Whole port area X Eco‐driving lessons Pier & cargo handling equipment X X X Waste fee reduction Whole port area X LED technology Terminal building X

SLIDE 18

18

Summary: Top 5 measures to strengthen economic effects of cruise tourism and accommodate the projected industry growth

Measure Impact on Evaluation

Seaward accessibility Landward accessibilit y Passenger flows Economi c effects Cruise line behaviour Impact Efforts Provide adequate sign posting X Limit number of group sizes of land excursions X Bring together local vendors and shipping lines X (X) (X) Establish “Green Port Fees” X Extend berth and pier infrastructure X

SLIDE 19

19

Project Structure

Four Work Packages (WP)

GCP Outline 2/2

SLIDE 20

20

Website www.greencruiseport.eu Please download the GCP Action Plan 2030

SLIDE 21

21

Studies published on www.greencruiseport.eu

Port of Helsinki and Ecobio Ltd: Green Cruise Port Waste Management – Port Reception Facility: Cost Efficiency and Future Prospects Report Maritime Institute in Gdansk: Common standards in the measurement of economic effects by cruise tourism. Klaipeda State Seaport Authority and PERITUS Partners: Klaipeda City Accessibility for Passengers of Cruise Ships; Passenger Behaviour and Smart Traffic Links with the City and the Near‐Hinterland of cruise ports by incl. IT functionalities, creating a software on accessibility and guidance Rostock Port GmbH and Baltic Marine Consult / HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH: Nautical Simulation Study

SLIDE 22

22

Studies published on www.greencruiseport.eu

Bergen og Omland Havnevesen and DNV GL: Onshore Power Supply f. Cruise Vessels, Assessment of

pportunities and limitations f. connecting cruise vessels

to shore power Rostock Port and CPL Competence in Ports and Logistics GmbH / NIT Institut für Tourismus‐ und Bäderforschung in Nordeuropa Tourism Crowding in Cruise Ports – A Comparative Study. Port of Esbjerg, COWI A/S and Kosan Krisplant A/S: Business Plan / Sustainable Energy Supply & innovative Solutions for Emission Reduction "Green bunkering of cruise vessels with sustainable fuel options”. Maritime Institute in Gdansk: Port dues strategies and incentives for cruise line companies for using green port feature.

SLIDE 23

23

Studies published on www.greencruiseport.eu

HPA Hamburg Port Authortity and DW‐Ship‐ Consult GmbH: Technical noise investigations at a Hamburg City cruise terminal. HPA Hamburg Port Authortity and DW‐Ship‐Consult GmbH: Emission sources and possible mitigation measures of cruise terminals. Rostock Port GmbH and DW Ship‐Consult: Feasibility of noise monitoring in the cruise port of Warnemünde. Rostock Port GmbH and SeaConsult HAM GmbH: Dimensions of Ocean‐going Cruise Vessels

SLIDE 24

24

Studies published on www.greencruiseport.eu

Port of Tallinn and AS Sweco Projekt: Sustainable energetic solutions for cruise terminal buildings in Northern Climate Maritime Institute in Gdansk: Port dues strategies and incentives for cruise line companies for using green port feature. Port of Tallinn, AS Sweco Projekt, and Salto AB OÜ: Building Design Documentation of Cruise Terminal in the Old City Harbour Port of Tallinn Rostock Port and NIT Institut für Tourismus‐ und Bäderforschung in Nordeuropa GmbH et al.: Rostock Cruise Tourism: Local Economic Impact and Customer Satisfaction.

SLIDE 25