The Green Cruise Port Project HELCOM Cooperation Platform “Results of Interreg Project Green Cruise Port” Ingo Fehrs, Hamburg Port Authority Helsinki, March 27th, 2019
Green Cruise Port (GCP) Overview Basic Information EU Interreg Programme • GCP is a project in the EU Interreg Baltic Sea Region Programme 2014 ‐ 2020 (www.interregbaltic.eu) • GCP elaborates a multidimensional strategic approach for a sustainable and qualitative future development for cruise shipping in port areas. • GCP encourages investments and procedures in environmentally friendly cruise port infra and superstructure in the Baltic Sea Region • GCP was implemented from March 2016 to February 2019. • GREEN CRUISE PORT embraces 20 partners, covering geographically all BSR countries and The Netherlands. • Budget: 2.8 Mio € (ERDF/NO budget 2.1 Mio € plus 0.7 Mio € own contribution). 2
GCP Overview Basic Information Map 3
Development of Sustainability in Cruise Port Locations Full Partner 1. Hamburg Port Authority 2. Hamburg Cruise Net e.V. 3. Rostock Port 4. Freeport of Riga Authority 5. Port of Tallinn 6. Klaipeda State Seaport Authority 7. Maritime Institute Gdansk 8. Port of Helsinki 9. Port of Bergen 10. Port of Esbjerg 4
Development of Sustainability in Cruise Port Locations Associated Partner 11. Port of Oslo, 12. Port of Stockholm, 13. Port of Copenhagen 14. Rosmorport Kaliningrad Branch 15. Port of Amsterdam 16. Port of Gothenburg 17. Rosmorport Northwest Basin Branch St. Petersburg 18. AIDA Cruises 19. TUI Cruises 20. Senate Chancellery of City of Hamburg 5
Project Structure WP1: Project Management, Administration, Communication WP2: Sustainable energy WP3: Smart cruise WP4: Smart cruise port supply & solutions for terminal buildings & traffic solutions & emission reduction reception facilities economic effects Improvement of port establish cruise port Environment ‐ infrastructure in order superstructure friendly traffic inte ‐ to reduce cruise vessel e.g. modern terminal gration of cruise emissions in harbours buildings, barrier ‐ free ports into local by adaption of latest access and suitable transport systems technical sustainabilty reception facilities and developments economic impact on port cities and regions 6
Project Structure • 10 Workshops and 2 Conferences for Partners and Stakeholders • 2 Best Practice Tours for Partners • 7 Steering Committee Meetings (internal) • 12 Conceptual ‐ , Analytical ‐ , Technical ‐ Studies and Business Plans (ST) • Green Cruise Port Action Plan 2030 7
Cruise industry in the Baltic Sea Region faces two main challenges PROJECTIONS FOR SHIPPING’S CO 2 EMISSIONS TO 2035 Main Goals of Action Plan cruise industry has to Merge the knowledge generated respond to within the GCP project and in other environmental related projects worldwide to provide challenges and try to information on how to minimize negative externalities meet growing sustainability requirements accommodate the projected Source: ITF (2018): Decarbonising Maritime Transport industry growth DEVELOPMENT OF CRUISE PASSENGER VISITS IN THE BSR strengthen economic effects cruise industry has to create the structural conditions to accommodate the expected industry growth 8
Relevant Environmental Rules For Ships And Ports Emission type Regulations considered Air Emission Rules For ships: MARPOL Annex VI, Directive 2012/33/EU of the European Parliament and Requirements For road and non-road vehicles: EURO standards Greenhouse Gas For ships: MARPOL Energy Efficiency Design Index and Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan / Emissions Rules EU MRV and Regulations For road and non ‐ road vehicles: EURO standards, EG Nr. 443/2009 and EG Nr. 510/2011 Noise Rules and For ports: Directive 2002/49/EC (Environmental Noise Directive END) Requirements For ships: SOLAS regulations of the IMO Wastewater MARPOL Annex IV (special area for sewage from passenger ships in Baltic Sea), CLIA policies Discharge Rules PRF Directive: indirect fee (30% ) also for sewage, and mandatory delivery also covers sewage from and Requirements ships (in accordance with the MARPOL discharge norms and with the exception based on sufficient storage capacity) Waste For ports: MARPOL 73/78, EU Port Reception Facility Directive which requires MS to provide for Management Rules adequate PRF, and provides for No ‐ Special ‐ Fee for garbage, New Directive will be adopted in April and Regulations 2019. For ships: MARPOL Annex V (Pollution by Garbage, PRF Directive: article 7: mandatory delivery obligation, as well as dedicated inspection regime (article 11) MARPOL Annex I: oily waste (including oily slops): PRF Directive MARPOL Annex II: tank washing containing NLS: PRF Directive MARPOL Annex VI: scrubber residues: PRF Dirctive Green Ship concept: PRF Directive (article 8) 9
Proposal of measures on how to improve level of sustainability EMISSION SOURCES OF A TYPICAL CRUISE TERMINAL Measures suggested are designed to reduce emissions and waste in cruise ports that arise from • Cruise ships at berth Land-side emissions & waste • Pier & cargo handling equipment • Terminal buildings • Road (external) traffic Water-side emissions & waste 10
two main criteria for assessment 1. Impact on sustainability Quality of a measure with regard to their potential on reducing local air pollutants, greenhouse gas and noise emissions 2. Efforts for implementation Capital and operational expenditure as well as operational efforts to implement a certain measure more than 100 measures have been compiled and prioritised 11
Evaluation of measures for WP 2 ‐ Sustainable Energy Supply & Innovative Solutions for Emission Reduction Objective 1: Avoid or reduce ship GHG and air emissions in ports Ship-port interface 1. On-shore power supply (OPS) 2. LNG PowerPac 3. LNG bunkering facilities: truck-to-ship (TTS) 4. LNG bunkering facilities: shore to ship 5. LNG bunkering facilities: ship- to-ship (STS) 6. LNG bunkering facilities: local liquefaction plant 7. Mobile LNG barge 8. Automated mooring Systems Exhaust gas treatment systems 9. Diesel particle filer (DPF) 10. Selective catalytic reduction system (SCR) 11. Scrubber systems Alternative fuels 12. LNG 13. Advanced biofuels 14. Ammonia (NH 3 ) 15. Electric / hybrid propulsion 16. Hydrogen (H 2 ) 17. Methanol Energy efficiency measures 18. Energy efficiency measures Objective 2: Avoid or reduce ship noise emissions in ports 19. Exhaust silencers 20. Noise reduction of ventilation systems Further measures: 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 18 12
Evaluation of measures for WP 3 – Smart Cruise Terminal Buildings & Innovative Reception Facilities 13
Evaluation of measures for WP 3 – Smart Cruise Terminal Buildings & Innovative Reception Facilities 14
Evaluation of measures for WP 4 – Smart Cruise Port Traffic Solutions & Economic Effects 15
Evaluation of measures for WP 4 – Smart Cruise Port Traffic Solutions & Economic Effects 16
Summary: Top 5 measures to reduce ship and port emissions and waste in port areas (WP 2+3) Emission focus Evaluation Measure Area GHG Air Noise Impact Efforts Waste Vessel ‐ related emissions X X X On ‐ shore power supply Ship ‐ port interface LNG bunkering facilities: truck ‐ to ‐ X X Ship ‐ port interface ship X X Liquefied natural gas Vessel fuels X X Energy efficiency measures Vessel X Exhaust silencers Vessel Port ‐ related emissions Emission reduction target Whole port area X X X X Obtain “green” energy Whole port area X Eco ‐ driving lessons Pier & cargo handling X X X equipment Waste fee reduction Whole port area X LED technology Terminal building X 17
Summary: Top 5 measures to strengthen economic effects of cruise tourism and accommodate the projected industry growth Impact on Evaluation Landward Economi Measure Seaward Passenger Cruise line Impact accessibilit c Efforts accessibility flows behaviour y effects Provide adequate sign posting X Limit number of group sizes of land excursions X Bring together local vendors and shipping lines X (X) (X) Establish “Green Port Fees” X Extend berth and pier infrastructure X 18
GCP Outline 2/2 Project Structure Four Work Packages (WP) 19
Website www.greencruiseport.eu Please download the GCP Action Plan 2030 20
Studies published on www.greencruiseport.eu Port of Helsinki and Ecobio Ltd: Green Cruise Port Waste Management – Port Reception Facility: Cost Efficiency and Future Prospects Report Maritime Institute in Gdansk: Common standards in the measurement of economic effects by cruise tourism. Klaipeda State Seaport Authority and PERITUS Partners: Klaipeda City Accessibility for Passengers of Cruise Ships ; Passenger Behaviour and Smart Traffic Links with the City and the Near ‐ Hinterland of cruise ports by incl. IT functionalities, creating a software on accessibility and guidance Rostock Port GmbH and Baltic Marine Consult / HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH: Nautical Simulation Study 21
Recommend
More recommend
