The Ethical Limits of the New Welfare Conditionality Paper - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the ethical limits of the new welfare conditionality
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Ethical Limits of the New Welfare Conditionality Paper - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Ethical Limits of the New Welfare Conditionality Paper presented to International Conference on Welfare Conditionality, University of York, 26-28 June 2018 Dr Katherine Curchin Research School of Social Sciences, ANU Outline 1. The New


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Ethical Limits of the New Welfare Conditionality

Paper presented to International Conference on Welfare Conditionality, University of York, 26-28 June 2018

Dr Katherine Curchin Research School of Social Sciences, ANU

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • 1. The “New Conditionality”
  • 2. Focus on ethics
  • 3. No Jab, No Pay
  • 4. Mutual Obligation
  • 5. What’s wrong with incentives?
  • 6. Conclusion

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Outline

  • 1. The “New Conditionality”
  • 2. Focus on ethics
  • 3. No Jab, No Pay
  • 4. Mutual Obligation
  • 5. What’s wrong with incentives?
  • 6. Conclusion

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Outline

  • 1. The “New Conditionality”
  • 2. Focus on ethics
  • 3. No Jab, No Pay
  • 4. Mutual Obligation
  • 5. What’s wrong with incentives?
  • 6. Conclusion

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Outline

  • 1. The “New Conditionality”
  • 2. Focus on ethics
  • 3. No Jab, No Pay
  • 4. Mutual Obligation
  • 5. What’s wrong with incentives?
  • 6. Conclusion

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Outline

  • 1. The “New Conditionality”
  • 2. Focus on ethics
  • 3. No Jab, No Pay
  • 4. Mutual Obligation
  • 5. What’s wrong with incentives?
  • 6. Conclusion

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Outline

  • 1. The “New Conditionality”
  • 2. Focus on ethics
  • 3. No Jab, No Pay
  • 4. Mutual Obligation
  • 5. What’s wrong with incentives?
  • 6. Conclusion

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

My key argument

Governing behaviour through incentives rather than reasons demonstrates a lack of respect for the autonomy of

  • citizens. The new conditionality is inherently illiberal.

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Incentives are problematic because:

  • 1. They are insulting
  • 2. They divert attention from persuasion
  • 3. They can exert undue influence

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Outline

  • 1. The “New Conditionality”
  • 2. Focus on ethics
  • 3. No Jab, No Pay
  • 4. Mutual Obligation
  • 5. What’s wrong with incentives?
  • 6. Conclusion

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Key References

Attwell, K., Leask, J., Meyer, S.B., Rokkas, P. & Ward, P. (2017). Vaccine rejecting parents’ engagement with expert systems that inform vaccination programs. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 14 (1), 65-76. Blume, S. (2006). Anti-vaccination movements and their interpretations. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 628–642. Goodin, R. E. (2002). Structures of Mutual Obligation. Journal of Social Policy, 31(4), 579-596. Grant, R. W. (2012). Strings Attached. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Henman, P. (2011). Conditional Citizenship? Electronic Networks and the New Conditionality in Public Policy. Policy and Internet, 3(3), 1-18. Pearce, A., Marshall, H., Bedford, H., & Lynch, J. (2015). Barriers to childhood immunisation: Findings from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. Vaccine, 33, 3377-3383. Sandel, M. (2012). What Money Can't Buy. London: Penguin. Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1990). Behavioural Assumptions of Policy Tools. Journal of Politics, 52(2), 510- 530. Wigham, S., Ternent, L., Bryant, A., Robalino, S., Sniehotta, F. F., & Adams, J. (2014). Parental Financial Incentives for Increasing Preschool Vaccination Uptake: Systematic Review. Pediatrics, 143(4).

14