1
The Complex Tones
- f E
ast/ Southeast Asian Languages
Current Challenges for Typology and Modelling
Alexis Michaud, CNRS‐LACITO & CNRS‐CEFC
The Complex Tones of E ast/ Southeast Asian Languages Current - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The Complex Tones of E ast/ Southeast Asian Languages Current Challenges for Typology and Modelling Alexis Michaud, CNRS LACITO & CNRS CEFC 1 2 Photos: Martine Toda 3 Naxi, Na, Laze Naxi, Na, Laze
Alexis Michaud, CNRS‐LACITO & CNRS‐CEFC
Photos: Martine Toda
« Conventional methods of description of tones have not attained the degree of accuracy and generality that have been accomplished for segmental features of speech of various languages, as evidenced by the most recent version of the International Phonetic Alphabet
(H. Fujisaki, W. Gu, and S. Ohno 2007: 240) Hiroya Fujisaki, Wentao Gu, and Sumio Ohno (2007), « Physiological and physical bases of the command‐response model for generating fundamental frequency contours in tone languages: implications for the phonology of tones », in Experimental Approaches to Phonology, ed. by Maria‐Josep Sole, Patrice Speeter Beddor and Manjari Ohala, Oxford University Press, pp. 228‐245
(William Wang: « possible tone systems »)
Tones defined by F0: Bantu; Naxi; & many others
Phonation type: irrelevant for Naxi
Not just F0: Vietnamese: bundle of F0 and phonation type characteristics; Tamang: F0; phonation type; consonant realization consonant realization
Mazaudon, Martine and Alexis Michaud. 2008. "Tonal contrasts and initial consonants: a case study of Tamang Tamang, a ‘missing link’ in tonogenesis." Phonetica 65:4, pp. 231‐256.
2cu‐ri 3pa‐pa 2cu‐ri 1pa‐pa
Tamang (1 speaker)
many languages
evidence to the contrary (Nick Clements, p.c. 2008)
Mazaudon, Martine. 2012. “Paths to Tone in the Tamang Branch of Tibeto‐Burman (Nepal).” In Dialects as a Testing Ground for Theories of Language Change, ed. Gunther de Vogelaer and Guido Seiler, 139–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
“… in spite of the vast amount of work on tone languages over the past thirty years, the number of phenomena that appear to require tone features has become significantly reduced, raising the issue whether the notion of tone features is at all useful. This paper first reviews the basic functions for which segmental features have been proposed, and then examines the evidence that tone features are needed to serve these or other functions in tone languages. The discussion focuses successively on level tones, contour tones, and register, building on examples from Africa and Asia. Our current evaluation of the evidence is that tone features, to the extent that they appear motivated at all, do not serve the same functions as segmental features.”
Clements, Nick †, Alexis Michaud, and Cédric Patin. 2011. “Do We Need Tone Features?” In Tones and Features, ed. Elizabeth Hume, John Goldsmith, and W. Leo Wetzels, 3–24. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Hyman, Larry. 2011. “Do tones have features?” Same volume
Pittayaporn, Pittayawat. 2007. Directionality of tone change. International Conference
Gradual, continuous evolution of contours. Not categorical Not categorical (no addition/deletion of levels). Direction Direction of tone change: some regularities.
Erickson, Donna. 1976. A Physiological Analysis of the Tones of Thai: University of Connecticut. Santitham Prom‐On & Yi Xu. This conference. Pitch target representation of Thai tones.
Categorical evolution Categorical evolution of levels. Phonetic pool of variation; diachronic change change: by transphonologization.
Rialland, Annie. 2001. "Anticipatory Raising in Downstep Realization: Evidence for Preplanning in Tone Production." Proceedings of the symposium “Cross‐linguistic studies of tonal phenomena” ed. by
[conservative realization] de Rhodes, Alexandre. 1651. Dictionarium Annamiticum Lusitanum et Latinum. Rome.
Haudricourt, André‐Georges. 1949. "L'origine des particularités de l'alphabet vietnamien." Dân Viêt‐Nam 3.61‐68.
‐《精选法汉‐汉法词典》(Dictionnaire concis français‐chinois‐français),商务印书馆、拉鲁斯出版社,1994 ‐ 林語堂 《 當代漢英詞典》香港中文大學, 一九七二年第一版
啊!我考过了! Wow! I passed the exam! 啊? 你在这儿干吗? Huh? What are you doing here? 啊, 这样可以 。 All right, that’s fine.
(i) marking of boundaries/junctures – strongly linked to syntax syntax; (ii) marking of information structure – pragmatics pragmatics;
(iii) expression of attitudes and emotions.
Major difference across languages: to what extent (if at all) these are structured in tonal terms. tonal intonation tonal intonation=addition of tones of intonational origin; =addition of tones of intonational origin; ‘Intonational tones’: intonational origin; structurally similar to lexical tones.
DEF.
Extension, by analogy, of a tonal, categorical treatment Extension, by analogy, of a tonal, categorical treatment… … … … to intonation, which is originally nontonal, noncategorical to intonation, which is originally nontonal, noncategorical
Interpretation Interpretation (hypothesis): (hypothesis):
Comparing « careful » and « emphatic » renderings of the same words in carrier sentences (This is ___ ): ‐ 1st context: teaching a student how to pronounce a word ‐ 2nd context: answering s.o. for the umpteenth time. Aim: ‐ Illustrating intonational malleability of tone (Vietnamese, Naxi). ‐ Comparing phonetic correlates of tone and of intonation. (in particular: F0, I)
Mid-range open quotient.
Open quotient: same range. F0: higher.
Time in ms Time in ms
(experimental settings unchanged)
Time in ms
Tone D2
( Vietnamese data: difference > 5 dB on average
sec. Open quotient (%)
↑ Naxi: differences in F0 (register + contour). English: various strategies. →
Blue: careful reading, red: emphatic reading
Tone H Tone M Tone L Tone H Tone M Tone L Expected ratios of intensity / F0, Naxi language
Expected ratios of intensity / F0, English language
in Vietnamese :
Emphasis: relies proportionally more on intensity in languages with tone.
High values = high increase in I
(I in dB, F0 in musical tones)
Effect of emphasis Effect of tones ENGLISH VIETNAMESE NAXI Lexical tone (Naxi H vs. M) Observed ratios of intensity / F0 Lexical tone: proportionally less bearing on intensity.
English Naxi Vietn. TONES
Chilin Shih, April 2003, Oxford University
Tone 3: lowest tone; tone 4: high, sharply falling Speech synthesis for Mandarin:
Shih Chilin et al. 1 template +strength coefficient (based on: informational prominence). Less strong = more coarticulated.
Languages differ in whether – and to what extent – they have intonational tones*. Intonational tones* strictly speaking: relatively rare.
*tones of intonational origin; structurally similar to lexical tones. DEF.
‘Superpositional’ approaches to prosody, tone‐sequence (‘autosegmental’) approaches: different field of typological application.
Rialland, Annie. 1995. "Review of Autosegmental Studies on Pitch Accent, ed by Harry van der Hulst and Norval Smith, Dordrecht and Providence: Foris Publications, 1988." Journal of Phonetics 23.367‐372.
Ladd, Robert. 1992. "An introduction to intonational phonology." Papers in laboratory phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody ed. by G. J. Docherty and R. Ladd, 321‐334. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
« In the most restrictive versions of current intonational phonology, it is explicitly assumed that independently chosen global shapes—e.g. a declination component—are not needed anywhere in the phonological description.
In effect, the restrictive linear view says that all languages have tonal strings; the main difference between languages with and without lexical tone is simply a matter of where the tonal specifications* come from. » (Ladd 1992)
Final upward tilt of Vietnamese tone C1: « due to final H »? Final rise in interrogative intonation (English, French): « due to final H »?
*Tone: understood as levels, « like H(igh) and L(ow) » (Gussenhoven 2004:xvii)
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ladd, Robert. 1978. "Stylized intonation." Language 54:3.517‐540.
Goldsmith, John. 1981. "English as a tone language." Phonology in the 1980s
PPT presentation on « English and tone languages », Introduction to Linguistics 2: Winter 2004
humanities.uchicago.edu/faculty/goldsmith/Intro2/
Unified account
and intonation
Hyman, Larry M. and Kemmonye C. Monaka. 2008. Tonal and non‐tonal intonation in Shekgalagari, handout of presentation at: Tone and Intonation in Europe (TIE) 3, University of Lisbon, Sept. 15‐17, 2008.
Can F Can F0
0 be isolated from other phonetic correlates?
be isolated from other phonetic correlates?
Term « Tonal » « Non‐tonal » Definition of Hyman et
terms Realized by F0 Realized by parameters
phonation types Meaning under a functional approach: in structural terms Contrastive tones, whatever their correlates All other phenomena, whatever their correlates
Pike: Pike: « « tonemes tonemes » »
→