The clinical landscape of managing patients with CKD: Where are we - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the clinical landscape of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The clinical landscape of managing patients with CKD: Where are we - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The clinical landscape of managing patients with CKD: Where are we now and what can we expect? David Cherney, MD University of Toronto Toronto, Canada OFFICIAL WCN 2019 SPONSORED LUNCH SYMPOSIUM April 15, 2019 - Melbourne, Australia The


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The clinical landscape of managing patients with CKD: Where are we now and what can we expect?

OFFICIAL WCN 2019 SPONSORED LUNCH SYMPOSIUM April 15, 2019 - Melbourne, Australia

David Cherney, MD

University of Toronto Toronto, Canada

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The The Cli Clinical nical Land Landsca scape pe of M

  • f Manag

anaging ing CKD: CKD: Wh Wher ere e Ar Are e We We No Now w an and Wh d What at Ca Can n We We Ex Expe pect ct

WCN - PACE 2019 David Cherney, MD CM, PhD, FRCP(C)

Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Toronto Clinician Scientist, Division of Nephrology, UHN Director, Renal Physiology Laboratory, UHN Scientist, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Spe Speak aker er disc disclosu losure re

Relationships with commercial entities:

  • Consulting / honoraria: Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Janssen,

Merck, AstraZeneca, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Sanofi,

  • Clinical trials: CREDENCE, TRANSLATE, BETWEEN, DIAMOND,

DAPA-CKD, SCORED, EMPA-CKD, INDORSE, ERADICATE-HF

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Obje Objectives ctives

  • Hemodynamic effects of sodium glucose cotransport-

2 (SGLT2) inhibitors

  • Effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in non-diabetic CKD
  • Future trials
slide-5
SLIDE 5

SGLT2, sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 Heerspink//Cherney HJ, et al. Circulation 2016;134:752–772

SGLT2 inhibition

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The “Tubular Hypothesis”: Normal Physiology

Heerspink//Cherney. Circulation 2016

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The “Tubular Hypothesis”: Diabetes and Hyperfiltration

Heerspink//Cherney. Circulation 2016

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The “Tubular Hypothesis”: Diabetes and SGLT2 Inhibition

Heerspink//Cherney. Circulation 2016

slide-9
SLIDE 9

SNGF SNGFR R and the a and the afferent arter fferent arteriole iole

Kidokoro et al. ADA (abstract) 2018

slide-10
SLIDE 10

In vivo imaging of A.A. change before and after empagliflozin

Red: BSA-Alexa594 Afferent A. Afferent A. Before medication 2hrs after medication Efferent A. Efferent A.

G G

Courtesy: Kidokoro//Kashihara. American Diabetes Association Meeting – Saturday June 23, 2018

slide-11
SLIDE 11

SGLT2 SGLT2 inhibi inhibition tion and th and the role e role of aden

  • f adenosi
  • sine

ne

Kidokoro et al. ADA (abstract) 2018

slide-12
SLIDE 12

AA G G AA

The alteration of SNGFR by empagliflozin under A1aR antagonist

Before medication 30 min after medication

Red: BSA-Alexa594

*P = 0.01 p = 0.99 *P = 0.0011

Courtesy: Kidokoro//Kashihara. American Diabetes Association Meeting – Saturday June 23, 2018

slide-13
SLIDE 13

SGLT2 inhibition and RAAS blockade

Afferent constriction and Efferent dilation

  • Normalisation of intraglomerular pressure due to

increased afferent and decreased efferent resistance?

  • Potential for additive intraglomerular pressure

reduction?

  • Potential for long-term renal protection?

Pharmacological actions:

SGLT2 inhibition

Afferent constriction

Haemodynamic effects and clinical implications:

  • Decreased intraglomerular pressure due to

increased afferent resistance in T1D-H patients

  • Decreased hyperfiltration

RAAS blockade

Efferent dilation

  • Decreased intraglomerular pressure due to

decreased efferent resistance

  • Decreased hyperfiltration
  • Proven renal protection in clinical trials

A B C

Afferent Efferent Afferent Efferent

Skrtić//Cherney. Diabetologia 2014;57:2599–2602

slide-14
SLIDE 14

1.5% vs. 2.8% HR 0.53 (0.43-0.66) P<0.001 40%↓ eGFR, ESRD, Renal death

Wanner C, et al. N Engl J Med 2016;375:323–334 Neil et al. NEJM June 12, 2017 Wiviott et al. N Engl J Med Nov 2018

SGLT2 SGLT2 inhibition inhibition

slide-15
SLIDE 15

SGLT SGLT2 2 Inhibito Inhibitors rs – Non Non-Diab Diabet etic ic Co Cond ndition itions

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Rajasekeran//Cherney. AJP Renal 2018

Renal protection in non-diabetic kidney disease? Pilot data in patients with FSGS

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Rajasekeran//Cherney. AJP Renal 2018

Ren Renal al fun funct ction, ion, stru struct ctur ure: e: sub subto tota tall lly nep nephrec hrectomiz tomized ed (SNx SNx) ) Sprag Sprague ue-Dawley Dawley ra rats ts

  • No effect: GFRINULIN, ERPFPAH, proteinuria
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19

EMPA-KIDNEY is an phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo- controlled outcome trial

*Single RAS inhibition in clinical appropriate dose and management of CV risk factors and other existing comorbidities incl. hypertension and diabetes

Empagliflozin 10 mg + standard of care* Placebo + standard of care* Placebo run-in

Screening* Randomisation (1:1) Double-blind N=~5000 Every 6 months thereafter, until required number of events has occurred

Follow-up visit

2-3 months Event driven: study continues until ≥1070 primary outcome events accrue 1 month 2 6 12

  • 2

+1 Months End of treatment

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03594110 (all accessed July 2018)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Both CVOTs and dedicated renal outcomes trials with SGLT2 inhibitors will generate data on renal endpoints

  • 1. NCT02547935. Available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02547935 ; 2. NCT01730534. Available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01730534; 3. NCT02065791. Available at

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02065791; 4. NCT03036124. Available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03036124; 5. NCT03036150. Available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03036150

Trial Patient cohorts N Endpoints

DELIGHT1 Dapagliflozin / dapagliflozin + saxagliptin / placebo 1:1:1 460 Primary: Percentage change in HbA1c, UACR Secondary: Proportion of patients achieving 30% reduction in UACR, body weight, FPG, seated SBP DECLARE2 Dapagliflozin / placebo 1:1 17,150 Primary: MACE non-inferiority and then superiority of co-primary endpoints of MACE and hospitalisation for heart failure or CV death Secondary: all-cause mortality; renal composite endpoint (sustained ≥40% decrease in eGFR to eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2 and/or ESRD and/or renal or CV death) CREDENCE3 Canagliflozin / placebo 1:1 4200 Primary: Composite renal and CV endpoint (ESRD, doubling of serum creatinine, renal or CV death) Secondary: 5P-MACE (CV death, non-fatal MI or non-fatal stroke, hospitalisation for CHF, hospitalization for unstable angina), renal composite endpoint (ESRD, doubling of serum creatinine, renal death), all-cause mortality DAPA-HF4 (HFrEF) Dapagliflozin / placebo 1:1 4500 Primary: Composite CV endpoint (CV death, hospitalization for HF or urgent HF visit) Secondary: CV death or hospitalization for HF, total HF hospitalizations and CV death events, KCCQ, renal composite (≥50% sustained decline in eGFR, ESRD, renal death), all-cause mortality DAPA-CKD5 (CKD) Dapagliflozin / placebo 1:1 4000 Primary: Composite renal endpoint (≥50% sustained decline in eGFR, ESRD, CV or renal death) Secondary: Renal composite (≥50% sustained decline in eGFR, ESRD, renal death), CV death or hospitalization for HF, all-cause mortality

2018 2019 2020

DECLARE CREDENCE DAPA-HF DAPA-CKD DELIGHT EMPA-KIDNEY VERTIS- CV

slide-21
SLIDE 21

CKD, chronic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; SGLT2i, sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor; TGFB, tubuloglomerular feedback; UACR, urinary albumin:creatinine ratio

Conclusions and key messages

  • SGLT2i: intraglomerular hypertension

– eGFR dip: occurs in CKD stages 3a, 3b, CKD

– eGFR slope, albuminuria, effects in large CV trials – CREDENCE study: stopped early due to efficacy – DAPA-CKD and empagliflozin studies

  • Effects relatively independent of HbA1c lowering
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Ack Ackno nowled wledgm gmen ents ts

  • Study participants
  • UHN/MSH Research Team
  • Bruce Perkins
  • Burns Laboratory, Ottawa
  • Daniel Drucker
  • Julie Lovshin
  • Vesta Lai, RN, CDE

– Maria Maione, RN – Josephine Tse, RN – Alana Lee, RN – Holly Tschirhart, RN

  • Students:

– Yuliya Lytvyn, PhD – Marko Skrtic, MD PhD – Harindra Rajasekeran MSc

  • EMPA-REG OUTCOME

– Bernard Zinman – Christoph Wanner – Silvio Inzucchi – Gert Meyer – Subodh Verma

  • Grant funding:
  • Salary support:
  • FSGS Study team (Toronto, Ottawa,

Winnipeg)

  • Heather N. Reich, Michelle Hladunewich,

Daniel Cattran, Syamantak Majumder6, Bridgit B. Bowskill, M. Golam Kabir6, Suzanne L. Advani, Ian W. Gibson M, Manish M. Sood, Andrew Advani

  • Colorado
  • Petter Bjornstad
  • David Maahs
  • Groningen – the Netherlands
  • Hiddo Heerspink
  • Claire Dekkers
  • Ron Gansevoort
  • Vancouver – DIAMOND trial
  • Sean Barbour