Measuring College and Career Readiness
PARCC RESULTS AND The 2015 BASELINE
DELRAN TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT
A PRESENTATION TO PARENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS
The 2015 BASELINE Measuring College and DELRAN TOWNSHIP SCHOOL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
PARCC RESULTS AND The 2015 BASELINE Measuring College and DELRAN TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT Career Readiness A PRESENTATION TO PARENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS JANUARY 12, 2016 PARCC - HOW DID WE GET HERE? A VISION FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION IN NEW JERSEY
Measuring College and Career Readiness
A PRESENTATION TO PARENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS
2009: New Jersey adopted higher course taking requirements for all students. 2010: New Jersey adopted the Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts and Mathematics.
RAISING STANDARDS
“Align New Jersey high school standards and graduation requirements to college and workforce entry requirements.” – NJ High School Redesign Steering Committee (HSRSC - 2008) New Jersey has adopted standards that “are widely recognized as appropriate standards for college and career readiness.” - College and Career Ready Taskforce (CCRT - 2012)
NEXT STEPS: REPLACE HSPA
2015: New Jersey adopted the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) assessments in English Language Arts/Literacy and Mathematics.
IMPROVING STUDENT ASSESSMENT
and previous assessments in the elementary and middle school in language arts and mathematics. Students took PARCC English Language Arts and Literacy Assessments (ELA/L) in grades 3 – 11. Students took PARCC Mathematics Assessments in grades 3 – 8 and End of Course Assessments in Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II.
▪ Indicates the degree to which your child has met grade level expectations in mathematics ▪ Level 1 through Level 5
▪ Shows how your child performed in each of 4 or 5 areas ▪ 3 levels indicated by arrow symbols ▪ up arrow: meets or exceeds expectations ▪ sideways arrow: nearly meets expectations ▪ down arrow: below expectations
Research Simulation Task (RST) For the RST, students are asked to analyze an informational topic presented through several sources. Students answer a series of questions and writing a response to a prompt, synthesizing information from multiple sources. Literary Analysis Task (LAT) For the LAT, students read and analyze two pieces of literature. Students write an analytic response to a prompt based on the literary texts. Narrative Writing Task (NWT) Students read a literary text from a grade-appropriate short story, novel or poem. Students write a narrative response to a prompt based on this literary text.
GUIDE TO ELA/LITERACY RELEASED ITEMS: UNDERSTANDING SCORING Example of the Reading Comprehension trait from the grades 6-11 rubric: Reading Comprehension of Key Ideas and Details:
Score Point 4 The student response demonstrates full comprehension of ideas stated explicitly and inferentially by providing an accurate analysis and supporting the analysis with effective and convincing textual evidence. Score Point 3 The student response demonstrates comprehension of ideas stated explicitly and/ or inferentially by providing a mostly accurate analysis, and supporting the analysis with adequate textual evidence.
Score Point 2 The student response demonstrates basic comprehension of ideas stated explicitly and/or inferentially by providing a generally accurate analysis and supporting the analysis with basic textual evidence. Score Point 1 The student response demonstrates limited comprehension
accurate analysis and supporting the analysis with limited textual evidence. Score Point 0 The student response demonstrates no comprehension of ideas by providing inaccurate or no analysis and little to no textual evidence.
▪ Performance on the most essential math concepts and standards in the grade level standards.
▪ Performance on tasks requiring students to create and justify logical solutions to problems, and/or analyze and correct the reasoning of others.
▪ Performance on tasks requiring students to create and use mathematical models, such as equations, to solve problems.
Count unt of Valid d Test Scores Approachi aching ng Expectat ations
(Level 3) Meeti ting ng Expectat ations
(Level 4) Exce ceedi ding ng Expectat ations
5) 5) District ct % >= Level 3 NJ % > >= Level 3
Grade 3
172 34% 30% 1% 65% 65% 68% 68%
Grade 4
127 31% 44% 9% 84% 84% 78% 78%
Grade 5
176 34% 39% 7% 80% 80% 77% 77%
Grade 6
159 34% 28% 9% 71% 71% 77% 77%
Grade 7
124 27% 35% 18% 80% 80% 75% 75%
Grade 8
128 23% 49% 5% 77% 77% 74% 74%
Grade 9
129 20% 30% 4% 54% 54% 64% 64%
Grade 10
91 29% 11% 0% 40% 40% 57% 57%
Grade 11
88 22% 34% 10% 66% 66% 65% 65%
**As compared to all schools in NJ**
READING WRITING
Literary Information Vocab Expression Conventions
G6
Slightly lower Slightly lower Slightly lower Lower Lower
G7
Slightly lower Slightly higher Slightly higher Slightly higher Slightly higher
G8
Higher Higher Slightly higher Slightly lower Slightly lower
G9
Lower Equal Higher Lower Lower
G10
Lower Lower Lower Lower Lower
G11
Higher Higher Slightly higher Higher Slightly higher
Test Taken # of Levels 4 and above Enrollment % Test Taken Average % Level 4 and above Grade 6 On-level 109 30 165 66% 736 28% Honors 32 29 42 76% 783 91% POR 14 2 21 67% 711 14% Grade 7 On-level 72 31 135 53% 745 43% Honors 38 32 53 66% 778 84% POR 11 2 21 52% 716 18%
Test Taken Passed#
Enrollment % Test Taken Average % Level 4 and above Grade 8 On-level 71 34 147 48% 746 52% Honors 38 34 63 60% 773 89% POR 13 1 20 65% 703 8%
Test Taken # of Levels 4 and above Enrollment % Test Taken Average % Level 4 and above Grade 9 General 5 9 55.6% 699 0% CP 75 22 132 56.8% 731 29.3% Honors 29 22 55 52.7% 765 75.9% POR 14 17 82.4% 699 0% Grade 10 General 4 9 44.4% 686 0% CP 59 6 150 39.3% 712 10.2% Honors 12 4 54 22.2% 750 33.3% POR 8 12 66.7% 683 0%
Test Taken # of Levels 3 and above Enrollment % Test Taken Average % of Levels 3 and above Grade 11 General 9 2 23 39.1% 701 22.2% CP 31 23 103 30.1% 739 74.2% Honors/ AP 35 32 85 41.2% 772 91.4% POR 9 11 81.8% 690 0%
Count nt of Valid Test st Scor
Approac achi hing ng Expect ctat ations ns (Level vel 3) Meeti eting ng Expect ctat ations ns (Level vel 4) Excee ceeding ng Expect ctat ations ns (Level evel 5) 5) Dist strict ct % >= Level vel 3 NJ % >= Level vel 3
Grade 3
175 34% 26% 1% 61% 61% 73% 73%
Grade 4
132 32% 33% 2% 67% 67% 70% 70%
Grade 5
175 30% 28% 2% 60% 60% 73% 73%
Grade 6
158 37% 35% 3% 75% 75% 71% 71%
Grade 7
127 43% 28% 2% 73% 73% 70% 70%
Grade 8*
80 21% 25% 0% 46% 46% 52% 52%
Alg lgebra a I
130 25% 35% 0% 60% 60% 61% 61%
Geomet metry
118 27% 24% 0% 51% 51% 53% 53%
Alg lgebra a II
68 25% 12% 0% 37% 37% 44% 44%
**As compared to all schools in NJ**
Major Content Supporting Content Reasoning Modeling 6th grade
Higher Lower Lower Higher
7th grade
Lower Slightly lower Slightly lower Lower
8th grade
Equal to NJ Higher Lower Slightly lower
Algebra I
Slightly lower Slightly lower Slightly lower Slightly lower
Geometry
Slightly higher Slightly lower Slightly lower Higher
Algebra II
Lower Lower Slightly higher Slightly higher
Test Taken # of Levels 4 and above Enrollment % Test Taken Average % of Levels 4 and above Grade 6 On-level 97 34 153 63% 737 35% Honors 38 27 54 70% 775 71% POR 19 24 79% 709 0% Grade 7 On-level 78 15 133 59% 732 19% Honors 37 24 60 62% 757 65% POR 8 20 40% 702 0%
Test Taken # of Levels 4 and above Enrollment % Test Taken Average % of Levels 4 and above Grade 8 On-level 63 19 136 46% 730 30% Honors **Alg I** 49 38 78 63% 762 78% POR 13 1 19 8% 692 8%
Test Taken # of Levels 4 and above Enrollment % Test Taken Average % of Levels 4 and above Algebra 1 General 8 17 47.1% 695 0% CP 56 7 107 52.3% 724 12.5% POR 16 17 94.1% 701 0%
Test Taken # of Levels 3 and above Enrollment % Test Taken Average % of Levels 3 and above Geometry General 14 1 34 41.2% 708 7.1% CP 39 12 111 35.1% 716 30.8% Honors 48 45 84 57.1% 750 93.8% POR 10 15 66.7% 704 0% Algebra 2 General 10 27 37.0% 699 0% CP 32 10 94 34.0% 711 31.3% Honors 18 15 68 26.5% 742 83.3% POR 5 12 41.7% 684 0%