7/25/2019 1
Storytelling Through Data
Engaging Stakeholders and Improving Data Literacy
Shawn Bergman, PhD
Appalachian State University Vela Institute
Storytelling Through Data Engaging Stakeholders and Improving Data - - PDF document
7/25/2019 Storytelling Through Data Engaging Stakeholders and Improving Data Literacy Shawn Bergman, PhD Appalachian State University Vela Institute CCE Stories = Hollywood Movie 1 7/25/2019 Look Below the Water Line The Final Story
7/25/2019 1
Engaging Stakeholders and Improving Data Literacy
Shawn Bergman, PhD
Appalachian State University Vela Institute
7/25/2019 2
Project Manager
Communicator
Scientist
Data Analyst
Journalist
Designer
Technologist
Kirk, A. (2016). Data visualisation: A handbook for data driven design. Sage Publications.
7/25/2019 3
Project Manager
Communicator
Scientist
Data Analyst
Journalist
Designer
Technologist
Kirk, A. (2016). Data visualisation: A handbook for data driven design. Sage Publications.
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (2014) Kirk, A. (2016). Data visualisation: A handbook for data driven design. Sage Publications.
Step 1: Formulate the BRIEF Step 2: Work with DATA Step 2: Work with DATA Step 3: EDITORIAL thinking Step 3: EDITORIAL thinking Step 4: Develop design SOLUTION Step 4: Develop design SOLUTION
7/25/2019 4
Barends, E., Rousseau, D.M., & Briner, R.B. (2014). Evidence-Based Management: The Basic Principles. Amsterdam: Center for Evidence-Based Management.
7/25/2019 5
representation of your story to encourage stakeholder engagement
7/25/2019 6
(The Results) Percent of G6, G7, and G8 students receiving tutoring services
Live Virtual District Students Math Lang Arts Science Math Lang Arts Science 30 308 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.7% 0.0% 0.0% 50 701 42.8% 0.0% 0.0% 22.3% 0.0% 0.0% 120 2699 24.5% 13.6% 0.0% 35.0% 0.0% 0.0% 220 322 0.9% 4.0% 0.0% 15.2% 0.0% 0.0% 380 277 28.2% 10.8% 10.8% 24.2% 0.0% 0.0% 570 590 49.2% 0.5% 0.3% 0.0% 14.4% 0.0% 810 1887 12.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.7% 870 420 22.9% 0.2% 3.8% 25.2% 0.0% 0.0% 950 320 18.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.6% 970 2224 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 17.0% 0.0% 0.0% 995 359 0.3% 24.2% 0.0% 7.2% 0.0% 0.0% Total 10107 17.0% 5.0% 0.5% 17.4% 0.8% 6.5% Live Virtual District Students Math Lang Arts Science Math Lang Arts Science 30 308 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.7% 0.0% 0.0% 50 701 42.8% 0.0% 0.0% 22.3% 0.0% 0.0% 120 2699 24.5% 13.6% 0.0% 35.0% 0.0% 0.0% 220 322 0.9% 4.0% 0.0% 15.2% 0.0% 0.0% 380 277 28.2% 10.8% 10.8% 24.2% 0.0% 0.0% 570 590 49.2% 0.5% 0.3% 0.0% 14.4% 0.0% 810 1887 12.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.7% 870 420 22.9% 0.2% 3.8% 25.2% 0.0% 0.0% 950 320 18.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.6% 970 2224 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 17.0% 0.0% 0.0% 995 359 0.3% 24.2% 0.0% 7.2% 0.0% 0.0% Total 10107 17.0% 5.0% 0.5% 17.4% 0.8% 6.5%
Some districts did not
their students
(The Results) Percent of G6, G7, and G8 students receiving tutoring services
7/25/2019 7
Live Virtual District Students Math Lang Arts Science Math Lang Arts Science 30 308 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.7% 0.0% 0.0% 50 701 42.8% 0.0% 0.0% 22.3% 0.0% 0.0% 120 2699 24.5% 13.6% 0.0% 35.0% 0.0% 0.0% 220 322 0.9% 4.0% 0.0% 15.2% 0.0% 0.0% 380 277 28.2% 10.8% 10.8% 24.2% 0.0% 0.0% 570 590 49.2% 0.5% 0.3% 0.0% 14.4% 0.0% 810 1887 12.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.7% 870 420 22.9% 0.2% 3.8% 25.2% 0.0% 0.0% 950 320 18.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.6% 970 2224 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 17.0% 0.0% 0.0% 995 359 0.3% 24.2% 0.0% 7.2% 0.0% 0.0% Total 10107 17.0% 5.0% 0.5% 17.4% 0.8% 6.5%
These districts did
(The Results) Percent of G6, G7, and G8 students receiving tutoring services
Live Virtual District Students Math Lang Arts Science Math Lang Arts Science 30 308 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.7% 0.0% 0.0% 50 701 42.8% 0.0% 0.0% 22.3% 0.0% 0.0% 120 2699 24.5% 13.6% 0.0% 35.0% 0.0% 0.0% 220 322 0.9% 4.0% 0.0% 15.2% 0.0% 0.0% 380 277 28.2% 10.8% 10.8% 24.2% 0.0% 0.0% 570 590 49.2% 0.5% 0.3% 0.0% 14.4% 0.0% 810 1887 12.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.7% 870 420 22.9% 0.2% 3.8% 25.2% 0.0% 0.0% 950 320 18.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.6% 970 2224 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 17.0% 0.0% 0.0% 995 359 0.3% 24.2% 0.0% 7.2% 0.0% 0.0% Total 10107 17.0% 5.0% 0.5% 17.4% 0.8% 6.5%
Live and virtual tutoring were not focused on the same topics in some districts
(The Results) Percent of G6, G7, and G8 students receiving tutoring services
7/25/2019 8
(The Results)
District Grade Students Live Math Virtual Math 30 6 92 0.0% 2.2% 30 7 104 0.0% 24.0% 30 8 112 0.0% 5.4% 50 6 212 88.7% 20.8% 50 7 246 23.2% 25.6% 50 8 243 22.6% 20.2% 380 6 90 1.1% 1.1% 380 7 86 44.2% 0.0% 380 8 101 38.6% 65.3% 870 6 144 20.8% 65.3% 870 7 139 33.1% 5.0% 870 8 136 14.7% 2.9% 950 6 110 24.5% 0.0% 950 7 110 15.5% 0.0% 950 8 100 16.0% 0.0% 970 6 650 0.0% 16.5% 970 7 804 0.0% 15.0% 970 8 770 0.0% 19.4%
Percent of students receiving tutoring services (Select Results)
(The Results)
District Grade Students Live Math Virtual Math 30 6 92 0.0% 2.2% 30 7 104 0.0% 24.0% 30 8 112 0.0% 5.4% 50 6 212 88.7% 20.8% 50 7 246 23.2% 25.6% 50 8 243 22.6% 20.2% 380 6 90 1.1% 1.1% 380 7 86 44.2% 0.0% 380 8 101 38.6% 65.3% 870 6 144 20.8% 65.3% 870 7 139 33.1% 5.0% 870 8 136 14.7% 2.9% 950 6 110 24.5% 0.0% 950 7 110 15.5% 0.0% 950 8 100 16.0% 0.0% 970 6 650 0.0% 16.5% 970 7 804 0.0% 15.0% 970 8 770 0.0% 19.4%
Percent of students receiving tutoring services (Select Results)
Some districts had disproportionate use
tutoring across grades
7/25/2019 9
(The Results)
District Grade Students Live Math Virtual Math 30 6 92 0.0% 2.2% 30 7 104 0.0% 24.0% 30 8 112 0.0% 5.4% 50 6 212 88.7% 20.8% 50 7 246 23.2% 25.6% 50 8 243 22.6% 20.2% 380 6 90 1.1% 1.1% 380 7 86 44.2% 0.0% 380 8 101 38.6% 65.3% 870 6 144 20.8% 65.3% 870 7 139 33.1% 5.0% 870 8 136 14.7% 2.9% 950 6 110 24.5% 0.0% 950 7 110 15.5% 0.0% 950 8 100 16.0% 0.0% 970 6 650 0.0% 16.5% 970 7 804 0.0% 15.0% 970 8 770 0.0% 19.4%
Percent of students receiving tutoring services (Select Results)
Some districts had disproportionate use across live/virtual tutoring and across grades
(The Results)
District Grade Students Live Math Virtual Math 30 6 92 0.0% 2.2% 30 7 104 0.0% 24.0% 30 8 112 0.0% 5.4% 50 6 212 88.7% 20.8% 50 7 246 23.2% 25.6% 50 8 243 22.6% 20.2% 380 6 90 1.1% 1.1% 380 7 86 44.2% 0.0% 380 8 101 38.6% 65.3% 870 6 144 20.8% 65.3% 870 7 139 33.1% 5.0% 870 8 136 14.7% 2.9% 950 6 110 24.5% 0.0% 950 7 110 15.5% 0.0% 950 8 100 16.0% 0.0% 970 6 650 0.0% 16.5% 970 7 804 0.0% 15.0% 970 8 770 0.0% 19.4%
Percent of students receiving tutoring services (Select Results)
Most districts had consistent live and virtual tutoring usage across grades
7/25/2019 10
Engaging Stakeholders and Improving Data Literacy
7/25/2019 11
Engaging Stakeholders and Improving Data Literacy
7/25/2019 12
to be met. The target groups should be here --> STUDENTS
relationships with these stakeholders to ensure support for project activities --> TEACHERS / PARENTS
monitored to ensure that they are not negatively affected
importance with regard to daily program decisions and outputs --> Federal Program Officer
Level of Influence Low Level of Importance Low High
“The Office” “The Bar”
(or Coffee Shop)
“The ‘Airplane’ Cockpit”
7/25/2019 13
Engaging Stakeholders and Improving Data Literacy
your story to encourage stakeholder engagement
7/25/2019 14
Kirk, A. (2016). Data visualisation: A handbook for data driven design. Sage Publications.
Kirk, A. (2016). Data visualisation: A handbook for data driven design. Sage Publications.
7/25/2019 15
Composition
Data representation
Annotation
Interactivity
Color
Kirk, A. (2016). Data visualisation: A handbook for data driven design. Sage Publications.
7/25/2019 16
Not Bad Little Better
7/25/2019 17
7/25/2019 18
7/25/2019 19
Professor and Director of Professional Education Appalachian State University bergmans@appstate.edu Director of Research Vela Institute shawn.bergman@velainstitute.org