Texture-Structure-Microstructure: a combined analysis by x-ray - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

texture structure microstructure a combined analysis by x
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Texture-Structure-Microstructure: a combined analysis by x-ray - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Texture-Structure-Microstructure: a combined analysis by x-ray diffraction of Pb 0.76 Ca 0.24 TiO 3 / Pt / TiO 2 / SiO 2 / Si-(001) M. Morales, D. Chateigner, L. Lutterotti, J. Ricote LPEC, Univ. Le Mans, France CRISMAT-ISMRA, Caen, France


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Texture-Structure-Microstructure: a combined analysis by x-ray diffraction

  • f Pb0.76Ca0.24TiO3 / Pt / TiO2 / SiO2 /

Si-(001)

  • M. Morales, D. Chateigner, L. Lutterotti, J. Ricote

LPEC, Univ. Le Mans, France CRISMAT-ISMRA, Caen, France DIM, Univ. di Trento, Italia DMF-CSIC, Madrid, España

ISMRA

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Summary

  • Usual up-to-date approaches for polycrystals

– Texture – Structure-Microstructure – Problems on ultrastructures

  • Combined approach

– Experimental needs – Methodology-Algorithm – Ultrastructure implementation – Case study on Pb0.76Ca0.24TiO3

  • Future trends
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Usual Texture Analysis

X=010 Y=100 Z=001

c α β

X Y

φ χ χ χφ π χφ d d n si ) P( 4 1 = V ) dV(

{hkl} pole figure measurement + corrections:

dg (g) f 8 1 = V dV(g)

2

π

We want f(g) (ODF): with g = (α,β,γ)

X=010 Y=100 Z=001

c a b α β γ

X Y

slide-4
SLIDE 4

> <

ϕ π

y // hkl hkl

~ d f(g) 2 1 = ) y ( P

  • We have to invert (Fundamental equation of Texture Analysis):

( ) ⎥

⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ =

+ hkl I 1 n hkl n 1 n

) y ( P ) g ( f ) g ( f N ) g ( f

  • WIMV refinement method:

Williams-Imhof-Matthies-Vinel

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Usual Structure-Microstructure Analysis

) bkg(2 ) 2 ( S ) 2 ( I = ) I(2

phases hkl, phases hkl, phases hkl,

θ + θ θ θ

(Full pattern fitting, Rietveld Analysis)

Si3N4 matrix with SiC whiskers: Random powder:

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2 c P hkl 2 hkl hkl

V L m F S ) 2 ( I = θ

S: scale factor (phase abundance) Fhkl: structure factor (includes Debye-Waller term) Vc: unit-cell volume

) 2 ( S * ) 2 ( S ) 2 ( S

S hkl I hkl hkl

θ θ = θ

SI: instrumental broadening SS: Sample aberrations crystallite sizes (iso. or anisotropic) rms microstrains ε

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Problems on ultrastructures

Ferroelectric film (PTC) Electrode (Pt) Antidiffusion barrier (TiO2) Oxide (native, thermally grown) SC Substrate (Si)

  • Strong intra- and inter-phase
  • verlaps
  • Mixture of very strong and

lower textures

  • texture effect not fully

removable: structure

  • structure unknown: texture

001/100 PTC 111 PTC + 111 Pt 011/110 PTC + Si (λ/2)

Sum diagram Need something !!

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Combined approach

Experimental needs

ω = 20° ω = 40°

Mapping Spectrometer space for correction of:

  • instrumental resolution
  • instrumental misalignments

χ 60° 0° χ 60° 0°

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Methodology-Algorithm Rietveld Structure, Microstructure WIMV Texture Rietveld and WIMV algorithm are alternatively used to correct for each others contributions: Marquardt non- linear least squares fit is used for the Rietveld. Pole figure extraction (Le Bail method): Phkl(χ,ϕ) Correction of intensities for texture: Ihkl(2θ,χ,ϕ) = Ihkl(2θ) Phkl(χ,ϕ)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Ultrastructure implementation Corrections are needed for volumic/absorption changes when the samples are rotated. With a CPS detector, these correction factors are:

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

χ ω µ − − χ µ − − =

χ

cos sin / T 2 exp 1 / cos / Tg exp 1 g C

2 1 film top

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

χ ω µ − χ µ − =

∑ ∑

χ χ

cos sin / T 2 exp / cos / T g exp C C

' i ' i ' i ' i 2 film top layer cov.

Gives access to individual Thicknesses in the refinement

slide-11
SLIDE 11

PTC Pt a = 3.945(1) Å c = 4.080(1) Å T = 4080(10) Å tiso = 390(7) Å ε = 0.0067(1) a = 3.955(1) Å T' = 462(4) Å t'iso = 458(3) Å ε' = 0.0032(1) Case study on Pb0.76Ca0.24TiO3

slide-12
SLIDE 12

WIMV vs Entropy modified WIMV approach WIMV E-WIMV Better refinement with E- WIMV:

  • lower reliability factors

(structure and texture)

  • better high density level

reproduction

Texture Pt Texture Index (m.r.d.2) PTC Texture Index (m.r.d.2) Pt RP0 (%) PTC RP0 (%) Rw (%) RBragg (%) WIMV 48.1 1.3 18.4 11.4 12.4 7.7 EWIMV 40.8 2 13.7 11.2 7 4.7

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Future trends

  • Combining with reflectivity measurements: independently

measured and refined thicknesses, electron densities and roughnesses

  • Adding residual stress determinations
  • Multiple Analysis Using Diffraction, a web-based tutorial for

the combined approach: search MAUD (Luca Lutterotti)

  • Quantitative Texture Analysis Internet Course: http://

lpec.univ-lemans.fr/qta (Daniel Chateigner)

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by EU project ESQUI (http://lpec.univ- lemans.fr/esqui : an x-ray Expert System for microelectronic film QUality Improvement, G6RD-CT99-00169), under the RTD program.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Quantitative Texture Analysis Internet Course http://lpec.univ-lemans.fr/qta