symplectic non squeezing for the discrete nonlinear schr
play

Symplectic non-squeezing for the discrete nonlinear Schr odinger - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Symplectic non-squeezing for the discrete nonlinear Schr odinger equation Alexander Tumanov University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Quasilinear equations, inverse problems and their applications dedicated to the memory of Gennadi


  1. Symplectic non-squeezing for the discrete nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation Alexander Tumanov University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign “Quasilinear equations, inverse problems and their applications” dedicated to the memory of Gennadi Henkin Dolgoprudny, Russia, September 12–15, 2016. Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  2. Joint work with Alexandre Sukhov Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  3. Gromov’s Non-Squeezing Theorem Let B n be the unit ball in C n ; then D = B 1 ⊂ C is the unit disc. B n ( r ) is the ball of radius r . Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  4. Gromov’s Non-Squeezing Theorem Let B n be the unit ball in C n ; then D = B 1 ⊂ C is the unit disc. B n ( r ) is the ball of radius r . Let ω = � n � n j = 1 dx j ∧ dy j = i j = 1 dz j ∧ dz j be the standard 2 symplectic form in C n = R 2 n . Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  5. Gromov’s Non-Squeezing Theorem Let B n be the unit ball in C n ; then D = B 1 ⊂ C is the unit disc. B n ( r ) is the ball of radius r . Let ω = � n � n j = 1 dx j ∧ dy j = i j = 1 dz j ∧ dz j be the standard 2 symplectic form in C n = R 2 n . A smooth map F : Ω ⊂ C n → C n is called symplectic if it preserves the symplectic form ω , that is, F ∗ ω = ω . Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  6. Gromov’s Non-Squeezing Theorem Let B n be the unit ball in C n ; then D = B 1 ⊂ C is the unit disc. B n ( r ) is the ball of radius r . Let ω = � n � n j = 1 dx j ∧ dy j = i j = 1 dz j ∧ dz j be the standard 2 symplectic form in C n = R 2 n . A smooth map F : Ω ⊂ C n → C n is called symplectic if it preserves the symplectic form ω , that is, F ∗ ω = ω . Theorem (Gromov, 1985) Let r , R > 0 . Suppose there is a symplectic embedding F : B n ( r ) → D ( R ) × C n − 1 . Then r ≤ R. Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  7. Gromov’s Non-Squeezing Theorem Let B n be the unit ball in C n ; then D = B 1 ⊂ C is the unit disc. B n ( r ) is the ball of radius r . Let ω = � n � n j = 1 dx j ∧ dy j = i j = 1 dz j ∧ dz j be the standard 2 symplectic form in C n = R 2 n . A smooth map F : Ω ⊂ C n → C n is called symplectic if it preserves the symplectic form ω , that is, F ∗ ω = ω . Theorem (Gromov, 1985) Let r , R > 0 . Suppose there is a symplectic embedding F : B n ( r ) → D ( R ) × C n − 1 . Then r ≤ R. What is complex here? . . . Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  8. Gromov’s Non-Squeezing Theorem Let B n be the unit ball in C n ; then D = B 1 ⊂ C is the unit disc. B n ( r ) is the ball of radius r . Let ω = � n � n j = 1 dx j ∧ dy j = i j = 1 dz j ∧ dz j be the standard 2 symplectic form in C n = R 2 n . A smooth map F : Ω ⊂ C n → C n is called symplectic if it preserves the symplectic form ω , that is, F ∗ ω = ω . Theorem (Gromov, 1985) Let r , R > 0 . Suppose there is a symplectic embedding F : B n ( r ) → D ( R ) × C n − 1 . Then r ≤ R. What is complex here? . . . Only notation. Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  9. Gromov’s Non-Squeezing Theorem Let B n be the unit ball in C n ; then D = B 1 ⊂ C is the unit disc. B n ( r ) is the ball of radius r . Let ω = � n � n j = 1 dx j ∧ dy j = i j = 1 dz j ∧ dz j be the standard 2 symplectic form in C n = R 2 n . A smooth map F : Ω ⊂ C n → C n is called symplectic if it preserves the symplectic form ω , that is, F ∗ ω = ω . Theorem (Gromov, 1985) Let r , R > 0 . Suppose there is a symplectic embedding F : B n ( r ) → D ( R ) × C n − 1 . Then r ≤ R. What is complex here? . . . Only notation. Gromov’s proof is based on complex analysis, namely on J-complex (pseudoholomorphic) curves. Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  10. Infinite-dimensional versions Flows of Hamiltonian PDEs are symplectic transformations. Non-squeezing property is of great interest. There are many results for specific PDEs. Kuksin (1994-95) proved a general non-squeezing result for symplectomorphisms of the form F = I + compact. Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  11. Infinite-dimensional versions Flows of Hamiltonian PDEs are symplectic transformations. Non-squeezing property is of great interest. There are many results for specific PDEs. Kuksin (1994-95) proved a general non-squeezing result for symplectomorphisms of the form F = I + compact. Bourgain (1994-95) proved the result for cubic NLS. Consider time t flow F : u ( 0 ) �→ u ( t ) of the equation iu t + u xx + | u | p u = 0 , x ∈ R / Z , t > 0 . Then F is a symplectic transformation of L 2 ( 0 , 1 ) , 0 < p ≤ 2. Bourgain proved the non-squeezing property for p = 2. For other values of p the question is open. Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  12. Infinite-dimensional versions Colliander, Keel, Staffilani, Takaoka, and Tao (2005) proved the result for the KdV. Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  13. Infinite-dimensional versions Colliander, Keel, Staffilani, Takaoka, and Tao (2005) proved the result for the KdV. Roum´ egoux (2010) - BBM equation. Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  14. Infinite-dimensional versions Colliander, Keel, Staffilani, Takaoka, and Tao (2005) proved the result for the KdV. Roum´ egoux (2010) - BBM equation. Abbondandolo and Majer (2014) - in case F ( B ) is convex. Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  15. Infinite-dimensional versions Colliander, Keel, Staffilani, Takaoka, and Tao (2005) proved the result for the KdV. Roum´ egoux (2010) - BBM equation. Abbondandolo and Majer (2014) - in case F ( B ) is convex. Finally, Fabert (2015) proposes a proof of the general result using non-standard analysis. Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  16. Infinite-dimensional versions Colliander, Keel, Staffilani, Takaoka, and Tao (2005) proved the result for the KdV. Roum´ egoux (2010) - BBM equation. Abbondandolo and Majer (2014) - in case F ( B ) is convex. Finally, Fabert (2015) proposes a proof of the general result using non-standard analysis. We prove a non-squeezing result for a symplectic transformation F of the Hilbert space assuming that the derivative F ′ is bounded in Hilbert scales. We apply our result to discrete nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations. Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  17. Hilbert scales Let H be a complex Hilbert space with fixed orthonormal basis ( e n ) ∞ n = 1 . Let ( θ n ) ∞ n = 1 be a sequence of positive numbers such that θ n → ∞ as n → ∞ , for example, θ n = n . Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  18. Hilbert scales Let H be a complex Hilbert space with fixed orthonormal basis ( e n ) ∞ n = 1 . Let ( θ n ) ∞ n = 1 be a sequence of positive numbers such that θ n → ∞ as n → ∞ , for example, θ n = n . For s ∈ R we define H s as a Hilbert space with the following norm: � x � 2 � | x n | 2 θ 2 s � s = n , x = x n e n . Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  19. Hilbert scales Let H be a complex Hilbert space with fixed orthonormal basis ( e n ) ∞ n = 1 . Let ( θ n ) ∞ n = 1 be a sequence of positive numbers such that θ n → ∞ as n → ∞ , for example, θ n = n . For s ∈ R we define H s as a Hilbert space with the following norm: � x � 2 � | x n | 2 θ 2 s � s = n , x = x n e n . The family ( H s ) is called the Hilbert scale corresponding to the basis ( e n ) and sequence ( θ n ) . We have H 0 = H . For s > r , the space H s is dense in H r , and the inclusion H s ⊂ H r is compact. Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  20. Hilbert scales Let H be a complex Hilbert space with fixed orthonormal basis ( e n ) ∞ n = 1 . Let ( θ n ) ∞ n = 1 be a sequence of positive numbers such that θ n → ∞ as n → ∞ , for example, θ n = n . For s ∈ R we define H s as a Hilbert space with the following norm: � x � 2 � | x n | 2 θ 2 s � s = n , x = x n e n . The family ( H s ) is called the Hilbert scale corresponding to the basis ( e n ) and sequence ( θ n ) . We have H 0 = H . For s > r , the space H s is dense in H r , and the inclusion H s ⊂ H r is compact. Example. H = L 2 ( 0 , 1 ) with the standard Fourier basis, θ n = ( 1 + n 2 ) 1 / 2 , n ∈ Z . Then H s is the standard Sobolev space. Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  21. Main Result Let B ( r ) = B ∞ ( r ) be the ball of radius r in H . Theorem Let r , R > 0 . Let F : B ( r ) → D ( R ) × H be a symplectic embedding of class C 1 . Suppose there is s 0 > 0 such that for every | s | < s 0 the derivative F ′ ( z ) is bounded in H s uniformly in z ∈ B ( r ) . Then r ≤ R. Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

  22. Discrete non-linear Schr¨ odinger equation Consider the following system of equations � n + f ( | u n | 2 ) u n + iu ′ a nk u k = 0 . (1) k Here u ( t ) = ( u n ( t )) n ∈ Z , u n ( t ) ∈ C , t ≥ 0. Alexander Tumanov Non-Squeezing for the discrete Schr¨ odinger equation

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend