Students’ financial literacy: results from PISA 2015
Friday, 16 June 2017 Mexico city
Students financial literacy: results from PISA 2015 Friday, 16 June - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Students financial literacy: results from PISA 2015 Friday, 16 June 2017 Mexico city The PISA financial literacy test In 2015, a 2015, around 48 000 students were assessed in financial 2015, a 2015, a round 48 000 students were
Students’ financial literacy: results from PISA 2015
Friday, 16 June 2017 Mexico city
In In In 2015, a
2015, a 2015, a 2015, around 48 000 students were assessed in financial round 48 000 students were assessed in financial round 48 000 students were assessed in financial round 48 000 students were assessed in financial literacy, representing about 12 million 15 literacy, representing about 12 million 15 literacy, representing about 12 million 15 literacy, representing about 12 million 15-
year year year-
schools of the 15 participating countries and economies schools of the 15 participating countries and economies schools of the 15 participating countries and economies schools of the 15 participating countries and economies
Students in countries and economies that participated in the Students in countries and economies that participated in the Students in countries and economies that participated in the financial literacy answered financial literacy answered financial literacy answered financial literacy answered
– a two-hour combination of tasks in science, reading and mathematics – A one-hour test in financial literacy (43 items) after the core assessment – Questions about their experience with money such as discussing money matters with parents, basic financial products and sources of money (through a ‘money management questionnaire’) … in addition to the standard questions about their personal background
Some 56% of 15-year-olds in participating OECD countries and economies have a bank account, 19% have a prepaid debit card
Young people are already financial consumers and will soon encounter complex financial decision
Some 64% earn money from some type of work activity
But fewer than one in three students have the skills to manage a bank account 31%
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Peru Brazil Lithuania Slovak Republic Italy Poland Canada Australia
Made payments online using the Internet Made a transaction using a mobile phone
Many young people use digital financial products
Source: World Bank Global Findex, 2014
Percentage of young people age 15-24 who have:
%
Australia Australia Australia at bachelor’s, master’s or doctoral levels who had a public who had a public who had a public who had a public student loan student loan student loan student loan in 2013/14
79%
United States United States United States United States who had a public student loan student loan student loan student loan in 2013/14
62%
Average amount of debt Average amount of debt Average amount of debt students graduate with in the Netherlands Netherlands Netherlands Netherlands
USD 18 000
in Canada Canada Canada Canada
USD 12 000
In some countries, students nearing the end of compulsory education will soon decide whether to take a student loan
Source: Education at a Glance 2016
10 20 30 40 50 Australia United States Netherlands Participating Canadian provinces %
Percentage of 15-year-old students who perform at Level 4 and above
At Level 4, students […] can make financial decisions taking into account longer- term consequences, such as understanding the overall cost implication of paying back a loan over a longer period […].
economies, 84% discuss money matters with their parents at least once a month
financial literacy
Students acquire financial skills from their parents… But up to what their parents can transmit them
socio-economic background of their family
financial literacy than disadvantaged students
Globalisation and digital technologies have made financial products and services more widely accessible but also more challenging
– The spread of digital financial services opens up new opportunities for financially excluded people to access the formal financial system… – but also exposes consumers to new security threats and risks of fraud that are compounded when low financial literacy is combined with poor digital skills and low cyber security awareness
– Increased life expectancy, less welfare protection, more “individualized” pensions, and more uncertain economic and job prospects due to digitalization, technological change, globalization
Financial education is a complement to financial consumer protection, inclusion and regulation
– The spread of digital financial services opens up new opportunities for financially excluded people to access the formal financial system… – but also exposes consumers to new security threats and risks of fraud that are compounded when low financial literacy is combined with poor digital skills and low cyber security awareness
– Increased life expectancy, less welfare protection, more “individualised” pensions, and more uncertain economic and job prospects due to digitalisation, technological change, globalisation
Knowledge and understanding of financial concepts and risks… …and the skills, motivation and confidence to apply such knowledge and understanding… …in order to make effective decisions across a range of financial contexts, to improve the financial well-being of individuals and society, and to enable participation in economic life
Financial literacy in PISA
What does financial literacy mean for the lives of 15-year-olds?
fare home? Or would it be better to buy pizza and invite friends home? Balance their priority and plan what to spend money on
and services Remember that some of the purchases have ongoing costs
legitimate, they should know what to do if they are not sure Being alert to possible fraud
by their household insurance Knowing what risk is and what insurance is meant for
to pay interest on the loan, on top of the advertised price for the compute Make an informed decision about credit
PISA framework for financial literacy Content
Money and transactions Planning and managing finances Risk and reward Financial landscape
Processes
Identifying financial information Analyse information in a financial context Evaluate financial issues Apply financial knowledge and understanding
Contexts
Education and work Home and family Individual Societal
1. What are the current needs and gaps in financial literacy of needs and gaps in financial literacy of needs and gaps in financial literacy of needs and gaps in financial literacy of students students students students across countries and within countries? 2. What are the main factors main factors main factors main factors explaining the wide inequalities wide inequalities wide inequalities wide inequalities within country? 3. Is financial literacy only about mathematics mathematics mathematics mathematics and and and and reading reading reading reading ? 4. What are students’ current experiences with money matters experiences with money matters experiences with money matters experiences with money matters ? Is it related to financial literacy? 5. How is financial literacy related to students’ financial financial financial financial behaviors behaviors behaviors behaviors and future expectations? Goal : Evidence to support effective policy action
5 research questions and a policy goal
What are the needs and gaps across and within countries?
B-S-J-G (China) Belgium (Flemish) Canadian provinces Russia Netherlands Australia United States Poland Italy Spain Lithuania Slovak Republic Chile Peru Brazil
380 400 420 440 460 480 500 520 540 560 580
Mean performance in financial literacy
Mean financial Mean financial Mean financial Mean financial literacy literacy literacy literacy score score score score
Figure Figure Figure Figure IV.3.2 IV.3.2 IV.3.2 IV.3.2
10 20 30 Russia Italy United States Belgium (Flemish) OECD average-7 Spain Slovak Republic Australia Poland Three-year score-point difference
Change between 2012 and 2015
Figure Figure Figure Figure IV.3.6 IV.3.6 IV.3.6 IV.3.6
13 22 22 13 19 20 20 20 22 22 25 32 35 38 48 53 33 11 24 22 17 15 6 8 10 12 6 4 6 3 1 3
80 60 40 20 20 40 60 80 100 B-S-J-G (China) Russia Belgium (Flemish) Canadian provinces Netherlands Australia Italy Poland United States OECD average-10 Spain Lithuania Slovak Republic Chile Peru Brazil
Students’ financial literacy by proficiency levels
%
BANK ERROR - Evaluate a potential financial fraud and respond appropriately to a financial scam e-mail message – Level 5 INVOICE Question 2 - Identify a delivery cost that is explicitly stated on an invoice – Level 2 INVOICE Question 1 – Recognise the purpose of an invoice - Below Level 2 PAY SLIP - Read a pay slip and recognise that the employer will only pay net salary into the employee’s bank – Level 4 INVOICE Question 3 (partial credit) - Interpret various elements on the same invoice to correct a mistake in the billing – Level 3
Variation within each country is wider than the variation between countries at the mean
Figure Figure Figure Figure IV.4.1 IV.4.1 IV.4.1 IV.4.1
Percentage of students at various percentiles on the financial literacy scale
200 300 400 500 600 700 B-S-J-G (China) 312 Canadian provinces 295 Netherlands 312 OECD average-10 285 Poland 262 Spain 265 Slovak Republic 311 Peru 276 25th - 10th percentile 50th - 25th percentile 75th - 50th percentile 90th - 75th percentile Score-point difference between 90th and 10th
What are the main factors (gender, socio-economic and immigrant background) explaining the wide inequalities within country?
5 10 15
Lithuania Slovak Republic Poland Australia Spain Brazil OECD average-10 Netherlands Canadian provinces Peru Russia Belgium (Flemish) United States Chile B-S-J-G (China) Italy
Before accounting for performance in other subjects After accounting for performance in mathematics and reading
In most countries/economies there are no differences in financial literacy between boys and girls at the mean…
Figure Figure Figure Figure IV.4.4 IV.4.4 IV.4.4 IV.4.4
Score-point difference Girls perform better Girls perform better Girls perform better Girls perform better Boys perform better Boys perform better Boys perform better Boys perform better Gender differences in financial literacy may be related different
learning, different contexts in which men and women grow up and live, and to a possible variation of these factors across generations.
Difference between boys and girls
10 20 30 40 50 60
Peru Brazil Lithuania Chile Slovak Republic Spain Italy Poland Russia United States OECD average-10 Australia Netherlands Canadian provinces Belgium (Flemish) B-S-J-G (China)
Boys Girls
… but in 9 countries and economies out of 15, more boys than girls are low performers
Figure Figure Figure Figure IV.4.5 IV.4.5 IV.4.5 IV.4.5
10 20 30 40 50 60 Boys Girls Students below Students below Students below Students below Level 2 Level 2 Level 2 Level 2 Students at Students at Students at Students at Level Level Level Level 5 5 5 5 % %
300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650
Peru 117 Brazil 78 Chile 103 Slovak Republic 80 Lithuania 71 Spain 79 United States 97 OECD average-10 89 Italy 60 Poland 73 Australia 107 Netherlands 104 Belgium (Flemish) 110 Russia 46 Canadian provinces 77 B-S-J-G (China) 132
Score points
Top quarter of ESCS Third quarter of ESCS Second quarter of ESCS Bottom quarter of ESCS Difference between students in the top quarter and students in the bottom quarter
Socio-economically advantaged students score 89 points higher than disadvantaged students, on average across OECD, equivalent to more than one PISA proficiency level
Table Table Table Table IV.4.11 IV.4.11 IV.4.11 IV.4.11
Mean score, by quarters of the PISA index of economic, social and cultural status (ESCS)
440 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 Never or hardly ever Once or twice a month Once or twice a week Almost every day Score points
Parents play a role in developing their children’s financial literacy not
through direct engagement
Figure IV.5.1 Figure IV.5.1 Figure IV.5.1 Figure IV.5.1
Mean score, by students’ answers to the question: “How often do you discuss money matters (e.g. talk about spending, saving, banking, investment) with your parents?” Discussing money matters with parents at least sometimes is associated with higher financial literacy than never discussing the subject, after accounting for students’ socio- economic status But discussing very
something else….
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Russia 45 Brazil 47 Slovak Republic 48 Italy 52 Canadian provinces 53 Lithuania 58 Spain 58 OECD average-10 62 Poland 62 Chile 62 Peru 68 B-S-J-G (China) 69 United States 70 Belgium (Flemish) 70 Netherlands 71 Australia 71
Variation uniquely associated with mathematics performance Variation uniquely associated with reading performance Variation associated with more than one domain Variation uniquely captured by the financial literacy assessment
Total explained variation
Student performance in financial literacy is correlated with performance in mathematics and reading, but around 38% of the score reflects factors that are uniquely captured by the financial literacy assessment
Table IV.3.10a Table IV.3.10a Table IV.3.10a Table IV.3.10a
Financial literacy skills may go beyond or fall short of the ability to use the knowledge that students acquired in compulsory education
10 20 30 40
Lithuania Spain Slovak Republic Poland Chile Italy OECD average-10 Netherlands Brazil Australia United States Peru Canadian provinces Russia Belgium (Flemish) B-S-J-G (China)
Score-point difference
Students’ performance in financial literacy is lower lower lower lower than the performance of students with similar scores in mathematics and reading Students’ performance in financial literacy is higher higher higher higher than the performance of students with similar scores in mathematics and reading
Figure Figure Figure Figure IV.3.12 IV.3.12 IV.3.12 IV.3.12
Difference between the actual financial literacy score and the score predicted by students’ performance in mathematics and reading
Highest performing countries/economies
What are students’ current experiences with money matters ? Are these related to financial literacy?
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Netherlands Australia Canadian provinces Belgium (Flemish) OECD average-10 Italy United States Spain B-S-J-G (China) Russia Slovak Republic Lithuania Chile Poland %
Student has both a bank account and a prepaid debit card Student has a bank account but no prepaid debit card Student has a prepaid debit card but no bank account Student earns money from a work activity
Many students hold basic financial products or earn money from work
Figure Figure Figure Figure IV.2.1 IV.2.1 IV.2.1 IV.2.1
On average, students who hold a bank account perform better in financial literacy than students of similar socio-economic status who do not have a bank account
Figure Figure Figure Figure IV.5.5 IV.5.5 IV.5.5 IV.5.5
20 40 60 80 100
Slovak Republic Russia Lithuania Poland B-S-J-G (China) Chile United States OECD average-10 Italy Belgium (Flemish) Australia Spain Canadian provinces Netherlands
Score-point difference
After accounting for socio-economic status Before accounting for socio-economic status
Difference between students who have a bank account and students who do not
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Chile Poland Russia Italy Lithuania Slovak Republic B-S-J-G (China) Spain United States OECD average-10 Belgium (Flemish) Canadian provinces Australia Netherlands % Students holding a bank account Students holding a bank account who perform below proficiency Level 4
Often two out of three of the students who hold a bank account do not have the skills to manage such an account
Table Table Table Table IV.5.13b IV.5.13b IV.5.13b IV.5.13b At Level 4, students can apply their understanding of complex financial concepts, interpret and evaluate financial documents such as a bank statement, and make financial decisions taking into account longer-term consequences, such as understanding the overall cost implication of paying back a loan Students who have a bank account but do not reach proficiency Level 4
How is financial literacy related to students’ financial behaviors?
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Slovak Republic Belgium (Flemish) Italy Poland Lithuania OECD average-10 Canadian provinces Netherlands Spain Australia B-S-J-G (China) United States Russia Chile
Not buy it Save up to buy it Try to borrow money from a friend Try to borrow money from a family member Buy it with money that really should be used for something else
Most students would save if they want to buy something for which they do not have enough money
Figure Figure Figure Figure IV.6.1 IV.6.1 IV.6.1 IV.6.1
Percentage of students who gave the following replies to the question: “Likelihood of students' response to the question “If you don’t have enough money to buy something you really want (e.g. an item of clothing, sports equipment) what are you most likely to do?”
1,00 1,50 2,00 2,50 3,00 3,50 Try to borrow money from a family member Try to borrow money from a friend Save up to buy it Not buy it Odds ratio Level 2 or 3 Level 4 or 5
Students' financial literacy is associated with understanding the value of saving
Figure Figure Figure Figure IV.6.2 IV.6.2 IV.6.2 IV.6.2
High performing students are more than twice as likely as low-performing students in financial literacy to choose the statement "Save up to buy it" rather than "Buy it with money that really should be used for something else“, after accounting for performance in mathematics and reading and
Financial literacy skills for all students Address the needs of low- performing students Tackle socio- economic inequalities early on Provide equal
learning to boys and girls Help students make the most of available learning
school Target parents at the same time as young people Provide young people with safe
learn by experience
Evaluate the impact of initiatives in and outside of school
are implementing a national strategy for financial education specifically addressing young people among their target audiences: … Australia, Brazil, Canada, Italy, the Netherlands, the Russian Federation, Spain, Peru and the United States .. And over 65 countries these days
elements in the school curriculum into existing subjects (Australia, Brazil, Flemish Community of Belgium, Lithuania, Peru, Slovak Republic, Spain – Canada and the United states, depending on province/state) … but to what extent is the curriculum implemented?
programmes in school (Brazil, Italy, Russia, Spain, US) …is it effective? evaluation needs to become systematic
(money weeks, savings day), museums, serious games
…complementary to school initiatives …can reach out-of-school young people … participation of non-profits and private sector to be monitored …again their impact needs to be evaluated more regularly
effectiveness through the OECD/International Network on Financial Education (INFE)
Australia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Estonia, Finland, Georgia, Indonesia, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Netherlands, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Spain, United States
www.oecd.org/finance/financial-education Flore-Anne.Messy@oecd.org SecretariatINFE@oecd.org and remember: Without Without Without Without data, you are just data, you are just data, you are just data, you are just another person with an opinion another person with an opinion another person with an opinion another person with an opinion
Find out more about our work at www.oecd.org/pisa All publications and the complete micro-level database