technology literacy survey technology literacy survey
play

TECHNOLOGY LITERACY SURVEY TECHNOLOGY LITERACY SURVEY Technology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TECHNOLOGY LITERACY SURVEY TECHNOLOGY LITERACY SURVEY Technology Literacy Tabulation Sheet Computer Applications - CIS 1113 Pilot Courses, Fall 2016 Face-to-Face Students Students assessed assessed WINDOWS 7 Pre 58 Post 41 Missed Pre


  1. TECHNOLOGY LITERACY SURVEY

  2. TECHNOLOGY LITERACY SURVEY Technology Literacy Tabulation Sheet Computer Applications - CIS 1113 Pilot Courses, Fall 2016 Face-to-Face Students Students assessed assessed WINDOWS 7 Pre 58 Post 41 Missed Pre - Missed Post - Assessment Task % knowledge Test % knowledge Test 1.1Identify the operating system used by a computer 62.1% 22 78% 9 1.2Demonstrate knowledge of the Windows Start menu 69.0% 18 93% 3 1.3Identify drives on a computer 44.8% 32 63% 15 1.4Identify the help menu 82.8% 10 88% 5 1.5Use Search to locate a file 63.8% 21 83% 7 1.6Identify and demonstrate knowledge of basic office software 72.4% 16 90% 4 program; identifying their corresponding file extensions 1.7Identify the desktop 51.7% 28 66% 14 1.8Identify the task bar 48.3% 30 66% 14 1.9Minimize and maximize windows 53.4% 27 76% 10 1.10Start programs 72.4% 16 95% 2 1.11Open, close and switch between windows 79.3% 12 93% 3 1.12Open files using appropriate programs 39.7% 35 51% 20 1.13Delete documents 79.3% 12 83% 7 1.14Shutdown, restart, and log off a computer 62.1% 22 51% 20

  3. TECHNOLOGY LITERACY SURVEY WORD Students assessed Students assessed Pre 58 Post 44 Missed Pre - Missed Post - % knowledge Test % knowledge Test 2.1Open a document 62.1% 22 68.2% 14 2.2Identify the Ribbon 58.6% 24 75.0% 11 2.3Use Save As to save to a particular folder and name the 43.1% 33 38.6% 27 document 2.4Identify file extensions 91.4% 5 97.7% 1 2.5Use Spelling and Grammar check 75.9% 14 88.6% 5 2.6Format the size, color and type of font 39.7% 35 63.6% 16 2.7Set single or double spacing 65.5% 20 77.3% 10 2.8Align text 79.3% 12 88.6% 5 2.9Use bullets and automatic numbering 86.2% 8 100.0% 0 2.10Use the Undo button 89.7% 6 95.5% 2 2.11Cut, copy and paste 81.0% 11 88.6% 5 2.12Set margins 58.6% 24 70.5% 13 2.13Select portrait or landscape 69.0% 18 72.7% 12 2.14 Demonstrate knowledge of the differences between “Save” 75.9% 14 97.7% 1 and “Save As” functions 2.15Print 84.5% 9 84.1% 7 2.16Save and close a document 81.0% 11 88.6% 5

  4. TECHNOLOGY LITERACY SURVEY EMAIL Students assessed Students assessed Pre 58 Post 41 Missed Pre - Missed Post - % knowledge Test % knowledge Test 3.1Define email 93.1% 4 92.7% 3 3.2Tell the difference between a URL and an email address 79.3% 12 87.8% 5 3.3Register for a new email account 55.2% 26 56.1% 18 3.4Log into email 79.3% 12 85.4% 6 3.5Address an email and create an email message; then, Send 5.2% 55 26.8% 30 an email 3.6Open an email and reply to all 82.8% 10 82.9% 7 3.7Forward an email 86.2% 8 87.8% 5 3.8Add an attachment to an email 91.4% 5 92.7% 3 3.9Open an attachment in an email 91.4% 5 90.2% 4 3.10Delete an email and retrieve an email from the trash 55.2% 26 61.0% 16 3.11Understand basics of email etiquette 60.3% 23 56.1% 18 3.12Use caution when opening an email from an unfamiliar 91.4% 5 92.7% 3 source 3.13Sign out of email 94.8% 3 100.0% 0 3.14Define computer virus 79.3% 12 82.9% 7 3.15Avoid giving out personal information to unfamiliar people 82.8% 10 82.9% 7 3.16Identify and delete junk mail, including spam 67.2% 19 68.3% 13 3.17Be selective and cautious about forwarding email to large 79.3% 12 85.4% 6 groups of people

  5. QUANTITATIVE & SCIENTIFIC REASONING

  6. QUANTITATIVE & SCIENTIFIC REASONING Discussion • Division of Science and Math faculty met for a retreat in August 2016 and discussed assessment • The assessment data included in this portion of the presentation include data from all 3 EOSC General Biology instructors: Mr. David Juarez (Wilburton), Dr. Andrea Green (Wilburton and McAlester), and Ms. Casey Meek (Idabel) • What about Math? • No data from Math courses are included because we decided to look at mathematical application in non-math courses instead.

  7. QUANTITATIVE & SCIENTIFIC REASONING Assessment Methods • All 3 biology instructors agreed upon using 3 separate assignments to assess learning goals 4.1-4.5. • All 3 of these assignments were exactly the same across all 3 instructors’ classes. • These assignments were administered after introducing their included subject material to students. • All 3 instructors collected data from these 3 assignments to report in this presentation. • We compared the number of student attempts with the number of student successes, and presented results as a percentage for each assessment (assignment). • Example • What proportion of students that attempted the assignments obtained the correct answers on those assignments? • Number “Correct” on assignments defined by those students that scored at least 60% on that assignment

  8. QUANTITATIVE & SCIENTIFIC REASONING Results of Fall 2016 Student Assessment Learning goal 4.1 is as follows: • 4.1. Describe and delineate the components of the scientific method

  9. Results of Fall 2016 Student Assessment 4.1. Describe and delineate the components of the scientific method • General Biology – Green • General Biology – Juarez • General Biology – Meek

  10. Results of Fall 2016 Student Assessment 4.1, cont’d • 4.1 All Biology classes combined

  11. QUANTITATIVE & SCIENTIFIC REASONING Learning Goals 4.2, 4.3, and 4.4. We used one assignment that assessed learning goals 4.2, 4.3, and 4.4, which are as follows: • 4.2. Apply scientific and mathematical methods to solving problems • 4.3. Collect, graph, and summarize data and make relevant observations and statements of results and formulate questions • 4.4. Evaluate evidence and determine if conclusions based upon data are valid and reliable

  12. QUANTITATIVE & SCIENTIFIC REASONING 4.2, cont’d • General Biology – Green • Applying mathematical methods  General Biology – Juarez  Applying mathematical methods

  13. QUANTITATIVE & SCIENTIFIC REASONING 4.2, cont’d • General Biology--Meek • Applying mathematical methods • 4.2 All Biology classes combined • Applying mathematical methods

  14. QUANTITATIVE & SCIENTIFIC REASONING 4.3. Collect, graph, and summarize data and make relevant observations and statements of results and formulate questions • General Biology — Green • Graph data • Interpret graph

  15. QUANTITATIVE & SCIENTIFIC REASONING 4.3, cont’d • General Biology – Juarez • Graph data • Interpret graph

  16. QUANTITATIVE & SCIENTIFIC REASONING 4.3, cont’d • General Biology – Meek • Graph data • Interpret graph

  17. QUANTITATIVE & SCIENTIFIC REASONING 4.3, cont’d • 4.3 All Biology classes combined • Graphing data • Interpreting graph

  18. QUANTITATIVE & SCIENTIFIC REASONING 4.4. Evaluate evidence and determine if conclusions based upon data are valid and reliable • General Biology-Green • General Biology - Juarez

  19. QUANTITATIVE & SCIENTIFIC REASONING 4.4, cont’d • General Biology – Meek • 4.4 All Biology classes combined

  20. QUANTITATIVE & SCIENTIFIC REASONING Learning Goal 4.5 Learning goal 4.5 is as follows: • 4.5. Distinguish sound scientific works from non- scientific works

  21. QUANTITATIVE & SCIENTIFIC REASONING 4.5. Distinguish sound scientific works from non-scientific works • General Biology-Green • General Biology – Juarez

  22. QUANTITATIVE & SCIENTIFIC REASONING 4.5, cont’d • General Biology – Meek • 4.5 All Biology classes combined

  23. QUANTITATIVE & SCIENTIFIC REASONING Summary • 85.7 % of students could describe and delineate the components of the scientific method (4.1) • 91.5 % of students could apply scientific and mathematical methods to solve problems (4.2) • 89.7 % of students could collect, graph, and summarize data and 82.1% of students could make relevant observations and statements of results and formulate questions (4.3) • 89.7% of students could evaluate evidence and determine if conclusions based upon data are valid and reliable (4.4) • 94.4% of students could distinguish sound scientific works from non-scientific works (4.5)

  24. QUANTITATIVE & SCIENTIFIC REASONING Conclusions- General Biology • Students achieved all learning outcomes with at least 60% proficiency • Our lowest combined % correct was 82.1% for learning goal 4.3 (interpreting graphs). • Weaknesses • Using math to solve problems • Creating correct graph type for data being analyzed • Interpreting results in graphical format • Closing the loop • Increase exercises that require math to solve problems • Increase tutorials on how to graph and when to use a bar graph or a line graph • Tutorials and more practice on graph interpretation

  25. ORAL COMMUNICATION

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend