State of the River: Geomorphic Structure Josh Wyrick, Ph.D. UC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

state of the river geomorphic structure
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

State of the River: Geomorphic Structure Josh Wyrick, Ph.D. UC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

State of the River: Geomorphic Structure Josh Wyrick, Ph.D. UC Davis 1 Geomorphic Structure Methodology Data Collection (topography, rating curve, hydraulics, GIS-Based Analyses substrate, vegetation & cover) 2D DEM Map Hydrodynamic


slide-1
SLIDE 1

State of the River: Geomorphic Structure

Josh Wyrick, Ph.D. UC Davis

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Geomorphic Structure Methodology

Data Collection (topography, rating curve, hydraulics, substrate, vegetation & cover) DEM Map Production GIS-Based Analyses 2D Hydrodynamic Modeling Morphological Units Integration with Biological Datasets Topographic Change Analysis Hydraulics Valley Characteristics

Sediment Budget Change Processes Depth & Velocity Wetted Areas

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

DEM Map Production

Dry Creek

Hammon Backwater

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

DEM Differences Map

flow

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Sediment Budget

Flow 26-ft DPD 58-67 years since Englebright Max erosion ~19 mi from mouth (~4 mi d/s from Englebright) 45% of current export from Timbuctoo Bend Net Scour Net Fill Segment Net Scour = 0.6 million ft3/y

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Allan James, 2012

Thalweg upstream of DPD has adjusted. ~85% of scour volume occurred out of channel

Profiles extracted from 3-m DEM interpolated from contour maps

Long-Term Thalweg Adjustment

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Topographic Change Processes Map

  • Spatial patterns of scour/fill & 1999/2008 channels
  • 9 Scour processes; 9 Fill processes; No Change areas
  • 9 Lateral processes; 9 Vertical processes

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Annual Volume (%) Area of Change (%)

Lateral 30 18 Vertical 70 82 Fill 49 58 Lateral 18 13 Vertical 82 87 Scour 51 42 Lateral 42 25 Vertical 58 75

Topographic Change Processes

  • Vertical processes dominate overall.
  • Vertical processes are net fill. Lateral

processes are net scour.

  • Both fill and scour processes are net

vertical. Lateral Vertical

Tailings berm

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Topographic Change Processes

Process Annual Volume % Downcutting 10.4 Bar Emergence 6.4 In-Channel Fill 2.8 Process Annual Volume % Overbank Scour 19.2 Overbank Storage 18.0 Vegetated Overbank Storage 15.7 Process Average (in/year) Cohesive Bank Retreat

  • 12.6

Berm Scour & Mass Failure

  • 11.6

Avulsion

  • 9.4

In Channel Out of Channel Changes in Depth

VS LF VF VS VF VF LS LS VS

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Vegetation & Roughness Map

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Substrate Map

11

DPD

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Substrate Characteristics

Mean Diameter = 97.4 mm

Typical range of Chinook spawning gravels

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Post-New Bullards Bar Hydrology

Timbuctoo Bend at 5,000 cfs (Feb, 2004)

13 Baseflow: 880 cfs (Smartsville) – 530 cfs (Marysville)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

2D Hydrodynamic Model

Inputs Validation

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Hydraulics Maps

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Inundation Maps

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Transience of High Velocity Zones

flow flow

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Channel Characteristics

Alluvial Valley Mean Slope = 0.16%

0.052% 0.13% 0.18% 0.14% 0.19% 0.20% 0.31%

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Channel Characteristics

Value Sinuosity < 1.2 Low 1.2 < S < 1.5 Moderate > 1.5 High

Mean Sinuosity = 1.1

Sinuosity = Stream Length Centerline Length

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Valley Characteristics

Ratio Entrenchment < 1.4 High 1.4 < ER < 2.2 Moderate > 2.2 Slight

Mean Entrenchment Ratio = 2.7

20

Goldfields

Dam

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Valley Characteristics

The available river meander valley may be narrower in the region

  • f the Goldfields as

compared to historic extents; however, currently the Dry Creek and DPD reaches are the widest of all the reaches at all discharges.

Reach Baseflow Width (ft) Bankfull Width (ft) Valley Width (ft) Englebright Dam

120 169 415

Timbuctoo Bend

205 273 544

Parks Bar

199 307 976

Dry Creek

248 419 1,009

Daguerre Point Dam

197 379 1,472

Hallwood

183 330 889

Marysville

174 231 562

LYR MEAN

195 319 968

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Morphological Unit Map

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Morphological Unit Map

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Morphological Unit Organization

Reach Abundant MU MU Area % Englebright Pool 41 Timbuctoo Pool 20 Parks Bar Riffle 19 Dry Creek Fast glide & Slackwater 18 DPD Riffle transition 28 Hallwood Fast glide 20 Marysville Pool 52 Abundance within Baseflow Non-random Organization Lateral Variability Longitudinal Distribution Adjacency Collocation Longitudinal Spacing

slide-25
SLIDE 25

MUs and Valley Characteristics

Morphological unit Water surface slope (%) Ratio of baseflow wetted width to mean width Entrenchment ratio Mean % < 1.4 % > 2.2 chute 0.416 0.47 2.6 14.8 66.7 fast glide 0.038 0.96 3.1 4.7 72.3 pool 0.013 0.93 2.4 20.9 37.5 riffle 0.765 0.94 2.6 10.3 65.3 riffle transition 0.124 1.14 3.3 4.1 84.3 run 0.118 0.78 3.2 2.4 89.2 slackwater 0.027 1.58 1.8 slow glide 0.030 1.00 2.6 14.3 42.9

25 HIGHEST LOWEST

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Life Stage: Holding Spawning Rearing MU: Pool Riffle; Run; Riffle Transition Slow Glide; Slackwater Reach Percent Areas of Baseflow Channel Englebright 52 9 32 Timbuctoo 9 37 32 Parks Bar 5 48 27 Dry Creek 7 36 34 DPD 8 48 22 Hallwood 20 38 25 Marysville 41 19 28 Total LYR 16 37 28

MUs and Habitat Availability

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

MUs and Chinook Spawning

MU % Redds

Riffle 39.5 Riffle Transition 18.5 Run 18.4 Fast Glide 9.3 Chute 4.0 Slow Glide 3.4 Slackwater 1.9 Lateral Bar 1.6 Point Bar 0.6 Pool 0.5 Medial Bar 0.2 Unknown* 2.0

~76% of Chinook redds

  • ccur in

these 3 MUs

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

MUs and Juvenile Rearing Habitat

400-ft sections (~2W) were randomly chosen for juvenile snorkel surveys. The percent MU abundance in each section equaled the reach-scale percentage.

Snorkel survey area

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

MUs and Cover Elements

Wood Pieces Wood Jams Human-Built Detritus

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Publicly Available Maps from RMT

Vetted & Available Now

  • Topography
  • Inundation zones
  • Geomorphic reaches
  • Vegetation LiDAR
  • Vegetation

presence/absence

  • 2D model-predicted

hydraulics for flows between 300 - 110,400 cfs

  • Morphological units

Available Soon

  • Substrate
  • DEM difference
  • Topographic change process
  • Chinook spawning HSI for

discharges 300-5,000 cfs

  • O Mykiss spawning HSI for

discharges 300-5,000 cfs

  • Cover

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Acknowledgements

  • RMT Members
  • UC Davis Lab
  • Greg Pasternack
  • Tarick Abu-Aly
  • Rusty Barker
  • Jen Carley
  • Nick Depsky
  • Dylan Garner
  • Bobby Gonzalez
  • Mathew Jian
  • Leah Kammel
  • Rafael Rodriguez
  • Anne Senter
  • Michael Strom
  • Matt Vaughan
  • Sooyeon Yi

31