Reduced Equations and Special Solutions for Geomorphic Dam-break - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

reduced equations and special solutions for geomorphic
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Reduced Equations and Special Solutions for Geomorphic Dam-break - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

BEM2014 2014/ 10/ 04 Reduced Equations and Special Solutions for Geomorphic Dam-break Flows In celebration of Professor Young Der-Liangs 70th birthday Herv Capart Dept of Civil Engineering National Taiwan University Sources 2 Capart,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Reduced Equations and Special Solutions for Geomorphic Dam-break Flows

BEM2014 2014/ 10/ 04

Hervé Capart Dept of Civil Engineering National Taiwan University

In celebration of Professor Young Der-Liang’s 70th birthday

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Sources 2 Capart, H., and D.L. Young (1998) Formation of a jump by the dam- break wave over a granular bed. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 372, 165– 187. Fraccarollo, L., and H. Capart (2002) Riemann wave description of erosional dam-break flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 461, 183–228. Capart, H., M. Bellal, and D.L. Young (2007) Self-similar evolution of semi-infinite alluvial channels with moving boundaries. Journal of Sedimentary Research 77, 13-22. Hsu, J.P.C., and H. Capart (2008) Onset and growth of tributary-dammed

  • lakes. Water Resources Research 44(11), W11201.

Spinewine, B., and Capart, H. (2013) Intense bed-load due to a sudden dam-break. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 731, 579-614. Capart, H. (2013) Analytical solutions for gradual dam breaching and downstream river flooding. Water Resources Research 49(4), 1968- 1987.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Dam break: sudden failure of rigid dam Example: Balin check dam, September 2007 Sudden water release produces geomorphic change. Dam breach: Gradual failure of loose dam Example: Tangjiashan landslide dam, June 2008 Water outflow and geomorphic change drive each other.

NTU-MHRG Xinhua

Geomorphic dam break and dam breach flows 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Research strategy 4 How to make these problems mathematically tractable ? 1) Use lab and field observations to guide the mathematics 2) Cast the flows as m oving boundary problems. 3) Exploit similarity and quasi-linearity to find special solutions.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Taipei dam break experiments (Capart and Young, 1998) 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Louvain dam break experiments (Spinewine and Capart, 2013) 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Evolving boundaries 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Vertical flow structure 8

Experimental Theoretical

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Semi-empirical closure relations 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

~       x u h t z ) (        x cu h c h c z t                 x z h u h x t u h ) (

2

Depth-integrated governing equations (Spinewine and Capart, 2013) 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Quasi-linear hyperbolic equations 11

W W B W       x t ) (

) ( ) ( i i i

K BK  

Eigenstructure Homogeneous hyperbolic system

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Riemann wave solution (Fraccarollo and Capart, 2002) 12

t ) / ( ) , ( t x t x W W 

) ( 3 3 ) ( 2 2 ) ( 1 1 i i i

K dW K dW K dW  

i

t x  

Self-similar expansion Integrate across simple wave

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Comparison with experiments 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Predicted velocity and concentration maps 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Detailed comparisons with experiments (Spinewine and Capart, 2013) 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Dam breach example: 2009 Namaxia debris dam 16

Forestry Bureau, Taiwan

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Alluvial diffusion theory (Capart, Bellal, Young, 2007; Hsu and Capart, 2008) 17

2 2

      x z KQ t z

w s

h z z

s w

      x zw )) ( (      x z h z z

w s w

Water-driven diffusion Complementary constraints on water surface profile

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Self-similar behavior (Capart, Bellal and Young, 2007) 18

) (

2 2

      x z t KQ t z

s s

   x t xC ) (            Qdt x f Qdt zs Qdt xC    

Diffusion problem Self-similar solution

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Dam breach solution (Capart, 2013) 19

Qdt R t

D

     ) (

2 / 3 2 / 1 27 8

) ( ) ( t bg t Q   ) ( ) ( t Q dt t dz A

L L

 

S.Y.J. Lai

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Reduction to a pair of autonomous ODEs 20

         

2

2 ) (

2 8 1 2 2

1 4 ) ( t t t         

2 / 3

) (  dt t d

2 / 3 2 / 3

) (        dt t d

ODE pair Solution

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Solution plots 21

3 2 3

) ˆ 1 ( ˆ 8 ) ( t t Q t Q

P

 

2 2

ˆ 1 ˆ ) ( t t d t

B

  

Breach drop Discharge hydrograph

P

T t t  ˆ

slide-22
SLIDE 22

GSC

Application to 1996 Lake Ha! Ha! dyke breach 22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

B C Xinhua / GSC

Comparison with more field events 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Flood wave routing to the downstream valley 24

8 2 3

2 / 1

      x h h f gS t h

V

Kinematic wave equation S.Y.J. Lai

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Solution by the method of characteristics 25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Wave profile evolution and discharge hydrographs at downstream stations 26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Comparison with 2008 Tangjiashan landslide dam breach flood 27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Conclusions 28 For both dam break and dam breach problems: 1) Reduced equations provide good approximations of real behavior. 2) Similarity and quasi-linearity can be exploited to find useful special solutions.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Acknowledgements and thanks 29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Acknowledgements and thanks 30