special and extra special groups
play

Special and Extra Special Groups Generalised Bestvina-Brady groups - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Special and Extra Special Groups Vladimir Vankov Bestvina-Brady groups Special and Extra Special Groups Generalised Bestvina-Brady groups Special Cube Complexes My work Vladimir Vankov 8 February 2019 Special and Extra Outline


  1. Special and Extra Special Groups Vladimir Vankov Bestvina-Brady groups Special and Extra Special Groups Generalised Bestvina-Brady groups Special Cube Complexes My work Vladimir Vankov 8 February 2019

  2. Special and Extra Outline Special Groups Vladimir Vankov Bestvina-Brady groups Bestvina-Brady groups Generalised Bestvina-Brady groups Special Cube Complexes Generalised Bestvina-Brady groups My work Special Cube Complexes My work

  3. Special and Extra Finiteness Conditions Special Groups Vladimir Vankov Augmentation ideal Bestvina-Brady groups Generalised Bestvina-Brady groups I G ∶= ker Z G → Z Special Cube Complexes My work G finitely generated ⇐ ⇒ I G finitely generated What about finitely presented? G is said to be FP 2 if I G is finitely presented.

  4. Special and Extra Right-Angled Artin Groups Special Groups Vladimir Vankov Bestvina-Brady groups Γ a graph. Denote by Γ 0 the vertices and Γ 1 the edges. Generalised Bestvina-Brady groups Special Cube RAAG ( Γ ) ∶ = ⟨ Γ 0 ∣ [ u , v ] ⇐ Complexes ⇒ uv ∈ Γ 1 ⟩ My work Empty graphs give free groups. Complete graphs give free abelian groups.

  5. Special and Extra Bestvina-Brady Groups Special Groups Vladimir Vankov Bestvina-Brady groups BB L ∶ = ker RAAG ( Γ ) → Z Generalised Bestvina-Brady groups Take L to be the clique complex of Γ (flag simplicial complex). Special Cube Complexes Theorem (M. Bestvina, N. Brady 1997) My work ▸ BB L is finitely presented ⇐ ⇒ π 1 ( L ) is trivial ▸ BB L is FP 2 ⇐ ⇒ H 1 ( L ) is trivial Consider the presentation complex of Higman’s group ⟨ a , b , c , d ∣ a − 1 bab − 2 , b − 1 cbc − 2 , c − 1 dcd − 2 , d − 1 ada − 2 ⟩

  6. Special and Extra Some Geometry Special Groups Vladimir Vankov Bestvina-Brady G L ( S ) : Group of deck transformations of a branched covering of a groups Generalised space made from RAAG ( Γ ) and BB L . Bestvina-Brady groups Special Cube Take the universal cover of the (standard) classifying space of Complexes RAAG ( Γ ) and quotient by BB L . Branching at vertices labelled by My work ’height function’. Branch vertices have pointwise stabilisers in action. Recipe: cover ˜ L → L , subset S ⊂ Z . Presentation is governed by loops in L (more about this on next slide...).

  7. Special and Extra Some algebra Special Groups Vladimir Vankov Bestvina-Brady groups Given a flag simplicial complex L and a subset S ⊂ Z containing 0, Generalised taking ˜ Bestvina-Brady L to be the universal cover of L , let the generators be the groups directed edges of L (with opposites being inverses). The relations in Special Cube Complexes G L ( S ) are now: My work ▸ For each directed triangle ( a , b , c ) in L , the relations abc = 1, a − 1 b − 1 c − 1 = 1 (triangle relations) ▸ Given a finite collection N of loops that normally generate π 1 ( L ) , for each n ∈ S the relation l n 1 l n 2 ... l n k = 1 for each loop ( l 1 ,..., l k ) in N .

  8. Special and Extra Interesting Properties Special Groups Vladimir Vankov Bestvina-Brady groups Generalised ▸ Similar to BB L , has property FP 2 ⇐ Bestvina-Brady ⇒ H 1 ( L ) trivial groups Special Cube ▸ For π 1 ( L ) non-trivial, there are uncountably many G L ( S ) . In Complexes My work fact, Theorem (I. Leary, R. Kropholler, I. Soroko 2018) L finite connected flag complex, not simply connected � ⇒ ∃ uncountably many quasi-isometry classes among G L ( S )

  9. Special and Extra Interesting Properties: Embedding Theorems Special Groups Vladimir Vankov Bestvina-Brady groups Bestvina and Brady showed that not all FP 2 groups are finitely Generalised Bestvina-Brady presented. But their groups all embed into RAAG s. groups Theorem (Ian Leary 2015) Special Cube Complexes Not all FP 2 groups can embed into finitely presented groups. My work Theorem (Higman-Neumann-Neumann 1949) Every countable group embeds in a 2-generated group. Theorem (Ian Leary 2016) Every countable group embeds in a FP 2 group.

  10. Special and Extra Interesting Properties: Relation Modules Special Groups Vladimir Vankov Bestvina-Brady groups For a group G = ⟨ g 1 ,..., g n ∣ r 1 ,..., r m ⟩ ≅ F / R , define Generalised Bestvina-Brady groups Special Cube s ∶ = Rank ( R ab ) = Rank ( R /[ R , R ]) Complexes My work t ∶ = min m ∈ N ∶ ∃ r i ∈ G with ⟨⟨ r 1 ,..., r m ⟩⟩ = R ( t − s ) is called the relation gap. For fixed L , G L ( S ) all have the same R ab . For S = ∅ , the gap is 0. For infinite S , the gap is ∞ . Finite S ?..

  11. Special and Extra Definition: combinatorics of edges in square Special Groups complexes Vladimir Vankov Bestvina-Brady groups Special Cube Complexes ; D . Wise , F . Haglund ( 2007 ) Generalised Bestvina-Brady groups In a square complex, a hyperplane is an parallelism equivalence class Special Cube of edges via being opposite edges in a square. Denote this by ∼ Complexes My work (abuse of notation) u ∼ v ⇐ ⇒ u , v are opposite in a square (same hyperplane) u ↺ v ⇐ ⇒ u , v share a vertex but are not adjacent in any square u ⊥ v ⇐ ⇒ u , v are adjacent in a square (hyperplanes cross)

  12. Special and Extra Definition: hyperplane pathologies Special Groups Vladimir Vankov Bestvina-Brady A square complex is special if it avoids all of the following groups pathologies: (abuse of notation) Generalised Bestvina-Brady groups ▸ u ∼ v and u ⊥ v (hyperplane crosses itself) Special Cube Complexes ▸ orienting each square, u ∼ − u (hyperplane is not 2-sided) My work ▸ u ∼ v and u ↺ v (hyperplane self-osculates) ▸ u ⊥ v and u ↺ v (two hyperplanes inter-osculate) I.e. given any two distinct edges u , v , at most one of the relations ∼ , ↺ , ⊥ holds between [ u ] and [ v ] .

  13. Special and Extra Properties Special Groups Vladimir Vankov Bestvina-Brady groups Generalised Bestvina-Brady groups The main result of interest is Special Cube Complexes Theorem (Wise, Haglund 2008) My work The fundamental group of a special cube complex embeds into SL n ( Z ) . This comes from a map to the classifying space of a RAAG .

  14. Special and Extra Understanding the complex and action Special Groups Using ˜ Vladimir Vankov L → L as the cover of the square by the octagon and taking S = 2 Z , trying to describe the complex on which G L ( S ) acts. Bestvina-Brady groups ▸ Pick basepoint X i per layer using ’height function’ Generalised Bestvina-Brady groups ▸ X i is stabilised by a i b i c i d i . Special Cube Complexes ▸ up- and down-links of X 2 j are squares My work ▸ up- and down-links of X 2 j + 1 are octagons ▸ projecting to 0-layer, X 2 j is the apex of a square-based pyramid whose base spells out the word a 2 j b 2 j c 2 j d 2 j ▸ projecting to 0-layer, X 2 j + 1 is the apex of an octagon-based pyramid whose base spells out the word a 2 j + 1 b 2 j + 1 c 2 j + 1 d 2 j + 1 a 2 j + 1 b 2 j + 1 c 2 j + 1 d 2 j + 1

  15. Special and Extra Description of the complex Special Groups Vladimir Vankov Bestvina-Brady groups a − 1 ⋅ X i + 2 Generalised Bestvina-Brady a − 1 ⋅ v i + 2 a − 1 ⋅ w i + 2 groups Special Cube Complexes My work b i + 1 a i + 1 ba −( i + 1 ) ⋅ X i + 1 X i + 2 X i + 1 u i + 1 v i + 1 a i + 1 X i + 1 a ⋅ X i + 1 w i + 1 a i + 1 ba −( i + 1 ) ⋅ v i + 1 a ⋅ u i + 1 v i + 1 a i + 1 ba − i ⋅ X i a ⋅ X i

  16. Special and Extra Passing to a torsion-free subgroup Special Groups Vladimir Vankov Bestvina-Brady groups Generalised Bestvina-Brady Consider the kernel of a homomorphism from G L ( S ) to a finite groups group. Special Cube Complexes My work First guess: send a to ( 1 , 2 ) . Fails. Hyperplanes need more room not to ’collapse’. Next guess: map to S 8 using 4 disjoint 2-cycles.

  17. Special and Extra Special Special Groups Vladimir Vankov Bestvina-Brady groups Generalised Bestvina-Brady groups Special Cube Complexes My work

  18. Special and Extra Representation Theory Special Groups Vladimir Vankov ’Shortcut’ to proving the complex is special. Bestvina-Brady groups Use faithful representation of the target finite group to study Generalised Bestvina-Brady hyperplane combinatorics. groups Special Cube Complexes Can use techniques from linear algebra to prove that certain My work equations cannot hold � ⇒ avoid hyperplane pathologies. − 1 ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ U ∈ ⟨ ⟩ 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ − 1 ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ , ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

  19. Special and Extra Periodic Order Equations in Finite Groups Special Groups Vladimir Vankov Bestvina-Brady groups S -pattern [1,1,1,2,1] Generalised Bestvina-Brady � ∃ a , b , c groups ⇐ Special Cube Complexes o ( a ) = o ( b ) = o ( c ) = 5 My work [ ab , bc ] trivial [ a 2 b 2 , bc ] trivial [ a 3 b 3 , bc ] has order 2.

  20. Special and Extra A terminological coincidence Special Groups Vladimir Vankov Bestvina-Brady groups Generalised Bestvina-Brady groups Special Cube Complexes Extra special groups. My work Central product of finitely many copies of D 8 or Q 8 .

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend