STAKEHOLDER MEETING December 2014 Meeting Agenda December 3rd, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
STAKEHOLDER MEETING December 2014 Meeting Agenda December 3rd, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
VMC Urban Design Guidelines STAKEHOLDER MEETING December 2014 Meeting Agenda December 3rd, 2014 - 1:30pm 1:30 0. Introductions I. Principles & Vision 1:35 II. Why? 1:40 Economic Value, Data, + Evidence Relation to parks
Meeting Agenda
December 3rd, 2014 - 1:30pm
1:30 1:35 1:40 1:45 1:50 1:55 2:05 2:15 3:00 3:20 0. Introductions I. Principles & Vision II. Why?
- Economic Value, Data, + Evidence
III. Key Issues
- Streetwall Articulation
- Pedestrian permeability
- Performative podiums - context related
- Retail Spaces
IV. What are we doing?
- Collaborative Process, Handbook
V. How do we do this?
- Framework, Precints, (Block?) Typologies,
Guidelines
- Draft Table of Contents
- Precinct level performance targets
- Performance vs. Prescriptive
- Interim conditions
Break VI. Best Practices Workshop
- Summary
- Priorities
- Structure
- Performance vs. Prescriptive
VII. Regroup + Discussion
- VIII. Closing + Summary
- Relation to parks
- Accessibility to POPS
- Sun shadows impact
- Impact of scale on pedestrian
realm
- Energy performance
Figure 4.6: Rendering of Millway Pedestrian Promenade
- I. Principles & Vision
Figure 4.6: Rendering of Millway Pedestrian Promenade
- I. Principles & Vision
Key Principles
- Transit-oriented
- Walkable
- Accessible
- Diverse
- Vibrant
- Green
- Beautiful
SECONDARY PLAN VISION
- I. Principles & Vision
- n
Urban Structure
SCHEDULE 1 Community Areas New Community Areas Parkway Belt West Lands Vaughan Metropolitan Centre (Regional Centre) Intensification Areas Primary Centres Railway Railway GO Transit Network Proposed Subway Extension Natural Areas and Countryside Greenbelt Plan Area1 Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan Area1 Urban Growth Centre Boundary Hamlet Stable Areas Employment Areas Subway Extension Local Centres Rail Facilities Regional Intensification Corridors Regional Intensification Corridors within Employment Areas Primary Intensification Corridors Primary Intensification Corridors within Employment Areas Urban Growth Centre Boundary Urban Boundary Minister’s Decision on ORMCP Designation Deferred Municipal Boundary 1 See Schedule 4 for limits and land use information of the Greenbelt Plan Area and Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan Area H i g h w a y 7 H i g h w a y 7 H i g h w a y 4 7 Highway 27 Highway 27 Jane Street Jane Street Keele Street H i g h w a y 4 Weston Road Weston Road Dufferin Street Dufferin Street Rutherford Road Rutherford Road B a t h u r s t S t r e e t B a t h u r s t S t r e e t Highway 50 K i n g V a u g h a n R- a
- n
- a
- a
- a
- p
- s
- a
- u
- n
- a
- r
- a
- u
2051
- 24,000 units
- 50,000 residents
- 24,000 jobs
- 413 people & jobs / ha
VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN VMC SECONDARY PLAN
Vaughan Metropolitan Centre Studies
Draft Demonstration Plan
City Park ‘Black Mt.’ Gateway Landform Island Park Creek Park Creek Park Central Square Possible Future Neighbourhood Park Urban Terraces Highway 7 Highway 407 Doughton Road Interchange Way Peelar Road Urban Terraces West Side Green Reserve Naturalized Corridor Jane Street Millway Avenue Linear Open Space West Side Green Reserve Naturalized Corridor135
Vaughan Metropolitan Centre | Streetscape and Open Space Plan
Raised Intersec
- n
with Con nuous Paving Linking Mews and Park Park Park Entrance Area with Specialty Paving, Ligh ng, Plan ng, etc. Vehicular Ramps to Raised Intersec
- n
Figure 5.24: Mews at Intersec
- n with Park (Typical Mid-block)
FRAMEWORK VISION FOR BLACK CREEK VMC STREETSCAPE AND OPEN SPACE PLAN
- I. Principles & Vision
Vaughan Studies
- Active Together Master Plan
- Cultural Plan
- Building a Gateway to Tomorrow’s Economy
- Green Directions Vaughan
- Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan
- Transportation Master Plan
- Vaughan Tomorrow
- II. Why?
Joseph Minicozzi - Average county property tax per acre ratio across sample set of 15 different cities from Montana to Florida
1 2 3 5 6 6 6 4 1 4 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 2 1 3
MDA Fine Motors Liberty Trading Extra Bases Walmart Supercenter Future Shop Select Sandwich Kal Tire X Tronics Creditstone Motors Club Pro Adult Entertainment Paradise Banquet & Convention Centre Oro Espresso Bar Doublerink Arenas/Vaughan Iceplex Liaison College Toromont Cat Power Systems Hilton Garden Inn Residence Inn Toronto Vaughan ND Graphics Upper Room Community Church Dub Linn Gate Irish Pub Dave & Busters Courtyard Toronto Vaughan Amc Interchange 30 Luxy Club Ikea Vaughan Hazleton Manor ETD Racing Riviera Parque Dining, Banquet & Convention Centre Inc.Berkeley Calloway Reit Easton Group Liberty Zzen Midvale Royal 7 Expo City L&M Pandolfo j a n e s t r e e t highway 400 c r e d i t s t
- n
e r
- a
d highway 7 highway 407 d r a v e l u
- b
y e l e g d e freshway drive peelar road maplecrete road barnes road mcleary court doughton road portage parkway
CENTRE BOUNDARY VAUGHAN METROPOLITAN URBAN GROWTH CENTRE BOUNDARY
applemill road vaughan street mill w a y a v e n ue a ppl e woo d road interchange way butt erm ill avenue
- III. Key Issues
SW tower needs better integration with existing hotel (phase 1) short distance between tower and hotel driveway from Hwy 7 contradicts SP
- verall issues
with streetscape, materials, articulation needs to better coordinate with phase 2 Ground fmoor feels crowded landscaping in the ROW need to better connect to the Black Creek spine stronger E-W pedestrian connection concerns with curtain wall, rotation of towers materials lack of pedestrian scale disconnection towers-podium excessive retail space; at- grade units missing podium condition weakened as becoming 1 storey at North collonade of questionable proportions, podium too long and fmat galleria shouldn’t be enclosed Lacks ‘back side’ sterilize fjrst 3 fmoors more urban landscape and frontage (no townhouses) better articulation of facade (particularly SW corner) further articulation of phase 3, connection to creek and south podium interface to collaborate with adjacent land owner, to close gaps in streetwall
- ffjce vestibule with more presence
and connected to courtyard larger retail (particularly Hwy 7) and offjce units revise location of access to underground parking raise height of ground fmoor break frontage wall create mews move entrance to the back no underground creek potential setback for cafe no parking on the back, all underground weight of concrete podium looks
- minous over single storey glazing
Review of Development Applications
- Streetwall Articulation
- Pedestrian permeability
- Performative podiums - context related
- Retail Spaces
- Relation to parks
- Accessibility to POPS
- Sun shadows impact
- Impact of scale on pedestrian realm
- Energy performance
- Diversity of building types
- Highway / Avenue 7
- Structured parking
- Servicing
- Materials
- IV. What are we doing?
Urban Design Guidelines
- Clarify expectations
- Streamline approval process
- Bridge gap between built-form policy and detailed design guidance
- Collaborative process
- IV. What are we doing?
Handbook
- IV. What are we doing?
Schedule URBAN DESIGN BEST PRACTICES OCT 2014 TODAY FEB 2015 APR 2015 MAY 2015 JUL 2015 DEVELOPMENT OF TYPOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT OF GUIDELINES REFINEMENT OF GUIDELINES FINAL PLAYBOOK Stakeholder Meeting Stakeholder Meeting Stakeholder Meeting Stakeholder Meeting Public Consultation
- IV. What are we doing?
Streamline approval process T O D A Y S U B M I S S I O N O F D E V E L O P M E N T A P P L I C A T I O N P R E R E Z O N I N G A P P L I C A T I O N D E S I G N R E V I E W P A N E L 1 D E S I G N R E V I E W P A N E L 2 D E V E L O P M E N T A P P R O V A L ( C O U N C I L ) C O N S T R U C T I O N
T O D A Y S U B M I S S I O N O F D E V E L O P M E N T A P P L I C A T I O N P R E R E Z O N I N G A P P L I C A T I O N D E S I G N R E V I E W P A N E L 1 D E S I G N R E V I E W P A N E L 2 D E V E L O P M E N T A P P R O V A L ( C O U N C I L ) C O N S T R U C T I O N URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
- IV. What are we doing?
Streamline approval process
URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES T O D A Y S U B M I S S I O N O F D E V E L O P M E N T A P P L I C A T I O N P R E R E Z O N I N G A P P L I C A T I O N D E S I G N R E V I E W P A N E L 1 D E V E L O P M E N T A P P R O V A L ( C O U N C I L ) C O N S T R U C T I O N
- IV. What are we doing?
Streamline approval process
- V. How do we do this?
Framework, Precincts, Typologies, guidelines
- VCC +VMC
- V. How do we do this?
Framework, Precincts, Typologies, guidelines
- VCC +VMC
- Character Areas
- V. How do we do this?
Framework, Precincts, Typologies, guidelines
- VCC +VMC
- Character Areas
- Building typologies
- V. How do we do this?
Framework, Precincts, Typologies, guidelines
- VCC +VMC
- Character Areas
- Building typologies
IMPLEMEN- TATION APPENDICES GREEN BUILDING DESIGN
+ + +
- V. How do we do this?
Table of Contents
3.0 CONCEPT 3.1 Built Form concept 3.2 Placemaking 3.3 Structuring built form elements 4.0 FRAMEWORK / OVERALL CONTROLS 4.1 Landuses (SP) 4.2 Height and density (SP) 4.3 Open Space and Community anchors (SOS) 4.4 Frontage 4.5 Streetwall 4.6 Setback 4.7 Parking loading and servicing 4.8 Existing buildings and remediation area (SP) 4.9 Plan Targets (?) 4.10 Precincts (SP) 4.11 View corridors (SOS) 5.0 BUILT FORM DESIGN 5.1 Vision 5.2 Intro to Character Areas 5.2.1 Avenue 7 area
5.2.1.1 Existing condition 5.2.1.2 Character 5.2.1.3 Typical Block Demos etc
5.2.2 Millway Avenue area
5.2.2.1 Existing condition 5.2.2.2 Character 5.2.2.3 Typical Block Demos etc
5.2.3 Central Park areas
5.2.3.1 Existing condition 5.2.3.2 Character 5.2.3.3 Typical Block Demos etc
5.2.4 Neighbourhood areas
5.2.4.1 Existing condition 5.2.4.2 Character 5.2.4.3 Typical Block Demos etc
5.2.5 Technology areas
5.2.1.1 Existing condition 5.2.1.2 Character 5.2.1.3 Typical Block Demos etc
5.2.6 Black Creek areas
5.2.1.1 Existing condition 5.2.1.2 Character 5.2.1.3 Typical Block Demos etc
6.0 BUILDING TYPOLOGIES 6.1 Highrise 6.2 Midrise 6.3 Lowrise 6.4 Civil buildings 6.5 Major retail 6.6 Kiosks 7.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES 7.1 Gateways 7.2 Privately owned public spaces (POPS) 7.3 Mews 7.4 Landscaping 7.5 Building entrances 7.6 Balconies and projections 7.7 Building Materials 7.8 Signage, wayfjnding and branding 7.9 Lighting 7.10 Parking and parking entrances 7.11 Vehicular access, loading and servicing 7.12 Infrastructure facilities Design Checklist 8.0 GREEN BUILDING DESIGN 7.1 Energy 7.2 Sustainability standards 7.3 Passive building design 7.4 Active building systems 7.5 Water effjciency 7.6 Building materials and Indoor environmental quality 7.7 Construction waste management 7.8 Green checklist
9.0 IMPLEMENTATION + PHASING 8.1 Implementation strategy 8.2 Phasing 8.3 Operations 10.0 APPENDIX
IMPLEMEN- TATION GREEN BUILDING DESIGN
+ + +
- V. How do we do this?
Table of Contents
3.0 CONCEPT 3.1 Built Form concept 3.2 Placemaking 3.3 Structuring built form elements 4.0 FRAMEWORK / OVERALL CONTROLS 4.1 Landuses (SP) 4.2 Height and density (SP) 4.3 Open Space and Community anchors (SOS) 4.4 Frontage 4.5 Streetwall 4.6 Setback 4.7 Parking loading and servicing 4.8 Existing buildings and remediation area (SP) 4.9 Plan Targets (?) 4.10 Precincts (SP) 4.11 View corridors (SOS) 5.0 BUILT FORM DESIGN 5.1 Vision 5.2 Intro to Character Areas 5.2.1 Avenue 7 area
5.2.1.1 Existing condition 5.2.1.2 Character 5.2.1.3 Typical Block Demos etc
5.2.2 Millway Avenue area
5.2.2.1 Existing condition 5.2.2.2 Character 5.2.2.3 Typical Block Demos etc
5.2.3 Central Park areas
5.2.3.1 Existing condition 5.2.3.2 Character 5.2.3.3 Typical Block Demos etc
5.2.4 Neighbourhood areas
5.2.4.1 Existing condition 5.2.4.2 Character 5.2.4.3 Typical Block Demos etc
5.2.5 Technology areas
5.2.1.1 Existing condition 5.2.1.2 Character 5.2.1.3 Typical Block Demos etc
5.2.6 Black Creek areas
5.2.1.1 Existing condition 5.2.1.2 Character 5.2.1.3 Typical Block Demos etc
6.0 BUILDING TYPOLOGIES 6.1 Highrise 6.2 Midrise 6.3 Lowrise 6.4 Civil buildings 6.5 Major retail 6.6 Kiosks 7.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES 7.1 Gateways 7.2 Privately owned public spaces (POPS) 7.3 Mews 7.4 Landscaping 7.5 Building entrances 7.6 Balconies and projections 7.7 Building Materials 7.8 Signage, wayfjnding and branding 7.9 Lighting 7.10 Parking and parking entrances 7.11 Vehicular access, loading and servicing 7.12 Infrastructure facilities Design Checklist 8.0 GREEN BUILDING DESIGN 7.1 Energy 7.2 Sustainability standards 7.3 Passive building design 7.4 Active building systems 7.5 Water effjciency 7.6 Building materials and Indoor environmental quality 7.7 Construction waste management 7.8 Green checklist
9.0 IMPLEMENTATION + PHASING 8.1 Implementation strategy 8.2 Phasing 8.3 Operations 10.0 APPENDIX
Special Conditions
- Adjacency to Highway
- Transition to stable commercial
uses (to the West)
- Interim adjacency to servicing of
neighbour commercial use site
- Interim adjacency to building not
compliant with streetwall
- Interim surface parking
IMPLEMEN- TATION GREEN BUILDING DESIGN
+ + +
Avenue 7
- V. How do we do this?
Character Areas
5.2.1 Avenue 7 area
Typical Block Demos
Avenue 7 Millway Avenue
- V. How do we do this?
Character Areas
5.2.1 Avenue 7 area
Typical Block Demos
5.2.2 Millway Avenue area
Typical Block Demos
Avenue 7 Millway Avenue Black Creek
- V. How do we do this?
Character Areas
5.2.1 Avenue 7 area
Typical Block Demos
5.2.2 Millway Avenue area
Typical Block Demos
5.2.3 Black Creek areas
Typical Block Demos
Avenue 7 Central Park Central Park Millway Avenue Black Creek
- V. How do we do this?
Character Areas
5.2.1 Avenue 7 area
Typical Block Demos
5.2.2 Millway Avenue area
Typical Block Demos
5.2.3 Black Creek areas
Typical Block Demos
5.2.4 Central Park areas
Typical Block Demos
Avenue 7 Central Park Central Park Neighbourhood Neighbourhood Neighbourhood Neigh. Millway Avenue Black Creek
- V. How do we do this?
Character Areas
5.2.1 Avenue 7 area
Typical Block Demos
5.2.2 Millway Avenue area
Typical Block Demos
5.2.3 Black Creek areas
Typical Block Demos
5.2.4 Central Park areas
Typical Block Demos
5.2.5 Neighbourhood areas
Typical Block Demos
Avenue 7 Central Park Central Park Neighbourhood Neighbourhood Neighbourhood Neigh. Technology Tech.
Tech. Tech.
Technology Millway Avenue Black Creek
- V. How do we do this?
Character Areas
5.2.1 Avenue 7 area
Typical Block Demos
5.2.2 Millway Avenue area
Typical Block Demos
5.2.3 Black Creek areas
Typical Block Demos
5.2.4 Central Park areas
Typical Block Demos
5.2.5 Neighbourhood areas
Typical Block Demos
5.2.6 Technology areas
Typical Block Demos
Avenue 7 Central Park Central Park Neighbourhood Neighbourhood Neighbourhood Neigh. Technology Tech.
Tech. Tech.
Technology Millway Avenue Jane St Black Creek
- V. How do we do this?
Character Areas
5.2.1 Avenue 7 area
Typical Block Demos
5.2.2 Millway Avenue area
Typical Block Demos
5.2.3 Black Creek areas
Typical Block Demos
5.2.4 Central Park areas
Typical Block Demos
5.2.5 Neighbourhood areas
Typical Block Demos
5.2.6 Technology areas
Typical Block Demos
5.2.7 Jane Street area
Typical Block Demos
- V. How do we do this?
Flexibility
REGENT PARK 2013 MASTER PLAN REGENT PARK SUSTAINABLE REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM REGENT PARK PHASING PLAN
Performance vs. Prescriptive
DOWNTOWN TALL BUILDINGS VISION AND SUPPLEMENTARY DESIGN GUIDELINES
- V. How do we do this?
2012
0m 100m 200m
90% / 4 floors 80% / 4 floors 70% / 4 floors 70% / 2 floors
97 C i T y C e n T r e r e d e v e l o p m e n T - u r b a n d e s i g n g u i d e l i n e s
2012.09.14_drafT
97
Figure 1.83 - streetwall plan
0m 100m 200m 400m 800m
90% / 4 floors 80% / 4 floors 70% / 4 floors 70% / 2 floors
C3 BUILT FORM
Phase I Boundary
C3.01.06 Streetwall
streetwall requirements ensure clearly defined edges to the public realm and help reinforce different urban
- characters. buildings must be built up to the setback
line at no less than the minimum percentage of street frontage at the minimum streetwall height indicated on the streetwall plan below.
Performance vs. Prescriptive
EDMONTON CITY CENTRE REDEVELOPMENT URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
- V. How do we do this?
Performance vs. Prescriptive
- V. How do we do this?
The following building parameters have been established to support the creation of an urban form that is comfortable for people, enhances the public realm, and establishes a signature identity of a compact, visually engaging urban environment.
Reduction of Apparent Face
The apparent face length of both the major and minor facades of larger buildings must be reduced by incorporating face offsets, notches and other massing reduction strategies to support the creation
- f buildings that will be pedestrian scaled and visually
well proportioned. A major change in height must be incorporated between distinct building masses or faces generated by a reduction in apparent face length in
- rder to encourage the expression of vertical forms
for towers and to reduce the overall perceived bulk of buildings.
Vertical Tower Form
Tall buildings should be expressed as vertical shafts coming down to the ground, while taking care to create a pedestrian scale at their base. attached low-rise massing is encouraged for wind protection and should be architecturally integrated with the tower.
Streetwall Calculation
In order to meet the streetwall requirements, buildings must be built up to the setback line at no less than the indicated minimum percentage of street frontage at the minimum streetwall height above sidewalk grade indicated on the Streetwall Plan ( Figure 1.63). Streetwall standards and calculations apply to each building, as opposed to being aggregated over the length of a block.
Allowable Variations to Streetwall Facade
Up to fifty percent (50%) of the streetwall facade may be recessed, up to a maximum of 1 meter, and still count towards the indicated streetwall requirement.
Articulated Tops
To encourage a high degree of articulation at tops
- f buildings, and to facilitate habitable roof-tops
buildings may project 4.3 meters beyond the indicated maximum height for an area of forty percent (40%) of the last habitable floor below the height limit. Roof-top projections must be setback a minimum of 3 meters from the building streetwall.
Performance vs. Prescriptive
- V. How do we do this?
Commercial Industrial Public Spaces Open Spaces Residential 31
city of los angeles department of city planningWalkability Checklist Guidance for Entitlement Review
1 Design grade level entrances from the public right-of-way for pedestrians. 2 Create primary entrances for pedestrians that are easily accessible from transit stops, with as direct a path as possible to the transit stop. 3 Make primary entrances to buildings visible from the street and sidewalk. 4 Maintain at least one entrance from the public way at retail establishments with doors unlocked during regular business hours. 5 Incorporate transitions from the sidewalk to the front door such as grade separation, landscaping, and/or porches at individual entrances to residences. These methods should not negatively impact the overall street wall. 6 Comply with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines at primary pedestrian entrances. Alternate approaches for persons with mobility limitations (such as a ramp next to the main path to the primary entry) should not be necessary. 7 Incorporate passageways or paseos into mid-block developments, particularly on long blocks, that facilitate pedestrian movement through the depth of the block to the front of the next parallel block. Pedestrians need not walk the circumference of a block in order to access the middle of the next parallel block or alley or parking behind the block. 8 Activate mid-block passageways or paseos so that they are visually interesting and safe spaces. 9 Provide direct access to building entrances from sidewalks and streets. 10 Locate buildings at the front property line or at the required setback to create a strong street
- wall. Where additional setback is necessary, that area can be used to create an “outdoor
room” adjacent to the street, incorporating seating or water features for example. 11 Use architectural features to provide continuity at the street where openings occur due to driveways or other breaks in the sidewalk and building wall.
building orientation implementation strategy checklist
Not Recommended Recommended
33
city of los angeles department of city planningWalkability Checklist Guidance for Entitlement Review
building orientation
Not Recommended
4
Maintain at least one entrance from the public way at retail establishments with doors unlocked during regular business hours.
3
Make primary entrances to buildings visible from the street and sidewalk.
Performance vs. Prescriptive
WALKABILITY CHECKLIST FOR ENTITLEMENT REVIEW
- V. How do we do this?
- V. How do we do this?
Interim conditions
- New high density development in proximity to existing
employment uses
- Fostering active at-grade uses along busy goods
movement routes
- Interim permissions for surface parking
- Phasing of interim lot uses
PERFORMATIVE PRESCRIPTIVE DEPENDS PERFORMATIVE PRESCRIPTIVE DEPENDS PERFORMATIVE PRESCRIPTIVE DEPENDS PERFORMATIVE PRESCRIPTIVE DEPENDS PERFORMATIVE PRESCRIPTIVE DEPENDS PERFORMATIVE PRESCRIPTIVE DEPENDS
Performance vs. Prescriptive
- V. How do we do this?
Gateways Integration with mobility View Corridors Adjacency to public spaces Transition to adjacent uses Building massing (Apparent Face, distance between buildings) Mid-block linkages Street frontage Ground fmoor retail Defjnition of entrances Private amenity space Privately owned public spaces Vehicular access and servicing Scale Building Height Podiums Towers Setbacks and stepbacks Angular planes Sun shadow and microclimate Major Retail Civic Buildings Kiosks Facade articulation Balconies and projections Architectural Expression/Building character Building materials (quality/sustainability Signage, wayfjnding and branding Lighting Streetwall Landscaping Mixing of building types Adequacy to commercial market demand Universal Accessibility Interim conditions Phasing of lot use Green buildings
SITE CONTEXT PEDESTRIAN REALM BUILDING MASSING SINGULAR TYPES ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER DISTRICT-WIDE MATTERS
- VI. Best Practices Workshop
Table 1 Table 2 Table 4 Table 3
10 mins 10 mins 10 mins 10 mins