OPA 81 PUBLIC MEETING May 28, 2013 Purpose of Official Plan 5-Year - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

opa 81
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

OPA 81 PUBLIC MEETING May 28, 2013 Purpose of Official Plan 5-Year - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

County Official Plan 5-Year Review OPA 81 PUBLIC MEETING May 28, 2013 Purpose of Official Plan 5-Year Review Ensure the Official Plan addresses provincial policy and plans 2005 Provincial Policy Statement addressed through OPA 53 (2007)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

County Official Plan 5-Year Review

OPA 81

PUBLIC MEETING

May 28, 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Purpose of Official Plan 5-Year Review

2

  • Ensure the Official Plan addresses provincial policy and plans

– 2005 Provincial Policy Statement addressed through OPA 53 (2007) – Places to Grow addressed through OPA 65 (2009) and the Centre Wellington and Erin Official Plans have since been amended to conform – OPA 81 needs to address Greenbelt conformity, and other matters of policy or plan conformity identified by the province

  • Also an opportunity to address areas of public concern or

interest identified through the 5-Year Review process

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Milestones so far

3

  • February 2010 - Special County Council Meeting
  • 2010 through 2012 – Preconsultation
  • September, 2012 - Open Houses held
  • May, 2013 - Notice of Public Meeting, Draft Amendment

circulated for comments (due June 14)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Greenbelt Plan

4

The Greenbelt Plan envisions a broad band

  • f permanently

protected land that will protect agriculture and natural heritage, while providing for a diverse range of economic and social activities associate with rural communities, agriculture, tourism, recreation and resource areas.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

New Section 9.9 Greenbelt Policies (Erin and Puslinch)

Greenbelt Plan policies are to be added to a new

  • section. Key Greenbelt Plan directions include:
  • Not allowing Urban Centre expansions until the 10-Year Greenbelt

Plan Review, and only where the growth is on municipal water and sewage systems, among other criteria.

  • Prime Agricultural areas shall not be redesignated to non-

agricultural uses

  • Development in the Natural Heritage System is subject to stronger

and more detailed environmental protection policies

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Greenbelt Natural Heritage System

  • Consists of

– core areas with the highest concentration of significant and/or sensitive natural features, and – linkages that connect the core areas

  • Includes some farmland and
  • ther rural land uses that are
  • utside of, or between, natural

features

  • The full range of existing and

new agricultural, agricultural- related, and secondary uses are allowed, while new buildings are to be sited 30m outside of natural features.

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Greenbelt Natural Heritage System

Examples of requirements:

  • Disturbed area to not exceed 25%
  • Impervious surface to not exceed 10%
  • For non-agricultural uses,
  • at least 30% of total developable area

will remain or be returned to natural self-sustaining vegetation,

  • buildings and structures do not occupy

more than 25% of the total developable area.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Other Provincial Legislation

Alternative and Renewable Energy

The current Official Plan section which is generally supportive of alternative and renewable energy systems, and has policies intended to direct the rezoning process, was added in 2008 to address the 2005 Provincial Policy Statement and local rezoning applications for wind energy systems. This section is proposed to be removed because the Official Plan and Zoning By- laws no longer apply, under the Green Energy Act.

Complete Applications and Preconsultation

Planning Act provides for policies to ensure that appropriate information is available to Councils, commenting agencies and the public when development applications are circulated. Highlights of these policies are:

  • Prior to confirming that an application is complete, the Council of the County or

a local municipality may require certain studies, to be prepared by a qualified professional and submitted.

  • The County or a local municipality may pass a by-law to require preconsultation
  • n any or all applications.
slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Greenlands System mapping updates

  • Hazardous lands such as floodplains and wetlands
  • Natural heritage features such as Areas of Natural and Scientific

Interest, wetlands and woodlands

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Greenlands System - significant woodlands

  • In the current Official Plan,

woodlands over 10ha are considered to be significant. Smaller woodlands may also have local significance and, where practical, these smaller woodlots should be protected.

  • The proposed change is that

woodlands in the rural area over 4ha would be considered significant, and woodlands in urban areas over 1ha would be considered significant.

  • Exceptions include plantations

under 10 ha, tree farms and

  • rchards.
slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Significant woodlands – example

Airphoto of rural area between Harriston and Palmerston

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Current Official Plan - dark green areas are Core Greenlands and light green areas are Greenlands.

Significant woodlands – example

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Proposed change - purple hatched areas would be added to the Greenlands because they are 4 ha or larger.

Significant woodlands – example

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Greenlands– other key policy changes

  • ‘Adjacent lands’ for impact assessment

means 120m from natural heritage features (not a zoning setback)

  • Statement that in areas not

undergoing significant development, particularly agricultural and rural areas, stewardship initiatives will be the main means to maintain, restore

  • r, where possible, improve linkages

and connectivity

  • Urban forests – County will encourage

the retention of trees where practical and will encourage increases in the

  • verall urban tree canopy
slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Mineral Aggregate Areas

  • Purpose is to show areas of high potential for mineral

aggregate extraction and indicates that aggregate deposits are likely to be available

  • Not a pre-approval for extraction - new or expanded

mineral aggregate operations within the Mineral Aggregate Area overlay require Rezoning

  • Outside the overlay area, new or expanded operations

require Rezoning and an amendment to the Official Plan

  • Currently includes sand and gravel deposits of Primary

significance, and approved extraction areas outside of the Primary area.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Current Mineral Aggregate Area Overlay (northern area)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Current Mineral Aggregate Area Overlay (southern area)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

  • Include sand and gravel deposits of Secondary significance,

at the request of the province; Not proposing to add ‘Selected Bedrock Resource Areas’

  • Exclude urban centres and hamlets plus 300m setback,

wetlands and significant woodlands, except for areas with existing approvals

  • Show the Mineral Aggregate Area on a new Schedule

(Schedule ’C’) to be more readable

  • Add a statement that Rezoning applications are subject to all

relevant policies of the Official Plan

Key Proposed Changes

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Proposed Mineral Aggregate Area Overlay (northern area)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Proposed Mineral Aggregate Area Overlay (southern area)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Paris and Galt Moraine Policy Area

The Paris and Galt Moraine Policy Area is proposed to be added to Schedule B, which shows Well Head Protection Areas. The Paris and Galt Moraines Policies intend to:

  • Protect moraine processes and features in order to

maintain and where possible restore and enhance groundwater and surface water features;

  • Promote stewardship activities on the moraines that

maintain, restore or enhance groundwater and surface water resources.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Paris and Galt Moraine Policy Area – Key Policies

  • Agriculture is a major activity on the moraines and is an accepted

and supported use of land. The County will encourage best practices for agriculture by developing and supporting stewardship programs.

  • Large scale development proposals will be required to demonstrate

that ground and surface water functions will be maintained, and where possible, enhanced.

  • Small scale developments that do not rely on significant site

alterations will not normally be required to demonstrate protection

  • f the moraines. Where planning approvals for small scale

developments are needed, best practices for site alteration will be required to reduce or eliminate cut and fill activities that would fill in land surface depressions.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Secondary Agricultural Area Severance Policies - Date change

Current policies

  • Only one new lot for residential purposes may be allowed from a parcel of

land existing on the date of provincial approval (April, 1999) of the Official Plan.

  • Subject to other criteria, including: that the lands have been owned by the

applicant for at least 5 years; and, that Minimum Distance Separation from livestock facilities can be met.

  • Once a new residential lot has been created, a second residential lot is not

allowed from either the severed or retained parcels.

Proposed change

  • One new lot for residential purposes may be allowed from a parcel of land

existing on March 1, 2005.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Secondary Agricultural Area Severance Policies - Lot size

Current policy:

  • Not normally larger than 0.8 ha (2 acres) unless existing natural features
  • r development patterns make a larger lot more practical.
  • No stated minimum although Zoning By-law minimum is 0.4 ha (1 acre)

and this is to be reflected with new wording in the Draft OPA 81

Options for public input:

  • Keep current 0.8 ha (2 acre) limit
  • Increase maximum to 2 ha (5 acres) or 4 ha (10 acres)
  • Remove maximum policy
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Other proposed Policy changes

30

General policies

  • Expanded direction about cultural heritage landscapes, and mitigation

measures in Heritage Impact Assessments

  • Infrastructure: changes that reflect broad definition and need to coordinate

Implementation policies

  • Site Plan control may address exterior design matters
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Other proposed Schedule changes

31

  • Propane Operations identified as Local Policy Areas in Minto and

Guelph/Eramosa. Notice of Planning Act applications is required within the hazard distances of these operations.

  • One Secondary Agricultural Area mapping error in Erin is to be corrected, not

proposing to reconsider Prime Agricultural Area designations.

  • Hamlet and Urban Centre boundary corrections

Ennotville Ospringe Cedar Valley Brisbane Highway 7 Hamlet Area Hollen Wallenstein Alma Drew Kenilworth Inverhaugh Ballinafad Orton Marden Rothsay Lebanon Yatton Glen Allan Morriston Rockwood

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Process from here…

32

Planning Committee Recommendation and County Council Adoption (September or October) Receive staff report about Public Meeting input and final changes, and may recommend that County Council adopt the Amendment. County Council then will consider the recommendation to Adopt the Amendment. Provincial Approval The province is the approval authority for the 5-Year Review Amendment. Appeals The province’s decision on the amendment is subject to potential appeals to the Ontario Municipal Board.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

http://www.wellington.ca/en/business/fiveyearreview.asp

33

The amendment documents and more background information are also available at: