CDE After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
CDE After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results CDE After School Division After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
➡ Data compilation and computation
➡ Response review and theming ➡ Queries
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Org Type # % School District 321 45.90% Nonprofit Program Provider (Subcontractor and/or Direct Grant) 177 25.30% County Office of Education 88 12.60% Other 40 5.70% Nonprofit Intermediary / TA Provider 22 3.10% Local Government 19 2.70% Charter School 12 1.70% Decline to State 8 1.10% No Answer 7 1.00% Foundation 6 0.90%
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Number of years experience # % 0 - 5 260 37.10% 6 - 10 200 28.60% 11 - 20 170 24.30% 21 or more 58 8.30% No Answer 8 1.10% Decline to State 4 0.60%
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
14% 32% 27% 11% 11% 5%
SA A SwA SwDA DA SDA
% SwA + 72.6%
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
“I have a growing sense of the vision, and am excited by
Superintendent at the helm, they are on track. I’m glad to hear that the strategic planning process is underway, and reaching out to people in the field.” “Creating a shared vision that matters to people, and keeping people focused in that direction needs to be a primary focus. The ASD can offer much more to the field beyond implementing the law and distributing grant funding.”
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
7% 31% 36% 13% 8% 5%
SA A SwA SwDA DA SDA
% SwA + 73.5%
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
“The Division should create a much more developed web site that could be used as a place for exchange of ideas. It can offer a statewide picture of the field, and help people learn about what other communities are doing. It can provide a map of the availability of various intermediaries and TA providers that offer program support.” “We need ongoing communication so that there is a sense
practices to help you do your work better’—instead of making site visits solely when something is wrong.”
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
10% 34% 29% 13% 8% 6%
SA A SwA SwDA DA SDA
“Current ASD tools for the collection and management of data related to after school/expanded learning provide helpful metrics for improving program quality.”
% SwA + 73.3%
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
“The Division needs to move away from being strictly compliance-driven, in contrast to talking about quality programming for kids; we have to put these two things together.” “We need to put in place a system that provides clear benchmarks and an accountability structure - so that it is clear to all players what the parameters are. No matter where you go in the state you could recognize it, whether a program is urban, rural, etc. Where there is a state contract, there is quality.”
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
11% 31% 33% 11% 9% 4%
SA A SwA SwDA DA SDA
“After school / expanded learning grantees receive the necessary support from the ASD to run high quality programs”
% SwA + 75.5%
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
“Regarding CDE’s work on 21st Century and ASES—they allow lots of lead time, and are good stewards of those funds, which serve many students.” “The 21st Century and ASES applications should more closely resemble one another. The 21st Century application is far too complex, which can prevent low-resourced communities from
requiring little advance program planning. This has important repercussions for the field, when program managers don’t spend time to think through what the goals are for their programs.”
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
12% 33% 31% 11% 10% 4%
SA A SwA SwDA DA SDA “The ASD consistently provides high-quality services and guidance in the area of program
meals, legal requirements, etc.) to the after school/expanded learning field.”
% SwA + 75.5%
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
10% 29% 33% 13% 11% 3%
SA A SwA SwDA DA SDA “The ASD consistently provides high-quality services in the area of program design and content (i.e., in areas that include best practices guidance, program content, learning in after school, alignment with the school day, etc.) to the after school/expanded learning field.”
% SwA + 72.7%
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
“The Division should push the money for Technical Assistance as far down as possible, so that the resources are available to everyone—anything that can be done to build local capacity for technical assistance is welcome.” “The ASD should query the field about what kind of Technical Assistance is needed, and then use that data to make decisions. For example, identify programs whose grants are being reduced due to lack of attendance, and then design TA around a specific related issue. There are already certain things that practitioners in the field know need to be addressed.”
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
8% 33% 32% 13% 9% 4%
SA A SwA SwDA DA SDA
“The ASD communicates clearly and in a timely fashion to the after school / expanded learning field regarding new policies and practices.”
% SwA + 73.8%
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
“The Division can be more proactive about the interpretation process for policy related to after school, instead of having the field force legislation related to after school programming.” “The Division must provide consistent and clear policy interpretations to people in the field. Providers don’t always get correct information about what policies are, and interpretation of policy is sometimes inconsistent with existing practice.”
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
7% 33% 31% 15% 9% 5%
SA A SwA SwDA DA SDA
“The ASD plays an appropriate role with regard to fostering statewide collaboration in the field of after school / expanded learning.”
% SwA + 71.4%
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
After School Division Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
Stakeholder Survey and Interview Results
“California has a lot to be proud of in the realm of after school programs, and should get more attention for its excellent work. We need to take this data to the public —there is a great California story to be told. The After School Division has the opportunity to offer a vision for the kinds of youth development and active and effective learning that after school programs can provide—this is what will protect our democracy...”