Soilmicrobial feedbacks to decomposition differences between native - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

soil microbial feedbacks to decomposition differences
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Soilmicrobial feedbacks to decomposition differences between native - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Soilmicrobial feedbacks to decomposition differences between native and invasive shrub species in an Animas River riparian zone Benjamin D. Duval NM Tech Duval Lab Co-authors Daniel Cadol (NMT-EES) Jamie Martin (Lab Manager) Bonnie Frey


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Daniel Cadol (NMT-EES) Bonnie Frey (NMBGMR/ICP-MS) Stacy Timmons (NMBGMR) Chloe Bonamici (NMT-EES/Stable Isotopes) Jamie Martin (Lab Manager) Heather Curtsinger Aubrey Hands Eleanor House

Duval Lab Co-authors

Soil‐microbial feedbacks to decomposition differences between native and invasive shrub species in an Animas River riparian zone

Benjamin D. Duval NM Tech

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Christian Science Monitor, August 13, 2015 Bloomfield, NM August, 2017

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Leaf chemistry Soil Climate Microbial community

CO2

  • rgN & P

Recalcitrant C forms

N2O

Energy for microbial biomass Mass loss Gas emissions Exo- enzymes Exo- enzymes

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Dissolved organic C

M+ M+

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Invasive species/N2 fixer High N litter

N2O emissions NO3

  • leaching

Greater C-processing enzyme activity?

N loss?

= N limitation feedback that favors invasive “home field advantage”

Soil N

Elaeagnus

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Native species Modest N litter

N2O emissions NO3

  • leaching

Greater N-processing enzyme activity?

N loss

= N mineralization feedback and “home field” advantage

Soil N

Populus

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Track sources of energy, C, N into aquatic food webs that feedback to metal cycling

Specific aim #1: learn something about different effects

  • f native vs. invasive plants on key ecosystem process

Specific aim #2: Importance of litter chemistry vs. soil on gas flux and exo-enzyme activity

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Populus Salix Elaeagnus Tamarix

Soil Litter

Populus Populus Salix Elaeagnus Tamarix “Native” “Invasion”

3-month litter-soil incubations

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Soil Litter

Tamarix Populus Salix Elaeagnus Tamarix “Restore” “Invasive”

Populus Salix Elaeagnus Tamarix

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Mass Loss (final) Gas flux (weekly)

Mass pre vs. post %C = residual energy

13C = correlations with

microbial biomass CO2 = respiration/activity of heterotrophic bacteria, archaea & fungi N2O = N loss from (de)-nitrification

slide-11
SLIDE 11

cellulose chitin Microbial enzymes drive system-level C:N:P stoichiometry

slide-12
SLIDE 12

exo-enzyme Ecosystem function

1,4 β-glucosidase

Releases glucose from cellulose

1,4 N-acetyl glucosidase (NAG)

Breaks chitin and chitodextrins

Leucine amino peptidase (LAP)

Breaks peptide bonds, liberates N

Acid phosphatase

Mineralizes organic P into phosphate Microbial enzymes drive system-level C:N:P stoichiometry

Sinsabaugh et al. 2009 Nature

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Litter mass remaining after 90 days soil P S E T P

0.47 0.48 0.44 0.47

S

0.31 0.25 0.24 0.32

E

0.42 0.40 0.40 0.45

T

0.40 0.44 0.42 0.44

Populus Salix Elaeagnus Tamarix

16% 19% 18% 15% 4% 8% 5% 4%

range

range

slide-14
SLIDE 14

1) Most complete decomposition on Salix soil (Rs matches with mass loss) 2) Populus most evenly “active” soils over time

slide-15
SLIDE 15

4) Early peaks in Rs from Russian olive 3) No clear home field advantage by faster decomposition

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Soil type has greater control on C cycling than litter Mass loss explains both %C and 13C

litter soil

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Sustained N2O emissions from Russian olive Litter greater control

  • n N-loss than soil
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Early in succession/decomposition/system development

  • C limitation to enzyme production
  • then > physiological need for N and P to

maintain cellular stoichiometry

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Aztec, New Mexico

Species matter (soil effects controlled by plants) Interactions/additive/counter-acting effects of litter community? Argues for inclusion of soil-microbial system information for making “restoration” policy

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Salix Tamarix Elaeagnus Populus

What else is leaching out from microbial activity during decomposition? Fate of leaves directly entering rivers vs. partially decomposed CPOM? Metal effects on decomposition?