Soilmicrobial feedbacks to decomposition differences between native - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Soilmicrobial feedbacks to decomposition differences between native - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Soilmicrobial feedbacks to decomposition differences between native and invasive shrub species in an Animas River riparian zone Benjamin D. Duval NM Tech Duval Lab Co-authors Daniel Cadol (NMT-EES) Jamie Martin (Lab Manager) Bonnie Frey
Christian Science Monitor, August 13, 2015 Bloomfield, NM August, 2017
Leaf chemistry Soil Climate Microbial community
CO2
- rgN & P
Recalcitrant C forms
N2O
Energy for microbial biomass Mass loss Gas emissions Exo- enzymes Exo- enzymes
Dissolved organic C
M+ M+
Invasive species/N2 fixer High N litter
N2O emissions NO3
- leaching
Greater C-processing enzyme activity?
N loss?
= N limitation feedback that favors invasive “home field advantage”
Soil N
Elaeagnus
Native species Modest N litter
N2O emissions NO3
- leaching
Greater N-processing enzyme activity?
N loss
= N mineralization feedback and “home field” advantage
Soil N
Populus
Track sources of energy, C, N into aquatic food webs that feedback to metal cycling
Specific aim #1: learn something about different effects
- f native vs. invasive plants on key ecosystem process
Specific aim #2: Importance of litter chemistry vs. soil on gas flux and exo-enzyme activity
Populus Salix Elaeagnus Tamarix
Soil Litter
Populus Populus Salix Elaeagnus Tamarix “Native” “Invasion”
3-month litter-soil incubations
Soil Litter
Tamarix Populus Salix Elaeagnus Tamarix “Restore” “Invasive”
Populus Salix Elaeagnus Tamarix
Mass Loss (final) Gas flux (weekly)
Mass pre vs. post %C = residual energy
13C = correlations with
microbial biomass CO2 = respiration/activity of heterotrophic bacteria, archaea & fungi N2O = N loss from (de)-nitrification
cellulose chitin Microbial enzymes drive system-level C:N:P stoichiometry
exo-enzyme Ecosystem function
1,4 β-glucosidase
Releases glucose from cellulose
1,4 N-acetyl glucosidase (NAG)
Breaks chitin and chitodextrins
Leucine amino peptidase (LAP)
Breaks peptide bonds, liberates N
Acid phosphatase
Mineralizes organic P into phosphate Microbial enzymes drive system-level C:N:P stoichiometry
Sinsabaugh et al. 2009 Nature
Litter mass remaining after 90 days soil P S E T P
0.47 0.48 0.44 0.47
S
0.31 0.25 0.24 0.32
E
0.42 0.40 0.40 0.45
T
0.40 0.44 0.42 0.44
Populus Salix Elaeagnus Tamarix
16% 19% 18% 15% 4% 8% 5% 4%
range
range
1) Most complete decomposition on Salix soil (Rs matches with mass loss) 2) Populus most evenly “active” soils over time
4) Early peaks in Rs from Russian olive 3) No clear home field advantage by faster decomposition
Soil type has greater control on C cycling than litter Mass loss explains both %C and 13C
litter soil
Sustained N2O emissions from Russian olive Litter greater control
- n N-loss than soil
Early in succession/decomposition/system development
- C limitation to enzyme production
- then > physiological need for N and P to
maintain cellular stoichiometry
Aztec, New Mexico
Species matter (soil effects controlled by plants) Interactions/additive/counter-acting effects of litter community? Argues for inclusion of soil-microbial system information for making “restoration” policy
Salix Tamarix Elaeagnus Populus