chapter 3 enzymes
play

CHAPTER 3: ENZYMES Shuler, M. L. and Kargi. (2002). Bioprocess - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CHAPTER 3: ENZYMES Shuler, M. L. and Kargi. (2002). Bioprocess Engineering: Basic Concept. 2 nd Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR PTT203: BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 (2014/2015) By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 1 COURSE OUTCOME 1:


  1. CHAPTER 3: ENZYMES Shuler, M. L. and Kargi. (2002). Bioprocess Engineering: Basic Concept. 2 nd Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR PTT203: BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 (2014/2015) By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 1

  2. COURSE OUTCOME 1: Ability to DIFFERENTIATE types of enzymes and analyze its kinetics study and catalysis. By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 2

  3. ENZYMES: PART 1 OUTLINE: INTRODUCTION ENZYME REACTION [ENZYME-SUBSTRATE] INTERACTION MULTISUBSTRATE ENZYME-CATALYZED REACTION By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 3

  4. INTRODUCTION • Enzymes: – A re “active” proteins (>15k Da) that can catalyze (increase) the rate of biochemical reactions by breaking and making chemical bonds. – Are produced by living cells such as plant, animal and microorganism. – Enzymes are specific to their substrate. – The specificity are determined by the active site. By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 4

  5. • Substrates: – Are the reactants that are activated by the enzyme. By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 5

  6. ENZYME REACTION • Enzymes lower the activation energy of the reaction catalyzed by binding the substrate and forming an enzyme-substrate, [ES] complex. • Enzymes do not affect the free-energy change or the equilibrium constant. By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 6

  7. THE ACTION OF AN ENZYME FROM THE ACTIVATION-ENERGY POINT OF VIEW By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 7

  8. • The interaction between the enzyme and its substrate is usually by weak forces such as van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonding. • The substrate binds to a specific site on the enzyme known as the active site. • The substrate in a small molecule and fits into a certain region on the enzyme molecule which is a larger molecule. By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 8

  9. Example: Amylase By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 9

  10. ENZYME-SUBSTRATE INTERACTIONS (ES) COMPLEX MODES OF ACTIVITY: 1. LOCK-AND-KEY MODEL By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 10

  11. ENZYME-SUBSTRATE INTERACTIONS (ES) COMPLEX MODES OF ACTIVITY: 1. LOCK-AND-KEY MODEL 2. INDUCED-FIT MODEL By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 11

  12. In multi-substrate enzyme-catalyzed reactions, enzymes can hold substrates such as: • proximity effect : – that the reactive regions of substrates are close to each other and to the enzyme’s active site. • orientation effect : – enzymes may hold the substrate at certain positions and angles to improve the reaction rate. By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 12

  13. ENZYMES: PART 2 OUTLINE: ENZYME KINETICS By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 13

  14. INTRODUCTION • Kinetics of simple enzyme- catalyzed reactions are often referred to as Michaelis- Menten kinetics or saturation kinetics . By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 14

  15. • An enzyme solution has a fixed number of active sites to which substrate can bind. • At high substrate concentrations, all these sites may be occupied by substrates or the enzymes is saturated . • Saturation kinetics can be obtained from a simple reaction scheme that involves a reversible step for [ES] complex formation and a dissociation step of the [ES] complex. k 2 k 1   E S ES E P k -1 By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 15

  16. Two major approaches used in developing a rate expression for the enzyme-catalyzed reactions are: k 2 k 1   E S ES E P k -1 Rapid-equilibrium Quasi-steady-state approach approach [ ] V S V [ S ]   m v m v    K [ S ] [ ] K S m m By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 16

  17. Assignment 1 Please download and use the Assignment Sheet in Portal… Question 1 Derive the Michaelis-Menten equation through Rapid Equilibrium approach. Question 2 Derive the Michaelis-Menten equation through Quasi Steady State approach. By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 17

  18. EXPERIMENTALLY DETERMINING RATE PARAMETERS FOR MM TYPE KINETICS • The values Km and Vm can be determined by using batch reactor. INITIAL-RATE EXPERIMENTS Product [S] [S 0 ] Known concentrations [E 0 ] By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 18

  19. The K M is the substrate concentration where v o equals one-half V max Figure 14-8 Plot of the initial velocity v o of a simple Michaelis – Menten reaction versus the substrate concentration [S]. By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 19

  20. Double reciprocal plot (lineweaver-burk plot) • M-M equation is linearized double-reciprocal form: V [ S ] 1 1 K 1     m m v  [ ] v V V [ S ] K S m m m • A plot of 1/ v vs. 1/[S] yields a linear line with a slope of K m /V m and y-axis intercept of 1/V m as in Figure 3.5 below: This plot gives good estimates on V m , but not necessarily on K m . • The error about the reciprocal of a data point is not symmetric bcoz • most experimental results crowded on one side of the graph. Data points at low substrate concentrations influence the slope and • intercept more than those at high substrate concentrations. By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 20

  21. Eadie-hofstee plot • Rearrangement of M-M equation into: V [ S ] v   m  m v v V K  m K [ S ] [ S ] m • A plot of v vs. v/[S] results in a line of slope – K m and y-axis intercept of V m as in Figure 3.6 below: • This plot can be subject to large errors since both coordinates contain v, but there is less bias on data points at low [S]. By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 21

  22. Hanes-woolf plot • Rearrangement of M-M equation into: m  [ S ] K 1 V [ S ]   m [ S ] v  v V V K [ S ] m m m • A plot of [S]/v vs. [S] results in a line of slope 1/V m and y- axis intercept of K m /V m as in Figure 3.7 below: [S]/v Slope=1/v max -K m K m /v max [ S ] • This plot is used to determine V m more accurately. By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 22

  23. Interpretation of Km and Vm • Km or K’m is intrinsic parameter while Vm is not. • Km is affected by the change in pH and temperature . • Vm is affected by the change in k2 and [E0] . By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 23

  24. ENZYMES: PART 3 OUTLINE: INHIBITED ENZYME KINETICS By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 24

  25. INTRODUCTION • Types of enzyme inhibitors: – Irreversible Inhibitors (Inactivators) – Reversible inhibitors • Competitive • Non-competitive (mixed) • Un-competitive By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 25

  26. Irreversible Enzyme Inhibition • Irreversible inhibitors associate with enzymes through covalent interactions. • The consequences of irreversible inhibitors is to decrease in the concentration of active enzymes (E T ) • Covalent modification of an enzyme may lead to loss of activity if: – an essential catalytic group is modified i.e. blocked – substrate binding is sterically hindered – the modification leads to some conformational distortion of the enzyme or mobility restraint By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 26

  27. Reversible Enzyme Inhibition • Many pharmaceuticals are enzyme inhibitors. • Reversible inhibitors associate with enzymes through non-covalent interactions. • Reversible inhibitors include three kinds: Competitive Uncompetitive Mixed inhibitors inhibitors inhibitors -bind to both E and -interfere with -bind to ES ES substrate binding complex By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 27

  28. Reversible Enzyme Inhibition Reversible inhibitors associate with enzymes through • non-covalent interactions. Reversible inhibitors include three kinds: 1. Competitive inhibitors 2. Mixed (Non-competitive) inhibitors 3. Un-competitive inhibitors By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 28

  29. Competitive Inhibition Inhibition constant    E I K I    EI By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 29

  30. Competitive Inhibition K M increases v max unchanged By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 30

  31. Competitive Inhibition: Lineweaver-Burk Plot Initial velocity in the presence of inhibitor   V S   max v    o K S M      I     1     K I MM equation: [ ] v S  max v [ I ]   [ S ] K ( 1 ) m K I By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 31

  32. Noncompetitive Inhibition Reversible Inhibitors The binding of the inhibitor will either alter the K M or V max or both. By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 32

  33. Noncompetitive (mixed) Inhibition: Lineweaver-Burk Plot By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 33

  34. Uncompetitive Inhibition • Uncompetitive Inhibition: Lineweaver-Burk Plot K m decreases v max decreases Slope unchanged k 1 k 2   E S ES E P k -1 + I K I ’ ESI By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 34

  35. Table 14-2 Effects of Inhibitors on the Parameters of the Michaelis – Menten Equation • Competitive inhibition  Raises K M only (intercept in L-B plot)  S and I compete for same binding site • Noncompetitive (mixed) inhibition  Lowers V max (slope in L-B plot); may increase or decrease K M  I binds at a site distinct from that at which the S binds • Uncompetitive inhibition  Both V max & K M affected  I binds to ES complex, but not free E Formation of an ESI complex which does not break down to products at a significant rate By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 35

  36. EFFECT OF PH AND TEMPERATURE By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 36

  37. By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 37

  38. By: Puan Nurul Ain Harmiza 38

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend