sirc instrument review project
play

SIRC Instrument Review Project Cara Lewis PhD, Ruben Martinez BA, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SIRC Instrument Review Project Cara Lewis PhD, Ruben Martinez BA, Cameo Borntrager PhD, Bryan Weiner PhD Overview Background & Project Goals Evidence Based Assessment Criteria Systematic Review Scope & Process Preliminary


  1. SIRC Instrument Review Project Cara Lewis PhD, Ruben Martinez BA, Cameo Borntrager PhD, Bryan Weiner PhD

  2. Overview ✦ Background & Project Goals ✦ Evidence Based Assessment Criteria ✦ Systematic Review Scope & Process ✦ Preliminary Results ✦ Website Tour ✦ Summary & Future Directions

  3. Impetus for the project ✦ Lack of communication ✦ Confusing state for stakeholders ✦ Measure redundancy ✦ Constructs with no measures ✦ Need to prioritize both measure quality and usability

  4. Project Goals Online Instrument Repository for SIRC Members Evidence Based Consensus Systematic Assessment Battery Review Criteria Step 1 Step 2 Step 3

  5. Evidence Based Assessment Criteria ✦ Based on: Hunsley & Mash (2008) and Terwee et al (2012) ✦ Vetted by 58 SIRC SPG members ✦ Reviewed by 2 test developers Piloted by Bryan Weiner ’ s team at UNC ✦ ✦ Preliminary Evidence demonstrates strong reliability ✦ Total possible score is 24 0 = None 1 = Minimal 2 = Adequate 3 = Good 4 = Excellent Reliability Validity Sensitivity Practicality ✦ Internal ✦ Structural ✦ Responsiveness ✦ Usability Consistency ✦ Predictive ✦ Norms

  6. Framework & Scope Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 39 Constructs Damschroder, Aron, Keith, Kirsh, Alexander, & Lowery, 2009

  7. Framework & Scope Outcomes for Implementation Research 17 Constructs Proctor, Silmere, Raghavan, Hobmand, Aarons, Bunger, et al. 2011

  8. Final List of Constructs CFIR Domains Construct Outcomes Construct Characteristics of Individuals Knowledge & Beliefs about Intervention Implementation Outcomes Acceptability Individual Stage of Change Adoption Individual Identification with Organization Appropriateness Other Personal Attributes Feasibility Self-Efficacy Penetration Inner Setting Culture Sustainability Implementation Climate Networks and Communications Client Outcomes Satisfaction Readiness for Implementation Structural Characteristics Intervention Characteristics Adaptability 33 Total Constructs Complexity Cost Design Quality and Packaging Evidence Strength and Quality Intervention Source Relative Advantage Trialability Outer Setting Cosmopolitanism External Policy and Incentives Patient Needs and Resources Peer Pressure Process Engaging Executing Planning Reflecting and Evaluating

  9. Systematic Review & Synthesis Process 1 Systematic Literature Review Construct Specific 2 3 Instrument Specific 4 Compile Packets & Highlight EBA-relevant info 5 Rate Each Instrument Twice Using EBA criteria 450 Instruments

  10. Preliminary Results ✦ Constructs with ZERO instruments 1. Design Quality and Packaging 2. Intervention Source 3. External Policy and Incentives 4. Peer Pressure 5. Implementation Climate: Tension for Change 6. Implementation Climate: Goals and Feedback 7. Engaging: Formally Appointed Internal Implementation Leaders 8. Engaging: Champions ✦ Average # of instruments = 18.6 (in the 6 Implementation Outcomes constructs)

  11. Website Tour

  12. Summary of Website Features Goal Feature Promote use of theory/framework Consolidated Framework for to guide implementation research Implementation Research Promote consensual Published definitions provided language/terms/definitions throughout Reduce creation of redundant Results from systematic review instruments provided Highlight importance of Evidence Based Assessment Criteria psychometric validation Aid stakeholders in identifying EBA Rating Profile and all available appropriate/useful instruments literature provided in one place Aid stakeholders in selecting Head-to-head EBA Rating Profile instruments Comparisons within each construct Aid stakeholders in accessing We contacted every single instruments instrument developer

  13. Future Directions ✦ Complete the Systematic Review and Rating of Remaining Constructs ✦ Consider Development of a Consensus Battery ✦ Create Capacity for Online Shared Data Warehouse

  14. Acknowledgements Ruben Martinez Cameo Borntrager Bryan Weiner Knowledge Users: Kate Comtois, Brad Steinfeld, David Ayer, Brian Mittman, Caryn Blitz IRP Task Force: Drs. Gregory Aarons, Cassidy Arnold, Melanie Barwick, Rinad Beidas, Helen Best, Elisa Borah, Cameo Borntrager, Craig Bryan, Adam Carmel, Mark Chaffin, Kate Comtois, Laura Damschroder, Dennis Donovan, Shannon Dorsey, Michelle Duda, Julia Felton, Dean Fixsen, Howard Goldman, Carmen Hall, Rochelle Hanson, Petra Helmond, Amanda Jensen- Doss, Sarah Kaye, Meghan Keough, Sara Landes, Cara Lewis, Marsha Linehan, Aaron Lyon, Melanie Barwick Michael McDonell, Kate McHugh, Maria Mancebo, Shari Manning, Christopher Martell, Erin Miga, Brian Mittman, Sandra Naoom, Byron Powell, Raphael Rose, Lisa Ruble, Joe Ruzek, Anju Sahay, Sonja Schoenwald, Rebecca Selove, Jeffrey Smith, Bradley Steinfeld, Phil Ullrich, Bryan Weiner, Elizabeth A. Wells, and Shannon Wiltsey Stirman.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend