S.P. 6223-20 TH 149 (Smith Avenue) High Bridge CMGC Project - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

S.P. 6223-20 TH 149 (Smith Avenue) High Bridge CMGC Project Mississippi River in St. Paul Industry Informational Meeting September 22, 2016

Outline

• Introductions
• Disclaimers
• Ground Rules
• Project Overview
• CMGC RFP
• CMGC Processes
• Consultant Contracts
• Conflict of Interest
• DBE Opportunities
• Questions

Introductions

MnDOT Project Manager: Steve Kordosky MnDOT Deputy PM: Greg Asche Our job is to ensure all proposers have the same information and to partner with the successful CMGC team and consultants. Feel free to ask questions at any time.

Introductions

MnDOT

• CMGC Program Manager: Kevin Hagness
• Bridge Consultant Contracts: Paul Kettleson

FHWA City of St. Paul

Disclaimers

We are taking notes during this meeting and will be posting any questions asked we feel need to be shared with those not in attendance. This presentation will be posted on-line at http://www.dot.state.mn.us/const/tools/const- manager-general-contractor.html

Disclaimer What is discussed today is informational only, meant to assist proposers in pursuit of contracting opportunities on this project. The ultimate RFP requirements are included in the final posted documents. Proposers are responsible for following the final RFP(s) If there are any discrepancies, submit a clarification request.

Ground Rules As per the CMGC RFP:

• Steve Kordosky is the Single Point of Contact.
• Each Proposing team needs to identify a

S.P.O.C.

Project Location

Project Goals

• Redeck and rehabilitate the bridge to achieve a

75-year design life.

• Limit the full closure of the Smith Ave High Bridge

for one year or less to prosecute bridge construction.

• Remove the existing external, grouted post-

tensioned tie while maintaining structural integrity

• f the bridge, safety of the workers, and safety of

the travelling public.

Project Goals

• Produce a cost effective design that optimizes the

means and methods of redecking and rehabilitating the bridge.

• Minimize impacts to stakeholders (river traffic,

traveling public, local community) and the environment, (including peregrine falcons, mussels, invasive species, parks, and the river)

Project Goals

• Build a professional and collaborative project

team among the owner, designer, and contractor using the CMGC delivery method.

• Maintain public trust and confidence in the Project

and the CMGC process.

Project Scope

• Redeck and Rehabilitation of Br No. 62090
• Open spandrel tied deck arch over river
• North and South approaches continuous steel

plate girder

• Roadway work from 7th St (TH 5) to George St.
• Separate design-bid-build roadway project from George St. to

I494 with a January 2018 letting.

Project Scope

• Cross section

Why CMGC?

• Early contractor involvement with a focus on:
• Arch span post-tensioning
• Sequencing of arch span deck removal and

replacement

• Staging of entire project including arch spans,

approach spans, staging areas, work in water, etc.

• Early contractor involvement to develop construction

schedule

Preconstruction services scope of work

• Hard deliverables required
• Equipment placement and construction loads during

staged deck removal and placement

• External PT removal and installation
• Temporary works, site access plans, arch span

concrete placement

• Analysis of precast deck
• See RFP for more details

Project Schedule

• Schedule based off one year full closure of Smith

Ave High Bridge to prosecute re-decking

• CMGC contractor on board by late November,

2016.

• Issue for bid June 2017.
• Start construction fall 2017, close bridge winter

2017-2018

Project Schedule

• ROW needed for approach roadway work

acquired by spring of 2018. Will need a PIF.

• ROW needed for bridge staging areas acquired

before advertisement.

• Environmental documentation complete by

January 2017

• Mussel survey fall of 2016

Project Cost

• Based on our Current Project Scope and Risk

Profile:

• Bridge No. 62090 costs: $21-34 million
• Roadway costs: $300k

Total Estimated Construction Cost: $22-$35 million

Project FTP Site

FTP Site for Background Information: ftp://ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/Mendota/SP% 206223-20%20High%20Bridge/

CMGC RFP

Table 2.1 - Procur uremen ment Sched hedul ule

MILESTO STONE DATE TE Iss ssue ue CMGC C RFP P Septe tember 19 19, , 2016 Proj

• ject

ct Informa formation ional Meeti eting ng Septe tember 22 22, , 2016 Deadline ne for Propose sers rs to Submi mit t Reques uests ts for Clari rifi fica cati tion

• n on the

e RFP Octob tober 7, 2016 16 Resp spon

• nses

es to Reques uests ts for r Clari rifi ficati tion

• n on RFP

Iss ssued ued Octo tober 10 10, , 2016 Deadline ne for Propose sers rs to Submi mit t Prop

• pos
• sal

Octo tober 14 14, , 2016 Inter terview ews Octo tober 25 25, , 2016 CMGC C Contr tracto tor r Selec elected ted Octo tober 27 27, , 2016 Noti tice ce to Proce

• ceed

ed – P/T Serv rvice ces s Contr tract ct Novem ember 23, 2016

• One-step Qualifications-Based Request for

Proposals (RFP)

• Final CMGC RFP is currently advertised on MnDOT’s

Consultant Services website: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/consult/notices.html

• Thank you to those who submitted comments on

the Draft CMGC RFP

CMGC RFP

• RFP Details:
• Interviews
• No Stipends
• No co-location
• DBE Goal for Construction
• No DBE Goal for CMGC P/T Contract
• CMGC Team to develop a Subcontracting Plan
• Includes approach to DBE engagement and

goal setting for the project.

A notification to Proposers has also been posted

• n MnDOT’s Consultant Services website to help

Proposers identify what changed between the draft CMGC RFP and the final CMGC RFP. In the event of any discrepancies between this document and the final CMGC RFP, the final CMGC RFP shall take precedent.

Noteworthy changes from “Draft”

• Section 1.3 - Bridge information is not security

sensitive

• Section 4.5 – Proposal quantities changed from 15 to

20

• Section 5.5 - Interviews Oct. 25, 2016
• Section 6.5.1 – Scope of work updated to include

helping MnDOT evaluate the use of pre-cast deck panels

Communications

Steve Kordosky, Project Manager, is the sole MnDOT contact person for clarification requests, communications about the project, the RFP, and Proposal submittals. Email: steve.kordosky@state.mn.us

Communications

CMGC programmatic questions shall be directed to Kevin Hagness, CMGC Program Manager: Email: Kevin.Hagness@state.mn.us

Proposal Delivery, Content, Format

• Proposals shall not exceed 15 pages; not

including cover letter, table of contents, section dividers, appendices, and required forms

• Resumes for Key Personnel shall not exceed two

pages per position

• 2-11x17 pages allowed for Project Experience

Table

Addendums and Clarifications

Proposers need to acknowledge all addendums and clarifications issued in their Proposals. RFP Clarification Request Forms can be found on MnDOT’s CMGC website: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/const/tools/const- manager-general-contractor.html

Mandatory Technical Interviews

• Approximately one hour in length
• No handouts or formal presentations
• Will consist of set questions for all Proposers and clarification

questions for each Proposer based on their Proposal

• Will not be scored separately – will be used as additional

information in support and to clarify the information contained in the proposal

• Questions will not be provided to Proposers in advance of the

interview

• Up to five representatives from Proposer’s team – must include

PM, CM, Lead Cost Estimator and PT Specialist

• Proposers must contact CMGC PM to schedule an interview time

CMGC Experience

Not required. Although CMGC experience can be valuable, there are other ways proposer’s can demonstrate their ability to be successful in the CMGC process.

Travel Reimbursement

MnDOT approval required for out of state travel. This is typical practice for MnDOT professional/technical services contracts and will be addressed with the apparent successful proposer prior to executing a contract. This should not deter proposer’s from proposing qualified out

• f state personnel for the preconstruction services.

Construction Services Fee

A Construction Services Fee fixed-markup percentage of 12% has been established in the RFP.

Formal workshops for design review, risk, and cost estimating are anticipated to occur at the 30%, 60%, and 90% design milestones. For each of these milestones, the cost estimates will include an Independent Cost Estimate (ICE), Owner’s/Engineer’s Estimate and the CMGC’s Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC).

The ICE and an Engineer’s Estimate will be used by MnDOT to validate the CMGC’s price proposal/bid.

Further information available on MnDOT’s CMGC website: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/const/tools/co nst-manager-general-contractor.html

Consultant Contacts

• Final Design Bridge No. 62090 and

Roadway.

• Bridge No. 62090 Peer Review.
• Independent Cost Estimating and Engineer’s

Estimating Services

• No construction oversight consultant

anticipated

AECOM is currently under contract with MnDOT to provide inspection, structural analysis and load rating services for the High Bridge. This contract had an

• ption that allowed for amending the scope of work to

include final design services. MnDOT intends to exercise this option.

KLJ is currently under contract with MnDOT to provide final roadway design services on TH 149 (Smith Avenue) from 7th Street to I-494. MnDOT intends to include the work from 7th Street to George Street with this CMGC project and the work from George Street to I-494 with a future design-bid-build project.

Consultant advertisement coming out very soon

There will be one RFP advertised for two separate contracts for the ICE and the Owner’s/Engineer’s Estimating services.

Scope of work for both contracts is very similar:

• production-based, contractor-style estimates at

each of the design milestones and at bid

• schedule analysis and development at each of the

design milestones and at bid

Desired Skills:

• production-based, contractor-style estimating

for major bridge projects of similar size, scope and complexity

• schedule analysis and development for bridge

projects of similar size, scope and complexity

• Relevant CMGC experience and an understanding
• f the CMGC process

Responder’s submission of a proposal is acknowledgement that Responder may be assigned, at the discretion of MnDOT, the ICE or the EE services contract.

Procurements Schedule

• RFP scheduled to be advertised late September,

2016

• 3-week advertisement planned
• ICE and EE under contract about the same time as

the CMGC Contractor

Continue to watch the MnDOT Consultant Services website for procurement updates, clarifications, and addendums: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/consult/notices.html

Conf nflic ict t of f Interes erest

DBE

• MnDOT Office of Civil Rights
• DBE Goal anticipated for construction

contract.

• Future DBE Meet and Greet Opportunities.

Questions?