Link Union Station (Link US) Project Construction Manager/General - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

link union station link us project
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Link Union Station (Link US) Project Construction Manager/General - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Link Union Station (Link US) Project Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) Industry Outreach August 3, 2020 1 I. W ELCOMING R EMARKS 9:00 9:10 am a. CMGC Objectives by Rick Clarke, Metro b. Change to CMGC Approach by Rick Clarke,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Link Union Station (Link US) Project

Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) Industry Outreach

August 3, 2020

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

  • Not Funded
  • Funded

I. WELCOMING REMARKS 9:00 – 9:10 am

  • a. CMGC Objectives by Rick Clarke, Metro
  • b. Change to CMGC Approach by Rick Clarke, Metro
  • II. LINK US PRESENTATION

9:10 - 9:30 am

  • a. Project Overview by Jeanet Owens, Metro
  • b. Project Benefits &
  • c. Phase A & B
  • d. Phase A Funding Plan
  • e. CMGC Key Constraints & Approach
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

  • Not Funded
  • Funded

II. LINK US PRESENTATION (Continue)

  • d. PE Design by Tom Kim, HDR

10:00 - 10:30 am i. Key Design Elements ii. Design Schedule

  • iii. Subsurface Utility Investigations

i. Geotechnical

  • iv. Sound Wall & Quiet Zone by Vincent Chio, Metro

v. Station & Platform

  • vi. Track Alignment
  • vii. Caltrans Involvement
  • viii. US 101 Viaduct Structure
  • ix. 55 Hour Lane Closure Approach

x. ATP & LADWP Overhead Poles

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

  • Not Funded
  • Funded

II. LINK US PRESENTATION (Continue)

  • e. CMGC Scope of Work

10:00 - 10:30 am

  • i. Construction Phasing & Schedule by Scott McConnell, Metro
  • ii. Constructability & Value Engineering by Scott McConnell, Metro

iii.Risk Management by Dave Davies, Metro iv.Scheduling & Cost Estimating by Jay Yoon, Metro

III. SMALL BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS by Elke Campbell 10:30 - 10:45 am

  • IV. CMGC PROCUREMENT by Fred Origel, Metro

10:45 - 11:00 am V. QUESTIONS & ANSWERS by all 11:00 - 11:45 am

  • VI. Closing by Miriam Long, Metro
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Welcoming Remarks

  • Not Funded
  • Funded

Rick Clarke

Chief Program Management Officer

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Link Union Station Overview

  • Not Funded
  • Funded

Jeanet Owens

Senior Executive Officer, Program Management and Regional Rail

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Link US Project Overview (Phases A & B)

  • Not Funded
  • Funded
slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

The Link to Southern California

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Los Angeles Union Station Today

Built in 1939 | Largest model hub in Southern California

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

10

Metro Regional Rail focus on Network Integration

Union Station

1. Los Angeles Union Station (LAUS) is the largest multi-modal rail and transit hub in Southern California serving over 100,000 passengers per day. 2. By 2028 Olympics, LAUS will serve over 200,000 passengers per day

Proposed Virgin Trains USA To Las Vegas

High Desert Corridor

High Speed Rail

VICTORVILLE

METROLINK SYSTEM Amtrak Pacific Surfliner

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

11

Link Union Station Regional Rail Overview

  • Not Funded
  • Funded

Carrier er Service ice # of W Weekday ay Passeng ngers rs (2017) # o

  • f Weekda

day Train ins (2017) Estimat ated ed Number er of Weekday ay Train ins (2040**) Metrolink Riverside 2,985 12 22 91 / Perris Valley Line 2,608 9 23 Antelope Valley 4,854 30 48 Orange County 7,616 21 41 San Bernardino 7,161 38 48 Ventura 3,276 33 51 LOSSAN Pacific Surfliner 4,100 24 38 Amtrak Southwest Chief; Coast Starlight; Sunset Limited; [2040 includes future Coast Daylight, Coachella Valley] 540 5 9

Total al *33,138 ,138 172 280

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

What will Link US Provide?

PROJECT BENEFITS

https://call.lifesizecloud.com/4705878

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

13

Link US Phase A (Funded)

Combined Run-Through Tracks Structure without the loop track Key Project Components 1. New rail communication, signals and early tracks to be performed by Metrolink 2. Utility relocation and street improvements 3. Platform #4 and Viaduct structure over the US 101 freeway

Early Track, Signal and Communication Improvements Commercial and Center Street Improvements/Utility Relocation/ROW Platform 4 Modifications Two initial run- through tracks

  • n a new run-

through track viaduct structure

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

14

LINK US CMGC RFP PHASE B

A separate traditional CMGC RFP Phase B issued in January 2021 for development of 35% Preliminary Engineering Design only and negotiate a separate construction contract once Phase B has been funded.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

15

Concept Rendering – subject to change

  • 1. Raising of entire rail yard

from the Vignes Bridge up to 15 feet

  • 2. New Platforms and

Expanded Passageway with retail and passenger amenities including escalators and elevators to all platforms

  • 3. Optimization of the

throat with a new lead track

Link US Phase B Construction Not Funded

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Link US Funding Plan (Phase A)

Metro’s funding partners includes CHSRA, CalSTA and SCRRA

Funding Source Amount ($ in millions)

State Proposition 1A/High Speed Rail Bonds $423.335 State Transit Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) $337.571 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) $60.820 Measure R $51.672 SCRRA JPA Contribution (Non-Metro) $40.000 Other HSR Funds $18.726 Measure M $13.274 LOSSAN/Amtrak $5.000

Total $950.398

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

SELECTED CMGC Project Delivery Method

  • 1. Maintain operations at Los Angeles Union Station, largest multi-

modal transit terminal in Southern California serving over 100,000 passengers every week day

  • 2. Fixed Budget – Due to the financial constraint of a $950 million

funding for the entire project, there is very limited ability to absorb cost overruns. a) Maximize cost and schedule savings with early engagement of the Contractor (constructability review, value engineering analysis, bottom-up construction estimate, risk analysis and construction schedule) at every design submittal. b) Minimize change orders during construction. c) Minimize third party delays with flexible phasing plan based on GC construction schedule.

DUE TO 3 KEY CONSTRAINTS:

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

CMGC Project Delivery Method

3rd KEY CONSTRAINT: Large Partners & Stakeholders

Key Stakeholders Funding Partners Metro CalSta SCRRA HSR

CALTRANS City of Los Angeles HSR William Mead Homes Arts District Others BNSF FRA LOSSAN/ AMTRAK SCRRA

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

CMGC Project Delivery Method

REVISED APPROACH

1. Classic CMGC Preconstruction Services

  • One Notice To Proceed for Preconstruction Services with off-ramps
  • Negotiate fixed lump sum price at 90% Design Plans for Early

Construction Work via Task Order (s)

2. Main Construction Services

  • Negotiate Final Firm Fixed Price by Supplemental Construction

Contract

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Environmental

  • Not Funded
  • Funded

Vincent Chio

Director, Metro Rail Environmental Project Manager

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

LINK UNION STATION

Environmental Clearance Status

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)

1. Final EIR: Completed in June 27, 2019 (Board Certified) 2. CEQA Amendment: in Progress thru Spring 2021 A. Permanent BNSF Track Removal (West Bank, 1st Street) B. BNSF Malabar Yard Improvements (City of Vernon) ❖ 49th Street: Close At-Grade Crossing ❖ 46th Street: Connect existing track segments

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

1. Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare EIS under FRA: Fall 2016 2. Revised NOI under HSR: Summer 2020 (BNSF West Bank & Malabar Yard) 3. Draft EIS: Spring 2021 4. Final EIS/ROD: Summer 2021

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Preliminary Design

  • Not Funded
  • Funded

Tom Kim

Senior Vice President, HDR Link US Project Manager

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

HDR DESIGN TEAM

Tom Kim, PE Project Manager

Mike Grubstein, PE Deputy Project Manager

Andrew Mull, PE Track Lead Mo Mah, AIA, LEED AP Architecture Lead Marc Cooley, PE Civil Lead Dan Weddell, PE Structures Lead Doug Smith, PE Traffic Lead Patrick O’Neil Environmental Lead

23

Key Discipline Leads

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

LINK UNION STATION PHASE A KEY DESIGN ELEMENTS

Area 1 - Throat (North of the Station) Area 2 - Station Area & Platform Modifications Area 3 - US-101 Viaduct Freeway Improvements & Commercial Street ATP Area 4 - Run–through Tracks West Bank Tie-In & Bridge over Amtrak Lead

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

LINK UNION STATION CMGC

List of Key Technical Documents

  • 1. Subsurface Utility Investigation Data Reports
  • 2. Geotechnical reports including boring data
  • 3. Updated 35% Preliminary Engineering Design Plans
  • 4. Caltrans approved Project Study Report/Project Report (PSR/PR)
  • 5. Caltrans approved Type Selection Report for US-101 Bridge
  • 6. Proposed approach to 55 hour lane closure of US-101 for run-

through track viaduct construction (LADOT & Caltrans approved)

  • 7. Structure Type Assessment Report for Center Street Bridge
  • 8. Draft preliminary technical specifications
  • 9. Preliminary construction phase risk register

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Phase A Preliminary Design Schedule

Subject to Change

  • 1. Review PE Designs with CMGC: April 2021 –July 2021
  • 2. 65% Design Development: Aug 2021-March 2022
  • 3. 90% Design: April 2022-Oct 2022

4

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

LINK US SUBSURFACE UTILITY INVESTIGATIONS

Investigation Summary by Project Area

  • 1. Metro Property

3 trenches and 4 potholes within Metro Division 20 property

  • 2. BNSF Property

3 trenches and 4 potholes within BSNF storage track area

  • 3. SCRRA Right of Way

12 trenches within rail corridor

  • 4. Union Station Platform Area

2 trenches within access road s/o platforms

  • 5. MWD Property

1 trench along MWD access road

  • 6. City of LA Local Street Right of Way

3 trenches and 3 potholes along Commercial and Vignes Streets

  • 7. Caltrans Right of Way

1 trench and 4 potholes within US-101 R/W

  • 8. Amtrak Property

3 potholes along Amtrak yard lead track Total work completed: 24 trenches, 11 potholes Total work to be completed upon agency approval: 5 trenches, 7 potholes Pothole/Trench Location Map

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

LINK US GEOTECHNICAL & HAZMAT INVESTIGATIONS

Summary of Field Investigations

Anticipated Work Areas Caltrans Right of Way 7 geotechnical borings and 4 hand auger hazmat borings BNSF Property 4 geotechnical borings Metro Property & Private Property 7 geotechnical borings and 1 hand auger hazmat boring Preliminary Design Phase Total work completed: 20 Geotechnical Borings, 21 Shared Geotechnical Borings/Environmental Samples and 22 Hazmat Borings Final Design Phase Total work to be completed: 18 Shared Geotechnical/Environmental Samples Borings and 5 Hazmat Borings

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

LINK US GEOTECHNICAL & HAZMAT DOCUMENTS

Summary of Technical Documents

Discipline Status Document Title

Geotechnical Completed Preliminary Geotechnical Report- Existing Data, dated July 2016 Geotechnical Completed Draft- Preliminary Geotechnical Design Report - Improvements Outside Caltrans ROW, dated April 2020 Geotechnical Completed Link US Geotechnical Data Report Viaduct Over US 101, dated October 2017 Geotechnical Completed Preliminary Foundation Report Viaduct Over US 101, dated December 2019 Hazmat Completed Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, Link Union Station Project Area, dated October 26, 2016 Hazmat Completed Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, Los Angeles Union Station Area, dated October 26, 2016 Hazmat Completed Soil Management Plan for Investigations, Link Union Station, dated January 16, 2017 Hazmat Completed Initial Site Assessment Report - Caltrans ROW, dated April 5, 2017 Hazmat Completed Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Workplan, dated September 25, 2017 Hazmat Completed Initial Site Assessment Update Report – Caltrans ROW, dated June 19, 2019 Geotechnical Pending Completion Geotechnical Design Report- Improvements Outside Caltrans ROW Geotechnical Pending Completion Final Foundation Report Viaduct Over US 101 - Caltrans ROW Geotechnical Pending Completion Final Foundation Report Retaining Walls - Caltrans ROW Hazmat Pending Completion Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

UPDATED LINK UNION STATION 35% DESIGN

Key Project Changes to Address Stakeholder Comments Key Changes

a) Modified US-101 bridge piles at abutments from driven to CIDH to reduce noise impacts b) Modified design of Center Street Bridge to address City comments regarding safety c) Added tunnel under track section for Metro maintenance/emergency access to Red/Purple Line portal trench d) Modernized Platform 4 canopy design e) Implemented ADA improvements along Commercial Street to address City comments

CMGC Opportunities

Modified 35% design for CMGC RFP and provided additional design details not typically provided at 35% to provide better starting point for contractor to review and make VE and constructability recommendations. 30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

LINK US PHASE A PROJECT

Area 1 - William Meade Homes Sound Wall on Retaining Wall

WILLIAM MEAD HOMES SOUND/RETAINING WALL LAYOUT

WILLIAM MEAD HOMES

SOUND WALL ON RETAINING WALL

CMGC Collaboration Opportunities:

  • a. How to minimize impacts to WMH residents
  • b. Determination of most efficient wall type
  • c. Potential early construction package

Benefits:

  • a. Reduced noise impacts to WMH residents which also

addresses request by Council District 1

  • b. EIR mitigation measure

31

TYPICAL WALL SECTION

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Looking Southwest from Bolero Lane/Bloom Street

NOISE MITIGATION - SOUND WALL

Conceptual Rendering

32

Existing Conditions Proposed Project - Vegetation (Vines)

  • n Sound Wall and Retaining Wall
slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Noise from Train Operations (Proposed Project)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS MITIGATION Noise from increased train activity

  • a. Existing sound level – 69dB

(Currently 233 Metrolink and Amtrak trains enter and leave Union Station, including empty trains to Central Maintenance Facility)

  • b. Year 2040 future sound level – up to 75dB

(830 Metrolink, Amtrak, and future High Speed Rail trains is projected to enter and leave Union Station)

Sound wall up to 22 feet tall to mitigate the impacts to less than significant level.

  • a. Future sound level with

the sound wall – 62dB 33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

TRAIN HORN NOISE NEAR WILLIAM MEAD HOMES

  • a. 40% of train horns heard at

the William Mead Homes in the early morning hours had a noise level over 90 dBA.

  • b. Under the leadership of

Council District 1, Metro is working with City of LA, Metrolink and CPUC on the implementation of the first quiet zone in City of LA. Over 120 trains cross N Main Street every weekday, starting at around 4am and sounding the train horns

William Mead Homes

Need for a Quiet Zone at Main Street

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Quiet Zone Ready Improvements at N. Main Street Railroad Grade Crossing

PROPOSED LIMITS OF QUIET ZONE ON THE WEST BANK

N Main St Xing DWP Pvt Xing N Main St Xing 0.28 miles

a. In a Quiet Zone, railroads are directed to cease the routine sounding their horns when approaching public highway-rail grade crossings. Train horns may still be used in emergency situations. b. Quiet Zones are subject to review and approval by

  • CPUC. City of LA is responsible for applying for a Quiet

Zone with the CPUC.

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Quiet Zone Ready Improvements

PROPOSED SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS AT

  • N. MAIN STREET

New Pedestrian Gates and Wider Sidewalks New Raised Median with New Vehicular Gates ADA and Access Improvements New Traffic Signal New Pedestrian Gates and Wider Sidewalks 36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Area 2 Station - Project Elements

MWD PLATFORM 5 PLATFORM 3 PLATFORM 2 PLATFORM 1 PLATFORM 6 PLATFORM 7

LINK US PHASE A PROJECT

Legend US-101 Viaduct Retained Fill Section Reconstructed access road Existing Platform Platform 4 modifications

SHORTEN/MODIFY PLATFORM 4 TO ACCOMMODATE TRACK RAMP CONSTRUCT RAMP TO TRANSITION TRACK FROM PLATFORM LEVEL TO BRIDGE LEVEL

PLATFORM 4

CMGC Collaboration Opportunities:

  • a. Plan construction access areas and routes
  • b. Define interim baggage operations and passenger movements

c. Manage passenger movement and access for safety and convenience

  • d. Determination of construction access/methods in confined space

LOWER ACCESS ROAD TO CROSS UNDER TRACK BRIDGE

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Area 2 Station – Platform 4 Modifications

LINK US PHASE A PROJECT

CMGC Collaboration Opportunities:

  • a. Architectural design refinements
  • b. Managing passenger movement and access during construction

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

LINK US PHASE A PROJECT

PROPOSED PLATFORM 4 IMPROVEMENTS WITH NEW CANOPY

Area 2 Station – Platform 4 Modifications

39

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

RUN-THROUGH TRACK ALIGNMENT

Area 3 - Track Alignment and Property Needs South of Union Station

110+00

Alignment constrained by the following:

  • a. Existing platforms at LAUS
  • b. El Monte Busway, US-101, and on/off ramps

c. Existing Red/Purple Line tunnel and portal trench

  • d. Center Street crossing
  • e. Future Metro Center Project

f. Existing SCRRA and BNSF track infrastructure

  • g. Existing adjacent development
  • h. LADWP electrical transmission corridor

RUN THROUGH TRACKS COMMERCIAL ST GAREY ST VIGNES ST CENTER ST DUCOMMUN ST SB US 101 NB US 101 LOS ANGELES RIVER METRO CENTER SITE

Legend Property Acquisition El Monte Busway Run through tracks

40

UNION STATION

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

LINK US PHASE A PROJECT

Area 3 – Run-through Track Structure South of Union Station

COMMERCIAL ST CENTER ST SB US 101 NB US 101 UNION STATION VIGNES ST GAREY ST DUCOMMUN ST CENTER ST BRIDGE MAINTENANCE VEHICLE ACCESS TUNNEL RETAINED FILL SECTION RETAINED FILL SECTION EL MONTE BUSWAY

41

US-101 VIADUCT

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

Preliminary Design Phase

a. Design exceptions for freeway geometry approved b. Project Report approval expected August 2020 c. Type Selection Report approval expected August 2020

CMGC Collaboration Design Phase

a. Review and approval of US-101 bridge and freeway modification design packages b. Open to early construction packages such as foundation installation c. Working with designer and contractor on aesthetic treatments

Area 3 – Caltrans Involvement During Preliminary Engineering and CMGC Phases

LINK US PHASE A PROJECT

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

LINK US PHASE A PROJECT

Area 3 – US 101 Viaduct and Freeway Modifications

COMMERCIAL ST NB US 101 UNION STATION

Legend US-101 Viaduct Retained Fill Section El Monte Busway

PATSAOURAS PLAZA GAREY ST VIGNES ST

CMGC Collaboration Opportunities:

  • a. Construction staging of the bridge and freeway

improvements Key Constraints:

  • a. Preserve SB on-ramp geometry
  • b. Provide std vertical clearance over US-101 and busway

c. Maintain US-101 thru lanes during construction Key Features:

  • a. Construct viaduct with 12’ to 14’ CIDH piles
  • b. Reconstruct retaining walls along El Monte Busway

c. Restripe US-101 to provide space for bridge bents

  • d. Reconstruct NB on-ramp from Vignes St

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

LINK US PHASE A PROJECT

Area 3 – US 101 Viaduct

LOWER RUN-THROUGH TRACK PROFILE IN PHASE A

Key Features:

  • a. Spans 1-3 & 7-9 precast
  • b. Spans 4-6 are CIP delta box

c. Bents 5 &6 are outriggers over SB US-101

  • d. Portion of Phase A deck profile

lower than ultimate CMGC Collaboration Opportunities:

  • a. Construct Spans 1 through 3 to

be raised in the future

  • b. Bridge and wall aesthetics

c. Freeway closure schedule for falsework and girder erection

TYPICAL SECTION ALONG BENT 2 TYPICAL SECTION ALONG BENTS 6R AND 6L

44

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

APPROACH TO 55 HOUR LANE CLOSURE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF RUN-THROUGH TRACK BRIDGE

Area 3 – Requires Joint Approval by Caltrans & LADOT

45

Proposed Closure (Year 2022)

a. 55 Hours on Weekend b. Closure Duration: From Friday 10 PM to Monday 5 AM c. 5 Weekend Closure in NB US-101 and 5 Weekend Closure in SB US-101 d. Only 1 direction of US-101 will be closed on a particular weekend

Executive Summary

a. Tested three Diversion Patterns (60/40, 70/30, 100/0) b. Tested two traffic levels (Actual at 5600 - 5800 vph and Max. Theoretical)

  • Not a substantial difference
  • Year 2022 Projections for Saturday Peak Hours, NB and SB
  • Some freeway segments hit capacity at 70/30
  • NB closure more complex
slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

APPROACH TO 55 HOUR LANE CLOSURE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF RUN-THROUGH TRACK BRIDGE

Area 3 – Requires Joint Approval by Caltrans & LADOT

46

TMP LOS Results Using 70-30 split for NB and SB closure and existing volumes:

a.

2 Freeway segments impacted

b.

5 intersections impacted

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

APPROACH TO 55 HOUR LANE CLOSURE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF RUN-THROUGH TRACK BRIDGE

Area 3 – Requires Joint Approval by Caltrans & LADOT

47

Proposed Recommendations

a. Maximum diversion is a 70/30 b. SB US 101 closure should stay open to Los Angeles Street c. NB US 101 could close at I-5/I-10 Interchange with support from diversion to I-710 d. Significant Regional SB diversion needed for SB closure e. I-110/I-10 ramps will need support f. Significant public information campaign will be needed

Next Steps

a. Work with Caltrans and LADOT to receive concurrence by August 2020 b. Work with CMGC on preparing Transportation Management Plan (TMP) and construction phasing

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

LINK US PHASE A PROJECT

Area 3 – Proposed Active Transportation Improvements

View from Southeast Corner of Commercial/Garey Intersection

Note: Per agreement with City of LA, active transportation is limited to Class IV bike lanes only with bollards and associated restriping (no R/W takes included)

48

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

Area 3 – Existing LADWP Power Lines & Poles in Conflict with Project

COMMERCIAL ST VIGNES ST CENTER ST SB US 101

Legend Existing power poles Existing power poles in conflict Existing overhead power lines

LINK US PHASE A PROJECT

a. Conflicts to be mitigated through relocation strategy that involves both underground and overhead relocations to be designed and constructed by LADWP b. Overhead relocations require use of engineered steel poles

ALISO ST

49

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50

Area 3 – Relocation of Impacted Power Facilities by LADWP

Completion of Relocation Design and Construction is Time Sensitive:

a. 18 month fabrication time for required engineered steel poles b. 1 year for relocation construction by LADWP c. Relocations need to be completed ahead of bridge construction

To Initiate Relocation Design, LADWP Needs Confirmation of Proposed Locations of:

a. Curb, sidewalk, and curb ramps b. Street trees c. Street lights d. Catch basins e. Other features that could influence pole placement Project engineers to advance design to provide requested information and obtain City of LA approval

LINK US PHASE A PROJECT

50

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

LINK US PHASE A PROJECT

Area 3 – Center Street Bridge

COMMERCIAL ST CENTER ST SB US 101

Legend Center St Bridge Retained Fill Section Limits of existing tunnel New traffic signal

ALISO ST

CMGC Collaboration Opportunities:

  • a. Staging and falsework design to maintain traffic operations
  • b. Develop construction methods to avoid impacts to the Red Line

tunnel including monitoring

AVOID EXISTING RED/PURPLE LINE TUNNELS RECONSTRUCT TRAFFIC ISLAND TO ACCCOMMODATE COLUMN

S S

Key Features:

  • a. Outrigger bent cap to span tunnel and preserve sight distance
  • b. Column and abutment foundations to avoid Red/Purple Line tunnel

Key Constraints:

  • a. Vehicle sight distance
  • b. Avoid Red/Purple Line Tunnel

c. Maintain traffic during construction

51

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

LINK US PHASE A PROJECT

Area 3 – Center Street Bridge

TYPICAL SECTION Key Constraints:

  • a. Vehicle sight distance
  • b. Vertical clearance under bridge

c. Avoid Red/Purple Line Tunnel below

  • d. Maintain traffic during construction

RED LINE TUNNEL STRUCTURES

Key Features:

  • a. Outrigger bent cap to span tunnel

and preserve sight distance

  • b. Column and abutment foundations

to avoid Red/Purple Line tunnel c. Columns located to preserve vehicle sight distance

52

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

LINK US PHASE A PROJECT

Area 4 - BNSF Yard – Project Elements

JACKSON ST METRO CENTER PROJECT SITE DUCOMMUN ST LOS ANGELES RIVER

AMTRAK YARD LEAD BRIDGE CONSTRUCT RETAINED FILL SECTION TO ACCOMMODATE RUN-THROUGH TRACK TRANSITION TO GRADE RUN-THROUGH TRACKS CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALL TO ACCOMMODATE LOWERED YARD LEAD

Legend Amtrak Yard Lead Bridge Retained Fill Section Maintenance Vehicle Tunnel Storm Drain Protection Slab

CMGC Collaboration Opportunities:

  • a. Construction methods and abutment

design to maintain track operation

  • b. Optimize lightweight fill retaining walls

and slab bridge protection structure

LOWER AMTRAK YARD LEAD TO ACCOMMODATE RUN-THROUGH TRACK CROSSING CONSTRUCT PROTECTION SLAB OVER 12’ DIA COLA STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCT MAINTENANCE & EMERGENCY ACCESS TUNNEL TO SERVE PORTAL TRENCH

Key Features:

  • a. Lightweight fill retaining walls
  • b. Box fire/maintenance access tunnel

c. Protection slab over storm drain

  • d. Lowered Amtrak yard lead

Key Constraints:

  • a. Red Line portal trench
  • b. 12’ dia COLA storm drain

c. Need to maintain Amtrak yard lead

  • d. Track clearance under First St Bridge

53

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

Benefits of BIM

Implementation of Building Information Modeling (BIM)

Risk Reduction

a. Find Coordination and Construction phasing issues in office rather than in field

Better Inform and Support Cost Estimation

a. Quantities can be dynamically pulled from models and trended over the design lifecycle

Automation of Plan Production from Model

  • a. Allow multiple alternative analysis when

compared to traditional 2D plan production due to dynamic and parametric setup

Enhanced Coordination

a. BIM Models provide effective ways to communicate and coordinate design among multiple stakeholders 542

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55

BIM Roles and Responsibilities

Implementation of Building Information Modeling (BIM)

Design Team

  • a. Developing 35% plan set to

“BIM Ready”

  • b. Design for 65% and beyond

done in BIM c. Perform Survey Gap analysis to identify additional survey needs

  • d. Use models to facilitate

coordination and communication with value engineering phase

  • e. Models used to enhance 4D

phasing efforts with construction team f. Models used to enhance 5D cost estimating efforts with construction team

Construction Team

  • a. 3D coordination with design and

trade contractor models

  • b. Lead 4D phasing efforts with

support of design team BIM models c. Lead 5D cost estimating effort with support of design team BIM models

  • d. Progress design team BIM models

as needed for use in shop drawings (BIM to fabrication models)

  • e. Generate BIM as-built

documentation and models 33

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56

CMGC Phasing and Scope of Services

  • Not Funded
  • Funded

Scott McConnell

Executive Officer, Program Management and Regional Rail

slide-57
SLIDE 57

57

CMGC - Scope Elements

  • Not Funded
  • Funded
  • A. Preconstruction Stage
  • By Fee
  • B. Construction Stage
  • By Task Order (Early Construction); or,
  • By Final Firm Fixed Contract
slide-58
SLIDE 58

58

CMGC - Phasing

  • Not Funded
  • Funded
slide-59
SLIDE 59

59

CMGC - Phasing Schedule

CONSTRUCTION Early Construction Work Final Firm Fixed Contract 2026 2027 PRE- CONSTRUCTION CMGC Procurement CMGC Precon Services 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Board Approval 35% ~ 65% 90% Off-ramp Fixed Construction NTP US 101 Viaduct & Highway Modification Platform 4 Track and Signal Work Testing

WMH Retaining Main Street Quiet

RSD

slide-60
SLIDE 60

60

CMGC – Preconstruction Scope of Services

  • Not Funded
  • Funded
  • A. Constructability Reviews
  • B. Value Engineering
  • C. Schedule Management
  • D. Cost Estimating
  • E. Risk Management
slide-61
SLIDE 61

61

CMGC – Constructability

  • Not Funded
  • Funded
  • A. Constructability Reviews
  • Develop a Constructability Checklist to

be performed at 35%, 65% and 90%

slide-62
SLIDE 62

62

CMGC – Constructability Checklist Example

  • Not Funded
  • Funded
slide-63
SLIDE 63

63

CMGC – Value Engineering

  • Not Funded
  • Funded
  • B. Value Engineering Analysis
  • Analysis can be provided during 35%,

65% and 90% Design Stages.

  • Value Engineering Applicable for only

major items, such as Bridge Span, Piles/Foundation, Track Work, etc.

slide-64
SLIDE 64

64

Scheduling and Cost Estimating

  • Not Funded
  • Funded

Jay Yoon

Director of Project Controls, Program Management and Regional Rail

slide-65
SLIDE 65

65

CMGC – Schedule Management

  • Not Funded
  • Funded
  • C. Schedule Management
  • 1. CPM (Critical Path Method) Schedule

for Precon and Construction Services

  • 2. Cash Flow Analysis
slide-66
SLIDE 66

66

CMGC – Cost Estimating

  • Not Funded
  • Funded
  • D. Cost Estimating
  • 1. Construction Cost Estimate at 35%,

65%, & 90% design level (100% for US- 101 viaduct)

  • 2. Final Firm Fixed Price
  • 3. Collaboration with A/E and

Independent Cost Estimator (ICE)

slide-67
SLIDE 67

67

Risk Management

  • Not Funded
  • Funded

Dave Davies

Deputy Executive Officer, Program Management

slide-68
SLIDE 68

68

CMGC – Risk Management

  • Not Funded
  • Funded
  • E. Risk Management
  • 1. Construction Risk Register will be issued with

the RFP

  • 2. Proposers are to identify Project Risks and

include a Risk Register in their Bid Package

  • 3. Consultants approach to Risk Management

during pre-construction and construction phases will be a bid evaluation criteria

  • 4. Consultants Risk Register will be rolled into the

Metro Risk Register

slide-69
SLIDE 69

69

PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION PHASE RISK REGISTER

Key Project Risks

  • 1. DWP Power Relocation: Schedule for design,

procurement and installation of steel poles

  • 2. Utility conflict not discovered by utility

investigation or identified by utility companies

  • 3. Delays due to discovery of historical, cultural or

archeological artifacts

  • 4. Construction of structural foundations in close

proximity to Red/Purple Line Tunnel

  • 5. Integrating new SCRRA track signals/systems into

existing system

  • 6. Boulders and obstructions at pile locations

Page from Project Risk Register

69

slide-70
SLIDE 70

70

CMGC – Risk Management

  • Not Funded
  • Funded
  • E. Risk Management (Cont)

1. Consultant will be an active participant in the risk management process, both pre-construction and construction 2. During pre-construction a formal quantitative risk analysis will be performed to support the project estimating effort and establish appropriate project contingencies 3. Construction working contingency will be established at the 100% design milestone and the establishment of a GMP 4. Metro will manage the construction working contingency through the Metro Risk, Contingency, and Change Control Procedures

slide-71
SLIDE 71

71

Small Business Requirements

  • Not Funded
  • Funded

Elke Campbell

Director, Diversity & Economic Opportunity Metro

slide-72
SLIDE 72

72

Disadvantage Business Enterprise (SBE) Goals & Programs

There will be a total of three (3) SBE Goals, one for each phase of the Project which will be stated in the RFP:

  • 1. Preconstruction Services Phase
  • 2. Early Construction Services Phase
  • 3. Construction Service Phase
slide-73
SLIDE 73

73

Procurement Overview

  • Not Funded
  • Funded

Fred Origel

Director, Contract Administration Metro

slide-74
SLIDE 74

74

Procurement Overview

Dates Subject to Change

August 3, 2020 INDUSTRY OUTREACH August 10, 2020 RELEASE RFQ December 10, 2020 CMGC RFP Due Date

March 25, 2021 Metro Board Award of CMGC

October 26, 2020 RELEASE RFP

slide-75
SLIDE 75

75

Fred Origel, Director, V/CM (323) 903-4111 OrigelF@metro.net Noelle Santos, Sr. Contract Administrator, V/CM (213) 922-3647 Santosn@metro.net

*During the proposal period, only contact the personnel listed above with the exception of DEOD, Ethics, and Metro Pre-Qual Dept.

Vendor/Contract Management Points of Contact for this Procurement:

Procurement Overview

slide-76
SLIDE 76

76

QUESTIONS ?

  • Not Funded
  • Funded
slide-77
SLIDE 77

77

Procurement Overview

  • Not Funded
  • Funded

Miriam Long

Director, Diversity & Economic Opportunity Department

slide-78
SLIDE 78

78

CLOSING

  • Not Funded
  • Funded

Small Business Programs

  • 1. Meet the Primes
  • 2. DBE Mentoring