1
Link Union Station (Link US) Project Construction Manager/General - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Link Union Station (Link US) Project Construction Manager/General - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Link Union Station (Link US) Project Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) Industry Outreach August 3, 2020 1 I. W ELCOMING R EMARKS 9:00 9:10 am a. CMGC Objectives by Rick Clarke, Metro b. Change to CMGC Approach by Rick Clarke,
2
- Not Funded
- Funded
I. WELCOMING REMARKS 9:00 – 9:10 am
- a. CMGC Objectives by Rick Clarke, Metro
- b. Change to CMGC Approach by Rick Clarke, Metro
- II. LINK US PRESENTATION
9:10 - 9:30 am
- a. Project Overview by Jeanet Owens, Metro
- b. Project Benefits &
- c. Phase A & B
- d. Phase A Funding Plan
- e. CMGC Key Constraints & Approach
3
- Not Funded
- Funded
II. LINK US PRESENTATION (Continue)
- d. PE Design by Tom Kim, HDR
10:00 - 10:30 am i. Key Design Elements ii. Design Schedule
- iii. Subsurface Utility Investigations
i. Geotechnical
- iv. Sound Wall & Quiet Zone by Vincent Chio, Metro
v. Station & Platform
- vi. Track Alignment
- vii. Caltrans Involvement
- viii. US 101 Viaduct Structure
- ix. 55 Hour Lane Closure Approach
x. ATP & LADWP Overhead Poles
4
- Not Funded
- Funded
II. LINK US PRESENTATION (Continue)
- e. CMGC Scope of Work
10:00 - 10:30 am
- i. Construction Phasing & Schedule by Scott McConnell, Metro
- ii. Constructability & Value Engineering by Scott McConnell, Metro
iii.Risk Management by Dave Davies, Metro iv.Scheduling & Cost Estimating by Jay Yoon, Metro
III. SMALL BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS by Elke Campbell 10:30 - 10:45 am
- IV. CMGC PROCUREMENT by Fred Origel, Metro
10:45 - 11:00 am V. QUESTIONS & ANSWERS by all 11:00 - 11:45 am
- VI. Closing by Miriam Long, Metro
5
Welcoming Remarks
- Not Funded
- Funded
Rick Clarke
Chief Program Management Officer
6
Link Union Station Overview
- Not Funded
- Funded
Jeanet Owens
Senior Executive Officer, Program Management and Regional Rail
7
Link US Project Overview (Phases A & B)
- Not Funded
- Funded
8
The Link to Southern California
9
Los Angeles Union Station Today
Built in 1939 | Largest model hub in Southern California
10
10
Metro Regional Rail focus on Network Integration
Union Station
1. Los Angeles Union Station (LAUS) is the largest multi-modal rail and transit hub in Southern California serving over 100,000 passengers per day. 2. By 2028 Olympics, LAUS will serve over 200,000 passengers per day
Proposed Virgin Trains USA To Las Vegas
High Desert Corridor
High Speed Rail
VICTORVILLE
METROLINK SYSTEM Amtrak Pacific Surfliner
11
11
Link Union Station Regional Rail Overview
- Not Funded
- Funded
Carrier er Service ice # of W Weekday ay Passeng ngers rs (2017) # o
- f Weekda
day Train ins (2017) Estimat ated ed Number er of Weekday ay Train ins (2040**) Metrolink Riverside 2,985 12 22 91 / Perris Valley Line 2,608 9 23 Antelope Valley 4,854 30 48 Orange County 7,616 21 41 San Bernardino 7,161 38 48 Ventura 3,276 33 51 LOSSAN Pacific Surfliner 4,100 24 38 Amtrak Southwest Chief; Coast Starlight; Sunset Limited; [2040 includes future Coast Daylight, Coachella Valley] 540 5 9
Total al *33,138 ,138 172 280
12
What will Link US Provide?
PROJECT BENEFITS
https://call.lifesizecloud.com/4705878
13
13
Link US Phase A (Funded)
Combined Run-Through Tracks Structure without the loop track Key Project Components 1. New rail communication, signals and early tracks to be performed by Metrolink 2. Utility relocation and street improvements 3. Platform #4 and Viaduct structure over the US 101 freeway
Early Track, Signal and Communication Improvements Commercial and Center Street Improvements/Utility Relocation/ROW Platform 4 Modifications Two initial run- through tracks
- n a new run-
through track viaduct structure
14
14
LINK US CMGC RFP PHASE B
A separate traditional CMGC RFP Phase B issued in January 2021 for development of 35% Preliminary Engineering Design only and negotiate a separate construction contract once Phase B has been funded.
15
15
Concept Rendering – subject to change
- 1. Raising of entire rail yard
from the Vignes Bridge up to 15 feet
- 2. New Platforms and
Expanded Passageway with retail and passenger amenities including escalators and elevators to all platforms
- 3. Optimization of the
throat with a new lead track
Link US Phase B Construction Not Funded
16
Link US Funding Plan (Phase A)
Metro’s funding partners includes CHSRA, CalSTA and SCRRA
Funding Source Amount ($ in millions)
State Proposition 1A/High Speed Rail Bonds $423.335 State Transit Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) $337.571 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) $60.820 Measure R $51.672 SCRRA JPA Contribution (Non-Metro) $40.000 Other HSR Funds $18.726 Measure M $13.274 LOSSAN/Amtrak $5.000
Total $950.398
17
SELECTED CMGC Project Delivery Method
- 1. Maintain operations at Los Angeles Union Station, largest multi-
modal transit terminal in Southern California serving over 100,000 passengers every week day
- 2. Fixed Budget – Due to the financial constraint of a $950 million
funding for the entire project, there is very limited ability to absorb cost overruns. a) Maximize cost and schedule savings with early engagement of the Contractor (constructability review, value engineering analysis, bottom-up construction estimate, risk analysis and construction schedule) at every design submittal. b) Minimize change orders during construction. c) Minimize third party delays with flexible phasing plan based on GC construction schedule.
DUE TO 3 KEY CONSTRAINTS:
18
CMGC Project Delivery Method
3rd KEY CONSTRAINT: Large Partners & Stakeholders
Key Stakeholders Funding Partners Metro CalSta SCRRA HSR
CALTRANS City of Los Angeles HSR William Mead Homes Arts District Others BNSF FRA LOSSAN/ AMTRAK SCRRA
19
CMGC Project Delivery Method
REVISED APPROACH
1. Classic CMGC Preconstruction Services
- One Notice To Proceed for Preconstruction Services with off-ramps
- Negotiate fixed lump sum price at 90% Design Plans for Early
Construction Work via Task Order (s)
2. Main Construction Services
- Negotiate Final Firm Fixed Price by Supplemental Construction
Contract
20
Environmental
- Not Funded
- Funded
Vincent Chio
Director, Metro Rail Environmental Project Manager
21
LINK UNION STATION
Environmental Clearance Status
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
1. Final EIR: Completed in June 27, 2019 (Board Certified) 2. CEQA Amendment: in Progress thru Spring 2021 A. Permanent BNSF Track Removal (West Bank, 1st Street) B. BNSF Malabar Yard Improvements (City of Vernon) ❖ 49th Street: Close At-Grade Crossing ❖ 46th Street: Connect existing track segments
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
1. Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare EIS under FRA: Fall 2016 2. Revised NOI under HSR: Summer 2020 (BNSF West Bank & Malabar Yard) 3. Draft EIS: Spring 2021 4. Final EIS/ROD: Summer 2021
21
22
Preliminary Design
- Not Funded
- Funded
Tom Kim
Senior Vice President, HDR Link US Project Manager
23
HDR DESIGN TEAM
Tom Kim, PE Project Manager
Mike Grubstein, PE Deputy Project Manager
Andrew Mull, PE Track Lead Mo Mah, AIA, LEED AP Architecture Lead Marc Cooley, PE Civil Lead Dan Weddell, PE Structures Lead Doug Smith, PE Traffic Lead Patrick O’Neil Environmental Lead
23
Key Discipline Leads
24
LINK UNION STATION PHASE A KEY DESIGN ELEMENTS
Area 1 - Throat (North of the Station) Area 2 - Station Area & Platform Modifications Area 3 - US-101 Viaduct Freeway Improvements & Commercial Street ATP Area 4 - Run–through Tracks West Bank Tie-In & Bridge over Amtrak Lead
24
25
LINK UNION STATION CMGC
List of Key Technical Documents
- 1. Subsurface Utility Investigation Data Reports
- 2. Geotechnical reports including boring data
- 3. Updated 35% Preliminary Engineering Design Plans
- 4. Caltrans approved Project Study Report/Project Report (PSR/PR)
- 5. Caltrans approved Type Selection Report for US-101 Bridge
- 6. Proposed approach to 55 hour lane closure of US-101 for run-
through track viaduct construction (LADOT & Caltrans approved)
- 7. Structure Type Assessment Report for Center Street Bridge
- 8. Draft preliminary technical specifications
- 9. Preliminary construction phase risk register
25
26
Phase A Preliminary Design Schedule
Subject to Change
- 1. Review PE Designs with CMGC: April 2021 –July 2021
- 2. 65% Design Development: Aug 2021-March 2022
- 3. 90% Design: April 2022-Oct 2022
4
27
LINK US SUBSURFACE UTILITY INVESTIGATIONS
Investigation Summary by Project Area
- 1. Metro Property
3 trenches and 4 potholes within Metro Division 20 property
- 2. BNSF Property
3 trenches and 4 potholes within BSNF storage track area
- 3. SCRRA Right of Way
12 trenches within rail corridor
- 4. Union Station Platform Area
2 trenches within access road s/o platforms
- 5. MWD Property
1 trench along MWD access road
- 6. City of LA Local Street Right of Way
3 trenches and 3 potholes along Commercial and Vignes Streets
- 7. Caltrans Right of Way
1 trench and 4 potholes within US-101 R/W
- 8. Amtrak Property
3 potholes along Amtrak yard lead track Total work completed: 24 trenches, 11 potholes Total work to be completed upon agency approval: 5 trenches, 7 potholes Pothole/Trench Location Map
27
28
LINK US GEOTECHNICAL & HAZMAT INVESTIGATIONS
Summary of Field Investigations
Anticipated Work Areas Caltrans Right of Way 7 geotechnical borings and 4 hand auger hazmat borings BNSF Property 4 geotechnical borings Metro Property & Private Property 7 geotechnical borings and 1 hand auger hazmat boring Preliminary Design Phase Total work completed: 20 Geotechnical Borings, 21 Shared Geotechnical Borings/Environmental Samples and 22 Hazmat Borings Final Design Phase Total work to be completed: 18 Shared Geotechnical/Environmental Samples Borings and 5 Hazmat Borings
28
29
LINK US GEOTECHNICAL & HAZMAT DOCUMENTS
Summary of Technical Documents
Discipline Status Document Title
Geotechnical Completed Preliminary Geotechnical Report- Existing Data, dated July 2016 Geotechnical Completed Draft- Preliminary Geotechnical Design Report - Improvements Outside Caltrans ROW, dated April 2020 Geotechnical Completed Link US Geotechnical Data Report Viaduct Over US 101, dated October 2017 Geotechnical Completed Preliminary Foundation Report Viaduct Over US 101, dated December 2019 Hazmat Completed Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, Link Union Station Project Area, dated October 26, 2016 Hazmat Completed Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, Los Angeles Union Station Area, dated October 26, 2016 Hazmat Completed Soil Management Plan for Investigations, Link Union Station, dated January 16, 2017 Hazmat Completed Initial Site Assessment Report - Caltrans ROW, dated April 5, 2017 Hazmat Completed Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Workplan, dated September 25, 2017 Hazmat Completed Initial Site Assessment Update Report – Caltrans ROW, dated June 19, 2019 Geotechnical Pending Completion Geotechnical Design Report- Improvements Outside Caltrans ROW Geotechnical Pending Completion Final Foundation Report Viaduct Over US 101 - Caltrans ROW Geotechnical Pending Completion Final Foundation Report Retaining Walls - Caltrans ROW Hazmat Pending Completion Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report
29
30
UPDATED LINK UNION STATION 35% DESIGN
Key Project Changes to Address Stakeholder Comments Key Changes
a) Modified US-101 bridge piles at abutments from driven to CIDH to reduce noise impacts b) Modified design of Center Street Bridge to address City comments regarding safety c) Added tunnel under track section for Metro maintenance/emergency access to Red/Purple Line portal trench d) Modernized Platform 4 canopy design e) Implemented ADA improvements along Commercial Street to address City comments
CMGC Opportunities
Modified 35% design for CMGC RFP and provided additional design details not typically provided at 35% to provide better starting point for contractor to review and make VE and constructability recommendations. 30
31
LINK US PHASE A PROJECT
Area 1 - William Meade Homes Sound Wall on Retaining Wall
WILLIAM MEAD HOMES SOUND/RETAINING WALL LAYOUT
WILLIAM MEAD HOMES
SOUND WALL ON RETAINING WALL
CMGC Collaboration Opportunities:
- a. How to minimize impacts to WMH residents
- b. Determination of most efficient wall type
- c. Potential early construction package
Benefits:
- a. Reduced noise impacts to WMH residents which also
addresses request by Council District 1
- b. EIR mitigation measure
31
TYPICAL WALL SECTION
32
Looking Southwest from Bolero Lane/Bloom Street
NOISE MITIGATION - SOUND WALL
Conceptual Rendering
32
Existing Conditions Proposed Project - Vegetation (Vines)
- n Sound Wall and Retaining Wall
33
Noise from Train Operations (Proposed Project)
POTENTIAL IMPACTS MITIGATION Noise from increased train activity
- a. Existing sound level – 69dB
(Currently 233 Metrolink and Amtrak trains enter and leave Union Station, including empty trains to Central Maintenance Facility)
- b. Year 2040 future sound level – up to 75dB
(830 Metrolink, Amtrak, and future High Speed Rail trains is projected to enter and leave Union Station)
Sound wall up to 22 feet tall to mitigate the impacts to less than significant level.
- a. Future sound level with
the sound wall – 62dB 33
34
TRAIN HORN NOISE NEAR WILLIAM MEAD HOMES
- a. 40% of train horns heard at
the William Mead Homes in the early morning hours had a noise level over 90 dBA.
- b. Under the leadership of
Council District 1, Metro is working with City of LA, Metrolink and CPUC on the implementation of the first quiet zone in City of LA. Over 120 trains cross N Main Street every weekday, starting at around 4am and sounding the train horns
William Mead Homes
Need for a Quiet Zone at Main Street
34
35
Quiet Zone Ready Improvements at N. Main Street Railroad Grade Crossing
PROPOSED LIMITS OF QUIET ZONE ON THE WEST BANK
N Main St Xing DWP Pvt Xing N Main St Xing 0.28 miles
a. In a Quiet Zone, railroads are directed to cease the routine sounding their horns when approaching public highway-rail grade crossings. Train horns may still be used in emergency situations. b. Quiet Zones are subject to review and approval by
- CPUC. City of LA is responsible for applying for a Quiet
Zone with the CPUC.
35
36
Quiet Zone Ready Improvements
PROPOSED SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS AT
- N. MAIN STREET
New Pedestrian Gates and Wider Sidewalks New Raised Median with New Vehicular Gates ADA and Access Improvements New Traffic Signal New Pedestrian Gates and Wider Sidewalks 36
37
Area 2 Station - Project Elements
MWD PLATFORM 5 PLATFORM 3 PLATFORM 2 PLATFORM 1 PLATFORM 6 PLATFORM 7
LINK US PHASE A PROJECT
Legend US-101 Viaduct Retained Fill Section Reconstructed access road Existing Platform Platform 4 modifications
SHORTEN/MODIFY PLATFORM 4 TO ACCOMMODATE TRACK RAMP CONSTRUCT RAMP TO TRANSITION TRACK FROM PLATFORM LEVEL TO BRIDGE LEVEL
PLATFORM 4
CMGC Collaboration Opportunities:
- a. Plan construction access areas and routes
- b. Define interim baggage operations and passenger movements
c. Manage passenger movement and access for safety and convenience
- d. Determination of construction access/methods in confined space
LOWER ACCESS ROAD TO CROSS UNDER TRACK BRIDGE
37
38
Area 2 Station – Platform 4 Modifications
LINK US PHASE A PROJECT
CMGC Collaboration Opportunities:
- a. Architectural design refinements
- b. Managing passenger movement and access during construction
38
39
LINK US PHASE A PROJECT
PROPOSED PLATFORM 4 IMPROVEMENTS WITH NEW CANOPY
Area 2 Station – Platform 4 Modifications
39
40
RUN-THROUGH TRACK ALIGNMENT
Area 3 - Track Alignment and Property Needs South of Union Station
110+00
Alignment constrained by the following:
- a. Existing platforms at LAUS
- b. El Monte Busway, US-101, and on/off ramps
c. Existing Red/Purple Line tunnel and portal trench
- d. Center Street crossing
- e. Future Metro Center Project
f. Existing SCRRA and BNSF track infrastructure
- g. Existing adjacent development
- h. LADWP electrical transmission corridor
RUN THROUGH TRACKS COMMERCIAL ST GAREY ST VIGNES ST CENTER ST DUCOMMUN ST SB US 101 NB US 101 LOS ANGELES RIVER METRO CENTER SITE
Legend Property Acquisition El Monte Busway Run through tracks
40
UNION STATION
41
LINK US PHASE A PROJECT
Area 3 – Run-through Track Structure South of Union Station
COMMERCIAL ST CENTER ST SB US 101 NB US 101 UNION STATION VIGNES ST GAREY ST DUCOMMUN ST CENTER ST BRIDGE MAINTENANCE VEHICLE ACCESS TUNNEL RETAINED FILL SECTION RETAINED FILL SECTION EL MONTE BUSWAY
41
US-101 VIADUCT
42
Preliminary Design Phase
a. Design exceptions for freeway geometry approved b. Project Report approval expected August 2020 c. Type Selection Report approval expected August 2020
CMGC Collaboration Design Phase
a. Review and approval of US-101 bridge and freeway modification design packages b. Open to early construction packages such as foundation installation c. Working with designer and contractor on aesthetic treatments
Area 3 – Caltrans Involvement During Preliminary Engineering and CMGC Phases
LINK US PHASE A PROJECT
42
43
LINK US PHASE A PROJECT
Area 3 – US 101 Viaduct and Freeway Modifications
COMMERCIAL ST NB US 101 UNION STATION
Legend US-101 Viaduct Retained Fill Section El Monte Busway
PATSAOURAS PLAZA GAREY ST VIGNES ST
CMGC Collaboration Opportunities:
- a. Construction staging of the bridge and freeway
improvements Key Constraints:
- a. Preserve SB on-ramp geometry
- b. Provide std vertical clearance over US-101 and busway
c. Maintain US-101 thru lanes during construction Key Features:
- a. Construct viaduct with 12’ to 14’ CIDH piles
- b. Reconstruct retaining walls along El Monte Busway
c. Restripe US-101 to provide space for bridge bents
- d. Reconstruct NB on-ramp from Vignes St
43
44
LINK US PHASE A PROJECT
Area 3 – US 101 Viaduct
LOWER RUN-THROUGH TRACK PROFILE IN PHASE A
Key Features:
- a. Spans 1-3 & 7-9 precast
- b. Spans 4-6 are CIP delta box
c. Bents 5 &6 are outriggers over SB US-101
- d. Portion of Phase A deck profile
lower than ultimate CMGC Collaboration Opportunities:
- a. Construct Spans 1 through 3 to
be raised in the future
- b. Bridge and wall aesthetics
c. Freeway closure schedule for falsework and girder erection
TYPICAL SECTION ALONG BENT 2 TYPICAL SECTION ALONG BENTS 6R AND 6L
44
45
APPROACH TO 55 HOUR LANE CLOSURE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF RUN-THROUGH TRACK BRIDGE
Area 3 – Requires Joint Approval by Caltrans & LADOT
45
Proposed Closure (Year 2022)
a. 55 Hours on Weekend b. Closure Duration: From Friday 10 PM to Monday 5 AM c. 5 Weekend Closure in NB US-101 and 5 Weekend Closure in SB US-101 d. Only 1 direction of US-101 will be closed on a particular weekend
Executive Summary
a. Tested three Diversion Patterns (60/40, 70/30, 100/0) b. Tested two traffic levels (Actual at 5600 - 5800 vph and Max. Theoretical)
- Not a substantial difference
- Year 2022 Projections for Saturday Peak Hours, NB and SB
- Some freeway segments hit capacity at 70/30
- NB closure more complex
46
APPROACH TO 55 HOUR LANE CLOSURE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF RUN-THROUGH TRACK BRIDGE
Area 3 – Requires Joint Approval by Caltrans & LADOT
46
TMP LOS Results Using 70-30 split for NB and SB closure and existing volumes:
a.
2 Freeway segments impacted
b.
5 intersections impacted
47
APPROACH TO 55 HOUR LANE CLOSURE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF RUN-THROUGH TRACK BRIDGE
Area 3 – Requires Joint Approval by Caltrans & LADOT
47
Proposed Recommendations
a. Maximum diversion is a 70/30 b. SB US 101 closure should stay open to Los Angeles Street c. NB US 101 could close at I-5/I-10 Interchange with support from diversion to I-710 d. Significant Regional SB diversion needed for SB closure e. I-110/I-10 ramps will need support f. Significant public information campaign will be needed
Next Steps
a. Work with Caltrans and LADOT to receive concurrence by August 2020 b. Work with CMGC on preparing Transportation Management Plan (TMP) and construction phasing
48
LINK US PHASE A PROJECT
Area 3 – Proposed Active Transportation Improvements
View from Southeast Corner of Commercial/Garey Intersection
Note: Per agreement with City of LA, active transportation is limited to Class IV bike lanes only with bollards and associated restriping (no R/W takes included)
48
49
Area 3 – Existing LADWP Power Lines & Poles in Conflict with Project
COMMERCIAL ST VIGNES ST CENTER ST SB US 101
Legend Existing power poles Existing power poles in conflict Existing overhead power lines
LINK US PHASE A PROJECT
a. Conflicts to be mitigated through relocation strategy that involves both underground and overhead relocations to be designed and constructed by LADWP b. Overhead relocations require use of engineered steel poles
ALISO ST
49
50
Area 3 – Relocation of Impacted Power Facilities by LADWP
Completion of Relocation Design and Construction is Time Sensitive:
a. 18 month fabrication time for required engineered steel poles b. 1 year for relocation construction by LADWP c. Relocations need to be completed ahead of bridge construction
To Initiate Relocation Design, LADWP Needs Confirmation of Proposed Locations of:
a. Curb, sidewalk, and curb ramps b. Street trees c. Street lights d. Catch basins e. Other features that could influence pole placement Project engineers to advance design to provide requested information and obtain City of LA approval
LINK US PHASE A PROJECT
50
51
LINK US PHASE A PROJECT
Area 3 – Center Street Bridge
COMMERCIAL ST CENTER ST SB US 101
Legend Center St Bridge Retained Fill Section Limits of existing tunnel New traffic signal
ALISO ST
CMGC Collaboration Opportunities:
- a. Staging and falsework design to maintain traffic operations
- b. Develop construction methods to avoid impacts to the Red Line
tunnel including monitoring
AVOID EXISTING RED/PURPLE LINE TUNNELS RECONSTRUCT TRAFFIC ISLAND TO ACCCOMMODATE COLUMN
S S
Key Features:
- a. Outrigger bent cap to span tunnel and preserve sight distance
- b. Column and abutment foundations to avoid Red/Purple Line tunnel
Key Constraints:
- a. Vehicle sight distance
- b. Avoid Red/Purple Line Tunnel
c. Maintain traffic during construction
51
52
LINK US PHASE A PROJECT
Area 3 – Center Street Bridge
TYPICAL SECTION Key Constraints:
- a. Vehicle sight distance
- b. Vertical clearance under bridge
c. Avoid Red/Purple Line Tunnel below
- d. Maintain traffic during construction
RED LINE TUNNEL STRUCTURES
Key Features:
- a. Outrigger bent cap to span tunnel
and preserve sight distance
- b. Column and abutment foundations
to avoid Red/Purple Line tunnel c. Columns located to preserve vehicle sight distance
52
53
LINK US PHASE A PROJECT
Area 4 - BNSF Yard – Project Elements
JACKSON ST METRO CENTER PROJECT SITE DUCOMMUN ST LOS ANGELES RIVER
AMTRAK YARD LEAD BRIDGE CONSTRUCT RETAINED FILL SECTION TO ACCOMMODATE RUN-THROUGH TRACK TRANSITION TO GRADE RUN-THROUGH TRACKS CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALL TO ACCOMMODATE LOWERED YARD LEAD
Legend Amtrak Yard Lead Bridge Retained Fill Section Maintenance Vehicle Tunnel Storm Drain Protection Slab
CMGC Collaboration Opportunities:
- a. Construction methods and abutment
design to maintain track operation
- b. Optimize lightweight fill retaining walls
and slab bridge protection structure
LOWER AMTRAK YARD LEAD TO ACCOMMODATE RUN-THROUGH TRACK CROSSING CONSTRUCT PROTECTION SLAB OVER 12’ DIA COLA STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCT MAINTENANCE & EMERGENCY ACCESS TUNNEL TO SERVE PORTAL TRENCH
Key Features:
- a. Lightweight fill retaining walls
- b. Box fire/maintenance access tunnel
c. Protection slab over storm drain
- d. Lowered Amtrak yard lead
Key Constraints:
- a. Red Line portal trench
- b. 12’ dia COLA storm drain
c. Need to maintain Amtrak yard lead
- d. Track clearance under First St Bridge
53
54
Benefits of BIM
Implementation of Building Information Modeling (BIM)
Risk Reduction
a. Find Coordination and Construction phasing issues in office rather than in field
Better Inform and Support Cost Estimation
a. Quantities can be dynamically pulled from models and trended over the design lifecycle
Automation of Plan Production from Model
- a. Allow multiple alternative analysis when
compared to traditional 2D plan production due to dynamic and parametric setup
Enhanced Coordination
a. BIM Models provide effective ways to communicate and coordinate design among multiple stakeholders 542
55
BIM Roles and Responsibilities
Implementation of Building Information Modeling (BIM)
Design Team
- a. Developing 35% plan set to
“BIM Ready”
- b. Design for 65% and beyond
done in BIM c. Perform Survey Gap analysis to identify additional survey needs
- d. Use models to facilitate
coordination and communication with value engineering phase
- e. Models used to enhance 4D
phasing efforts with construction team f. Models used to enhance 5D cost estimating efforts with construction team
Construction Team
- a. 3D coordination with design and
trade contractor models
- b. Lead 4D phasing efforts with
support of design team BIM models c. Lead 5D cost estimating effort with support of design team BIM models
- d. Progress design team BIM models
as needed for use in shop drawings (BIM to fabrication models)
- e. Generate BIM as-built
documentation and models 33
56
CMGC Phasing and Scope of Services
- Not Funded
- Funded
Scott McConnell
Executive Officer, Program Management and Regional Rail
57
CMGC - Scope Elements
- Not Funded
- Funded
- A. Preconstruction Stage
- By Fee
- B. Construction Stage
- By Task Order (Early Construction); or,
- By Final Firm Fixed Contract
58
CMGC - Phasing
- Not Funded
- Funded
59
CMGC - Phasing Schedule
CONSTRUCTION Early Construction Work Final Firm Fixed Contract 2026 2027 PRE- CONSTRUCTION CMGC Procurement CMGC Precon Services 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Board Approval 35% ~ 65% 90% Off-ramp Fixed Construction NTP US 101 Viaduct & Highway Modification Platform 4 Track and Signal Work Testing
WMH Retaining Main Street Quiet
RSD
60
CMGC – Preconstruction Scope of Services
- Not Funded
- Funded
- A. Constructability Reviews
- B. Value Engineering
- C. Schedule Management
- D. Cost Estimating
- E. Risk Management
61
CMGC – Constructability
- Not Funded
- Funded
- A. Constructability Reviews
- Develop a Constructability Checklist to
be performed at 35%, 65% and 90%
62
CMGC – Constructability Checklist Example
- Not Funded
- Funded
63
CMGC – Value Engineering
- Not Funded
- Funded
- B. Value Engineering Analysis
- Analysis can be provided during 35%,
65% and 90% Design Stages.
- Value Engineering Applicable for only
major items, such as Bridge Span, Piles/Foundation, Track Work, etc.
64
Scheduling and Cost Estimating
- Not Funded
- Funded
Jay Yoon
Director of Project Controls, Program Management and Regional Rail
65
CMGC – Schedule Management
- Not Funded
- Funded
- C. Schedule Management
- 1. CPM (Critical Path Method) Schedule
for Precon and Construction Services
- 2. Cash Flow Analysis
66
CMGC – Cost Estimating
- Not Funded
- Funded
- D. Cost Estimating
- 1. Construction Cost Estimate at 35%,
65%, & 90% design level (100% for US- 101 viaduct)
- 2. Final Firm Fixed Price
- 3. Collaboration with A/E and
Independent Cost Estimator (ICE)
67
Risk Management
- Not Funded
- Funded
Dave Davies
Deputy Executive Officer, Program Management
68
CMGC – Risk Management
- Not Funded
- Funded
- E. Risk Management
- 1. Construction Risk Register will be issued with
the RFP
- 2. Proposers are to identify Project Risks and
include a Risk Register in their Bid Package
- 3. Consultants approach to Risk Management
during pre-construction and construction phases will be a bid evaluation criteria
- 4. Consultants Risk Register will be rolled into the
Metro Risk Register
69
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION PHASE RISK REGISTER
Key Project Risks
- 1. DWP Power Relocation: Schedule for design,
procurement and installation of steel poles
- 2. Utility conflict not discovered by utility
investigation or identified by utility companies
- 3. Delays due to discovery of historical, cultural or
archeological artifacts
- 4. Construction of structural foundations in close
proximity to Red/Purple Line Tunnel
- 5. Integrating new SCRRA track signals/systems into
existing system
- 6. Boulders and obstructions at pile locations
Page from Project Risk Register
69
70
CMGC – Risk Management
- Not Funded
- Funded
- E. Risk Management (Cont)
1. Consultant will be an active participant in the risk management process, both pre-construction and construction 2. During pre-construction a formal quantitative risk analysis will be performed to support the project estimating effort and establish appropriate project contingencies 3. Construction working contingency will be established at the 100% design milestone and the establishment of a GMP 4. Metro will manage the construction working contingency through the Metro Risk, Contingency, and Change Control Procedures
71
Small Business Requirements
- Not Funded
- Funded
Elke Campbell
Director, Diversity & Economic Opportunity Metro
72
Disadvantage Business Enterprise (SBE) Goals & Programs
There will be a total of three (3) SBE Goals, one for each phase of the Project which will be stated in the RFP:
- 1. Preconstruction Services Phase
- 2. Early Construction Services Phase
- 3. Construction Service Phase
73
Procurement Overview
- Not Funded
- Funded
Fred Origel
Director, Contract Administration Metro
74
Procurement Overview
Dates Subject to Change
August 3, 2020 INDUSTRY OUTREACH August 10, 2020 RELEASE RFQ December 10, 2020 CMGC RFP Due Date
March 25, 2021 Metro Board Award of CMGC
October 26, 2020 RELEASE RFP
75
Fred Origel, Director, V/CM (323) 903-4111 OrigelF@metro.net Noelle Santos, Sr. Contract Administrator, V/CM (213) 922-3647 Santosn@metro.net
*During the proposal period, only contact the personnel listed above with the exception of DEOD, Ethics, and Metro Pre-Qual Dept.
Vendor/Contract Management Points of Contact for this Procurement:
Procurement Overview
76
QUESTIONS ?
- Not Funded
- Funded
77
Procurement Overview
- Not Funded
- Funded
Miriam Long
Director, Diversity & Economic Opportunity Department
78
CLOSING
- Not Funded
- Funded
Small Business Programs
- 1. Meet the Primes
- 2. DBE Mentoring