runoff group
play

Runoff Group Ma, Struba, Cassandra Springer, Jalen Allen, Derek - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Runoff Group Ma, Struba, Cassandra Springer, Jalen Allen, Derek Risch, Tal Margalit, Tiana Tran Objective To assess and interpret rainfall runoff data from September 2016-November 2016 Manoa valley watershed using runoff modeling


  1. Runoff Group Ma, Struba, Cassandra Springer, Jalen Allen, Derek Risch, Tal Margalit, Tiana Tran

  2. Objective • To assess and interpret rainfall runoff data from September 2016-November 2016 Manoa valley watershed using runoff modeling

  3. Descrip?on • Runoff : The flow of water over the land surface, in rills, in stream channels, and in rivers . (Giambelluca 2016) - Occurs during rainfall events - Soil is saturated to capacity

  4. Why assess runoff? • Understand flow of water after rain event • Understand hydrologic soil groups • Watershed quality • Urban impacts

  5. Methods: Hydrologic Soil Group soilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov

  6. Methods: Hydrologic Soil Group

  7. Methods: Curve Numbers

  8. Methods: Daily Precip Aggregation Daily rainfall from September to November

  9. Methods: AMC Curve Numbers Rainfall limits for estimating AMC (Ambient Moisture Conditions) (US Soil Conservation Service)

  10. Methods: SCS Daily Runoff Estimate Soil Conservation Service (SCS) RO estimate and the stream flow

  11. Methods: Baseflow Model

  12. Methods: Temporal Disaggregation Equations (Grid): - Hourly Data: - (Precip. (hr)/Precip.(day)) x Baseflow/Runoff (day)) = Baseflow/ Runoff (hr) - Total Runoff: - (Baseflow (hr) + Runoff (hr)) = Total Runoff (hr)

  13. Results: Total Estimated Runoff vs. Streamflow Figure 6: Total Estimated RO versus Streamflow from Figure 7: Total estimated RO versus Stream Gauge. October to November R^2 = 0.885

  14. Results: Upper vs. Lower Watershed Figure 8: Upper (blue) and Lower (orange) comparison of precipitation Figure 9: Upper (blue) and Lower (orange) comparison of RO

  15. Challenges • Equation is not 100% accurate • Many variables needed • Chance of human error • Theoretical vs reality

  16. Discussion • The Stream Flow and the Es?mated RO closely match the rainfall events • The bo,om 2 graphs show that there is a correla?on between the 5-day/ baseflow average rainfall and the SCS es?mate

  17. Discussion of the Upper vs. Lower Watershed Figure 8: Upper (blue) and Lower (orange) comparison of precipitation Figure 9: Upper (blue) and Lower (orange) comparison of RO

  18. Discussion “In most humid regions, infiltra?on capaci?es are high because vegeta?on protects the soil from rain-packing and dispersal, and because the supply of humus [dark organic material, formed by decomposi?on] and the ac?vity of mircofauna create an open soil structure” (Dunne, Chp. 9) “Under such condi?ons rainfall intensi?es generally do not exceed infiltra?on capaci?es, and HOF does not occur on large areas of the landscape” (Dunne, Chp. 9) Unless its a residen?al area, which is covered in cement or has been developed, where there will be more flooding if the rainfall exceeds infiltra?on.

  19. Resources Dunne, Thomas and Luna B. Leopold. Water in Environmental Planning . W.H. Freeman and Company, 1978 Giambelluca, Tom. Runoff [PDF format]. Fall 2016. Retrieved from GEOG 405 Website: h,p://climate.socialsciences.hawaii.edu/Courses/GEOG405/ index.htm

  20. Ques?ons? Anyone but Tom can ask ques?ons... UHM Geography Department

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend