porewater concentration and bioavailability
play

POREWATER CONCENTRATION AND BIOAVAILABILITY Upal Ghosh Department - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

POREWATER CONCENTRATION AND BIOAVAILABILITY Upal Ghosh Department of Chemical, Biochemical, & Environmental Engineering University of Maryland Baltimore County FRTR May 11, 2016 0 Outline Pollutant bioavailability in sediments


  1. POREWATER CONCENTRATION AND BIOAVAILABILITY Upal Ghosh Department of Chemical, Biochemical, & Environmental Engineering University of Maryland Baltimore County FRTR May 11, 2016 0

  2. Outline  Pollutant bioavailability in sediments  Freely dissolved concentration in porewater  Measurement using passive sampling  Application case studies:  site-specific sediment risk assessment  remedy monitoring 1 1

  3. Bioaccumulation And Exposure of DDD Large fish 100g fish 0.17 mg DDD 1.7 ppm Small fish 0.5 ppm Plankton 0.0265 ppm 2 L water Water 0.0002 mg DDD 0.0001 ppm Sediment 2 K oc = 151,000 1 ppm 2

  4. Bioaccumulation of Hydrophobic Compounds Legacy contaminants in exposed sediment contaminates the food chain through: 1) bioaccumulation in benthic organisms 2) flux into the water column, and uptake in the pelagic food web. • Predictions work reasonably well for natural systems 1 • Predictions become more challenging for industrially impacted sediments Contaminated sediment 3 3

  5. Conceptual Understanding of Passive Sampling 1) Hydrophobic chemicals partition among the Passive sampler aqueous and different solid phases 2) Equilibrium distribution can be described by linear free energy relationships Freely dissolved C total = C free + DOC*K DOC *C free + POC*K POC *C free POC DOC Two approaches to measure total and freely dissolved concentrations: 1) Remove POC by centrifugation/flocculation, measure total dissolved concentration and DOC, and estimate freely dissolved concentration. 2) Use calibrated passive sampler to measure freely dissolved concentration, measure DOC, and estimate total dissolved concentration. 4 4

  6. Prediction of Toxicity : Sediment vs. Freely Dissolved Conc. 120 120 Percent Survival (%) 100 100 Survival (%) 80 80 60 60 NONTOXIC TOXIC 40 40 Nontoxic Sediment Toxic Sediment Nontoxic Sediment 20 20 Toxic Sediment 0 0 1 10 100 1000 10000 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Sediment Total PAH Concentration (mg/kg) SPME Pore Water PAH Conc. ( µ moles/L) Figure 1. Chronic toxicity to H. azteca (28- Figure 2. Chronic toxicity to H. azteca (28- day) can not be predicted from total PAH day) can be predicted by estimating PAHs in concentration in MGP sediment sediment pore water. Kreitinger et al , ETC 2007 5 5

  7. Prediction of Biouptake in Benthic Organisms: Sediment vs. Freely Dissolved Conc. • 7 freshwater and marine sediments • Freely dissolved conc. measured by passive sampling and also directly • Lipid concentrations better predicted from freely dissolved porewater Predicted from sediment Predicted from porewater Werner et al. ES&T 2010 6 6

  8. Measurement of HOCs in Water is Challenging Need to measure <ng/L concentrations in sediment porewater Two approaches to get to this concentration: 1) Modeling based on partitioning calculations: A) Sediment concentration and fraction OC B) Model presumes a certain partitioning behavior for the OC C) Complication from the presence of BC D) Difficult to characterize BC partitioning 2) Direct measurement: A) Detection limits associated with manageable grab sampling B) Separation of colloids challenging C) Passive sampling 7 7

  9. Examples of Passive Sampling Use 1) Batch equilibrium measurements for low aqueous concentrations (PCBs, PAHs, dioxins) 2) In-situ probing to assess ambient contaminant concentrations or to assess changes with time or with treatment Pictures of typical applications: water sediment Depth profiling of Laboratory batch Stream water quality Field evaluation of porewater in sediment assessment treatment performance equilibrium 8 8

  10. Deployment of Passive Samplers into Surface Sediments Rope and buoy for retrieval after deployment Underwater video camera for confirming placement depth Passive sampler encased in stainless steel mesh and framed for sediment deployment Tool for inserting passive sampler frame in Image from underwater camera showing the passive sampler being inserted into sediment 9 sediment. The 8’ pole allows deployment from a boat in shallow water sediments

  11. Uptake of Pollutants in Passive Sampler  Equilibrium slow for: 1) high K ow ; 2) static porewater  Mass transfer in sediment side difficult to predict  Performance Reference Compounds (PRCs) are used to correct for non-equilibrium  PRCs have similar diffusion properties as analytes Polymer fractional uptake 1 Passive sampler 0.5 0 0 30 60 10 Time (days) 10

  12. Case Study 1:Site Specific Risk Assessment 27-acre degraded wetland Contaminants detected in marsh soil:  Metals (e.g. As, Pb, Cr)  PAHs  PCBs  Pesticides 11 24 th Annual NARPM Training Program 11

  13. Benthic Organism-Based PRGs (Equilibrium Partitioning Approach): PRG sediment = Toxicity Value × CF × foc × Koc • PRG, concentration in sediment (mg/kg DW sediment) • Toxicity Value , Aquatic community-based toxicity value (µg/L) • CF, Conversion factor of mg/1,000 µg • foc, Organic carbon fraction (2 % default used in initial calculation, average of 4% TOC was detected in sediments ) • Koc, Organic carbon partition constants (default value from HHRAP used in initial calculation, measured specific Koc used in revised version) EPA, 2003c, 2003d, 2003e, 2005j, 2008b Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol (HHRAP 2012) 12 24 th Annual NARPM Training Program 12

  14. Food Web Modeling Based PRGs  Local receptors: American robin, Raccoon, Spotted sandpiper , etc.  Spotted sandpiper was selected due to its most rigid sediment concentration criteria. (EPA 2007a, 1999, 1993) 13 24 th Annual NARPM Training Program 13

  15. Study Objectives Evaluate site specific bioavailability of PAHs and PCBs in South Wilmington Wetland sediment and refine risk assessment. Methods  Sediment samples collected from 15 sites.  Measurement of PCB, PAH, and pesticide concentrations in sediment samples.  Laboratory partitioning study for PCBs and PAHs using passive sampler • Four weeks partitioning test • Polyethylene (PE) as passive sampler PE (C PE ) • C W = C PE /K PE • K PE previously determined Sediment (C S ) 14 24 th Annual NARPM Training Program 14

  16. Bioaccumulation in Benthic Organisms • Organism: Lumbriculus variegatus • Daily water exchange and quality monitoring • 28 days exposure • Worm collection and depuration • Cleanup and analysis for PCBs 15 24 th Annual NARPM Training Program 15

  17. Partition Constants For PAHs, PCBs, Pesticides 9.0 8.0 PCB: y = 0.81x + 1.00 PAH: y = 0.73x + 3.06 R² = 0.83 R² = 0.92 7.0 log Koc 6.0 5.0 Koc for PAH from this study 4.0 correlation from Di Toro 3.0 Koc for PCB from this study correlation from Schwarzenbach 2.0 Koc for pesticides from this study correlation from Gerstl, Z. 1.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 log Kow  Measured Koc values for both PAHs and PCBs were 1-2 orders of magnitude higher than the generic values used in preliminary risk assessments  Literature median value of BC/OC ratio : 9%, n=300 (Cornelissen et al. 2005)  Measured BC/OC ratio: 17-36% 16 24 th Annual NARPM Training Program 16

  18. PCB Bioaccumulation Measured Cw + literature BCF Estimated Cw by OC model + literature BCF Predicted PCB in worms (ug/g ww) 100 Estimated Cw by OC&BC model + literature BCF 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 0.00001 0.00001 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Measured PCB in worms (ug/g ww) Measured Cw provides best prediction of PCB bioaccumulation 17 24 th Annual NARPM Training Program 17

  19. Benthic Organism-Based PRGs Using Site Specific Koc 10000 1000 Revised sediment PRG (mg/kg) 100 10 1 0.1 PAH 0.01 Pesticides 0.001 PCB 0.0001 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Initial sediment PRG (mg/kg) 18 24 th Annual NARPM Training Program 18

  20. Case Study 2: Predicting Uptake in Fish After in situ Treatment • Evaluate the effect of sediment amendment with AC on PCB uptake in fish • Test the ability of existing PCB bioaccumulation models to predict changes observed in fish uptake upon AC amendment of sediment • Incorporate measured freely dissolved concentrations by passive sampler in food chain models 19 19

  21. Laboratory Exposure Experiments Water flow in aquaria tanks • Treatments: • Clean sediment (Rhode River) • PCB impacted sediment (Near-shore Grasse River) • PCB impacted sediment-AC treated in the lab • Replicate aquaria with passive samplers in water column and sediment Passive • Fish species: Zebrafish samplers • PCB-free diet • Sampling after 45 and 90 days Sediment Components in each aquaria 20 20

  22. Porewater and Overlying Water PCBs 82.6 300 90 283.9 233.2 80 Untreated Grasse River 250 Overlying water PCBs (ng/L) Untreated Grasse River Porewater PCBs (ng/L) 70 50.0 200 60 41.4 Treated Grasse River Treated Grasse River 50 150 40 95.0 100 30 20 50 8.0 11.3 4.3 5.0 10 2.4 1.9 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.1 1.4 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0 0 Mono Di Tri Tetra Penta Hexa Mono Di Tri Tetra Penta Hexa PCB homologs PCB homologs • Porewater and Overlying PCB concentrations in PCB impacted untreated sediment were high and were reduced by more than 95% upon amendment with AC. • In the PCB-impacted untreated sediment tanks, porewater PCB concentrations were 3-7 fold higher than the overlying concentrations indicating sediment as the PCB source to the water column. 21 21

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend