Porewater and Bioavailability at Contaminated Sediment Sites Karl - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

porewater and bioavailability at contaminated sediment
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Porewater and Bioavailability at Contaminated Sediment Sites Karl - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Porewater and Bioavailability at Contaminated Sediment Sites Karl Gustavson Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) Outline Problem definition Porewater, bioavailability, and exposures Passive samplers for porewater


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Porewater and Bioavailability at Contaminated Sediment Sites

Karl Gustavson Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Outline

 Problem definition  Porewater, bioavailability, and exposures  Passive samplers for porewater assessment  Passive sampler applications and environments  Recommendations for use

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Sediment Remediation

 Conducted to decrease risk to consumers of fish.  Conducted to decrease risk to benthos.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

There is a complex relationship between sediment and biota contamination. …influenced by concentration, bioavailability, fish diet, behavior, movement, etc.

Sediment – Biota Relationship

Magar et al. 2009

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Sediment – Contaminant Dynamics

 All sediments aren’t created equal…  they vary in potential to drive contaminant uptake.

Gosh 2003 Magar et al. 2009

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Terms

 Porewater (interstitial water)

  • Water residing in the pore space of sediments.

 Bioavailability

  • The individual physical, chemical, and biological

interactions that determine exposure of organisms to chemicals associated with soils and sediments.

USGS.gov Alexander, 2000. ES&T 34: 4259-4265.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Bioavailability Driving Exposures and Effects

 “Only a portion of the sediment-bound contamination is bioavailable, and there is no simple way of determining the available fraction through the use of extractants”  “For several kinds of pollutants the interstitial water fraction has been shown to be most available to the benthos” (Swartz and Lee, 1980)

DiToro 1991, ET&C 10:1541 Landrum 1989, ES&T 23:588

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Bioavailability Driving Exposures and Effects

 Lack of concordance between toxicity and bioaccumulation and contaminant concentrations in bulk sediment.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Using EqP with lit. Koc and sediment PAH-34 grossly

  • ver-predicts mortality, and does not separate toxic from

non-toxic sediments.

Courtesy of Steve Hawthorne, Univ North Dakota

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

The two carbon (Koc/KBC) model and sediment PAH-34 grossly under-predicts mortality, and does not separate toxic from non-toxic sediments.

log KBC=0.6997 log Kow + 2.822, Koelmans, 2006

Courtesy of Steve Hawthorne, Univ North Dakota

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Measured freely-dissolved PAH-34 greatly improve mortality predictions, while still being conservative.

Courtesy of Steve Hawthorne, Univ North Dakota

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

5.56 4.95 4.95 4.47 6.10 7.47 4.15 8.16 5.88

PCB-18 (2,2’,4) Log Kow: 5.24

Compared to Koc of : a) Traffic soot b) Oil soot c) Wood soot d) Coal soot e) Coal f) Charcoal g) Flyash h) Activated carbon i) Graphite Jonker and Koelmans. 2002

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Variation in Contaminant Partitioning

Hawthorne et al. 2011

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Porewater Sampling

 Importance long recognized.

  • Variety of techniques: squeezing,

centrifugation, leaching, filtering, direct sampling

  • Issues
  • sampling altering chemistry
  • including DOC- and POC-associated

contaminants

  • Need to measure freely-dissolved fraction
  • More detail in Mark Cantwell’s Presentation

Sayles et al. 1976

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

  • Accumulate freely-dissolved organic contaminants from

surrounding water into a solid phase.

  • Contaminant concentrations of the samplers are measured.
  • Circumvent problems associated with colloids, rapid- and slow-

desorbing contaminants, and accounting for carbon content and variation.

Passive Samplers

Passive Sampler

Graphic: Rob Burgess, EPA-ORD

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Diversity of Passive Samplers

SPME

solid phase microextraction

PED

polyethylene device

SPMD

semi-permeable membrane devices

POM

polyoxymethylene samplers

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Prediction of Dissolved Concentration Cdissolved = Cpassive sampler Kpassive sampler/water

Deployment Time (days) Concentration (ng/mL Passive Sampler)

“Equilibrium” Sampling

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Quantification of Dissolved Concentration

Courtesy of Joseph Kreitinger, USACE

~1.5 mL porewater SPME Fiber

“Depletive” Sampling

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Water Column Contaminant Analysis

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

South Harbor (SH) South Harbor Nearshore (SF12) North Harbor

Area Total DDx (ng/L) North Harbor 0.2 South Harbor 1.5 Nearshore (SF-12) Not recovered

 “Freely dissolved” DDx concentration in surface water.

  • Nature and Extent
  • Relative

Contamination

  • Exposure

Assessment

  • Inclusion in food

web modeling

Conventional Sampling was Non-detect

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Use of Passive Samplers in Cap Performance Monitoring

In-situ SPME Samplers and Associated Cores

  • D. Reible, Texas Tech University
slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

PAH Profiles through Isolation Cap

 Cap profile shows performance as expected (isolation)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

PAH Profiles through Isolation Cap

 Evidence of recontamination

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Use of Passive Samplers in Cap Performance Monitoring

 Freely-dissolved PAH profiles through cap

  • Nature and extent
  • Changes over time
  • Cap performance
  • Recontamination
  • Source ID
  • D. Reible, Texas Tech University
slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Surrogates for Aquatic Organisms?

Aquatic organisms vary in their interaction with the environment and physiology

  • Gradient from sessile to highly mobile
  • Large differences in food preference and feeding behavior
  • Gradient from poor metabolizes (e.g., mussels) to efficient

biotransformers (e.g., fish from contaminated environments)

GROWTH DILUTION TRANSFORMATION

UPTAKE ELIMINATION

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26 Rhoads 1974

Benthic Invertebrate Feeding Strategies

Al Kennedy, USACE ERDC

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

 Comparison of PCB uptake among

  • rganisms with

different feeding strategies.  All organisms exposed to the same PCB- contaminated sediment.

s s a a a

BSAF

2 4 6 8

Di Tri Tetra Penta Hexa Hepta-Nona Total

Lotufo, USACE ERDC

Variability in Bioaccumulation Potential

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Where Porewater/Bioavailability Assessments are Useful?

 Where bulk sediment concentrations aren’t sufficient.  To define

  • Nature and Extent of Contamination
  • Concentration-Toxicity Relationships
  • Definining Exposure Concentrations
  • “Truly-dissolved” pore- or surface-water
  • Flux from sediment bed
  • Remedial Effectiveness Evaluations
slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Questions

 gustavson.karl@epa.gov 703-603-8753