Planning Agency August 11, 2016 Mike McKeever CEO, Sacramento Area - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

planning agency
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Planning Agency August 11, 2016 Mike McKeever CEO, Sacramento Area - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Truckee Meadows Regional Planning Agency August 11, 2016 Mike McKeever CEO, Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) Sacramento Area Council of Governments 6 counties 22 cities 2.2 million people 31 Board members


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Truckee Meadows Regional Planning Agency August 11, 2016

Mike McKeever CEO, Sacramento Area Council

  • f Governments (SACOG)
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Sacramento Area Council

  • f Governments
  • 6 counties
  • 22 cities
  • 2.2 million people
  • 31 Board members
slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Blueprint: Information-based planning

D

Regional Jurisdiction Neighborhood

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Broad Public Outreach

  • 8,000 Participants &
  • Broad Representation
  • Across the Region
  • Diverse Interest Groups
  • Neighborhood, County

and Regional Scale Workshops

slide-6
SLIDE 6

1st Regional Scenario: Base Case Future – Continue Past Trends

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Need to plan both the regional and neighborhood levels

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Regional Forum 2004 — 1400 people

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Elected Officials Summit — Oct. 2004

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Basecase 2050

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Blueprint 2050

slide-12
SLIDE 12

SACOG Major Planning Initiatives

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Enhancing rural economic viability and environmental sustainability

Rural-Urban Connections Strategy

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Regional Planning: Urban and Rural

slide-15
SLIDE 15

RUCS Crop Map

Export Markets Local Markets

RUCS Scenario Analysis Tool Scenario Results Modules Informing Scenarios

ROI Water Deman d Labor Deman d Truckin g

slide-16
SLIDE 16

SB375: Regional Scenario Planning with a Performance Edge

  • Integrating transportation

and land use/housing policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions AND

  • Advance public health, social

equity, environmental sustainability, and economic growth

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Set Targets

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS)

Transportation investments + Land use patterns

  • An enhanced Regional Transportation Plan
  • Where will homes, job centers, open space, retail be located?
  • More opportunities to drive less through increased public

transit and biking and walking options.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

MTP/SCS Adopted February, 2016

  • Key Issue: Phasing and right-sizing of land use

and transportation projects

  • Land Use:

– Housing (700,000 units capacity and 300,000 units demand) – Employment (1.3 million jobs capacity and 350,000 jobs demand)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Forecasting which projects will be built and when

  • Regulatory Factors (local, state, federal)
  • Policy Factors (air quality, regional plans)
  • Market Factors (proximity to jobs center, housing

types nexus to demand, demand in subarea, adjacency to services, interest and capacity of developer, feasibility of funding needed new infrastructure)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Benefit Measures

  • Travel time

(auto, truck, transit, bike & ped)

  • System reliability
  • Emissions
  • Safety
  • Health
  • Maintenance and state of

good repair

  • Land use & accessibility
  • Total capital costs

(amortized at annual level)

  • Auto & truck ownership and
  • perating costs
  • Transit operating costs
  • Additional annual O&M costs

Project Costs

slide-22
SLIDE 22

SACOG CURRENT MTP: CAPACITY PROJECTS ONLY IF MATCH LAND USE

  • Is the roadway congested during peak demand periods,

either in the base year (2012) or the planning horizon year?

  • Is the increase in capacity on the roadway greater than

the projected increase in travel on the roadway?

  • Is the roadway significantly under-utilized during peak

periods?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Land Use Change: 2012 to DRAFT 2036 MTP/SCS

slide-24
SLIDE 24

(Licensed to Sacramento Area Co

dway Congestion Levels and Relative Volumes--Discussion Draft Project List FT Peak Period V/C Ratios <=0.90 Peak Period V/C Ratios from 0.91 to 1.00 Peak Period V/C Ratios from 1.01 to 1.10 Peak Period V/C Ratios > 1.10

Peak Period V/C Ratios <=0.90 Peak Period V/C Ratios from 0.91 to 1.00 Peak Period V/C Ratios from 1.01 to 1.10 Peak Period V/C Ratios > 1.10

Roadway Congestion Levels and Relative Volumes—Discussion Draft Project List

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Project Phasing: Outcomes

  • 196 fewer lane miles of new roads
  • 100 road or highway projects deferred
  • 60 new road or highway projects added
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Infill Focused Compact Growth Low Density Pays For: Public Sector $500 MM $530 MM $600 MM

  • Off-Site streets
  • Sewer trunk, collection &

treatment

  • Parks Infrastructure

Developer $700 MM $1.2 B $1.8 B

  • Local streets
  • Sewer laterals
  • Water & Stormwater laterals,

collection & detention

Total $1.2 B $1.8 B $2.5 B

Development Costs Yuba County

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Infill Focused Compact Growth Low Density Annual O&M $78 MM $85 MM $89 MM Annual Revenue $100 MM $94 MM $80 MM $22 MM $9 MM

  • $9 MM

Annual Cost and Revenue to Yuba County