Planning Agency August 11, 2016 Mike McKeever CEO, Sacramento Area - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶

Oct 19, 2023 209 likes •498 views

Truckee Meadows Regional Planning Agency August 11, 2016 Mike McKeever CEO, Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) Sacramento Area Council of Governments 6 counties 22 cities 2.2 million people 31 Board members

SLIDE 1

Truckee Meadows Regional Planning Agency August 11, 2016

Mike McKeever CEO, Sacramento Area Council

f Governments (SACOG)

SLIDE 2

Sacramento Area Council

f Governments
6 counties
22 cities
2.2 million people
31 Board members

SLIDE 3

SLIDE 4

Blueprint: Information-based planning

D

Regional Jurisdiction Neighborhood

SLIDE 5

Broad Public Outreach

8,000 Participants &
Broad Representation
Across the Region
Diverse Interest Groups
Neighborhood, County

and Regional Scale Workshops

SLIDE 6

1st Regional Scenario: Base Case Future – Continue Past Trends

SLIDE 7

Need to plan both the regional and neighborhood levels

SLIDE 8

Regional Forum 2004 — 1400 people

SLIDE 9

Elected Officials Summit — Oct. 2004

SLIDE 10

Basecase 2050

SLIDE 11

Blueprint 2050

SLIDE 12

SACOG Major Planning Initiatives

SLIDE 13

Enhancing rural economic viability and environmental sustainability

Rural-Urban Connections Strategy

SLIDE 14

Regional Planning: Urban and Rural

SLIDE 15

RUCS Crop Map

Export Markets Local Markets

RUCS Scenario Analysis Tool Scenario Results Modules Informing Scenarios

ROI Water Deman d Labor Deman d Truckin g

SLIDE 16

SB375: Regional Scenario Planning with a Performance Edge

Integrating transportation

and land use/housing policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions AND

Advance public health, social

equity, environmental sustainability, and economic growth

SLIDE 17

Set Targets

SLIDE 18

Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS)

Transportation investments + Land use patterns

An enhanced Regional Transportation Plan
Where will homes, job centers, open space, retail be located?
More opportunities to drive less through increased public

transit and biking and walking options.

SLIDE 19

MTP/SCS Adopted February, 2016

Key Issue: Phasing and right-sizing of land use

and transportation projects

Land Use:

– Housing (700,000 units capacity and 300,000 units demand) – Employment (1.3 million jobs capacity and 350,000 jobs demand)

SLIDE 20

Forecasting which projects will be built and when

Regulatory Factors (local, state, federal)
Policy Factors (air quality, regional plans)
Market Factors (proximity to jobs center, housing

types nexus to demand, demand in subarea, adjacency to services, interest and capacity of developer, feasibility of funding needed new infrastructure)

SLIDE 21

Benefit Measures

Travel time

(auto, truck, transit, bike & ped)

System reliability
Emissions
Safety
Health
Maintenance and state of

good repair

Land use & accessibility
Total capital costs

(amortized at annual level)

Auto & truck ownership and
perating costs
Transit operating costs
Additional annual O&M costs

Project Costs

SLIDE 22

SACOG CURRENT MTP: CAPACITY PROJECTS ONLY IF MATCH LAND USE

Is the roadway congested during peak demand periods,

either in the base year (2012) or the planning horizon year?

Is the increase in capacity on the roadway greater than

the projected increase in travel on the roadway?

Is the roadway significantly under-utilized during peak

periods?

SLIDE 23

Land Use Change: 2012 to DRAFT 2036 MTP/SCS

SLIDE 24

(Licensed to Sacramento Area Co

dway Congestion Levels and Relative Volumes--Discussion Draft Project List FT Peak Period V/C Ratios <=0.90 Peak Period V/C Ratios from 0.91 to 1.00 Peak Period V/C Ratios from 1.01 to 1.10 Peak Period V/C Ratios > 1.10

Peak Period V/C Ratios <=0.90 Peak Period V/C Ratios from 0.91 to 1.00 Peak Period V/C Ratios from 1.01 to 1.10 Peak Period V/C Ratios > 1.10

Roadway Congestion Levels and Relative Volumes—Discussion Draft Project List

SLIDE 25

SLIDE 26

Project Phasing: Outcomes

196 fewer lane miles of new roads
100 road or highway projects deferred
60 new road or highway projects added

SLIDE 27

Infill Focused Compact Growth Low Density Pays For: Public Sector $500 MM $530 MM $600 MM

Off-Site streets
Sewer trunk, collection &

treatment

Parks Infrastructure

Developer $700 MM $1.2 B $1.8 B

Local streets
Sewer laterals
Water & Stormwater laterals,

collection & detention

Total $1.2 B $1.8 B $2.5 B

Development Costs Yuba County

SLIDE 28

Infill Focused Compact Growth Low Density Annual O&M $78 MM $85 MM $89 MM Annual Revenue $100 MM $94 MM $80 MM $22 MM $9 MM

$9 MM