Singular Research Conference
Jeffrey Glajch, Vice President & CFO
Singular Research Conference
September 10, 2009
Singular Research Conference Singular Research Conference Jeffrey - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Singular Research Conference Singular Research Conference Jeffrey Glajch, Vice President & CFO September 10, 2009 Safe Harbor Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the
September 10, 2009
This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions and can be identified by words such as “expects,” “estimates,” “projects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” and other similar words and expressions. All statements addressing operating performance, events, or developments that Graham expects or anticipates will occur in the future, including but not limited to, statements relating to anticipated revenues, profit margins, foreign operations, Graham’s strategy to build its global sales representative channel, the effectiveness of automation in expanding Graham’s engineering capacity, representative channel, the effectiveness of automation in expanding Graham s engineering capacity, Graham’s ability to improve its cost competitiveness, customer preferences, changes in market conditions in the industries in which Graham operates, changes in general economic conditions and customer behavior and Graham’s acquisition strategy are forward-looking statements. Because they are forward-looking, they should be evaluated in light of important risk factors and uncertainties. These risk factors and uncertainties are more fully described in Graham's most recent Annual and Quarterly Reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, included under the heading entitled “Risk Factors.” Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of Graham's underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those y g p p y y y currently anticipated. Undue reliance should not be placed on Graham's forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, Graham disclaims any obligation to update or publicly announce any revisions to any of its forward-looking statements.
Founded: 1936; IPO: 1968 ;
NYSE Amex: GHM $12.92 Common shares outstanding 9.8 million $ Market capitalization $127 million 52-week price range $42.66 – $6.85
237,557 Stock splits: ► 5 for 4 1/2/2008 ► 2 for 1 10/7/2008 Ownership: ►Institutional 52.5% ►Insider 2.9%
Note: Market data as of September 2, 2009; ownership as of most recent filing.
Condensers 26% 26% Ejectors 40% Heat Exchangers 9% Aftermarket 19% Pumps 6%
U.S. 51% International 49%
Note: Percent of Q1 FY2010 revenue.
Refinery Ejector System
Ejector system lowers the pressure in the distillation column to allow crude oil to
CNOOC Huizhou Refinery–China 240,000 BBL/day refinery
boil at a lower temperature. This allows for more efficient and cost-effective separation of crude oil into valuable products, such as diesel, gas oils, kerosene, and other fuels. kerosene, and other fuels. An ejector system is a combination of ejectors and condensers connected in series. condensers connected in series. Graham provides the ejectors and condensers as components.
Condensers Ejectors
Graham Corporation, 2009
Chemical Processing
27%
R fi i Other Industrial &
46% 22%
Refining Industrial & Commercial Applications
46% 22% 5%
Note: Percent of FY2010 revenue.
Power
OIL REFINING CHEMICAL PROCESSING
OIL REFINING Conventional crude oil Oil sands Extra-heavy crude oil CHEMICAL PROCESSING Ethylene Ammonia Nitrogen Ethylene glycol Detergent alcohols Plastics, resins, fibers Extra heavy crude oil Sour crude Lube oil Nitrogen Methanol Styrene Polystyrene Plastics, resins, fibers Coal-to-liquids (CTL) Gas-to-liquids (GTL) POWER GENERATION Cogeneration Waste to energy OTHER APPLICATIONS Edible oil/Oleochemicals Biofuels: Waste-to-energy Heat, power and light Geothermal Nuclear I it Biofuels: Ethanol Biodiesel HVAC Industrial gases In-situ Industrial gases Cryogenic
$34 million Refineries South Korea, China, Bahrain, Oman, South America, USA $20 million Petrochemical China, North Africa, Trinidad & Tobago, Mexico USA Mexico, USA $4 million Power generation Turkey, USA $16 illi Edibl il HVAC il USA $16 million Edible oil, HVAC, oil production, government, industrial gases, OEM USA
Total Net Growth: 6 mb/d
(through 2015) Europe: 0.2 mb/d Total Net Growth: 6 mb/d Russia and Eastern Europe: US & Canada: 0.9 mb/d Europe: 0.2 mb/d Latin Asia- Pacific: 2.9 mb/d America & Africa: 0.3 mb/d Africa: Middle East: 1.3 mb/d 0.4mb/d
mb/d = million barrels per day Source: OPEC World Oil Outlook 2009
Market GHM Competitors Market GHM Market Share Competitors
Refining vacuum distillation ~ 75% Gardner Denver Refining vacuum distillation 75% Gardner Denver Chemicals/Petrochemicals ~ 25% Croll Reynolds; Schutte Koerting; Gardner Denver Turbomachinery OEM – refining ~ 50% Ambassador; Yuba; Kreuger Turbomachinery OEM refining, petrochemical 50% Ambassador; Yuba; Kreuger Turbomachinery OEM – power and power producer ~ 15% Holtec; Babcock; Thermal Engineering; Yuba; Krueger HVAC ~ 10% Alfa Laval; APV; ITT; Ambassador
Market GHM Competitors Market GHM Market Share Competitors
Refining vacuum distillation ~ 35 to 50% Gardner Denver; GEA Jet Pump; g ; p; Korting Hannover; Edwards Chemicals/Petrochemicals ~ 25% Croll Reynolds; Schutte Koerting; Gardner Denver; GEA Jet Pump; K ti H Ed d Korting Hannover; Edwards Turbomachinery OEM – refining, petrochemical ~ 50% Donghwa-Entec; Bumwoo; Oiltechnik; Kreuger; various local fabricators Turbomachinery OEM – power and power producer ~ 15% Holtec; Babcock; Thermal Engineering; Yuba; Krueger
$101.1 $93 6 ($ in millions) $55 2 $65.8 $86.4 $93.6 $65.0 $60 - $70 $41.3 $55.2
FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 Q1 FY10 FY2010 E t FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 Q1 FY10 TTM FY2010 Est.
Beyond Volume Enhancements Sales per Employee
(in thousands)
Inventory Turnover
(times per year)
10.0 11.0 12.6 12.4 308.0 374.0 363.0 5.7 7.9 172.0 222.0 248.0
FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 Q1FY10 TTM FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 Q1FY10 TTM
$86.4 $101.1 $93.6 $41.3 $55.2 $65.8
39.5% 41.3% 40.4%
Potential FY2010 range: 28% - 31%
18.2% 28.9% 25.6%
FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 Q1FY10 TTM
Gross Margin Revenue
$17 467
$15,034 $17,467 $15,301
($ in thousands)
$5,761 $296 $3,586 ,
FY2005* FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 Q1FY10 TTM Earnings $1 71 $1 49 $0 58** $0 38 $0 03 $1 50
Note: All earnings per share amounts adjusted for stock splits * From continuing operations. ** Includes R&D tax credit of $0.16.
per Share $1.71 $1.49 $0.58** $0.38 $0.03 $1.50
$61.1 $64.4 Equity Long-term Liabilities
($ in millions)
$16 6 $27.1 $30.7 $48.5
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments ($ in millions)
$16.6 $6.1 $2.8 $1.6 $1.8 $2.6 $2.6 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009Q1FY10 $36.8 $46.2 $45.3* $11.0 $15.1
$57.4 $72.7 $73.9 Current Assets Current Liabilities
$2.7
FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 Q1 FY10
$22.1 $27.4 $36.7 $57.4 $10 9 $10 6 $16.6 $20.4 $23.2 $20.8
* $42 7 million in U S banks and
$10.9 $10.6
FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 Q1FY10 $42.7 million in U.S. banks and U.S. Treasury securities.
Sales increased 145% and cash conversion cycle was lowered from 112 to 17 days at 3/31/09
86 4 101.1 93.6
100 120 100 120
ycle (Days) $ millions)
112 55.2 65.8 86.4
60 80 60 80
h Conversion Cy Sales ($
41.3
40 40
Cas
41
Expected to be in th
20 20
FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 Q1 FY10 TTM
17
the 20- to 30- day range in 2010
Note: cash conversion cycle equals days sales outstanding plus days inventory on hand minus days payables outstanding TTM Sales Cash Conversion Cycle
$75 7 $86.5 $107.1 ($ in millions) $54.2 $75.7 $48.3 $49.9 $66.2 $73.9 $54.9 $22.4 $33.1 $37.0 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 Q1FY2010 TTM TTM
Backlog Orders
$101.1
FY09
$65.7
FY98
Mid-Point FY 2010 Guidance
$51.8 $34.9
31.3% 41.3% 29.5% 26.0%
FY00 Sales Gross Margin O ti M i
23.9% 29.5% 9.5% 1.0% 9.0%
Operating Margin * Assumes mid-point of FY 2010 guidance: a 35% reduction in revenue, a 29.5% gross margin and $13.5 million in SG&A expenses
U S: Limited petrochem investment
U.S: Limited petrochem investment Middle East: Becoming active
Middle East: Becoming active Asia/Middle East: Integrating refining/petrochem;
Asia/Middle East: Integrating refining/petrochem; Considering new ethylene capacity
International: Ammonia/fertilizer plants Some project revamps, others grassroots
Development
People
Customers
Performance
Upturn
Engineered- Engineered to-order products
and/or
Strong management team / Up to $60 million
and/or
team / quality culture $60 million in revenue Return exceeds cost of cost of capital
September 10, 2009
Decline in projected U S consumption Global recession slows demand growth Decline in projected U.S. consumption Cap and Trade heavily penalizes U.S. refiners Over capacity in U.S. refining Expanding economies in emerging/developing countries A i Middl E t S th A i Asia Middle East South America
World Oil Outlook 2008: 50% demand increase by 2030 World Oil Outlook 2008: 50% demand increase by 2030 World Oil Outlook 2009: 23% demand increase by 2030
renewables
requirements
fossil fuels
Biggest contributor = 5 mb/d by 2030
by 2030
Source: OPEC World Oil Outlook 2008
$100 to $150 million potential demand for demand for Graham products from from 2010 to 2016
An 11 MW turbine-generator set at a geothermal power producing plant in Papua New Guinea
Supports a steam turbine and enables the conversion of maximum energy in high pressure steam into power