Paper presentation Ultra-Portable Devices Paper: Lourans Samid, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

paper presentation ultra portable devices
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Paper presentation Ultra-Portable Devices Paper: Lourans Samid, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Paper presentation Ultra-Portable Devices Paper: Lourans Samid, Yiannos Manoli, A Low Power and Low Voltage Continuous Time Modulator, ISCAS, pp 4066 - 4069, 23 26 May, 2005. Presented by: Dejan Radjen 2009-11-17 Paper


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Paper presentation – Ultra-Portable Devices

Paper: Presented by:

Lourans Samid, Yiannos Manoli, A Low Power and Low Voltage Continuous Time ∑Δ Modulator, ISCAS, pp 4066 - 4069, 23 – 26 May, 2005.

Dejan Radjen

2009-11-17 1 Paper Presentation - Ultra Portable Devices

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • Introduction to Δ∑ modulators
  • Continuous Time Δ∑ modulators
  • Amplifier Requirements
  • Measurement Results
  • Summary and Conclusions

2009-11-17 2 Paper Presentation - Ultra Portable Devices

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction to Δ∑ modulators

2010-02-08 Paper Presentation - Ultra Portable Devices 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction to Δ∑ modulators

  • White noise approximation is accurate if the input signal is

changing rapidly and is random

  • White noise approximation is also more accurate as the number of

bits N in the quantizer increases

  • For a one bit quantizer (a comparator) the white noise

approximation is least accurate – but it is used anyway with proper watchfulness

  • Maximum theoretical SNR for an ideal ADC using white noise

approximation: SNRdB = 6.02N + 1.76

2010-02-08 Paper Presentation - Ultra Portable Devices 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction to Δ∑ modulators

2010-02-08 Paper Presentation - Ultra Portable Devices 5

General Δ∑ modulator

Linear model Using the linear model the output can be written as: Y(z) = STF(z)X(z) + NTF(z)E(z) STF(z) = Signal Transfer Function NTF(z) = Noise Transfer Function

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Introduction to Δ∑ modulators

  • Implementation example of a 2:nd order 1 bit Δ∑-modulator

2010-02-08 Paper Presentation - Ultra Portable Devices 6

STF = z-1 NTF = (1 – z-1)2 Second order noise shaping

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Continuous Time Δ∑ Modulators

  • Continuous Δ∑ modulators offer implicit anti-aliasing filter

2010-02-08 Paper Presentation - Ultra Portable Devices 7

Modulator Topology

Distributed feedback nth order CT- loop filter

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Continuous Time Δ∑ - Modulators

  • Excess loop delay τd is the delay between the quantizer output signal

and the DAC output signal

2010-02-08 Paper Presentation - Ultra Portable Devices 8

Excess Loop Delay

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Continuous Time Δ∑-modulators

Coefficient Mismatch

  • In DT-Δ∑ modulators the coefficients are given by ratios between

capacitors

  • In CT- Δ∑ modulators the coefficients are decided by RC – time

constants with tolerances of ± 30 %

  • An additional tuning circuit can be added to improve the accuracy
  • f the RC constants
  • Another method is to use a less aggressive noise transfer function

by moving the poles

2010-02-08 Paper Presentation - Ultra Portable Devices 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Continuous Time Δ∑ - Modulators

  • a. Without moving the poles
  • b. With moving the poles

2010-02-08 Paper Presentation - Ultra Portable Devices 10

Coefficient Mismatch

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Continuous Time Δ∑-modulators

Clock Jitter

2010-02-08 Paper Presentation - Ultra Portable Devices 11

Error signal Exponential DAC output signals reduce sensitivity to clock jitter

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Continuous Time Δ∑-modulators

Integrator Implementation

2010-02-08 Paper Presentation - Ultra Portable Devices 12

Active RC-integrator GmC - integrator

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Amplifier Requirements

  • Finite DC-gain of the amplifiers cause quantization noise leakage.

A rule of thumb is Adc > OSR

  • Finite Gain bandwidth affects the noise transfer function and can

cause instability

  • Distortion, Slew rate and noise limitations are primarily due to the

amplifier in the first integrator

  • Most power has to be spent on the amplifier in the first integrator

2010-02-08 Paper Presentation - Ultra Portable Devices 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Measurement Results

Measurement Results for the Third Order Continuous Time Δ∑ modulator

2010-02-08 Paper Presentation - Ultra Portable Devices 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Measurement Results

Measurement Results for the Third Order Continuous Time Δ∑ modulator

2010-02-08 Paper Presentation - Ultra Portable Devices 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Summary and Conclusions

  • The paper mainly discusses different non idealities present in CT

Δ∑ modulators

  • Continuous time Δ∑ modulators are more suitable for low power

design than their discrete time counterparts

  • The price paid is increased sensitivity to component mismatch,

excess loop delay and clock jitter

2010-02-08 Paper Presentation - Ultra Portable Devices 16