[PPT] - old mans beard, Clematis vitalba M A N A A K I W H E N U A L A N D PowerPoint Presentation

SLIDE 1

O c t o b e r 1 8 M A N A A K I W H E N U A – L A N D C A R E R E S E A R C H P A G E 1

Proposed introduction of the gall mite, Aceria vitalbae, as a biocontrol agent for

ld man’s beard, Clematis vitalba

SLIDE 2

O c t o b e r 1 8 M A N A A K I W H E N U A – L A N D C A R E R E S E A R C H P A G E 2

Aceria vitalbae

SLIDE 3

O c t o b e r 1 8 M A N A A K I W H E N U A – L A N D C A R E R E S E A R C H P A G E 3

Aceria vitalbae infested Clematis vitalba

SLIDE 4

O c t o b e r 1 8 M A N A A K I W H E N U A – L A N D C A R E R E S E A R C H P A G E 4

Aceria vitalbae on Clematis vitalba

SLIDE 5

O c t o b e r 1 8 M A N A A K I W H E N U A – L A N D C A R E R E S E A R C H P A G E 5

Aceria genistae on scotch broom

SLIDE 6

O c t o b e r 1 8 M A N A A K I W H E N U A – L A N D C A R E R E S E A R C H P A G E 6

Phylogenetic Analyses of Clematis (Ranunculaceae) Lei Xie, Jun Wen, and Liang-Qian Li, 2011

SLIDE 7

O c t o b e r 1 8 M A N A A K I W H E N U A – L A N D C A R E R E S E A R C H P A G E 7

Phylogenetic Analyses of Clematis (Ranunculaceae) Lei Xie, Jun Wen, and Liang-Qian Li, 2011

SLIDE 8

O c t o b e r 1 8 M A N A A K I W H E N U A – L A N D C A R E R E S E A R C H P A G E 8

Phylogenetic Analyses of Clematis (Ranunculaceae) Lei Xie, Jun Wen, and Liang-Qian Li, 2011

SLIDE 9

O c t o b e r 1 8 M A N A A K I W H E N U A – L A N D C A R E R E S E A R C H P A G E 9

Clade Species Test series Plants examined % of plants with mites at 60 days Mean symptom score at 60 days Est. mites per bud at 60 days Plants examined at 120 days % plants with mites at 120 days Mean symptom score at 120 days Mean estimated mites per bud (total buds examined) VII Clematis vitalba 1 10 100% 5 20−50 2 No control

3

6 100% 5 >50 6 100% 5 35 (58) VII

C. stans

2 7 85% 3.4

3

8 75% 3.0 10−50 6 100% 3.9 (84) VI

C. viticella

2 10 10%

V
C. terniflora

2 6 17% 0.2

X
C. montana

2 10 30% 0.3

XxVI
C. montana x viticella

3 8 0%

III
C. cunninghamii*

No tests III

C. afoliata*

1 10 0% 2 15 20% 3 8 0% 7 14.2% 0.01 (49) III

C. foetida *

1 10 0% III

C. forsteri*

2 10 10% 3 1 0%

III
C. marata*

2 10 10% 3 10 30% 0.9 c.10 8 37.5% 0.9 (241) III

C. marmoraria x petriei*

2 10 30% 3 9 22% 0.2 10−20 6 33.0% 0.6 (102) III

C. paniculata*

1 10 0% III

C. petriei*

1 10 0% III

C. quadribracteolata*

1 10 0% II?

C. 'Miss Bateman'

2 10 0% Other Ranunculus sp. 3

Combined results of three series of experiments testing the susceptibility of Clematis

species to Aceria vitalba

SLIDE 10

O c t o b e r 1 8 M A N A A K I W H E N U A – L A N D C A R E R E S E A R C H P A G E 1 0

Aceria vitalbae infested Clematis vitalba seedlings

SLIDE 11

O c t o b e r 1 8 M A N A A K I W H E N U A – L A N D C A R E R E S E A R C H P A G E 1 1

Clade Species Test series Plants examined % of plants with mites at 60 days Mean symptom score at 60 days Est. mites per bud at 60 days Plants examined at 120 days % plants with mites at 120 days Mean symptom score at 120 days Mean estimated mites per bud (total buds examined) VII Clematis vitalba 1 10 100% 5 20−50 2 No control

3

6 100% 5 >50 6 100% 5 35 (58) VII

C. stans

2 7 85% 3.4

3

8 75% 3.0 10−50 6 100% 3.9 (84) VI

C. viticella

2 10 10%

V
C. terniflora

2 6 17% 0.2

X
C. montana

2 10 30% 0.3

XxVI
C. montana x viticella

3 8 0%

III
C. cunninghamii*

No tests III

C. afoliata*

1 10 0% 2 15 20% 3 8 0% 7 14.2% 0.01 (49) III

C. foetida *

1 10 0% III

C. forsteri*

2 10 10% 3 1 0%

III
C. marata*

2 10 10% 3 10 30% 0.9 c.10 8 37.5% 0.9 (241) III

C. marmoraria x petriei*

2 10 30% 3 9 22% 0.2 10−20 6 33.0% 0.6 (102) III

C. paniculata*

1 10 0% III

C. petriei*

1 10 0% III

C. quadribracteolata*

1 10 0% II?

C. 'Miss Bateman'

2 10 0% Other Ranunculus sp. 3

Combined results of three series of experiments testing the susceptibility of Clematis

species to Aceria vitalba

SLIDE 12

O c t o b e r 1 8 M A N A A K I W H E N U A – L A N D C A R E R E S E A R C H P A G E 1 2