New Grissom High School Selection Process Request for - - PDF document

new grissom high school
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

New Grissom High School Selection Process Request for - - PDF document

New Grissom High School Selection Process Request for Qualifications Identify Selection 15 Firms Committee Submitted Qualifications Develop & Communicate Selection Criteria to Architects & Selection Committee New Grissom High


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

New Grissom High School

15 Firms Submitted Qualifications

Request for Qualifications Identify Selection Committee Develop & Communicate Selection Criteria to Architects & Selection Committee

  • Selection Process
slide-3
SLIDE 3

New Grissom High School

5 Firms Interviewed

Selection Committee Rated Importance Factor of Criteria Selection Committee Ranked Each Firm Rankings adjusted with Importance Factor

Interviews Selection Rankings

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Interview Evaluation & Scoring

  • Scored Rankings for each presenting firm are shown
  • below. Chapman Sisson Architects is the firm

recommended by the selection committee for the design of the New Grissom High School project

slide-5
SLIDE 5

NEW GRISSOM HIGH SCHOOL

Architect Selection Process

  • Request for Qualifications
  • Interview Process
  • Evaluation & Recommendation

Criteria

  • Selection Committee Evaluations

& Recommendation

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Request for Qualifications

  • Request for qualifications sent to

approximately thirty (30) qualified Architectural firms throughout the state.

  • Each firm was provided with written list of criteria

for consideration of qualifications.

  • Submittals for consideration for interviews

received from fifteen (15) firms.

  • An interview committee was selected

consisting of Grissom High School faculty, student representatives, and members of the Grissom community

  • The submittals were reviewed and rated

by TCU and the Huntsville City Schools Operations division to develop a short list

  • f firms for interviews.
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Schedule

  • Programming / Educations Specifications

October / December 2012

  • Interviews for Architect Selection

November 2012

  • Design: January 2013 through February

2014

  • Bids for Construction: March / April 2014
  • Construction: May 2014 through May 2016
  • Occupancy / First Classes: August 2016
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Interviews / Selection Process

  • Presentations to the selection committee
  • ccurred on November 14, 2012.
  • Each firm was provided with written list of

criteria for consideration

  • Submittals for consideration for interviews

received from fifteen (15) firms

  • The submittals were reviewed and rated

by TCU and the Huntsville City Schools Operations division to develop a short list

  • f the most qualified firms for interviews.
  • An interview committee was selected

consisting of Grissom High School faculty, student representatives, and members of the Grissom community.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Interview Evaluation & Scoring

  • The Selection Committee ranked each presenting

firm and ranked the importance factor of each critical question. The results are shown in the summary below.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Recommendation for Selection

  • Based on the scored results of the interviews /

presentations of the five firms there was a unanimous selection recommended by the selection committee.

  • Chapman Sisson Architects is the firm

recommended for the design of the New Grissom High School project.

  • Additional due diligence was performed by TCU

Consulting Services, LLC and Huntsville City Schools to confirm the capacity and qualifications

  • f the recommended firm to perform this work. We

concur with the recommendations of the selection committee.

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

HUNT SVI L L E C I T Y SC HO O L S ARC HI T EC T SEL EC T I O N MAT RI X No ve mb e r 14, 2012

Judging Criteria In‐ house Team Experien ce Schedul e Previo us Performan Minori ty Participati Consultan ts LEED

Litigatio n Other Other Other Other

Tota l Importance Architects

Fuqua & Partners ‐ Weighted SKT Architects ‐ Weighted

KPS Group

‐ Weighted Davis Architects ‐ Weighted

Chapman Sisson

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21