MPN Experimental Assessment of Symptoms by Utilizing Repetitive - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mpn experimental assessment of symptoms by utilizing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

MPN Experimental Assessment of Symptoms by Utilizing Repetitive - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MPN Experimental Assessment of Symptoms by Utilizing Repetitive Evaluation (MEASURE) Trial Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Quality of Life (MPN-QOL) Study Group Allison H. Smith, MD, MPH Hematology/Oncology Fellow Norris Cotton Cancer Center


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MPN Experimental Assessment of Symptoms by Utilizing Repetitive Evaluation (MEASURE) Trial

Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Quality of Life (MPN-QOL) Study Group

Allison H. Smith, MD, MPH Hematology/Oncology Fellow Norris Cotton Cancer Center Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN)

Polycythemia vera (PV) Essential thrombocythemia (ET) Myelofibrosis (MF)

  • Gene mutations:
  • Janus kinase 2 (JAK2)
  • Calreticulin (CALR)
  • Thrombopoietin receptor (MPL)
  • Hematopoietic stem

cell disorders

  • Clonal proliferation of

1+ myeloid cell lines

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Clinical Features

  • Polycythemia or anemia
  • Leukocytosis
  • Thrombocytosis
  • Hepatosplenomegaly
  • Risk of thrombotic and thromboembolic events
  • Risk of bleeding
  • Risk of progression to MF, MDS, or AML
  • Increased mortality
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Symptom Burden

  • 90% of patients experience MPN-related symptoms
  • Most common and severe = fatigue
  • Most patients report decline in quality of life
  • Impairment in work functioning and activity level
  • MF patients often have highest symptom burden and

lowest quality of life

Harrison et al. Ann Hematol 2017;96(10):1653-1665

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Common MPN Symptoms

✓ Fatigue ✓ Early satiety ✓ Anorexia ✓ Pruritis ✓ Bone pain ✓ Night sweats ✓ Cachexia/weight loss ✓ Abdominal pain ✓ Nausea ✓ Fever ✓ Weakness ✓ Mood changes ✓ Sleep disturbance ✓ Cognitive impairment

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Treatment Approaches

  • Pharmacologic options
  • Cytoreductive therapy – hydroxyurea, anagrelide, pegylated

interferon, busulfan

  • JAK1/2 inhibition – ruxolitinib
  • COMFORT I trial: reduction in spleen size, improvement in

symptoms (abdominal pain, bone pain, night sweats, pruritis)

  • Antiplatelet – aspirin, clopidogrel
  • Anticoagulation – warfarin
  • Phlebotomy
  • Stem cell transplantation

Verstovsek et al. Blood 2012;120(6):1202-1209

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Background

  • Outcome studies have historically focused on

hematologic improvement and survival benefit

  • Few prospective studies have evaluated patient-

reported symptoms and quality of life outcomes

  • MEASURE trial aims to quantify objectively

symptomatic response to standard therapies

  • Interim results presented:
  • 340 patients enrolled
  • 270 patients have completed both study visits
slide-8
SLIDE 8

MEASURE Trial

  • MPN Experimental Assessment of Symptoms by

Utilizing Repetitive Evaluation (MEASURE) trial

  • Prospective international cohort study
  • Evaluates changes in target symptoms:
  • Common MPN symptoms
  • Impacts on functioning in various domains
  • Global quality of life measures
  • Non-experimental medical therapy and/or phlebotomy
  • Anticipated 480 ET, PV, and MF patients
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Study Methods

  • Study visits:

1) At enrollment 2) Three to six months after enrollment

  • Patients complete survey instruments:
  • MPN-SAF TSS – seven consecutive days
  • EORTC QLQ-C30
  • MDASI
  • Hematology physicians report:
  • Patient demographics
  • Laboratory data
  • Clinical information
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form - Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Results: Demographics

  • Interim results: 340 patients enrolled (of target 480)
  • 270 have completed both study visits
  • Average 140 days between visits
  • 51% male, 49% female
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Results: Clinical Data

  • Mutational analysis (not required):
  • 77% have JAK2 V617F
  • 3% have MPL W515
  • <1% have JAK2 exon 12, CALR, TET2, ASXL1, EZH2
  • Clinical features:
  • History of splenectomy

2%

  • History of thrombosis

15%

  • History of hemorrhage

4%

  • Required transfusion

4%

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Results: Therapies

  • Most common therapies received prior to enrollment:
  • Aspirin (34%)
  • Phlebotomy (15%)
  • Hydroxyurea (14%)
  • Anticoagulation/warfarin (6%)
  • Most common current MPN therapies:
  • Hydroxyurea (67%)
  • Aspirin (24%)
  • Phlebotomy (9%)
  • Ruxolitinib (8%)
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Results: MPN-SAF TSS

  • Significant decrease in weight loss
  • Significant increase in poor quality of life
  • No improvements in other symptoms
  • Cumulative MPN-SAF TSS score remained stable at 24.4

P = 0.0046 P = 0.0370

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Results: EORTC QLQ-C30

No significant improvements in any of 5 domains of functioning

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Results: MDASI

No change in symptom severity or symptom distress scores

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Discussion

  • MPNs are associated with burdensome symptoms that

significantly compromise quality of life

  • To date, no prospective studies have quantified symptomatic

response to standard-of-care treatments

  • Interim results from MEASURE trial suggest that standard

treatments have limited impact on patient symptomatology

  • No improvements in overall quality of life
  • Congruent findings among all 3 survey instruments
  • Relatively low proportion of patients in this cohort treated with

ruxolitinib

  • Shown previously to improve symptom burden
  • May have impacted symptom responses seen in the group as whole
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Future Directions

  • Complete study enrollment and data analysis
  • Symptom burden and treatment impact by MPN type
  • Impact of ruxolitinib therapy on QOL and symptoms
  • Correlation between hematologic outcomes and patient

reported outcomes

  • Physician assessment of symptom burden
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Acknowledgments

  • NNECOS
  • Fellowship faculty at DHMC
  • Program director: Mary Chamberlin, MD
  • Research mentors at Mayo Clinic Arizona
  • Ruben Mesa, MD
  • Holly Geyer, MD
  • Study staff at MEASURE trial international sites
  • Our study subjects
slide-22
SLIDE 22

❖ Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA ❖ UT Health, San Antonio, TX, USA ❖ Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy ❖ Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain ❖ Roskilde University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark ❖ NU Hospital Organization, Uddevalla, Sweden ❖ Institution for Medical Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden ❖ Hospital Organization, Uddavella, Sweden ❖ Uddevalla Sjukhus, Uddavella, Sweden ❖ Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia ❖ FUNDALEU, Buenos Aires, Argentina ❖ Hôpitaux de l'Université Catholique, Lille, France ❖ St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia ❖ Goodheart Instiutie Rotterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands NHS Foundation Trust: ❖ Guy's & St Thomas, London, UK ❖ Heart of England, Birmingham, UK ❖ University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK ❖ Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK ❖ Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK ❖ Calderdale & Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Huddersfield, UK ❖ Salisbury Healthcare, Salisbury, UK ❖ Hampshire Hospitals, Southampton, UK ❖ Mid Yorkshire Hospitals, Wakefield, UK ❖ St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK ❖ Royal Free Hospital, London, UK ❖ Guy's Hospital, London, UK

Study Sites

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Thank you!