experimental assessment of experimental assessment of p
play

Experimental Assessment of Experimental Assessment of p Brine - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Experimental Assessment of Experimental Assessment of p Brine and/or CO2 Leakage Brine and/or CO2 Leakage Th Through Well Cements at Through Well Cements at Th h W ll C h W ll C t t t t Reservoir Conditions Reservoir Conditions


  1. Experimental Assessment of Experimental Assessment of p Brine and/or CO2 Leakage Brine and/or CO2 Leakage Th Through Well Cements at Through Well Cements at Th h W ll C h W ll C t t t t Reservoir Conditions Reservoir Conditions Reservoir Conditions Reservoir Conditions Dr. Brant Bennion Dr. Brant Bennion Hycal Energy Research Labs/Weatherford Labs Hycal Energy Research Labs/Weatherford Labs Dr. Stefan Bachu Dr. Stefan Bachu ERCB ERCB (Now With Alberta Research Council) (Now With Alberta Research Council)

  2. Presentation Summary Presentation Summary Presentation Summary Presentation Summary  Context of the problem  Context of the problem Context of the problem Context of the problem  Experimental design  Experimental design Experimental design Experimental design  Experimental Results Experimental Results  Interpretation and implications Interpretation and implications  Conclusions Conclusions

  3. The Issue The Issue The Issue The Issue  Formations may have adequate sealing  Formations may have adequate sealing Formations may have adequate sealing Formations may have adequate sealing caprock caprock  The caprock may be broached in multiple  The caprock may be broached in multiple The caprock may be broached in multiple The caprock may be broached in multiple (sometimes hundreds) of locations by (sometimes hundreds) of locations by wellbores of varying age and completion wellbores of varying age and completion y g y g g g p p type type  Long term isolation of the formation due to Long term isolation of the formation due to g leakage through these wellbores is a leakage through these wellbores is a major concern major concern

  4. CASING CASING CASING CEMENT CEMENT PLUG FORMATION FORMATION

  5. Poor Cement Bond Poor Cement Bond CASING CASING CASING CEMENT CEMENT PLUG FORMATION FORMATION

  6. Casing Corrosion Casing Corrosion CASING CASING CASING CEMENT CEMENT PLUG FORMATION FORMATION

  7. Cement Degradation Cement Degradation CASING CASING CASING CEMENT CEMENT PLUG FORMATION FORMATION

  8. Program Objectives Program Objectives Program Objectives Program Objectives  To quantify the in  To quantify the in To quantify the in-situ permeability to CO To quantify the in situ permeability to CO situ permeability to CO 2 situ permeability to CO 2 2 and CO and CO 2 saturated brine at reservoir saturated brine at reservoir conditions for typical class G well cement conditions for typical class G well cement conditions for typical class G well cement conditions for typical class G well cement  To evaluate permeability between typical To evaluate permeability between typical casing and class G cement with varying casing and class G cement with varying casing and class G cement with varying casing and class G cement with varying degrees of cement and cement bond degrees of cement and cement bond integrity present at reservoir conditions integrity present at reservoir conditions integrity present at reservoir conditions integrity present at reservoir conditions

  9. Class G Cement Permeability Class G Cement Permeability Measurements Measurements

  10. Test Conditions for Cement Test Conditions for Cement P P Permeability Measurements Permeability Measurements bili bili M M  Temperature  Temperature Temperature – 65 deg C Temperature 65 deg C 65 deg C 65 deg C  Differential pressure across 5 cm cement Differential pressure across 5 cm cement sample – 15,150 kPa sample sample sample 15 150 kPa 15 150 kPa 15,150 kPa  Backpressure Backpressure – – 5000 kPa 5000 kPa  Confining stress Confining stress – – 25,000 kPa 25,000 kPa  Brine Brine – 1.5, 6 and 8 % NaCl solution 1.5, 6 and 8 % NaCl solution , saturated with CO2 gas at 65 deg C and saturated with CO2 gas at 65 deg C and 20,150 kPag pressure 20,150 kPag pressure , , g p g p

  11. Lab Equipment Lab Equipment Lab Equipment Lab Equipment

  12. Test Results Test Results Test Results Test Results

  13. Cement Cement-Casing Bonding Tests Cement Cement Casing Bonding Tests Casing Bonding Tests Casing Bonding Tests

  14. Test Conditions Test Conditions Test Conditions Test Conditions  Diameter of composite  Diameter of composite Diameter of composite – 7 cm Diameter of composite 7 cm 7 cm 7 cm  Diameter cement sheath Diameter cement sheath – – approx 1.6 cm approx 1.6 cm  Length  Length Length – approx. 10 cm Length approx 10 cm approx 10 cm approx. 10 cm  Temperature Temperature – – 60 deg C 60 deg C  Pore pressure P Pore pressure – 13780 kPag 13780 kP 13780 kP 13780 kPag  Confining pressure Confining pressure – – 24100 kPag 24100 kPag  Fluid Fluid – supercritical ethane or CaCl supercritical ethane or CaCl 2 saturated brine saturated brine

  15. Test #1 Test #1 – ‘Perfect Bond’ Test #1 Test #1 ‘Perfect Bond’ Perfect Bond Perfect Bond Cement Cement Steel Steel Cement Steel

  16. Perfect Bond Test Results Perfect Bond Test Results Perfect Bond Test Results Perfect Bond Test Results

  17. Poor Micro Annular Bond Test Poor Micro Annular Bond Test Poor Micro Annular Bond Test Poor Micro Annular Bond Test

  18. Poor Micro Annular Bond Test Poor Micro Annular Bond Test Poor Micro Annular Bond Test Poor Micro Annular Bond Test Steel Cement Steel Cement 10 to 35 Micron 10 to 35 Micron Gap Cement Steel

  19. Poor Micro Annular Bond Test Poor Micro Annular Bond Test R R Results Results l l Test Phase Displacing Fluid Measured Permeability mD I iti l Nit Initial Nitrogen Displacement Di l t D Dry Nitrogen Nit 120 43 120.43 10% CaCl2 Flood 10% CaCl2 0.241 Dense Phase Ethane Supercritical Ethane 0.533 10% CaCl2 Flood 10% CaCl2 Flood 10% CaCl2 10% CaCl2 0 079 0.079

  20. Cracked Cement Annulus Cracked Cement Annulus Cracked Cement Annulus Cracked Cement Annulus

  21. ‘Small’ Cracks Test ‘Small’ Cracks Test Small Cracks Test Small Cracks Test 1 to 5 Micron Diameter Cracks

  22. Small Cracks Results Small Cracks Results Small Cracks Results Small Cracks Results

  23. Large Cracks in Cement Large Cracks in Cement Large Cracks in Cement Large Cracks in Cement 100 to 500 Micron Cracks

  24. Large Cracks Test Results Large Cracks Test Results Large Cracks Test Results Large Cracks Test Results Test Phase Displacing Fluid Measured Permeability mD Initial Nitrogen Displacement I iti l Nit Di l t D Dry Nitrogen Nit 2897 2897 10% CaCl2 Flood 10% CaCl2 1.56 Dense Phase Ethane Supercritical Ethane 0.905 10% CaCl2 Flood 10% CaCl2 Flood 10% CaCl2 10% CaCl2 0 725 0.725

  25. Comparison of Effect Phase Permeability vs. Original Open Area 10000 1000 mD ermeability - Kn2 100 KCaCl2 KC2 Linear (Kn2) Phase Pe Linear (KC2) 10 Linear (KCaCl2) 1 0.1 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 Original Open Area - cm2

  26. More Details More Details More Details More Details  ‘Experimental Assessment of Brine and/or  Experimental Assessment of Brine and/or ‘Experimental Assessment of Brine and/or Experimental Assessment of Brine and/or CO2 Leakage Through Well Cements at CO2 Leakage Through Well Cements at Reservoir Conditions , To be Published in Reservoir Conditions’ To be Published in Reservoir Conditions , To be Published in Reservoir Conditions’ To be Published in The International Journal of Greenhouse The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control (In proof available online at Gas Control (In proof available online at Gas Control (In proof, available online at Gas Control (In proof, available online at www.sciencedirect.com) www.sciencedirect.com)

  27. Conclusions Conclusions Conclusions Conclusions

  28. Conclusions Conclusions Conclusions Conclusions  Good quality class G cement without fractures Good quality class G cement without fractures q q y y appears to provide a good barrier to CO2 (in the appears to provide a good barrier to CO2 (in the shorter term periods evaluated in this work) shorter term periods evaluated in this work)  Good bonding of typical J55 metal casing to G G Good bonding of typical J55 metal casing to d b d b di di f f i i l J55 l J55 l l i i class G cement was observed which appeared class G cement was observed which appeared to have very low permeability to have very low permeability to have very low permeability to have very low permeability  The presence of micro cracks or a micro annulus The presence of micro cracks or a micro annulus severely degraded the ability of the severely degraded the ability of the cement/casing pair to restrict the motion of cement/casing pair to restrict the motion of supercritical gas with several orders of supercritical gas with several orders of magnitude increase in permeability observed magnitude increase in permeability observed magnitude increase in permeability observed magnitude increase in permeability observed

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend