Montesano WWTP Wynoochee River Bank Protection Project BY MATT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

montesano wwtp wynoochee river bank protection project
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Montesano WWTP Wynoochee River Bank Protection Project BY MATT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Montesano WWTP Wynoochee River Bank Protection Project BY MATT KASTBERG REGIONAL DIVISION MANAGER COMMUNITY BUILDING - PUGET SOUND OFFICES 253.604.6735 | DESK 253.278.1468 | CELL MKASTBERG@PARAMETRIX.COM What i is the i issue?


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Montesano WWTP Wynoochee River Bank Protection Project

BY MATT KASTBERG REGIONAL DIVISION MANAGER COMMUNITY BUILDING - PUGET SOUND OFFICES 253.604.6735 | DESK 253.278.1468 | CELL MKASTBERG@PARAMETRIX.COM

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What i is the i issue?

  • Wynoochee River is migrating eastward toward the

City of Montesano’s WWTP and threatening to breach the WWTP

  • Left unaddressed, an environmental, economic and

public health disaster is imminent

  • Bank is eroding at a rate of 17 feet per year
  • Rate of erosion is likely to increase exponentially as

newly formed back-eddy increases in size

  • Future flood events will likely increase risk of breach

with each occurrence

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Wynoochee hee River Le Left Bank Li Lines

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Wynoochee hee Rive ver – Jul uly 2006 y 2006

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Wynoochee hee Rive ver – Augu ugust 2016 2016

slide-6
SLIDE 6

WWT WWTP - Apr pril 2017 2017

slide-7
SLIDE 7

WWT WWTP – Apr pril 2017 2017

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Project O Over ervi view

  • In January 2016, the City of Montesano hired Parametrix, Inc. to evaluate a

proposed design of three (3) two-hundred (200) foot rock groins to deflect the river flow away from the WWTP.

  • In fall of 2016, modeling results indicated that the proposed groin option

would not provide the long term protection for the WWTP desired by the City.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Project O Over ervi view

  • In the spring of 2017, the City began to explore other solutions to prevent

an imminent disaster related to the WWTP.

  • Recent work to evaluate viable solutions has included;
  • Project meetings, stakeholder engagement, project updates and technical

memorandums

  • Evaluation of existing site conditions (UAV photos, wetland delineation, bathymetry,

Topographic Survey)

  • Developed and evaluated list of potential long term and short term solutions
  • Preliminary project cost estimates of preferred solutions
  • Development of permit matrix summarizing anticipated permit requirements
  • Hydraulic Modeling of preferred short term solution (Sheet Pile Wall)
  • Began to evaluate WWTP Relocation options (in process)
  • Began to evaluate reported slope deformation and other site distress (in process)
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Potential S Solut utions

  • ns
  • Potential Short Term Solutions
  • 300’ Sheet Pile Wall to north of WWTP
  • Optional Engineered Log Structures along face of proposed Sheet Pile Wall
  • Stage hundreds of Log Jacks on uplands to north of WWTP
  • As bank erodes, jacks would fall into river and reduce scour and rate of bank

erosion

  • Remove sludge from settling ponds, backfill with rock, explore

alternatives for solids storage and continue to explore long term solution options

  • Potential Long Term Solutions
  • In-River Piles
  • Re-opening Relic Channels
  • Engineered Log Structures
  • River Retaining (scalp right bank bar to pull river away from WWTP)
  • Log Jacks
  • Relocate WWTP
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Proposed S ed Solut utions

  • ns
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Proposed S ed Solut utions

  • ns
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Lo Log J g Jack cks

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Eng ngineer neered L ed Log Struc uctur ures es

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Re Re-open R

  • pen Relic C

Channel nnel

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Upcoming A ng Activities es

  • Technical Workshop with Regulatory Agencies
  • June 22nd (1-3pm)
  • Focus of meeting is to provide project update and collect input
  • WWTP Relocation Conceptual Evaluation
  • June 30th
  • Parametrix, Inc. to provide City with Technical Memorandum to consider

potential relocation sites for the WWTP including description of each alternative, design criteria, land requirements and general estimated cost estimates

  • Evaluation of reported slope deformation and other site

distress

  • June 30th
  • Geotech (AMEC) and Parametrix to evaluate existing site conditions and

establish settlement baseline for future analysis.

  • City of Montesano Internal Meeting
  • July 10th
  • City will meet internally to discuss preferred alternatives, funding and path

forward.