March 27, 2012 Presentation Team Tammy Bruns, Math Teacher Jackson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

march 27 2012 presentation team
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

March 27, 2012 Presentation Team Tammy Bruns, Math Teacher Jackson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Everett Public Schools Math Curriculum Adoption Grades 6-8 Algebra I Geometry Algebra II with Trigonometry March 27, 2012 Presentation Team Tammy Bruns, Math Teacher Jackson High School Debbie Engel, Math Teacher Gateway Middle School


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Everett Public Schools Math Curriculum Adoption

Grades 6-8 Algebra I Geometry Algebra II with Trigonometry

March 27, 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

March 27, 2012

2

Presentation Team

 Tammy Bruns, Math Teacher Jackson High School  Debbie Engel, Math Teacher Gateway Middle School  Angie Griffith, Parent  Marilyn Mallory, Math Instructional Facilitator  Catherine Matthews, Director of District Improvement

and On Time Graduation

 Kaye Peterson, Math Teacher Jackson High School  Karen Price, Math Teacher Everett High School  Jana Sanchez, Math Instructional Facilitator  Dick Sander, Math Curriculum Specialist

slide-3
SLIDE 3

March 27, 2012

3

Math Adoption Process

 First of Three Phases:

 Grades 6-8, Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II /

Trigonometry

 Grades 11-12, Advanced Math Courses  Grades K - 5

slide-4
SLIDE 4

March 27, 2012

4

K – 12 Math Adoption Timeline

2011 -12 2012-13 2013-14

Grade 6-8 Algebra I Geometry Algebra II/Trig Review And Adopt Implement Advanced Math Review and Adopt Implement Grades K - 5 Review and Adopt Implement

slide-5
SLIDE 5

March 27, 2012

5

Preparation for Adoption

 District Math Review  GAP Analysis by OSPI  Alignment with Common Core State Standards, Washington

State Performance Expectations, College Readiness Standards in partnership with Everett Community College

 Implementation of College Math Placement Test in

partnership with Everett Community College

 On-going alignment efforts

slide-6
SLIDE 6

March 27, 2012

6

Math Leadership Team

 Training in Common Core Content Standards

and Mathematical Practices, and Instructional Best Practices

 Identify the essential criteria:

 Alignment with standards and mathematical practices  Best practices in instruction/assessment  Balance of foundational conceptual development and

procedural fluency

 Accessibility to special populations

slide-7
SLIDE 7

March 27, 2012

7

Math Leadership Team

Catherine Matthews, Director of District Improvement and on Time Graduation Dick Sander, K-12 Math Curriculum Specialist Marilyn Mallory, Math Instructional Facilitator Jana Sanchez, Math Instruction Facilitator Jan Bakken, Special Services Specialist

Elementary Principal: Kimberly Gilmore, Silver Firs Elementary M.S. Principal: Peter Scott, Gateway MS H.S. Administrator: Larry Fleckenstein, Cascade HS Elementary Math Teacher: Judi Caudle, Hawthorne Elementary M.S. Math Teacher: Nancy Coe, Heatherwood MS H.S. Math Teacher: Kristin Gebert, Everett HS Alternative/Online Math Teacher: Mark Ryder, Sequoia HS Special Education Math Teacher: Jennay Trautmann, Gateway

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Math Adoption Team Members

Grade 6: Theresa Figurelli - Heatherwood Laura Breen - Evergreen Shannon Depew- Eisenhower Grade 7: Deborah Engel- Gateway Sharon Fabrizio- Heatherwood Tammi Clugston- North (SpEd) Grade 8: Steve Baker- North Brittany Elliott- Evergreen Sherry Tracy- Eisenhower Algebra I: Kaye Peterson – JHS Tricia Percival- EHS (SpEd) Sinead Pollom- EHS Amy Crum – CHS Elona Loewen-Heatherwood Geometry: Becky Kitzman- SHS Jodi Worthington-CHS Karen Price – EHS Alyshia Gandrud- Evergreen Algebra II Trigonometry: Kathy Anderson- EHS Tammy Bruns- JHS Jennifer Green - CHS

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Math Adoption Team Members

Parents: Angela Griffith - Middle School Robert Moore – High School Everett Community College: Chris Quarles Building Administrators: Dave Peters, CHS Linda Tyrrell, North District Personnel: Jan Bakken, Special Education Administrator Kim Durkin, Special Education Administrator Marilyn Mallory, Math Instructional Facilitator Jana Sanchez, Math Instructional Facilitator Dick Sander, K-12 Math Curriculum Specialist Celia O’Connor-Weaver, ELL Facilitator Catherine Matthews, Director of District Improvement and On Time Graduation

slide-10
SLIDE 10

March 27, 2012

10

Math Adoption Team

 Teachers, parents and administrators

 Teacher and administrator selection to ensure all

schools, levels and programs represented

 Parents selected from applicants to ensure balance

 Purpose:

 Evaluate instructional materials to support the math

curriculum

 Recommend final selection  Develop implementation plan

slide-11
SLIDE 11

March 27, 2012

11

Process

 Training and preparation of Math Adoption Team (MAT)

in Common Core Content Standards and Mathematical Practices, best practices in instruction and assessment, and brain research

 Solicited text resources Washington, Oregon, Alaska

Textbook Representatives Association

 Initial screening for alignment, bias and special

populations by representatives from the Math Leadership Team (MLT) and MAT of all texts

 Narrowing selections based on initial screening

slide-12
SLIDE 12

March 27, 2012

12

Process

 In depth screening by MAT

 Grades 6-8:

 Holt McDougal (Burger)  Holt Big Ideas (Larson)  Pearson Prentice-Hall Common Core  Pearson Connected Math 2

 Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II/ Trigonometry

 Holt McDougal (Burger)  Holt (Larson)  Glencoe  Pearson Prentice-Hall Common Core  Kendall Hunt Discovering

slide-13
SLIDE 13

March 27, 2012

13

Process

 Lesson testing

 Lessons were selected from each textbook  Publishers were not identified to the teachers  5-6 teachers at each grade level conducted tests for

each publisher

 Included teachers beyond the Math Adoption Team to

get wider feedback

 Written feedback was provided to the MAT for each

lesson tested

slide-14
SLIDE 14

March 27, 2012

14

Teacher Participants in Lesson Testing

Laura Breen, 6th Grade EVGN Kristi Eisenkraft, 6th Grade EVGN Nancy McPeak, 7th Grade, EVGN Liz Frederickson, 7th Grade, EVGN Brittany Elliott, 8th Grade, EVGN Alicia Gandrud, 8th Grade, EVGN Shannon Depew, 6th and 7th Grades, EIS Sherry Tracy, 8th Grade, EIS Jennifra Madison, 7th and 8th Grades, EIS Toy Piekarski, 6th Grade EIS Patti Weber, 6th and 7th Grades, EIS Patty Personius, 6th Grade, GWY Chris Pratt, 6th Grade, GWY Debbie Engel, 6th and 7th Grades, GWY Betty Howard, 8th Grade, GWY Theresa Figurelli, 6th Grade HWD Nancy Coe, 7th Grade HWD Elona Loewen, 7th and 8th Grades HWD Sharon Fabrizio, 7th and 8th Grades HWD Andy Harper, 6th and 7th Grades HWD Tammi Clugston, 6th and 7th Grades, NOR (SpED) Steve Baker, 8th Grade, NOR Lynn St. Sauver, 7th Grade, NOR Sherry Boroumand, Cascade High School Scott Stencil, Cascade High School Amy Crum, Cascade High School Jodi Worthington, Cascade High School Jennifer Green, Cascade High School Eric Smith, Cascade High School Brittney Elliott, Evergreen MS Alyshia Gandrud, Evergreen MS Tricia Percival, Everett High School Kristie Tom, Everett High School Kathy Anderson, Everett High School Sinead Pollom, Everett High School Karen Price, Everett High School Heather Gabel, Everett High School Elona Loewen, Heatherwood MS Gus Anaya, HM Jackson High School Tammy Bruns, HM Jackson High School Kaye Peterson, HM Jackson High School Jason Gadek, HM Jackson High School Margaret Armstrong, HM Jackson High School Tom Lundberg, HM Jackson High School Becky Kitzman, Sequoia High School

slide-15
SLIDE 15

March 27, 2012

15

Process

 Math Adoption Open House Events

 Jackson High School: November 29th from 6:30 – 8:00 pm  Evergreen Middle School: November 30th from 6:30 – 8:00 pm  Penny Creek Elementary School: December 14th from 4:00 –

7:00 pm  Advertised through InTouch, ConnectEd, Principal

Communications

 Parents, staff and community members gave

written feedback to the MAT

slide-16
SLIDE 16

March 27, 2012

16

Process

 Presentations by Consultants on December 8th

 Prescribed presentation format  Common scoring guide  Fixed time format

slide-17
SLIDE 17

March 27, 2012

17

Selection of Recommended Texts

 Reviewed feedback from staff, parents and community members

 Screening  Lesson testing  Feedback from parents, staff and community  Consultant presentations

 Evaluated all sources of feedback against initial criteria:

 Alignment with Common Core State Content Standards and

Mathematical Practices

 Instructional Best Practices  Balance between procedural fluency and conceptual understanding  Meeting the needs of diverse learners / special populations  Parent and student resource accessibility

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Recommended Texts

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

1900 South Batavia Avenue Geneva, IL 60134

Holt McDougal Mathematics Grade 6 (2012)

ISBN: 978-0-547-64716-6

Holt McDougal Mathematics Grade 7 (2012)

ISBN: 978-0-547-64717-3

Holt McDougal Mathematics Grade 8 (2012)

ISBN: 978-0-547-64719-7

Pearson Education

P .O. Box 2500 Lebanon, IN 46052

Pearson Geometry Common Core (2012 Ed.)

ISBN: 978-0-13-318548-5

Pearson Algebra I Common Core (2012 Ed.)

ISBN: 978-0-13-318582-9

Pearson Algebra II Common Core (2012 Ed.)

ISBN: 978-0-13-318602-4

Pearson Algebra I Foundations (2011 Ed.)

ISBN: 978-0-78-546917-9

Pearson Geometry Foundations (2011 Ed.)

ISBN: 978-0-78-546940-7

slide-19
SLIDE 19

March 27, 2012

19

Parent Representative Perspective

 Process  Experience as a member of the Math

Adoption Team

slide-20
SLIDE 20

March 27, 2012

20

Holt

 Alignment with Common Core State Standards

in Mathematics

 CCSSM content and practices fully developed and integrated

into text

 CCSSM teacher professional development in each lesson

 Instructional Best Practices

 Multiple options for differentiation  Clear learning targets  Alternative opener and activity for each lesson  Critical thinking is supported with higher order questioning  Formative and summative assessments are provided and

editable

slide-21
SLIDE 21

March 27, 2012

21

Holt

 Balance between procedural fluency and

conceptual understanding

 Well balanced throughout text

 Meeting the needs of diverse learners and

special populations

 Resources are multi-level (remediation, on-target, and

extensions) and editable

 Options for differentiation for special needs and ELL

students

 Parent and student resource accessibility

 On-line and disk resources included textbook and

tutorials

slide-22
SLIDE 22

March 27, 2012

22

Pearson

 Alignment with Common Core State Standards in

Mathematics

 CCSSM content and practices fully embedded in text and

scaffolded

 Alignment with college readiness standards

 Instructional Best Practices

 Provides formative assessments which are computer graded and

which provide item analysis and individually recommended remediation

 Uses Understanding By Design instructional model  All teacher tools are projection ready and editable  Premade note taking guide  Common misconceptions are explained in teacher edition and

error analysis problems are provided for students

 Variety of examples with clear explanations

slide-23
SLIDE 23

March 27, 2012

23

Pearson

 Balance between procedural fluency and conceptual

understanding

 Concept development prior to student practice  Addresses students’ prior knowledge  Appropriate mix of skill practice and critical thinking problems

 Meeting the needs of diverse learners / special populations

 Every lesson includes ELL support (multi-lingual) and

differentiated remediation

 Foundation books have same learning targets with expanded

examples and individualized practice

 Visual formatting supports GLAD strategies  Lesson notes provided  Introductory contextual videos for each chapter

slide-24
SLIDE 24

March 27, 2012

24

Pearson

 Parent and student resource

accessibility

Online and one on one tutoring Visuals and formatting assist students and

parents in accessing information

Video tutorials Lesson PowerPoints

slide-25
SLIDE 25

March 27, 2012

25

Implementation Plan

 Materials purchased and available to teachers prior to

summer and in classroom in fall of 2012

 Professional development in effective use of instructional

materials to support student learning

 Professional development on the effective use of

technology through the teacher, parent and student interface

 Review and revise instructional calendars to align with

Common Core Standards in Mathematics and newly adopted materials

 Professional development in Common Core Standards  Development/implementation of common formative and

summative assessments

slide-26
SLIDE 26

March 27, 2012

26

Questions?