kernels sequences and approximations
play

Kernels, Sequences and Approximations P . Zinterhof Department of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Kernels, Sequences and Approximations P . Zinterhof Department of Computer Sciences University of Salzburg Smolenice, 07.09 - 09.09.16 Overview Introduction 1 Hausdorff-Distances and Dispersion 2 Quality of Interpolation 3 Computational


  1. Kernels, Sequences and Approximations P . Zinterhof Department of Computer Sciences University of Salzburg Smolenice, 07.09 - 09.09.16

  2. Overview Introduction 1 Hausdorff-Distances and Dispersion 2 Quality of Interpolation 3 Computational complexity 4 P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 2/28

  3. Outline Introduction 1 Hausdorff-Distances and Dispersion 2 Quality of Interpolation 3 Computational complexity 4 P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 3/28

  4. Standard Problem Given a domain E and a function f ( x ) , find x 1 , ..., x N such that N � f ( x ) d µ ( x ) − 1 � | f ( x n ) | is small! N E n = 1 The answer depends on the domain E and the class H of functions f ∈ H . The problem of approximation and interpolation of functions is similar. Because of the generality of the questions the literature is knowingly infinite. P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 4/28

  5. I consider the following problem: Given a domain E and a class of functions H and points x 1 , x 2 , ... x N ∈ E . What can one say about the quality of the ”mesh” x 1 , ..., x N in view of integration, interpolation and approximation? P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 5/28

  6. A possible starting point let E = [ 0 , 1 ) s , s = 1 , 2 , 3 ... Let H α s = { f ( x 1 , x 2 , ... x s ) = ∞ � ˆ f ( m 1 , ... m s ) exp ( 2 π i ( m 1 x 1 + ... + m s x s )) } , m 1 ,... m s = −∞ such that for ¯ m = max ( 1 , | m | ) , m ∈ Z , holds c 1 � � | ˆ f ( m 1 , ... m s ) | ≤ ( m 1 , ... m s ) α = O , α > 1 , ( m 1 , ... m s ) α The exponent α is connected with differentiability properties of the function f . ”Korobow-classes” P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 6/28

  7. Discrepancy A mesh � x 1 , ..., � x N ∈ E will be good, if it is ”uniform distributed” in E . A classical measure for the quality of uniform distribution is essentially due to H. Weyl, who introduced the so called discrepancy, which we will not consider in this frame. P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 7/28

  8. Diaphony Some years ago I introduced the so called Diaphony F N of the mesh x N ∈ E [ 0 , 1 ) s : � x 1 , ..., � � x n = ( x 1 n , ..., x sn ) , n = 1 , ..., N : N ∞ F N := 1 1 1 � � ( m 1 , m 2 ... m s ) 2 e ( 2 π i ( m 1 ( x 1 k − x 1 l )+ ... + m s ( x sk − x sl ))) 2 N 2 k , l = 1 m = −∞ � m � = � � 0 P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 8/28

  9. It could be made much simpler: Let B 2 ( x ) = 1 − π 2 6 + π 2 1 2 ( 1 − 2 { x } ) 2 = � m 2 exp ( 2 π ixm ) m We get now N s F N = ( 1 1 � � B 2 ( x kj − x lj ) − 1 ) 2 N 2 k , l = 1 j = 1 P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 9/28

  10. curse of dimension N − > ∞ x n ) ∞ → 0 ⇔ ( � Theorem: F N − − − − n = 1 is u.d. mod 1 N | 1 � � x | ≤ CF α f ( � f ( � x ) d � Theorem: x n ) − N N E n = 1 � ln s N 1 � � � F N = O , F N = O Typically: N 1 − ǫ N Very Bad: cassical cartesian product rules: � 1 � F N = O , it is sharp! 1 N s P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 10/28

  11. The frequent occurrences of 2 and 1 2 call for Hilbert space approach!! Leitmotiv: Put ϕ n ( x ) = 1 nexp ( 2 π inx ) , n ∈ Z , f n | 2 < ∞ , � ˜ � | ˜ and put < ϕ n , ϕ m > = δ nm , H := { f ( x ) = f n ϕ n ( x ) } , n n ∈ R and you get a Hilbert space of continuous functions. P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 11/28

  12. More general Let E � = ∅ , K ( x , y ) : ExE → C strictly pos. def. matrix. Let < K ( x , y 1 ) , K ( x , y 2 ) > := K ( y 2 , y 1 ) , then span { a 1 K ( x , y 1 ) + a 2 K ( x , y 2 ) + ... + a n K ( x , y n ) } = H defines a Hilbertspace with rep. Kernel K(x,y): < f ( x ) , K ( x , y ) > = f ( y ) , f ∈ H f ⇒ f ( x ) being a cont. functional on H Bergman, Aronszajn, Moore, Zaremba, ... P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 12/28

  13. We define a metric on E := d ( x , y ) : || K ( t , x ) − K ( t , y ) || and assume compactness of the metric space (E, d). Let now ( x n ) ∞ n = 1 be a sequence of points in E , x n � = x m , n � = m . We apply Gram-Schmidt to K ( x , x 1 ) , K ( x , x 2 ) , ..., K ( x , x n ) , ... and get an orthonormal sequence τ n ( x ) , n ∈ N . ( τ n ( x )) ∞ n = 1 has the important property τ m ( x n ) = 0 for m > n . n = 1 ˜ f n τ n ( x ) ∈ H . We compute ˜ Let f ( x ) = � ∞ f n , n = 1 , 2 , ... recursively: ˜ f 1 = f ( x 1 ) /τ 1 ( x 1 ) , ˜ f 2 = ( f ( x 2 ) − ˜ f 1 τ 1 ( x 2 )) /τ 2 ( x 2 ) , ... ˜ f n = ( f ( x n ) − ˜ ˜ f 1 τ 1 ( x n ) − ... − f n − 1 τ n − 1 ( x n )) /τ n ( x n ) The τ n ( x n ) � = 0 , n ∈ N , by Cholesky’s theorem. e.g. P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 13/28

  14. Main question In which cases is the ONS ( τ n ( x )) ∞ n = 1 an ONB: ∞ � ˜ f n τ n ( x ) for all f ( x ) ∈ H ?? f ( x ) = n = 1 Theorem: ( τ n ( x )) n is an ONB ⇔ ( K ( t , x n )) n is total in H ⇔ ( f ( x n ) = 0 = > f = 0 ∀ f ∈ H ) Let now K N ( x , y ) := � N n = 1 τ n ( x ) τ n ( y ) , K ⊥ N ( x , y ) = K ( x , y ) − K N ( x , y ) . K N ( x , y ) reproduces H N = span { K ( x , x 1 ) , ..., K ( x , x N ) } , K ⊥ N ( x , y ) � H N = H ⊥ reproduces H - N . P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 14/28

  15. Def: The N-th totality of x 1 , ... x N , ... is y ∈ E || K ⊥ T N = max N ( x , y ) || = max || K N ( x , y ) || − || K N ( x , y ) || = y 1 1 2 − K N ( y , y ) 2 ) = max max y ( K ( y , y ) T N ( y ) y Theorem: ( x n ) ∞ N →∞ T N = 0. n = 1 is total in E iff lim The proof uses Arzela-Ascoli’s theorem. P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 15/28

  16. Outline Introduction 1 Hausdorff-Distances and Dispersion 2 Quality of Interpolation 3 Computational complexity 4 P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 16/28

  17. Hausdorff-Distances and Dispersion The Hausdorff-Distance between { x 1 , ... x N } ⊆ E and E itself is defiend by δ ( x 1 , ... x N ) = max n = 1 ,... N d ( x , x n ) min x Mostly δ ( x 1 , ... x N ) is called the dispersion of x 1 , ..., x N in E . Well known: The sequence ( x n ) ∞ n = 1 is dense in E iff lim N →∞ δ N = 0 The following theorem holds: 0 ≤ T N ≤ δ N P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 17/28

  18. Corollary If ( x n ) ∞ n = 1 is dense in E, it is total as well. I have a Hilbert space and total sequences with arbitrary bad density properties. Furthermore I have a Hilbert space (E,K,H), where T N → 0 ⇔ δ N → 0 . It means, a sequence ( x n ) ∞ n = 1 is total iff it is dense in that special space E . P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 18/28

  19. Outline Introduction 1 Hausdorff-Distances and Dispersion 2 Quality of Interpolation 3 Computational complexity 4 P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 19/28

  20. Problem We want to find a function f N ( x ) , such that f N ( x n ) = f ( x n ) , n = 1 , ..., N , and f N ( x ) ∈ span { K ( x , x n ) , n = 1 , ..., N } = H N . Let l 1 ( x ) , l 2 ( x ) , ..., l H ( x ) ∈ H N , such that l m ( x n ) = δ nm . The l 1 ( x ) , ..., l H ( x ) are the dual base to K ( x , x 1 ) , ..., K ( x , x N ) . So, f N ( x ) = � N n = 1 f ( x n ) l n ( x ) ∈ H n fulfills the requirements. On the k = 1 ˜ other hand f ( x n ) = � N f k τ k ( x n ) , because τ k ( x n ) = 0 for k > N . So we get f N ( x ) = � N n = 1 ˜ f n τ n ( x ) , because f N ( x ) and f ( x ) coincide at x 1 , ..., x N . P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 20/28

  21. It follows: ∞ ∞ ∞ f n | 2 � 1 | τ n ( x ) | 2 � 1 � 2 � � ˜ � | ˜ � 2 | f ( x ) − f N ( x ) | = | f n τ n ( x ) | ≤ n = N + 1 n = N + 1 n = N + 1 ∞ 1 � | ˜ f n | 2 ) T N = || f ⊥ x ∈ E = | f ( x ) − f N ( x ) | ≤ ( N ( x ) || · T N ≤ || f || T N max 2 n = N + 1 ∞ 1 | ˜ � f n | 2 ) and || f − f N || = ( 2 n = N + 1 means that the ”Lagrange”-Interpolation function f N ( x ) is the best approximation in Hilbert space sense! P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 21/28

  22. Outline Introduction 1 Hausdorff-Distances and Dispersion 2 Quality of Interpolation 3 Computational complexity 4 P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 22/28

  23. Computational complexity The computation of ˜ f n , τ n ( x ) , n = 1 , ..., N , K N ( x , y ) needs O ( N 2 ) operations. Important special case: E = G, compact abelian group with Haar measure λ and K ( x , y ) = k ( x − y ) , k ( x ) = f ( x ) ⋆ f ( − x ) , f ( x ) ∈ L 2 ( G ) , and x n = x 1 · n , n = 0 , ..., N − 1 is a cyclic subgroup of G. Then one can apply FFT with N log(N) operations. P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 23/28

  24. I have similar results for numercical Integration of the type I g ( f ) = < f , g > using f ( x 1 ) , ..., f ( x H ) . ”But that’s another story” would Rudyard Kipling say.... P. Zinterhof : Kernels, Sequences and Approximations 24/28

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend