introduction to magnetic recording
play

Introduction to Magnetic Recording Laurent Ranno - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

European School on Magnetism Cluj-Napoca, 16th September 2007 Introduction to Magnetic Recording Laurent Ranno laurent.ranno@grenoble.cnrs.fr Dept Nanosciences, Institut Nel, CNRS/UJF, Grenoble European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007


  1. Magnetic Recording Media 100 nm Record 421 Gbit/in 2 (demo Seagate sept. 2006) 275 kti, 1530 kbi BAR 5.6 PMR 20 nm 7 nm particle European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  2. Magnetic Recording Media One Magnetic Bit = One information Parameters Two states --> uniaxial anisotropy Stable --> anisotropy large enough Access --> how to write/read ? First solution : particulate media European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  3. Magnetic Recording Media : Particulate Media Origin of the Uniaxial anisotropy E = θ 2 K sin Shape Anisotropy vs Magnetocrystalline Anisotropy European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  4. Magnetic Recording Media : Particulate Media Coercicity : Anisotropy Field in a small particle Saturated Magnetisation Rotation Magnetisation H>H c H=H c European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  5. Magnetic Recording Media : Particulate Media Coercicity : Much Smaller than Anisotropy in a larger particle Nucleation + Propagation Saturated Magnetisation H>H c H=H c European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  6.      µ µ Shape anisotropy : = − ⋅ = + ⋅ E 0 H M 0 ( N M N M ) M ⊥ ⊥ d // // 2 2 µ = + 2 2 0 ( N M N M ) ⊥ ⊥ // // 2 For a needle-like particle N // =0 and N =0.5 ⊥ µ µ i.e. = = θ 2 2 2 0 0 E N M M sin ⊥ ⊥ 2 2 4 µ 0 M = 0.5 to 1 T for oxides, 2.2 T for Fe and 2.5 T for FeCo maximum shape anisotropy : 200 kJ/m 3 (using 1 Tesla magnetisation) 1250 kJ/m 3 absolute maximum European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  7. Magnetocrystalline Anisotropy : E= K 1 sin 2 ( θ ) K 1 (kJ/m 3 ) Ni 5 Max shape anisotropy Fe 48 Co 530 PtFe 6 600 SmCo 5 17 200 Low symmetry structure (hexagonal, rhomb. tetragonal) + large spin orbit constant (rare-earth or platinum) give MCA larger than the shape anisotropy But Co, Pt are expensive (OK as thin films) Rare earths are corrosive European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  8. Magnetic Recording Media : Particulate Media Ferro/ferrimagnetic particles in polymer Packing fraction ≤ 40 vol.% binder µ 0 H C due to 1-10 µ m -Shape anisotropy γ -Fe 2 0 3 (0.3 - 0.5 µ m, 0.04 T) CrO 2 (0.2 - 0.6 µ m, 0.04 T) Polymer binder Substrate (polyester/Al) Fe 1-x Co x (0.1- 0.3 µ m, 0.25 T) -Magnetocrystalline anisotropy BaFe 12 O 19 (0.05-0.15 µ m , 0.25T ) γ -Fe 2 0 3 Fe Max. storage density : 100 Megabits/in 2 Min. bit area ≈ 6.5 µ m 2 BaFe 12 O 19 Applications : Audio & video tapes, floppy disk European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  9. Magnetic Recording Media : Continuous Media Beyond particle media smaller particle --> continuous granular media better materials --> cobalt based European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  10. Magnetic Recording Media : Transition Width M x x Longitudinal Media x 2a Let us suppose that M does not depend on thickness 2 M x = The transition width is 2a M ( x ) s arctan x π a  dM ( x ) 2 M 1 The density of « magnetic » charges is : ρ = − = − = − s div M π ⋅ 2 dx a x + 1 2 a - - ------ - - - - ------ - - - - ------ - - x x European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  11. Magnetic Recording Media : Transition Width  - - ------ - -  ρ ⋅ t - - ------ - - 1 r dV - - ------ - - ∫∫∫ = - - ------ - - H d - - ------ - - - - ------ - - - - ------ - - π 3 4 r x 0 x  2 M t a Bit width infinite = − H s d π ⋅ 2 + 2D charge x a + 1 2 a 2 M t 1 ≤ ≤ s H H Maximum Demag field d c π ⋅ a 2 M t M t , ( M t in fact) As small as possible ≥ a s s r π ⋅ H H As large as possible c c European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  12. Magnetic Recording Media : Transition Width Thin film media As small as possible M r t Small magnetisation Signal amplitude will also decrease !!!! H As large as possible Hard magnetic materials c (see N. Dempsey's talk) The write field should be larger than H c !!! European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  13. Magnetic Recording Media : Continuous Media Need to reduce M r t L u b r i c a n t to increase H C C a r b o n o v e r c o a t 10-30 nm CoCrM / Cr (M=Ta, Pt) M a g n e t i c l a y e r C r u n d e r l a y e r S u b s t r a t e Thin film media Exchange coupling → transition noise Has been limited by : • Physical grain segregation (process / underlayer effects) • Compositional segregation Cr-rich Co-rich Max. storage density ≈ 100 Gbits/in 2 Min. bit area ≈ 10 -2 µ m 2 Applications : disk drives European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  14. Magnetic Recording Media : Continuous Media Multilayers Substrate : Aluminium (Al-Mg) or glass (stiffer) Underlayers : smoothing (NiP), Nucleation, texture (Cr, CrV) Magnetic layer : Co-rich CoCrPt(Ta) Hard layer : Diamond-like Carbon DLC Lubricant layer : fluorocarbons CoCr lattice parameter evolves with Pt or Ta substitution Cr underlayer becomes CrV or CrW to match lattice parameters Nucleation and texture layer could be NiAl (produces Co(100)) European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  15. Longitudinal media 26.5 Gb/in 2 demonstrator M.A. Schultz et al. (Read-Rite), IEEE Trans Mag. 36 (2000)2143 CoCrPtTaB/Cr Intermag 2002 5 nm (Seagate and Fujitsu) 100 Gbit/in 2 µ 0 Hc : 0.48 T M r t : 0.35 x10 -3 emu/cm 2 AFC Film µ 0 Hc : 0.25 T Average grain size : 9 nm M r t : 0.4 x10 -3 emu/cm 2 Film thickness : 19 nm Average grain size : 11 nm Transition parameter : 20 nm European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  16. Magnetic grains size distribution 0.25 45 Gbit/in 2 24 Gbit/in 2 16 Gbit/in 2 9 nm mean size 10 nm mean size 11 nm mean size Std. Dev. 2.2nm 0.2 normalized frequency 100 Gbit/in 2 0.15 9.1 nm mean size Std. Dev. 1.7nm 10 Gbit/in 2 0.1 12 nm mean size 6 Gbit/in 2 0.05 15 nm mean size 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 grain size (nm) Kryder, Seagate European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  17. Magnetic Recording Media : A physical limit : Superparamagnetism Superparamagnetism Remanent state is bistable lower limit to the size of a stable ferromagnetic particle if anisotropy energy < thermal energy i.e. K V < kT for data storage want τ > 10 years i.e. must have K V / kT > 60 K V at 300 K φ min K 1 π 0 (MJ/m 3 ) (nm) Uniaxial system Fe 0.05 20 thermal relaxation time, τ Co 0.5 8 �τ �τ = τ 0 exp(K V / kT ) Nd 2 Fe 14 B 5 4 SmCo 5 17 2 1/ τ 0 is the attempt frequency ( τ 0 ≈ 10 -9 s) European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  18. Magnetic Recording Media : Enhanced Continuous Media CoCrPt - - - AFC coupled media - - - + + Ru (0.6nm) M r .t becomes M r .t 1 -M r .t 2 RKKY AF coupled bilayer Co/Ru/Co Fullerton et al. APL 2001 Total M r .t decreases : less sensitive to demagnetising fields but less signal also Total M r .t decreases : but V does not, so K.V can be maintained Max. storage density ≈ 100 Gbits/in 2 130 Gbit/in 2 in 2002 (Read-Rite) Min. bit area ≈ 10 -2 µ m 2 150 Gbit/in 2 in 2006 (Hitachi) Applications : Ultra High Density European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  19. Magnetic Recording Media : Enhanced Continuous Media The limit of longitudinal media has been reached Signal M.t vanishes Coercivity is becoming larger than available write field ----> transition to perpendicular recording European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  20. Magnetic Recording Media : Beyond Longitudinal Media European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  21. New SUL layer Induce Co recording layer with c-axis out-of-plane European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  22. Magnetic Recording Media : Beyond Longitudinal Media Perpendicular recording (commercial early 2007) Overcoat/lubricant 4 nm Recording layer 15 nm CoCrPt+SiO2 (7 nm + R.C. 2-3°) Decoupling+Texturing layer 20 nm SUL 80 nm Co 100-x Ta 6-12 Zr 2-6 amorphous Seedlayer+substrate European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  23. Magnetic Recording Media : Perpendicular Media Different aspect ratio : Decrease of demagnetising field Thicker films allowed SUL : Soft Underlayer to double the thickness Write field twice as large available The write head should now provide perpendicular fields HDD PMR 2007 new head design 130 Gbit/in 2 µ 0 Hc : 0.4 T M r t : 0.7 x10 -3 emu/cm 2 Sept. 2006 Demo Seagate 421 Gbit/in 2 Grain size 7 nm European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  24. Magnetic Recording Media : Perpendicular Media European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  25. Magnetic Recording Media : Perpendicular Media What's the next step? FePt could be stable down to 3 nm grain size BUT : only in the bct L10 phase (needs annealing) Hc is very large (large K) European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  26. Magnetic Recording Drive : Data transfer, coding Original Floppy disk Coding system Frequency Modulation : 2 Clock periods / information bit 1 is flux reversal + flux reversal 0 is no reversal + reversal (simple density recording) Shortest magnetic bit is one clock-period-long European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  27. Magnetic Recording Drive : Data transfer, coding Better Coding system Modified Frequency Modulation 2 clock periods /bit but never RR 1 : N R Shortest magnetic bit is 2 0 after a 1 : N N clock-long 0 after a 0 : R N (present double density Recording ) European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  28. Magnetic Recording Drive : Data transfer, coding Hard Disk Coding MF : 1.5 flux reversal /bit MFM : 0.75 flux reversal /bit RLL (Run Length Limited) 0.46 flux reversal /bit PRML (Partial Response Maximum Likelihood) increase 30% EPRML increase 20% European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  29. Magnetic Recording Media : Beyond Present Media GRANULAR MEDIA PATTERNED MEDIA 10 2 10 3 GRAINS = 1 BIT 1 GRAIN = 1 BIT granular media give also rise to media noise (not well defined transition) And 100 grains means 10 % statistical noise European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  30. Magnetic Recording Media : Beyond Continuous Media Patterned media : How to make them ? e-beam lithography Nano-imprint self assembly + self organisation moiré arrays European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  31. Grain Dispersion Narrowing SOMA : Self Organised Magnetic Array 45 Gbit/in 2 demo media (Seagate) Nanoparticle arrays • 8.5 nm grains • 6 nm FePt particles σ area ≅ 0.5 ∀ σ area ≅ 0.1 S. Sun, Ch.Murray, D. Weller, L. Folks, A. Moser, Science, 287, 1989 (2000) (slide courtesy of D. Weller - Seagate) European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  32. Co-Pt multilayers irradiated by a He + beam Change of magnetic properties Same idea with FePt L 10 phase European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  33. Nano-imprint + RIE + Lift-off Ni + Si RIE + Co-Pt mutilayers 60 nm dot array European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  34. Magnetic dimensions are smaller than ! semiconductor industry lithography tools 400 350 International Technology Roadmap for semiconductors 300 Node number 250 200 Magnetic Bit length 150 100 65 nm Commercial microprocessors (Intel AMD) 45 nm 50 0 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Year European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  35. Magnetic Recording Heads Stray field measurement only magnetic transition contribute M-O signal laser wavelength limit (diffraction) Solid state (resistance) electrical connection memory matrix European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  36. Magnetic Recording Heads : inductive heads Mini electromagnet Write head was the same as Read head ϕ ⋅ d S dB = − = − e dt dt velocity : moving media and/or moving head surface : signal proportional to coil area now floppy, VHS ... Still the write head in up-to-date HDD European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  37. European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  38. B gap =f(I) Higher Magnetisation Materials to create larger magnetic fields NiFe ---> FeCo based (and soft) Presently demonstration with 2.4 Tesla materials Problem : The largest M at room temperature is 2.5 T new materials required European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  39. Magnetic Recording Heads : MR heads Larger signal : electrical response to stray fields AMR (Anisotropic Magnetoresistance) : Ni 80 Fe 20 (permalloy) film GMR (Giant Magnetoresistance) : Fe / Cu / NiFe TMR (Tunnel Magnetoresistance ) : Fe / Al 2 O 3 /NiFe European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  40. Magnetic Recording Heads : MR heads Angular dependence of MR Dépendance Angulaire de la MR 1.5 AMR GMR 1 Work-points 0.5 0 -0.5 -1 -1.5 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 Angle (°) Signal processing people want linear response Consequence for linear sensing : Angle at 45° or 90° European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  41. Magnetic Recording Heads : material development High spin polarisation materials : CoFe Spin filtering effects : CoFeB / MgO / CoFeB TMR >>100 % Magnetic semiconductors : GaAsMn ... electronics + spin + optics ... European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  42. One word about tapes Tape media went from particle to continuius media too Mechanically less stable --> wider tracks But parallel tracks is possible Recorded tracks are Head Stack parallel and run the full length of the tape. Tape motion Unrecorded Tape Recorded Tape MR heads (multiheads) are being implemented 100 GB tape EMTEC 2003 600 m (thickness 9 microns) coercive field : 185 mT track/inch : 923 (27.5 micron) bit/inch : 93000 (270 nm) European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  43. IV - MRAM European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  44. MAGNETIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY Non volatile Fast < 50 ns read and write cycle time infinite cyclability European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  45. Memory cell MRAM European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  46. Switching Field of the free layer current current Stoner-Wohlfarth astroid (coherent rotation of magnetisation) (uniaxial anisotropy) European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  47. First generation : current generated magnetic field +Stoner Wohlfarth reversal large current poor selectivity improve cell selectivity and decrease current Second generation : Toggle (Freescale) Heat assistance to decrease Hc (Crocus) Third generation : Spin torque reversal European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  48. First Commercial MRAM : 4 Mbit 35 ns write-read cycle 20 year non volatility European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  49. fabrication : 0.6 µ m technology + Cu (1 Mb) 0.18 µ m (4 Mb) 7 µ m 2 /cellule 25 mm 2 wafer 200 mm performance : 3 Volt 20 MHz 45% TMR (low bias) 30% at operating bias (1% uniformity) 25 Oe coercivity MOTOROLA 1T-1MTJ cell cladded lines 50 ns access time European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  50. Motorola « Toggling Mode » S.A.F. free layer Co / Ru / Co RKKY A.F. coupling H>Hc Spin flop transition European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  51. Easy axis European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  52. E.A. European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  53. E.A. European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  54. E.A. European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  55. E.A. European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  56. E.A. European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  57. E.A. European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  58. E.A. European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  59. E.A. European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  60. E.A. European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  61. E.A. European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

  62. E.A. European School on Magnetism Cluj 2007 Laurent Ranno (Institut Néel)

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend