Diffusion in magnetic fields G. Alecian (CNRS, Observatoire de - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

diffusion in magnetic fields
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Diffusion in magnetic fields G. Alecian (CNRS, Observatoire de - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Diffusion in magnetic fields G. Alecian (CNRS, Observatoire de Paris) Ap magnetic Magnetic Ap star Also: -Ambipolar diffusion (Babel & Michaud, 1991) -Effect on models (LeBlanc, Michaud & Babel, 1994) G.Alecian, IAU 224 2 Ion


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Diffusion in magnetic fields

  • G. Alecian

(CNRS, Observatoire de Paris)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

G.Alecian, IAU 224

2

Ap magnetic

Magnetic Ap star

Also:

  • Ambipolar diffusion

(Babel & Michaud, 1991)

  • Effect on models

(LeBlanc, Michaud & Babel, 1994)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

G.Alecian, IAU 224

3

Ion diffusion velocity without magnetic field

VDi ≈ Dip − Ai − Zi −1 2       mp kT g + Ai mp kT gi

rad +…

     

Microscopic diffusion velocity of an ion (Zi) :

gravity

Radiative acceleration

slide-4
SLIDE 4

G.Alecian, IAU 224

4

The effect of horizontal magnetic fields

  • n the diffusion velocity
  • Correcting factor in the direction orthogonal to magnetic lines
  • The corrected average diffusion velocity (approximated) for horizontal field

ti is the « collision » time ωi / 2π is the cyclotron frequency fslow,i = 1+ ωi

2ti 2

( )

−1

VD ≈ Ni fslow,iVDi

i

Ni

i

ωi = ZeH mic 0 < fslow,i ≤1

slide-5
SLIDE 5

G.Alecian, IAU 224

5

Some typical results

  • Silicon: Vauclair, Hardorp & Peterson (1979)

have shown the consequence of the ions trapping by the magnetic field

Fig4a of Alecian & Vauclair (1981)

Similar studies for:

  • Oblique rotator model (Michaud, Megessier

& Charland, 1981)

  • Ga in Ap stars (Alecian & Artru, 1987)
  • Ca, Sc, Ti, Mn, Cr, Sr in 53 Camelopardalis

(Babel & Michaud, 1991)

  • Al in Ap stars (Hui Bon Hoa, Alecian &

Artru, 1996)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

G.Alecian, IAU 224

6

Oblique magnetic lines

Alecian & Vauclair, 1981 : and, an horizontal component! VH,Zi = Vi fslow,i + 1 fslow,i sin2θ       VH,Xi = fslow,iVi 2 sin2θ

slide-7
SLIDE 7

G.Alecian, IAU 224

7

Horizontal diffusion !

  • Mégessier, 1984 (Si distribution on Bp and Ap stars with dipolar field and

applying the previous formulae) However, the time scale for the appearance of significant inhomogeneities through horizontal diffusion onto the stellar surface is about 107y ! This implies that magnetic structures should be stable over a long period. Moreover, time scales are much shorter for vertical diffusion, which remains dominant in the stratification process Therefore, abundance patches are more likely formed through the Vz component (by inhomogeneous vertical diffusion according to the local field angle).

slide-8
SLIDE 8

G.Alecian, IAU 224

8

Radiative accelerations, with and without magnetic field

g i

rad =

n i ,k ni Am pc

k,m> k

e.I

( )Ω dΩdν

Ω

ν∫

gi

rad =

n i,k ni Am pc σ k,m

φ ν,n i

( ) dν

k,m >k

(magnetic)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

G.Alecian, IAU 224

9

The CARAT code

  • Polarized radiation transfer in LTE (Alecian & Stift, 2004)

– VALD data base, Kurucz ATLAS9 models, plane-parallel – Magnetic field up to 60 000 Gauss, any angle – Detailed opacities up to 5 mA of resolution – radiative accelerations for 329 ions – parallel computing

slide-10
SLIDE 10

G.Alecian, IAU 224

10

Effet du champ sur grad

Raie du Mg II

SrII λ 4077

6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 log gv (SrII)

  • 6
  • 4
  • 2

2 log τ5000 0T CARAT 0T BM 1.5T CARAT 1.5T CARAT without M-O 1.5T BM

(a)

6 5 4 3 2 1 log g (SrII)

  • 6
  • 4
  • 2

2 log τ5000

log gv (SrII):

CARAT CARAT without M-O BM

log gh (SrII):

BM CARAT without M-O (-x) CARAT (+x) CARAT (-x) β = 60°

(b)

Teff=8500K

slide-11
SLIDE 11

G.Alecian, IAU 224

11

Blends

6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 log grad

  • 6
  • 4
  • 2

2 log τ5000 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.2 4.0 3.8 6 5 4 3 2 0T, with blends 4T, with blends 0T, alone 4T, alone Cr Fe Ag

Effect of Blends

slide-12
SLIDE 12

G.Alecian, IAU 224

12

Zeeman amplification

0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0

  • 0.1
  • 0.2

ε

  • 6
  • 4
  • 2

2

log τ5000 4T vs 0T, 0°

Be B C O Mg Al Si P S Cl Ca Sc Ti Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge Zr Ag Cd In Sn Pr Os Ir Au Hg Bi

log(amplification) Teff = 12 000K

slide-13
SLIDE 13

G.Alecian, IAU 224

13

Preliminary results (complete computation with CARAT) Al

Teff=12000K

slide-14
SLIDE 14

G.Alecian, IAU 224

14

Preliminary results (2) Al

comparing fluxes

slide-15
SLIDE 15

G.Alecian, IAU 224

15

Future developments

  • Stratification at equilibrium (already in progress for zero field case, see

LeBlanc et al.) –  Self-consistent models –  NLTE

  • 2D stratifications (modelling oblique rotators)
  • + all potentially important processes (ambipolar diffusion,

hydrodynamics,…)

  • Connection to internal structure
  • Far in the future: time-dependent stratifications (LTE,…)