Diffusion in magnetic fields
- G. Alecian
(CNRS, Observatoire de Paris)
Diffusion in magnetic fields G. Alecian (CNRS, Observatoire de - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Diffusion in magnetic fields G. Alecian (CNRS, Observatoire de Paris) Ap magnetic Magnetic Ap star Also: -Ambipolar diffusion (Babel & Michaud, 1991) -Effect on models (LeBlanc, Michaud & Babel, 1994) G.Alecian, IAU 224 2 Ion
(CNRS, Observatoire de Paris)
G.Alecian, IAU 224
2
Also:
(Babel & Michaud, 1991)
(LeBlanc, Michaud & Babel, 1994)
G.Alecian, IAU 224
3
VDi ≈ Dip − Ai − Zi −1 2 mp kT g + Ai mp kT gi
rad +…
gravity
Radiative acceleration
G.Alecian, IAU 224
4
2ti 2
−1
i
i
ωi = ZeH mic 0 < fslow,i ≤1
G.Alecian, IAU 224
5
have shown the consequence of the ions trapping by the magnetic field
Fig4a of Alecian & Vauclair (1981)
Similar studies for:
& Charland, 1981)
(Babel & Michaud, 1991)
Artru, 1996)
G.Alecian, IAU 224
6
G.Alecian, IAU 224
7
applying the previous formulae) However, the time scale for the appearance of significant inhomogeneities through horizontal diffusion onto the stellar surface is about 107y ! This implies that magnetic structures should be stable over a long period. Moreover, time scales are much shorter for vertical diffusion, which remains dominant in the stratification process Therefore, abundance patches are more likely formed through the Vz component (by inhomogeneous vertical diffusion according to the local field angle).
G.Alecian, IAU 224
8
rad =
k,m> k
Ω
ν∫
rad =
∞
k,m >k
G.Alecian, IAU 224
9
– VALD data base, Kurucz ATLAS9 models, plane-parallel – Magnetic field up to 60 000 Gauss, any angle – Detailed opacities up to 5 mA of resolution – radiative accelerations for 329 ions – parallel computing
G.Alecian, IAU 224
10
SrII λ 4077
6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 log gv (SrII)
2 log τ5000 0T CARAT 0T BM 1.5T CARAT 1.5T CARAT without M-O 1.5T BM
(a)
6 5 4 3 2 1 log g (SrII)
2 log τ5000
log gv (SrII):
CARAT CARAT without M-O BM
log gh (SrII):
BM CARAT without M-O (-x) CARAT (+x) CARAT (-x) β = 60°
(b)
Teff=8500K
G.Alecian, IAU 224
11
6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 log grad
2 log τ5000 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.2 4.0 3.8 6 5 4 3 2 0T, with blends 4T, with blends 0T, alone 4T, alone Cr Fe Ag
G.Alecian, IAU 224
12
0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0
ε
2
log τ5000 4T vs 0T, 0°
Be B C O Mg Al Si P S Cl Ca Sc Ti Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge Zr Ag Cd In Sn Pr Os Ir Au Hg Bi
log(amplification) Teff = 12 000K
G.Alecian, IAU 224
13
Teff=12000K
G.Alecian, IAU 224
14
comparing fluxes
G.Alecian, IAU 224
15
LeBlanc et al.) – Self-consistent models – NLTE
hydrodynamics,…)